Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:31:55.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water Mythology and the distribution of Palaeolithic Parietal Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Paul G. Bahn
Paul G. Bahn
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years there has been a refreshing move away from simplistic interpretations of Palaeolithic art: few scholars still adhere to the view of ‘art for art's sake’ or ‘totemism’, although many are reluctant to abandon the formerly dominant theory of ‘hunting magic’. The approach of Laming-Emperaire (1962) and Leroi-Gourhan (1965) is undoubtedly more realistic, in view of what is now known about the highly complex thought-processes which lie behind present-day ‘primitive’ art; but interpretation of cave art's content is unlikely to advance very far, and is largely a waste of time.

There has been a similar move away from the study of Palaeolithic art as a single line of continuous evolution, as this view ignores the factors of artistic ability and individuality; moreover, the stretching of the period by absolute dating has underlined the rarity of the phenomenon. I have argued elsewhere (Bahn 1977a, 251) that Palaeolithic art represents a large output by a relatively small number of individuals. It is obvious that no one single explanation will suffice to account for any aspect of an art which assumed a wide variety of forms and which lasted for tens of thousands of years.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 44 , December 1978 , pp. 125 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexinsky, G., 1968. ‘Slavonic Mythology’, New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, 281–98. Hamlyn, London.Google Scholar
Anon, 1964. Les Guides Bleus—Pyrénées-Gascogne. Hachette, Paris.Google Scholar
Bahn, P. G., 1977a. ‘Seasonal Migration in S.W. France during the late Glacial Period’, Journal of Arch. Science 4, 245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P. G., 1977b. ‘The Pyrenees—a Palaeoeconomic Approach’, Anthropos (Athens) 4, f1/2 (Jan-April), 259–63.Google Scholar
Bourdier, F., 1967. Préhistoire de France. Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar
Burkitt, M., 1933. The Old Stone Age. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casteret, N., 1966. Secrets et Merveilles des Mondes Souterrains. Perrin, Paris.Google Scholar
de Lucas, Castillo Dr., 1956. ‘Los “Ejemplos” Asturianos en la Mitología de las Aguas’, Bol. Inst. Estudios Asturianos, 10, No. 27, 94–108.Google Scholar
Chevalier, M., 1956. La Vie Humaine dans les Pyrénées Aréigeoises. Génin, Paris.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1944. ‘Water in Antiquity’, Antiquity 18, 1–15.Google Scholar
Glory, A. et al. , 1948. ‘Les Peintures de l'Age du Métal en France Méridionale’, Préhistoire 10, 7–135.Google Scholar
Guirand, F., 1968. ‘Greek Mythology’, New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, 85–198. Hamlyn, London.Google Scholar
James, E. O., 1921. ‘Water, Water-Gods (Primitive and Savage)’. In Hastings, J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 12, 704–08. Clark, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Joanne, A., 1862. Itinéraire des Pyrénées. Hachette, Paris.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G., 1972. Four Archetypes. Routledge and Kegan-Paul, London.Google Scholar
Laming-Emperaire, A., 1962. La Signification de l'Art Rupestre Paéolithique. Picard, Paris.Google Scholar
Leach, E., 1977. ‘A View from the Bridge’. In Spriggs, M. (ed.) Archaeology and Anthropology, 161–76. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Supp. Ser. 19.Google Scholar
Leclerc, J., 1974. Gorge d'Enfer aux Eyzies. Fanlac, Périgueux.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1965. Préhistoire de l'Art Occidental. Mazenod, Paris.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1973. From Honey to Ashes, Introduction to a Science of Mythology, Vol. 2. Cape, London.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1976. ‘The Meander as a system: the analysis and recognition of iconographic units in Upper Palaeolithic compositions’, Proc. biennial conference, Australian Inst. Abor. Studies, Canberra 1974.Google Scholar
Masson-Oursel, P. & Morin, L., 1968. ‘Indian Mythology’, New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, 325–78. Hamlyn, London.Google Scholar
Nagel's Encyclopedia Guide to Spain, 4th edition, 1970.Google Scholar
Nougier, L.-R., 1974. L'Aventure Humaine de la Préhistoire. Hachette, Paris.Google Scholar
Nougier, L.-R. and Robert, R., 1957. Rouffignac, La Guerre des Mammouths. Table Ronde, Paris.Google Scholar
Rat, P., 1959. Les Pays Crétacés Basco-Cantabriques (Espagne). Public. de l'Univ. de Dijon 18.Google Scholar
Roseville des, Grottes, 1911. ‘Gravures rur Roches dans la Grotte d'Arudy. (Basses-Pyrénées)’, Bull. Soc. Préh. Fr. 8, 364–5.Google Scholar
Sieveking, A., 1976. ‘Settlement Patterns of the Later Magdalenian in the Central Pyrenees’. In Sieveking, G. et al. (ed.) Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology, 583–603. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Sieveking, A. and Sieveking, G., 1962. The Caves of France and Northern Spain, a Guide. London.Google Scholar
Thurston, H., 1915. ‘Lourdes’. In Hastings, J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 8, 148–151. Clark, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Tiné, S., 1972. ‘Culto Neolitico delle Acque nella Grotta Scaloria’, Valcamonica Symposium, Les Religions de la Préhistoire, 185–90.Google Scholar
Vidal de la Blache, P., 1908. La France. Paris.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C. and Higgs, E. S., 1970. ‘Prehistoric Economy in the Mount Carmel area of Palestine: site catchment analysis’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 36, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, J., 1963. La Religion des Celtes. Payot, Paris.Google Scholar
Wendt, H., 1969. The Romance of Water. London.Google Scholar