Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:19:32.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Dimensions of Early Neolithic Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Klavs Randsborg
Affiliation:
Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology, University of Copenhagen

Extract

In 1947 C. J. Becker, in his fundamental classifying work on the Early Neolithic phase of the socalled ‘Funnel-Beaker Culture’, described this set of phenomena within a frame of reference which can at best be termed ‘tribal’ (Becker 1947). For instance, in the late period of the Early Neolithic, Period C of the sequence, he observes certain differences, primarily of the type of decoration, in the pottery of respectively Northern Jutland and Southern Denmark. This result is connected with the differential patterns of distribution for other cultural features including forms of burial. Accordingly, the southern complex is baptized ‘The South Danish Megalithic Group’, the northern one ‘The North Jutland Non-Megalithic Group’. In Southern Denmark simple—‘earth’—graves are very few, while a much higher number of dolmens with Early Neolithic C pottery is known. In North Jutland the number of earth graves is considerable, but the picture is blurred by a relatively high number of dolmens too.

Each of these assemblages, and a few minor ones not to be mentioned here, is seen as referring to a ‘tribe’ or ‘a group of tribes’ sharing the said types of graves, decorations on pottery, and, for instance, specific types of weapons. No clear-cut borderlines can, however, be drawn between the complexes as the geographical differences of the distributions consist of statistical concentrations of one or another trait in one area rather than of mutual exclusions. Only the type of decoration on the North Jutland pottery does not seem to occur outside this zone, while the reverse is not the case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aner, E., 1963. ‘Die Stellung der Dolmen Schleswig-Holsteins in der nordischen Megalithkultur’, Offa, 20, 9 ff.Google Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1947. ‘Mosefundne Lerkar fra Yngre Stenalder, Studier over Tragtbaegerkulturen i Danmark’, Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1947, 1 ff.Google Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1954. ‘Die mittel-neolitischen Kulturen in Südskandinavien’, Acta Archaeologica, 25, 49 ff.Google Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1959. ‘Stendyngegrave fra mellem-neolitisk tid’, Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1959, 1 ff.Google Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1973. ‘Studien zu neolitischen Flintbeilen’, Acta Archaeologica, 44, 125 ff.Google Scholar
Brøndsted, J., 1957. Danntarks oldtid I (second edition). København.Google Scholar
Glob, P. V., 1944. ‘Ṡtudier over den jyske Enkeltgravskultur’, Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1944, 1 ff.Google Scholar
Lomborg, E., 1973. Die Flintdolche Dänemarks. Studien über Chronologie und Kulturbeziehungen des südskandi avischen Spätneolitikums, Nordiske Fortidsminder Serie B. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Randsborg, K., 1974. ‘Social Stratification in Early Bronze Age Denmark: a Study in the Regulation of Cultural Systems’, Prähistorische Zeitschrift, 49, 38 ff.Google Scholar
Siegel, S., 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J., 1969. Biometry. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Tauber, H., 1972. ‘Radiocarbon chronology of the Danish Mesolithic and Neolithic’, Antiquity, 46, 106 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. H., 1972. ‘A computer simulation model of Great Basin Shoshonean subsistence and settlement patterns’. In Clarke, D. (ed.), Models in Archaeology, 671 ff. London.Google Scholar
Thorvildsen, K., 1941. ‘Dyssetidens Gravfund i Danmark’, Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1941, 22 ff.Google Scholar
Yeomans, K. A., 1968. Statistics for the social scientist. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Åberg, N., 1937. Kulturmotsättningar i Danrnarks stenålder. Kungl. vitterhets historie och antikvitets akademiens handlinger, 42: 4. Stockholm.Google Scholar