Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:14:03.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sharpness of embeddings in logarithmic Bessel-potential spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

David E. Edmunds
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Analysis and its Applications, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, England e-mail: [email protected]
Petr Gurka
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Agricultural University, 160 21 Prague 6, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] (or [email protected])
Bohumír Opic
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zitna 25, 115 67 Prague 1, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper is a continuation of [4], where embeddings of certain logarithmic Bessel-potential spaces (modelled upon generalised Lorentz-Zygmund spaces) in appropriate Orlicz spaces (with Young functions of single and double exponential type) were derived. The aim of this paper is to show that these embedding results are sharp in the sense of [8].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Adams, D. R.. A sharp inequality of J. Moser for higher order derivatives. Ann. of Math. 128 (1988), 385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bennett, C. and Rudnick, K.. On Lorentz-Zygmund spaces. Dissertationes Math. 175 (1980), 172.Google Scholar
3Bennett, C. and Sharpley, R.. Interpolation of Operators, Pure and Applied Mathematics 129 (New York: Academic Press, 1988).Google Scholar
4Edmunds, D. E., Gurka, P. and Opic, B.. Double exponential integrability, Bessel potentials and embedding theorems. Studia Math. 115 (1995), 151–81.Google Scholar
5Edmunds, D. E. and Krbec, M.. Two limiting cases of Sobolev imbeddings. Houston J. Math. 21 (1995), 119–28.Google Scholar
6Fuglede, B.. The logarithmic potential in higher dimensions. Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 33 (1960), 114.Google Scholar
7Fusco, N., Lions, P. L. and Sbordone, C.. Some remarks on Sobolev imbeddings in borderline cases (Preprint no. 25, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, 1993).Google Scholar
8Hempel, J. A., Morris, G. R. and Trudinger, N. S.. On the sharpness of a limiting case of the Sobolev imbedding theorem. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 3 (1970), 369–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kufner, A., John, O. and Fučík, S.. Function spaces (Prague: Academia, 1977).Google Scholar
10Lorentz, G.. On the theory of spaces A. Pacific J. Math. 1 (1951), 411–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Moser, J.. A sharp form of an inequality by N. Trudinger. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 20 (1971), 1077–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Stein, E. M.. Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
13Trudinger, N. S.. On imbeddings into Orlicz spaces and some applications. J. Math. Mech. 17 (1967), 473–84.Google Scholar
14Ziemer, W. P.. Weakly Differentiable Functions, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 120 (Berlin: Springer, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar