Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T07:34:20.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Relationships, Dating and Taphonomy of the Human Bone from the Mesolithic site of Cnoc Coig, Oronsay, Argyll, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Christopher Meiklejohn ,
Deborah C. Merrett ,
Richard W. Nolan ,
Michael P. Richards  and
Paul A. Mellars
Christopher Meiklejohn
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3B 2E9 Department of Anthropology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Deborah C. Merrett
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3B 2E9
Richard W. Nolan
Affiliation:
Deceased
Michael P. Richards
Affiliation:
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Paul A. Mellars
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, CB2 3DZ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the spatial distribution of the human bone sample excavated from the Mesolithic shell midden site of Cnoc Coig on Oronsay in the Inner Hebrides, Scotland. Although no burials were recovered the information from the apparently isolated bone finds has been significant. Two types of bone group are distinguished, one that resembles the widely reported ‘loose bone’ phenomenon that is widely recognised from European Mesolithic sites. The other, represented by two bone groups at Cnoc Coig, is, at this time, restricted to western Scotland. It is dominated by hand and foot bones and appears to represent purposive behaviour. We concentrate our discussion on the latter phenomenon and place it within discussion of the nature of the later Mesolithic in western Scotland.

Résumé

Cet article examine la répartition dans l'espace des échantillons d'ossements humains mis au jour sur le site du dépôt coquillier mésolithique de Cnoc Coig à Oronsay, dans les Inner Hebrides, Ecosse. Bien qu'on n'y ait pas découvert d'inhumation, les renseignements fournis par ce qui était apparemment des trouvailles d'os isolés se sont avérés significatifs. Nous avons pu distinguer deux types de groupes d'os, l'un qui ressemble au phénomène bien documenté des 'os détachés' qui est largement reconnu dans les sites mésolithiques européens. L'autre, représenté par deux groupes d'os à Cnoc Coig, est, à ce moment, restreint à l'Ecosse occidentale. Il est dominé par des os de mains et de pieds et semble représenter un comportement qui correspond à un but. Nous concentrons notre discussion sur ce dernier phénomène et le plaçons dans le cadre d'une discussion de la nature du mésolithique final en Ecosse occidentale.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel untersucht die räumliche Verbreitung der Probe menschlichen Knochens, die an der Fundstelle eines mesolithischen Muschelhaufens in Cnoc Coig auf Oronsay auf den Inneren Hebriden in Schottland ausgegraben wurde. Obwohl keine Gräber gefunden wurden, ist die Information zu den angeblich isoliert gefundenen Knochenfunden wichtig. Es konnten zwei Typen von Knochengruppen unterschieden werden; der eine Typ ähnelt dem bereits ausführlich beschriebenen ‘Lose-Knochen-Phänomen’, das man hinreichend von europäischen mesolithischen Fundstellen kennt. Der andere Typ ist durch zwei Knochengruppen in Cnoc Coig überliefert, und ist in dieser Zeit auf das westliche Schottland beschränkt. Es durch Hand- und Fußknochen gekennzeichnet und scheint ein Indiz für zielgerichtetes Verhalten zu sein. Wir konzentrieren uns in unserem Artikel auf das letztere Phänomen und wollen es damit zur Diskussion über die Beschaffenheit des späten Mesolithikums im westlichen Schottland stellen.

Résumen

Este trabajo examina la distribución espacial de los huesos humanos excavados en el yacimiento Mesolítico conchero de Cnoc Coig en Oronsay en las Islas Hébridas, Escocia. Aunque no se recuperaron enterramientos, la información procedente de los hallazgos, aparentemente aislados, de huesos es importante. Se distinguen dos tipos de grupo de huesos, uno similar al bien conocido fenómeno ‘hueso suelto’ que ha sido ampliamente reconocido en yacimientos mesolíticos europeos. El otro, representado por dos grupos de huesos en Cnoc Coig, está, hasta ahora, limitado al oeste de Escocia. En el predominan los huesos de la mano y pies, y parece ser representativo de un comportamiento intencional. Nuestra discusión se concentra en este último fenómeno y lo sitúa en el contexto del debate sobre la naturaleza del tardo Mesolítico en el oeste de Escocia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 71 , 2005 , pp. 85 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bishop, A.H. 1914. An Oransay shell-mound — a Scottish pre-Neolithic site. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 48, 52–108Google Scholar
Bonsall, C., Anderson, D.E. & Macklin, M.G. 2002a. The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in western Scotland and its European context. Documenta Praehistorica 29, 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsall, C., Macklin, M.G., Anderson, D.E. & Payton, R.W. 2002b. Climate change and the adoption of agriculture in north-west Europe. European Journal of Archaeology 5(1), 9–23Google Scholar
Brinch Petersen, E. & Meiklejohn, C. 2003. Three cremations and a funeral: aspects of burial practice in Mesolithic Vedbæsk. In Larsson, L., Kindgren, H., Knutsson, K., Leoffler, D. & Åkerlund, A. (eds), Mesolithic on the Move: papers presented at the Sixth International Conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Stockholm 2000, 485–93. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal Program, Radiocarbon 37(2), 425–30Google Scholar
Connock, K.D., Finlayson, B. & Mills, C.M. 1992. A shell-midden with burials at Carding Mill Bay, near Oban, Scotland. Glasgow Archaeological Journal 17, 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constandse-Westermann, T.S. & Meiklejohn, C. 1979. The human remains from Swifterbant [Swifterbant Reports 12]. Helinium 19, 237–66Google Scholar
Duday, H. & Masset, C.. 1987. Anthropologie Physique et Archéologie: Méthode d'Etude des Sépultures. Paris: Editions du C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Finlayson, B. 1995. Complexity in the Mesolithic of the Western Scottish seaboard. In Fischer, A. (ed.), Man and Sea in the Mesolithic, 261–4. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, B. 1998. Wild Harvestors: the first people in Scotland. Edinburgh: Historic ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Pettitt, P.B., Bronk Ramsey, C. & Klinken, G.J. van. 1998. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 26. Archaeometry 40, 437–55Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 1992. Ritualer med mennesknogler i yngre stenalder. Kuml [Årbog for Jysk Arkæiologisk Selskab] 1991–2, 7–52Google Scholar
Lacaille, A.D. 1954. The Stone Age in Scotland. Oxford: University PressGoogle Scholar
Larsson, L., Meiklejohn, C. & Newell, R.R. 1981. Human skeletal material from the Mesolithic site of Ageröd I:HC, Scania, Southern Sweden. Fornvännen 76, 161–8Google Scholar
Lawson, T.J. 1981. The 1926–7 excavations of the Creag nan Uamh bone caves, near Inchnadamph, Sutherland. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 111, 7–20Google Scholar
Lawson, T.J. & Bonsall, C. 1986. The Palaeolithic in Scotland: a reconsideration of evidence from Reindeer Cave, Assynt. In Collcutt, S.N. (ed.), The Palaeolithic of Britain and its Nearest Neighbours: recent trends, 85–9. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology & Prehistory, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J.I. in press. The human remains. In Mercer, R. & Healy, F. (eds), Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England. Excavation and Survey of a Neolithic Monument Complex and its Surrounding Landscape, 387–412. London: English Heritage Archaeological ReportGoogle Scholar
Meiklejohn, C. & Denston, B. 1987. The human skeletal material: inventory and initial interpretation. In Mellars, 1987a, 290–300Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, C. & Constandse-Westermann, T.S. 1978. The human skeletal material from Swifterbant, early Neolithic of the Northern Netherlands: inventory and demography [Final Reports on Swifterbant I]. Palaeohistoria 20, 39–89Google Scholar
Mellars, P.A. 1978. Excavation and economic analysis of Mesolithic shell middens on the island of Oronsay (Inner Hebrides). In Mellars, P.A. (ed.), The Early Postglacial Settlement of Northern Europe, 371–96. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P.A. (ed.) 1987a. Excavations on Oronsay: prehistoric human ecology on a small island. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P.A. 1987b. Cnoc Coig. In Mellars, 1987a, 213–40Google Scholar
Mellars, P.A. 2004. Mesolithic Scotland, coastal occupation, and the role of the Oronsay Middens. In Saville, A. 2004a, 167–83Google Scholar
Mellars, P.A. & Wilkinson, M.R. 1980. Fish otoliths as evidence of seasonality in prehistoric shell middens: the evidence from Oronsay (Inner Hebrides). Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 46, 19–44Google Scholar
Mercer, R.J. 1980. Hambledon Hill: a Neolithic Landscape. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Mercer, R.J. 1985. A Neolithic fortress and funeral center. Scientific American 252(3), 94–101Google Scholar
Mercer, R.J. 1988. Hambledon Hill, Dorset England. In Burgess, C. et al. (eds), Enclosures and Defences in the Neolithic of Western Europe, 89–106. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S403Google Scholar
Mithen, S. 2000. Mesolithic sedentism on Oronsay: chronological evidence from adjacent islands in the southern Hebrides. Antiquity 74, 298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. (ed.) 2001a. Hunter-Gatherer Landscape Archaeology: the Southern Hebrides Mesolithic Project. 1988–98. Cambridge: McDonald InstituteGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. 2001b. The Scottish Mesolithic: problems, prospects and the rationale for the Southern Hebrides Mesolithic Project. In Mithen, 2001a, 9–37Google Scholar
Mithen, S. 2004. The ‘Mesolithic Experience’. In Saville, 2004a, 243–60Google Scholar
Mithen, S & Finlay, N. 2001. Staosnaig, Colonsay: excavations 1989–1995. In Mithen, 2001a, 359–441Google Scholar
Mithen, S & Finlayson, B. 1991. Red Deer hunters on Colonsay? The implications of Staosnaig for the interpretation of the Oronsay middens. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 57, 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. & Lake, M. 1996. The Southern Hebrides Mesolithic Project: reconstructing Mesolithic settlement in western Scotland. In Pollard, T. & Morrison, A. (eds), The Early Prehistory of Scotland, 123–51. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Mook, W.G. 1986. Business meeting: recommendations/resolutions adopted by the twelfth International Radiocarbon Conference. Radiocarbon 28, 799Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., Constandse-Westermann, T.S. & Meiklejohn, C. 1979. The skeletal remains of Mesolithic Man in western Europe: an evaluative catalogue. Journal of Human Evolution 8, 1–228 +vGoogle Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, L. 2003. Embodied Rituals and Ritualized Bodies: tracing ritual practices in Late Mesolithic bodies. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell InternationalGoogle Scholar
Nolan, R.W. 1986. Cnoc Coig; the Spatial Analysis of a Late Mesolithic Shell Midden in Western Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
Pollard, T. 1996. Time and tide: coastal environments, and ritual practice. In Pollard, T. & Morrison, A. (eds), The Early Prehistory of Scotland, 198–213. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Richards, M.P. & Mellars., P.A. 1998. Stable isotopes and the seasonality of the Oronsay middens. Antiquity 72, 178–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, M.P. & Sheridan, J.A. 2000. New AMS dates on human bone from Mesolithic Oronsay. Antiquity 74, 313–15Google Scholar
Rogers, J. 1990. The human skeletal material. In Saville, 1990, 182–98Google Scholar
Saville, A. (ed.) 1990. Hazleton North, Gloucestershire, 1979–82: the excavation of a Neolithic Long Cairn of the Cotsvu old-Severn group. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Saville, A. 2002. Mesolithic: a Hebridean ‘trend-setter’ (review of Mithen 2001a). Antiquity 76, 258–61Google Scholar
Saville, A. (ed.) 2004a. Mesolithic Scotland and its Neighbours. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Saville, A. 2004b. Introducing Mesolithic Scotland: the background to a developing field of study. In Saville, (ed.) 2004a, 3–24Google Scholar
Saville, A. 2004c. The material culture of Mesolithic Scotland. In Saville, 2004a, 185–220Google Scholar
Saville, A. & Hallén, Y. 1994. The ‘Obanian Iron Age’: human remains from the Oban cave sites, Argyll, Scotland. Antiquity 68, 715–23Google Scholar
Schulting, R.J., 1998. Slighting the Sea: stable isotope evidence for the transition to farming in northwestern Europe. Documenta Praehistorica 25, 203–18Google Scholar
Schulting, R.J. & Richards, M.P. 2002. The wet, the wild and the domesticated: the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition on the West Coast of Scotland. European Journal of Archaeology 5(2), 147–89Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Braziunus, T. 1993. Modelling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC, Radiocarbon 35(1), 137–90Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Beck, J.W., Burr, G.S., Hughen, K.A., Kromer, B., McCormac, G., Plicht, J. van der & Spurk, M. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24, 000–0 cal BP, Radiocarbon 40(3), 1041–83Google Scholar
Switsur, V. & Mellars, P.A. 1987. Radiocarbon dating of the shell midden sites. In Mellars, 1987a, 139–49Google Scholar
Telford, D. 2002. The Mesolithic inheritance: contrasting Neolithic monumentality in eastern and western Scotland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 68, 289–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, W. 1895. On human and animal remains found in caves at Oban, Argyllshire. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 29, 410–38Google Scholar