Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T13:44:44.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liszt, Mahler and the Chorale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1981

John Williamson
Get access

Extract

An index reference in Donald Mitchell's study of Mahler's ‘Wunderhorn’ years seems to promise an appraisal of Mahler's debt to Liszt; on the page, however, an assumption precedes an exhortation to ‘serious research and documentation’. The debt is located in Mahler's ‘consistent and brilliant’ use of transformation of themes with particular reference being made to the ‘Faust’ Symphony. Elsewhere, Mitchell cites a trumpet tune from the finale of the ‘Resurrection’ Symphony and its subsequent transformation into a chorale as an example of ‘how closely Mahler had studied Liszt’. The species of transformation demonstrated is common in Liszt, mood and association being altered by radically changing the context while leaving melodic, harmonic and rhythmic contour relatively untouched. All of this, however, Mahler might have learned from Wagner, Smetana, Weber or many another composer of dramatic or programmatic music. Real documentation, in the form of letters or recorded comment, has always taken place in discussion of Mahler's debt to Liszt to the pursuit of technical and aesthetic parallels; Constantin Floras' study in progress is typical in that copious motivic and thematic cross-reference, and extensive documentation with regard to Mahler and Liszt individually far outweigh recorded discussion by Mahler of Liszt's personality and music.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association , Volume 108 , 1981 , pp. 115 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Royal Musical Association and the Authors

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Donald Mitchell, Gustav Mahler: The Wurderhorn Years (London, 1975), 163.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., 343. The parallel cited concerns II/5, bar 230ff and bar 472ff.Google Scholar

3 Constantin Floros, Gustav Mahler, 2 vols. (3rd in preparation), Wiesbaden, 1977.Google Scholar

4 See in particular Redlich's review of T. W. Adorno, Mahler, in Die Musikforschung, xix (1966), 224.Google Scholar

5 Peter Franklin, ed., Natalie Bauer-Lechner: Recollections of Gustav Mahler, tr. Dika Newlin (London, 1980), 12.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 30.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., 37–8.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., 184.Google Scholar

9 Henri-Louis de la Grange, Mahler, i (London, 1974), 277 and 560.Google Scholar

10 Knud Manner, ed., Selected Letters of Gustav Mahler, tr. Eithne Wilkins and Ernst Kaiser (London, 1979), 342.Google Scholar

11 la Grange, op. cit., 25, 55 and 315; Ferrucio Busoni, The Essence of Music and Other Papers, tr. Rosamund Ley (New York, 1965), 89.Google Scholar

12 Alma Mahler, Gustos Mahler: Memories and Letters, tr. Basil Creighton, ed. Donald Mitchell (3rd edn., London, 1973), 239.Google Scholar

13 Alma Mahler, op.cit., 130; la Grange, op. cit., 70.Google Scholar

14 la Grange, op. cit., 107.Google Scholar

15 Edward R. Reilly, Gustav Mahler and Guide Adler (London. 1982), 72.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., 41.Google Scholar

17 Paul Bekker, Gustav Mahlers Stafonien (Berlin, 1921), 16 and 26–7.Google Scholar

18 Dika Newlin, Bruckner — Mahler — Schoenberg (New York, 1947), 194–6.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., 194.Google Scholar

20 Floros, op. cit., ii, 188.Google Scholar

21 Franklin, ed., op. cit., 181.Google Scholar

22 la Grange, op. cit., 602–3.Google Scholar

23 Floros, op. cit., ii, 391–2 and 396–406.Google Scholar

24 Léon Guichard, ‘Liszt et la littérature française’, Revue de musicologie, lvi (1970), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 C.f. analyses in Arthur Hahn. Franz Liszt: Symphonische Dichtungen (Berlin: Schlesinger, n.d.), 36, and Rudolf Kloiber, Handbuch der Symphonischen Dichtung (Wiesbaden, 1967), 25.Google Scholar

26 Floras, op. cit., ii, 120; Peter Raabe, Die Entstehungsgeschichte der ersten Orchesterwerke Franz Liszts (Leipzig, 1916), 42–54.Google Scholar

27 Peter Raabe, Franz Liszt, 2 vols. (Stuttgart/Berlin, 1931), ii, 94–5.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 95.Google Scholar

29 Floros, op. cit., ii, 120.Google Scholar

30 Eberhardt Klemm, ‘Zur Geschichte der Fünften Sinfonie von Gustav Mahler. Der Briefwechsel zwischen Mahler und dem Verlag C. F. Peters und andere Dokumente’, Jahrbuch Peters 1979, 35.Google Scholar

31 Bernhard Hansen. Variationen und Variante in den Musikalichen Werken Franz. Liszts (diss., Hamburg. 1959), 81–2; Alfred Heuss, ‘Eine motivisch-thematische Studie über Lists sinfonische Dichtung Ce qu'on extend sur la montagne’, Zeitschrift der Internationalen. Musikgesellschaft, xiii (1911/12), 10–21.Google Scholar

32 Heuss, op. cit., 17–18.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., 17.Google Scholar

34 Paul Bekker, op. cit., 181.Google Scholar

35 Neville Cardus, Gustav Mahler (London, 1965), 190; Bernd Sponheuer, Logik des Zerfalls (Tutzing, 1978), 237–279. See also H. H. Eggebrecht, Die Musik Gustav Mahlers (Munich, 1982), 112.Google Scholar

36 Alma Mahler, op. cit., 47–8.Google Scholar

37 Franklin, ed., op. cit., 240.Google Scholar

38 Manner, ed., op. cit., 177–181.Google Scholar

39 Vladimir Karbusicky, Gustav Mahler und seine Umvelt (Darmstadt, 1978), Chapter 3, passim.Google Scholar

40 Manner, ed., op cit., 178–9.Google Scholar

41 Norman Del Mar, Mahler's Sixth Symphony: A Study (London, 1980), 53.Google Scholar