Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:33:36.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the existence and nonexistence of global solutions of a diffusion-advection equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Keng Deng
Keng Deng
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

We consider the diffusion-advection equation ut = uxx + (ε/(1 − u)β)x(ε >0, β >0), 0 < x < 1, t >0, under the boundary conditions ux + ε/(1 − u)β = 0. We prove that there is a critical number ε(β) such that when ε < ε(β) for certain initial data a global solution exists and converges to the corresponding stationary solution; any solution must quench (u reaches one in finite or infinite time) if ε ≧ε(β). We also show that quenching can only occur at x = 0, and that for each ε > 0 there exist initial data for which the solution quenches in finite time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 123 , Issue 6 , 1993 , pp. 1099 - 1108
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Alikakos, N. D., Bates, P. W. and Grant, C. P.. Blow-up for a diffusion-advection equation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 113 (1989), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Amann, H.. Parabolic evolution equations and non-linear boundary conditons. J. Differential Equations 72 (1988), 201–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Deng, K. and Levine, H. A.. On the blow-up of ut at quenching. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 106 (1989), 1049–1056.Google Scholar
4Friedman, A.. Partial Differential Equations of Parabolic Type (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965).Google Scholar
5Grant, C. P.. Stabilisation and blow-up of solutions of a nonlinear parabolic equation (Masters Thesis, Brigham Young University, 1988).Google Scholar
6Kawarada, H.. On solutions of the initial-boundary value problem for u t = + 1/(1 – u). Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 10 (1975), 729–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Ladyzenskaja, O. A., Solonnikov, V. A. and Ural'ceva, N. N.. Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type, Translations of Mathematical Monographs 23. (Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Levine, H. A.. The phenomenon of quenching: A survey. In Proceedings of the Vlth International Conference on Trends in the Theory and Practice of Nonlinear Analysis, North Holland, New York State, 1985.Google Scholar
9Levine, H. A.. Advances in quenching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Reaction–Diffusion Equations and Their Equilibrium States, Vol. 3, 319–346 (Boston: Birkhäuser, 1992).Google Scholar
10Levine, H. A.. Stability and instability for solutions of Burgers' equation with a semilinear boundary condition. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 19 (1988), 312–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Levine, H. A.. Quenching, nonquenching, and beyond quenching for solutions of some parabolic equations. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (IV) 155 (1989), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Park, S. R.. The phenomenon of quenching in the presence of convection (Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, 1989).Google Scholar
13Yoshikawa, A.. On the behavior of the solutions to the Lamm equation of the ultracentrifuge. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15 (1984), 686–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Zelenyak, T. I.. Stabilisation of solutions of boundary value problems for a second-order equation with one space variable. Differential Equations 4 (1968), 17–22.Google Scholar