Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:36:25.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disconjugacy and the limit-point condition for fourth-order operators*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

Robert M. Kauffman
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Dundee

Synopsis

Let L denote the ordinary differential operator given by Lf = (pf″)″ + (qf′)′ + rf, with p″, q′ and r continuous functions on [0,∞), and with p>0, q ≦ 0, and r ≧ 0. It is proved that if the equation Lg = 0 possesses a non-oscillatory solution, then any non-trivial solution f to Lf = 0 such that f(0) = f′(0) = 0 is eventually bounded away from zero.

This theorem is used to prove that, for a general class of functions q and r containing the polynomials as a very special case, the equation Lg = 0 has at most two linearly independent square integrable solutions, when p is identically one, q ≦ 0 and r ≧ 0.

Finally, the main theorem is applied to show that certain sixth-order operators are limit-3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Coppel, W. A.. Discondugacy. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 220 (Berlin: Springer, 1971).Google Scholar
2Eastham, M. S. P.. The limit-2 case of fourth order differential equations. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 22 (1971), 131134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Everitt, W. N.. Some positive definite differential operators. J. London Math. Soc. 43 (1968), 465473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Nehari, Z.. Disconjugate linear differential operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (1967), 500516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Schneider, L. J.. Oscillation properties of the 2-2 disconjugate fourth order selfadjoint differential equation. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (1971), 545550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar