Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:36:32.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Countess Geschwitz's Series: a Controversy Resolved?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1980

Get access

Extract

When Universal Edition originally published the vocal score of Acts 1 and 2 of Berg's Lulu in 1936 it was generally assumed that the publication of the score of Act 3 would follow in a few months. There was at that time no reason to think otherwise; it was known that Erwin Stein, who had prepared the vocal score of the first two acts for publication, had already completed work on the final act, and the published score of Acts 1 and 2 itself carried a reassuring prefatory note saying that Berg had completed Lulu shortly before his death and that, although large selections of the work remained to be scored, the vocal score of Act 3 would be published in the near future. In the event it has taken almost forty-five years for the score of the final act to appear. Although, thanks mainly to the pioneering work of George Perle, much was known about Act 3 before it finally reached the stage in February 1979, analytical studies of the opera have inevitably concentrated on the music of Acts 1 and 2. Only now, with the publication of the vocal score of Act 3, are we able to examine in any detail the way in which the musical elements exposed in these earlier acts are further developed in Act 3 and to assess the function of these elements in the context of the work as a whole.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Royal Musical Association and the Authors

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Willi Reich, Alban Berg (Vienna, 1937).Google Scholar

2 Ibid., 112.Google Scholar

3 George Perle, ‘Lulu: Thematic Material and Pitch Organization’, Music Review, xxvi (1965), 269302.Google Scholar

4 Willi Reich, The Life and Work of Alban Berg, translated by Cornelius Cardew (London, 1965), 163.Google Scholar

5 George Perle, Serial Composition and Atonality (3rd edn., Berkeley, 1972), 74–5.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 75.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., 74.Google Scholar

8 Willi Reich, op. cit. (1965), 163.Google Scholar

9 Douglas Jarman, The Music of Alban Berg (London, 1979), 121–2.Google Scholar

10 Douglas Jarman, ‘Lulu: The Sketches’, Newsletter of the International Alban Berg Society, vi (June 1978), 48.Google Scholar

11 Basic Cell I at its primary pitch level can also be regarded as belonging to a similar series of inversionally related pitches centring around the dyads A-Bb/Eb-E. This alternative interpretation is not, however, exploited during the course of this scene.Google Scholar

12 The terminology is adopted from that suggested by George Perle in his Twelve Tone Tonality (Berkeley, 1980).Google Scholar

13 Douglas Jarman, ‘Dr Schön's Five-Strophe Aria: Some Notes on Tonality and Pitch Organization in Berg's Lulu’, Perspectives of New Music, viii (1970), 2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar