Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:35:43.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Logarithmic upper bounds for weak solutions to a class of parabolic equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2019

Xiangsheng Xu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA ([email protected])

Abstract

It is well known that a weak solution φ to the initial boundary value problem for the uniformly parabolic equation $\partial _t\varphi - {\rm div}(A\nabla \varphi ) +\omega \varphi = f $ in $\Omega _T\equiv \Omega \times (0,T)$ satisfies the uniform estimate

$$\Vert \varphi \Vert_{\infty,\Omega_T}\les \Vert \varphi\Vert_{\infty,\partial_p\Omega_T}+c \Vert f \Vert_{q,\Omega_T}, \ \ \ c=c(N,\lambda, q, \Omega_T), $$
provided that $q \gt 1+{N}/{2}$, where Ω is a bounded domain in ${\open R}^N$ with Lipschitz boundary, T > 0, $\partial _p\Omega _T$ is the parabolic boundary of $\Omega _T$, $\omega \in L^1(\Omega _T)$ with $\omega \ges 0$, and λ is the smallest eigenvalue of the coefficient matrix A. This estimate is sharp in the sense that it generally fails if $q=1+{N}/{2}$. In this paper, we show that the linear growth of the upper bound in $\Vert f \Vert_{q,\Omega _T}$ can be improved. To be precise, we establish
$$ \Vert \varphi \Vert_{\infty,\Omega_T}\les \Vert \varphi_0 \Vert_{\infty,\partial_p\Omega_T}+c \Vert f \Vert_{1+{N}/{2},\Omega_T} \left(\ln(\Vert f \Vert_{q,\Omega_T}+1)+1\right). $$

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brezis, H. and Wainger, S.. A note on limiting cases of Sobolev embedding and convolution inequalities. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 5 (1980), 773789.Google Scholar
2Chiarenza, F., Fabes, E. and Garofalo, N.. Harnack's inequality for Schrödinger operators and the continuity of solutions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 98 (1986), 415425.Google Scholar
3Evans, L. C. and Gariepy, R. F.. Measure theory and fine properties of functions (Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1992).Google Scholar
4Kozono, H. and Taniuchi, Y.. Limiting case of the Sobolev inequality in BMO with application to the Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 214 (2000), 191200.Google Scholar
5Ladyzenskaja, Q. A., Solonnikov, V. A. and Ural'ceva, N. N.. Linear and Quasi-linear equations of parabolic type. Tran. Math. Monographs, vol. 23 (Providence, RI: AMS, 1968).Google Scholar
6Moser, J.. A new proof of de Giorgi's theorem concerning the regularity problem for elliptic differential equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13 (1960), 457468.Google Scholar
7Xu, X.. Logarithmic upper bounds for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), 34853490.Google Scholar