Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:17:01.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contracting sets and dissipation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Alexandre N. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Campus de São Carlos, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this work we study reaction–diffusion systems in fractional power spaces Xα which are embedded in L. We prove that the solution operators T(t) to these problems are globally defined, point dissipative, locally bounded and compact. That ensures the existence of global attractors. We also find a set containing the range of every function in the attractor, providing good estimates on asymptotic concentrations. This is done under very few hypotheses on the reaction term. These hypotheses are natural and easy to verify in many applications. The tools employed are the theory of invariant regions for systems of parabolic partial differential equations, the notion of contracting sets and the variation of constants formula. Several examples are considered to emphasise the applicability of these techniques.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Adams, R.. Soboiev Spaces (New York: Academic Press. 1971).Google Scholar
2Brèzis, H.. Analyse Fonctionnelle (Paris: Masson, 1983).Google Scholar
3Carvalho, A. N.. Infinite dimensional dynamics described by ordinary differential equations. J. Differential Equations 116 (1995), 338404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Carvalho, A. N. and Hale, J. K.. Large diffusion with dispersion. Nonlinear Anal. 17(1991), 1139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Carvalho, A. N. and Oliveira, L. A. F.. Delay-partial differential equations with some large diffusion. Nonlinear Anal 22 (1994). 1057 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Carvalho, A. N. and Pereira, A. L.. A scalar parabolic equation whose asymptotic behavior is dictated by a system of ordinary differential equations. J. Differential Equations 112 (1994). 81130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Carvalho, A. N. and Ruas-Filho, J. G.. Global attractors for parabolic problems in fractional power spaces. SIAM J. Math- Anal. 26 (1995). 415–27.Google Scholar
8Chafee, N. and Infante, E. F.. A bifurcation problem for a nonlinear partial differential equation of parabolic type. Appl. Anal. 4 (1974), 1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Chueh, K.. Conley, C. and Smoller, J.. Positively invariant regions for systems of nonlinear diffusion equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 26 (1977), 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Conway, E., HofT, D. and Smoller, J.. Large time behavior of solutions of systems of nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 35 (1978), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Courant, R. and Hilberl, D.. Methods of Mathematical Physics, I (Chichester: John Wiley, 1989).Google Scholar
12Friedman, A.. Partial Differential Equations (Melbourne, FA: Krieger, 1983).Google Scholar
13Fusco, G.. On the explicit construction of an ODE which has the same dynamics as a scalar parabolic PDE. J. Differential Equations 69 (1987). 85110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Hale, J. K.. Asymptotic behavior and dynamics in infinite dimensions. Pitman Res. Notes Math. 132 (1985), 1 42.Google Scholar
15Hale, J. K.. Large diffusivity and asymptotic behavior in parabolic systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 118 (1986), 455–66.Google Scholar
16Hale, J. K.. Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 25 (Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, 1988).Google Scholar
17Hale, J. K. and Raugel, G.. Partial differential equations in thin domains. Proc. Int. Conf. Alabama 1990 in Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics (Edited by Bennewitz, C.), pp. 63 97. (New York: Academic Press, 1991).Google Scholar
18Hale, J. K. and Raugel, G.. Attractors for Dissipative Evolutionary Equations, CDSNS Report series #72 (Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 1992).Google Scholar
19Hale, J. K. and Rocha, C.. Varying boundary conditions with large diffusivity. J. Math. Pures Appl 66(1987), 139–58.Google Scholar
20Hale, J. K. and Rocba, C.. Interaction of diffusion and boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 11 (1987a), 633–49.Google Scholar
21Hale, J. K. and Sakamoto, K.. Shadow systems and attractors in reaction diffusion equations. Appl Anal. 32(1989), 287303.Google Scholar
22Henry, D.. Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 840 (Berlin: Springer. 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Ikeda, T. and Mimura, M.. An interfacial approach to regional segregation of two competing species mediated by a predator. J. Math. Biol. 31(1993), 215 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Marion, M.. Finite-dimensional attractors associated with partly dissipative reaction diffusion systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (1989). 816–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Murray, J. D.. Mathematical Biology (Berlin: Springer Biom at hematics Texts, 1989).Google Scholar
26Pazy, A.. Semigroup of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences 44 (Berlin: Springer, 1983).Google Scholar
27Protter, M. F. and Weinberger, H. F.. Maximum Principles in Differential Equations (New York: Prentice-Hall, 1967).Google Scholar
28Smoller, J.. Shock Waves and Reaction-Diffusion Equations, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 258 (Berlin: Springer, 1983).Google Scholar
29Tcmen, R.. Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Applied Mathematical Sciences 68 (Berlin: Springer, 1988).Google Scholar
30Yoshizawa, T.. Stability Theory by Liapunor's Second Method (Tokyo: Mathematical Society of Japan, 1966).Google Scholar