Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:34:57.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three-phase boundary motions under constant velocities. I: The vanishing surface tension limit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Fernando Reitich
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Box 8205, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8205, U.S.A.
H. Mete Soner
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, U.S.A.

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the dynamics of material interfaces such as solid–liquid, grain or antiphase boundaries. We concentrate on the situation in which these internal surfaces separate three regions in the material with different physical attributes (e.g. grain boundaries in a polycrystal). The basic two-dimensional model proposes that the motion of an interface Гij between regions i and j (i, j = 1, 2, 3, ij) is governed by the equation

Here Vij, kij, μij and fij denote, respectively, the normal velocity, the curvature, the mobility and the surface tension of the interface and the numbers Fij stand for the (constant) difference in bulk energies. At the point where the three phases coexist, local equilibrium requires that

In case the material constants fij are small, and ε ≪ 1, previous analyses based on the parabolic nature of the equations (0.1) do not provide good qualitative information on the behaviour of solutions. In this case, it is more appropriate to consider the singular case with fij = 0. It turns out that this problem, (0.1) with fij = 0, admits infinitely many solutions. Here, we present results that strongly suggest that, in all cases, a unique solution—‘the vanishing surface tension (VST) solution’—is selected by letting ε→0. Indeed, a formal analysis of this limiting process motivates us to introduce the concept of weak viscosity solution for the problem with ε = 0. As we show, this weak solution is unique and is therefore expected to coincide with the VST solution. To support this statement, we present a perturbation analysis and a construction of self-similar solutions; a rigorous convergence result is established in the case of symmetric configurations. Finally, we use the weak formulation to write down a catalogue of solutions showing that, in several cases of physical relevance, the VST solution differs from results proposed previously.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Allen, S. M. and Cahn, J. W.. A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsening. Acta Metall. 27 (1979), 1085–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Angenent, S. and Gurtin, M. E.. Multiphase thermomechanics with interfacial structure 2. Evolution of an isothermal interface. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 108 (1989), 323–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Atkinson, H. V.. Theories of normal grain growth in pure single phase systems. Acta Metall. 36 (1988), 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Barles, G., Soner, H. M. and Souganidis, P.. Front propagation and phase filed theory. SIAM J. Control Optim. 31/2 (1993), 439–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Bronsard, L. and Reitich, F.. On three-phase boundary motion and the singular limit of a vectorvalued Ginzburg–Landau equation. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 124 (1993), 355–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Crandall, M., Ishii, H. and Lions, P.-L.. User's guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 27/1 (1992), 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Fleming, W. and Soner, H. M.. Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions (New York: Springer, 1993).Google Scholar
8Gurtin, M., Souganidis, P. and Soner, H. M.. Anisotropic planar motion of an interface relaxed by the formation of infinitesimal wrinkles. J. Differential Equations (to appear).Google Scholar
9Merriman, B., Bence, J. K. and Osher, S. J.. Motion of multiple junctions: a level set approach (Preprint).Google Scholar
10Mullins, W.. Two dimensional motion of idealized grain boundaries. J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1956), 900–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Smith, C. S.. Grain shapes and other metallurgical applications of topology. In Metal Interfaces, 65108 (Cleveland: American Society for Metals, 1952).Google Scholar
12Taylor, J. E.. The motion of multi-phase junctions under prescribed phase-boundary velocities (Preprint).Google Scholar