Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:13:17.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The chemical fate of the endogenous plant antioxidants carvacrol and thymol during oxidative stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

N. Deighton ,
S. M. Glidewell ,
B. A. Goodman  and
S. G. Deans
N. Deighton
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
S. M. Glidewell
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
B. A. Goodman
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
S. G. Deans
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW, UK
Get access

Synopsis

The major antioxidants present in the essential (volatile) oils of oregano (Origanum vulgare, L.), summer savory (Satureja hortensis, L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris, L.) have been identified as carvacrol and thymol which have both been demonstrated to possess fungicidal and bactericidal properties. EPR spectra produced upon oxidation are inconsistent with the expected phenoxy free radicals (RO), but resemble those of galvinoxyl and anthronyl radicals. The EPR spectrum, in the case of carvacrol, is a pair of quintets with isotropic splittings, 0.325 and 0.080 millitesla (mT). ENDOR and TRIPLE resonance experiments have been performed and are indicative of the paramagnetic species being a substituted anthronyl. Further studies are being conducted to characterise these species and to investigate their potential roles during oxidative stress.

Type
Short Communications
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 102: Oxygen and Environmental Stress in Plants , 1994 , pp. 247 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akgül, A. & Kivanç, M. 1989. Sensitivity of 4 foodborne molds to essential oils from Turkish spices, herbs and citrus peel. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 47, 129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipault, J. R., Mizuno, G. K., Hawkins, J. M. & Lundberg, W. O. 1952. Antioxidant properties of natural spices. Food Research 17, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deans, S. G., Noble, R. C., Penzes, L. & Beregi, E. 1993. Natural antioxidants from aromatic and medicinal plants. In: Role of free radicals in biological systems, Hungarian Liver Foundation Symposium, pp. 159–65, Balatonaliga, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.Google Scholar
Deighton, N., Glidewell, S. M., Deans, S. G. & Goodman, B. A. 1993. Identification by EPR spectroscopy of carvacrol and thymol as the major sources of free radicals in the oxidation of plant essential oils. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 63, 221–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, H. & Hellwege, K-H. (Eds) 1979. ‘Landolt-Bornstein’, II/9 (C2), pp. 55–164. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pauli, A. & Knobloch, K. 1987. Inhibitory effects of essential oil components on growth of food-contaminating fungi. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel Untersuchung und Forschung 185, 10–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieger, M. 1987. The chemical fate of antioxidants. Cosmetics & Toiletries 102, 83–96.Google Scholar