Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:42:09.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Valdoe: Archaeology of a Locality within the Boxgrove Palaeolandscape, West Sussex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Matthew Pope ,
Mark Roberts ,
Andrew Maxted  and
Pat Jones
Matthew Pope
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H OPY
Mark Roberts
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H OPY
Andrew Maxted
Affiliation:
Sussex Institute, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9RF
Pat Jones
Affiliation:
Sussex Institute, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9RF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A programme of archaeological assessment, funded through the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund, was undertaken at the Valdoe Quarry in West Sussex ahead of a renewed and final stage of gravel extraction at the site. This paper gives an account of the evidence for human activity recovered in the course of this work. The analysis demonstrates that the Valdoe Quarry contained archaeology relating to the transport and modification of bifaces. These signatures formed part of wider patterns of land-use operated by the same hominin groups found at Boxgrove, within a single, developing palaeolandscape. It is concluded that further activity sites remain to be discovered within the general environs of the Valdoe and the parish of East Lavant where historically there have been surface finds of bifaces.

Résumé

Un programme d'évaluation archéologique, financé par Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund, a été entrepris dans la carrière de Valdoe dans l'East Sussex avant la reprise, pour une dernière phase, de l'extraction de gravier sur le site. Cette étude rend compte des témoignages d'activité humaine recouvrés au cours de ces travaux. L'analyse démontre que la carrière de Valdoe contenait une archéologie en rapport avec le transport et la modification de bifaces. Ces signatures faisaient partie d'un schéma plus étendu d'utilisation des terres exécuté par les mêmes groupes d'hominidés que ceux trouvés à Boxgrove, à l'intérieur d'un seul paléo-paysage en évolution. On en conclut que d'autres sites d'activités restent à découvrir dans les environs généraux de Valdoe et de la paroisse d'East Lavant où on a retrouvé des haches de poing en surface au cours de l'histoire.

Zusammenfassung

Un programa de evaluación arqueológica, financiado por el Fondo de Sostenibilidad de Aggregates Levy, ha sido llevado a cabo en la Cantera Valdoe en East Sussex, antes de una reanudación y fase final de extracción de gravilla en el yacimiento. Este trabajo presenta la evidencia de actividad humana que fue recuperada durante la evaluación. El análisis demuestra que la Cantera Valdoe contenía arqueología relacionada con el transporte y modificación de bifaces. Estas huellas formaban parte de modelos más amplios de uso del terreno, operados por los mismos grupos de homíninos encontrados en Boxgrove, dentro de un único paleopaisaje en desarrollo. Se concluye que quedan por descubrir otros sitos de actividad dentro del entorno general del Valdoe y del distrito de East Lavant, donde históricamente se han dado hallazgos de superficie de hachas.

Zusammenfassung

Ein vom Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund finanziertes archäologisches Evaluierungsprogramm wurde im Valdoe Steinbruch in East Sussex im Zuge einer erneuten und letzten Phase des dortigen Kiesabbaus durchgeführt. Dieser Beitrag berichtet über die dabei entdeckten und dokumentierten Hinterlassenschaften menschlicher Aktivitäten. Die Analyse zeigt, dass im Valdoe Steinbruch archäologisches Material gefunden wurde, das im Zusammenhang mit dem Transport und Modifikation von Bifacien gesehen werden muss. Diese Kennzeichen sind ein Teil einer großräumigeren Landnutzung, die von den gleichen Hominidengruppen herrühren, die in Boxgrove gefunden worden sind, und innerhalb einer einzigen, sich entwickelnden Paläolandschaft verstanden werden müssen. Es wird zusammengefasst, dass weitere Fundplätze menschlicher Aktivitäten innerhalb der näheren Umgebung von Valdoe und der Gemeinde von East Lavant, wo allgemein in der Vergangenheit Oberflächenfunde von Faustkeilen gemacht worden sind, gefunden und erforscht werden müssen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 75 , 2009 , pp. 239 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ashton, N., Lewis, S.G. & Parfitt, S. 1998. Excavations at the Lower Palaeolithic Site at East Farm, Barnham, Suffolk, 1980–94. London: British Museum Occasional Paper 125Google Scholar
Austin, L. 1994. Life and death of a Boxgrove biface. In Ashton, N. & David, A. (eds), Stories in Stone, 119–25. Lithic Studies Society Occasional Paper 4Google Scholar
Barnes, R.S.K. 1980. Coastal Lagoons. Cambridge Studies in Biology 1. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Bergman, C.A. & Roberts, M.B. 1988. Flaking technology at the Acheulean site of Boxgrove, West Sussex (England). Revue Archaeologique de Picardie 1–2 (numero special), 105–13Google Scholar
Bergman, C.A.Roberts, M.B., Collcutt, S.N. & Barlow, P. 1990. Refitting and spatial anlaysis of artefacts from Quarry 2 at the Middle Pleistocene site of Boxgrove, West Sussex, England. In Cziesla, E., Eickhoff, S., Arts, N. & Winter, D. (eds), The Big Puzzle, 265–82. Bonn: HolosGoogle Scholar
Blumenschine, R.J. & Masao, F.T. 1991. Living sites at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania? Preliminary landscape archaeology results in the basal Bed II lake margin zone. Journal of Human Evolution 21, 451–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, B.A. & Sampson, C.G. 1986. Analysis by replication of two Acheulian artefact assemblages. In Bailey, G.N. & Callow, P. (eds), Stone Age Prehistory: essays in memory of Charles McBurney, 29–44. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Calkin, J.B. 1934. Implements from the Higher Raised Beaches of Sussex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia 7, 333–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.A., Horne, D.J., Whittaker, J.E., Atkinson, T. & Roberts, M.B. in press. Middle Pleistoceneclimate and hydrological environment of the Boxgrove hominin site (West Sussex, UK) from ostracod palaeoecological and geochemical records. Journal of Quaternary ScienceGoogle Scholar
Isaac, G.L. 1977. Olorgesailie. Chicago: University PressGoogle Scholar
Leakey, M.D. 1971. Olduvai Gorge 3. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Macphail, R. I. 1999. Micromorphology. In Roberts, & Parfitt, 1999, 118–55Google Scholar
McNabb, J. 1998. On the move. Theory, time-averaging and resource transport at Olduvai Gorge. In Ashton, N., Healy, F. & Pettitt, P. (eds), Stone Age Archaeology: essays in honour of John Wymer, 15–23. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 102/Lithic Studies Society Occasional Paper 6Google Scholar
Newcomer, M.H. 1971. Some quantitative experiments in handaxe manufacture. World Archaeology 3, 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfitt, S.A. 1998. Pleistocene vertebrate faunas of the West Sussex coastal plain: their stratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental significance. In Murton, J.B., Whiteman, C.A., Bates, M.R., Bridgland, D.R., Long, A.J., Roberts, M.B. & Walker, M.P. (eds), The Quaternary of Kent and Sussex: Field Guide, 121–35 London: Quaternary Research AssociationGoogle Scholar
Pope, M.I. 2001. New investigations at Slindon Bottom Palaeolithic Site, West Sussex: an interim report. Lithics 22, 3–10Google Scholar
Pope, M.I. 2002. The Significance of Biface-rich Assemblages: an examination of behavioural controls on lithic assemblage formation in the Lower Palaeolithic. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Pope, M.I. 2004a. Behavioural implications of biface discard: assemblage variability and land-use at the Middle Pleistocene site of Boxgrove. In Walker, E.A., Wenban-Smith, F. & Healy, F. (eds), Lithics in Action, 38–47. Oxford: Lithic Studies Society Occasional Paper 24Google Scholar
Pope, M.I. 2004b. The Raised Beach Mapping Project. 6Google Scholar
Potts, R. 1988. Early Hominid Activities at Olduvai. New York: Aldine de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Potts, R. 1989. Olorgesailie: New excavations and findings in Early and Middle Pleistocene toolmaking and the transport of resources. Journal of Human Evolution 18, 269–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, R. 1994. Variables versus models of early hominid land use. Journal of Human Evolution 27, 7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, R., Behrensmeyer, A.K. & Ditchfield, P. 1999. Palaeolandscape variation and early Pleistocene hominid activities: Members 1 and 7, Olorgesailie Formation, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution 37, 747–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preece, R.M. & Bates, M.R. 1999. Mollusca. In Roberts, & Parfitt, 1999, 170–4Google Scholar
Roberts, M.B. 1986. Excavation of a Lower Palaeolithic site at Amey's Eartham Pit, Boxgrove, West Sussex: a preliminary report. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52, 215–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M.B. 1999a. Geological framework. In Roberts, & Parfitt, 1999, 21–37Google Scholar
Roberts, M.B. 1999b. Appendix 3. The Slindon Formation. In Roberts, & Parfitt, 1999, 428Google Scholar
Roberts, M.B. 2003. Beyond Boxgrove: the Boxgrove Raised Beach Mapping Project. Past Matters 1, the Heritage of Chichester District, 15–17Google Scholar
Roberts, M.B. & Parfitt, S.A. 1999. Boxgrove: a Middle Pleistocene Hominid Site at Eartham Quarry, Boxgrove, West Sussex. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 17Google Scholar
Roberts, M.B., Parfitt, S.A., Pope, M.I. & Wenban-Smith, F.F. 1997. Boxgrove, West Sussex: Rescue Excavations of a Lower Palaeolithic Landsurface (Boxgrove Project B, 1989–91). Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 63, 303–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M.B. and Pope, M.I. 2009. The archaeological and sedimentary records at Boxgrove and Slindon. In Briant, R.M., Bates, M.R., Hosfield, R.T. & Wenban-Smith, F.F. (eds), The Quanternary of Solent Basin and West Sussex Raised Beaches. London: Quanternary Association Field GuideGoogle Scholar
Roebroeks, W., Loecker, D. de & Hennekens, P. 1992. ‘A veil of stones’: on the interpretation of an early Palaeolithic low-density scatter at Maastricht Belvedere (The Netherlands). Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 25, 1–16Google Scholar
Schick, K. 1986. Stone Age Sites in the Making. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S319Google Scholar
Schick, K. 1987a. Modeling the formation of Early Stone Age artifact concentrations. Journal of Human Evolution 16, 789–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, K. 1992. Geoarchaeological analysis of an Acheulean site at Kalambo Falls, Zambia. Geoarchaeology 7(1), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shephard-Thorn, E.R., Bery, F.G. & Wyatt, R.J. 1982. Geological notes and local details for 1:10,000 sheets SU80NW, NE, SW and SE, SU90NW, NE, SW and SE, TQ00NW, SW. West Sussex Coastal Plain between Chichester and Littlehampton. Keyworth: Institute of Geological SciencesGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. 1993. The structure of the Lower Pleistocene archaeological record: a case study from the Koobi Fora formation. Current Anthropology 34, 201–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. 1994. The implications of time averaging for reconstructing the land-use patterns of early tool using hominids. Journal of Human Evolution 27, 89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeter, M., Stout, S.D., Trinkaus, E., Stringer, C.B., Roberts, M.B., & Parfitt, S.A. 2001. Histomorphometric age assessment of the Boxgrove 1 tibial diaphysis. Journal of Human Evolution 40, 331–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinkaus, E., Stringer, C.B., Ruff, C.B.Hennessy, R.J., Roberts, M.B. and Parfitt, S.A. 1999. Diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry of the Boxgrove 1 Middle Pleistocene human tibia. Journal of Human Evolution 37, 1–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voorhies, M.R. 1969. Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. University of Wyoming Contributions to Geology Special Paper 1, 1–69Google Scholar
Woodcock, A. 1981. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Periods in Sussex. Oxford: British Archaeological report 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenban-Smith, F.F. 1999. Knapping technology. In Roberts, & Parfitt, 1999, 384–95Google Scholar