Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:50:20.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple bifurcation in a predator–prey system with nonmonotonic predator response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Franz Rothe  and
Douglas S. Shafer
Franz Rothe
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, U.S.A.
Douglas S. Shafer
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A model of a predator–prey system showing group defence on the part of the prey is formulated, and reduced to a three-parameter family of quartic polynomial systems of equations. Mathematically, this system contains the Volterra–Lotka system, and yields numerous kinds of bifurcation phenomena, including a codimension-two singularity of cusp type, in a neighbourhood of which the quartic system realises every phase portrait possible under small smooth perturbation. Biologically, the nonmonotonic behaviour of the predator response function allows existence of a second singularity in the first quadrant, so that the system exhibits an enrichment paradox, and, for certain choices of parameters, coexistence of stable oscillation and a stable equilibrium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 120 , Issue 3-4 , 1992 , pp. 313 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Andronov, A. A., Leontovich, E. A., Gordon, I. I. and Maier, A. G.. Qualitative Theory of Second-Order Dynamic Systems, Israel Program for Scientific Translations (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
2Andronov, A. A., Leontovich, E. A., Gordon, I. I. and Maier, A. G.. Theory of Bifurcations of Dynamic Systems on a Plane, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
3Carr, J., Chow, S.-N. and Hale, J. K.. Abelian integrals and bifurcation theory. J. Differential Equations 59 (1985), 413–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Chicone, C. and Shafer, D. S.. Separatrix and limit cycles of quadratic systems and a theorem of Dulac. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 278 (1983), 585–612.Google Scholar
5Dumortier, F.. Singularities of Vector Fields. J. Differential Equations 23 (1977), 53–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Dumortier, F., Roussarie, R. and Sotomayor, J.. Generic 3-parameter families of vector fields on the plane, unfolding a singularity with nilpotent linear part. The cusp case of codimension 3. Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems 7 (1987), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Freedman, H. I.. Deterministic Mathematical Models in Population Ecology Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1980).Google Scholar
8Freedman, H. I. and Wolkowicz, G. S. K.. Predator-Prey systems with group defense: the paradox of enrichment revisited. Bull. Math. Biol. 48 (1986), 493–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9van Gils, S. A.. A note on “Abelian integrals and bifurcation theory”. J. Differential Equations 59 (1985), 437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10van Gils, S. A. and Horozov, E.. Uniqueness of limit cycles in planar vector fields which leave the axes invariant. Contemp. Math. 56 (1986), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Velasco, E. A. González. Generic properties of polynomial vector fields at infinity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (1969), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Guckenheimer, J. and Holmes, P.. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields (New York: Springer, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hartman, P.. Ordinary Differential Equations (Boston: Birkhäuser, 1982).Google Scholar
14Hassard, B. and Wan, Y. H.. Bifucation formulae derived from center manifold theory. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 63 (1978), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Kopell, N. and Howard, I. N.. Bifurcations and trajectories joining critical points. Adv. in Math. 18 (1975), 306–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Marsden, J. E. and McCracken, M.. The Hopf Bifurcation and Its Applications (New York: Springer, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Perko, L.. On the accumulation of limit cycles. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 99 (1987), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Rothe, F. and Shafer, D. S.. Bifurcation in a quartic polynomial system arising in biology. In Bifurcations of Planar Vector Fields: Proceedings, Luminy, 1989, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1455 (New York: Springer, 1990).Google Scholar
19Wolkowicz, G. S. K.. Bifurcation analysis of a predator–prey system involving group defence. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 48 (1988), 592–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar