Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:11:29.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Duality between p-groups with three characteristic subgroups and semisimple anti-commutative algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2019

S. P. Glasby
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematics of Symmetry and Computation, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth6009, Australia ([email protected])
Frederico A. M. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil ([email protected]; [email protected])
Csaba Schneider
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil ([email protected]; [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let p be an odd prime and let G be a non-abelian finite p-group of exponent p2 with three distinct characteristic subgroups, namely 1, Gp and G. The quotient group G/Gp gives rise to an anti-commutative 𝔽p-algebra L such that the action of Aut (L) is irreducible on L; we call such an algebra IAC. This paper establishes a duality GL between such groups and such IAC algebras. We prove that IAC algebras are semisimple and we classify the simple IAC algebras of dimension at most 4 over certain fields. We also give other examples of simple IAC algebras, including a family related to the m-th symmetric power of the natural module of SL(2, 𝔽).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019

Footnotes

*

Current address: Departamento de Matemática, Centro Federal de Educação, Técnológica de Minas Gerais, CEFET-MG, Av. Amazonas 7675, Belo, Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

References

1Bray, J. N., Holt, D. F. and Roney-Dougal, C. M.. The maximal subgroups of the low-dimensional finite classical groups, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 407 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bremner, M. and Hentzel, I.. Invariant nonassociative algebra structures on irreducible representations of simple Lie algebras. Experiment. Math. 13 (2004), 231256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Bremner, M. R. and Douglas, A.. The simple non-Lie Malcev algebra as a Lie-Yamaguti algebra. J. Algebra 358 (2012), 269291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Brooksbank, P. A. and Wilson, J. B.. Computing isometry groups of Hermitian maps. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 19751996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Brooksbank, P. A., Maglione, J. and Wilson, J. B.. A fast isomorphism test for groups whose Lie algebra has genus 2. J. Algebra 473 (2017), 545590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Eick, B., Leedham-Green, C. R. and O'Brien, E. A.. Constructing automorphism groups of p-groups. Comm. Algebra 30 (2002), 22712295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Glasby, S. P., Pálfy, P. P. and Schneider, C.. p-groups with a unique proper non-trivial characteristic subgroup. J. Algebra 348 (2011), 85109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Hiss, G.. Die adjungierten Darstellungen der Chevalley-Gruppen. Arch. Math. (Basel) 42 (1984), 408416 (German).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Holt, D. F., Eick, B. and O'Brien, E. A.. Handbook of computational group theory. Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (Boca Raton) (Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Huppert, B. and Blackburn, N.. Finite groups. II, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 242 (Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982), AMD, 44.Google Scholar
11Kleidman, P. and Liebeck, M.. The subgroup structure of the finite classical groups, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 129 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Kleidman, P. B., Meierfrankenfeld, U. and Ryba, A. J. E.. HS < E 7(5). J. London Math. Soc. (2) 60 (1999), 95107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Kowalski, E.. An introduction to the representation theory of groups, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 155 (Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2014).Google Scholar
14Kuzmin, E. N.. Structure and representations of finite dimensional Malcev algebras. Quasigroups Related Systems 22 (2014), 97132.Google Scholar
15Lubotzky, A. and Mann, A.. Powerful p-groups. I. Finite groups. J. Algebra 105 (1987), 484505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Suprunenko, D. A.. Matrix groups. Translated from the Russian; Translation edited by K. A. Hirsch; Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 45 (Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Soc., 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Taunt, D. R.. Finite groups having unique proper characteristic subgroups. I. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 51 (1955), 2536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Thomas, C. B.. Representations of finite and Lie groups (London: Imperial College Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Wilson, J. B.. More characteristic subgroups, Lie rings, and isomorphism tests for p-groups. J. Group Theory 16 (2013), 875897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Wilson, J. B.. On automorphisms of groups, rings, and algebras. Comm. Algebra 45 (2017), 14521478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Wilson, R. A.. The finite simple groups, volume 251 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics (London: Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar