Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:46:32.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting the Chalcolithic site of El Ventorro (Madrid, Spain). Ceramic Re-fitting and Taphonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2014

ANTONIO BLANCO-GONZÁLEZ  and
JOHN CHAPMAN
ANTONIO BLANCO-GONZÁLEZ
Affiliation:
1 Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, South Road DH1 3LE Durham UK. Email: [email protected]
JOHN CHAPMAN
Affiliation:
1 Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, South Road DH1 3LE Durham UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Monumental ditches and Bell Beakers are two key phenomena in later prehistoric Europe involved in the study of El Ventorro, near Madrid. In this article, we discuss and develop an analytical protocol for a thorough characterisation of the patterns of breakage, abrasion, and representation of ceramics. The procedure is tested with a large ceramic sample from ‘Pithouse 013’, an unusually rich context which challenges stereotypical accounts of the domestic sphere, feasting, and prestige goods deposition. This sunken feature was filled with a heterogeneous mixture of recently broken remains and secondary residues, and is reinterpreted here as a ditch segment instead of everyday fossilised occupation surfaces. The paper sheds important new light on depositional practices, the social biographies of Beaker pottery, and the infilling of ditched enclosures. It also allows the assessment of the potential of this integrated re-fitting and taphonomic strategy to illuminate poorly understood aspects of pottery in a range of time–place contexts.

Résumé

Revisite du site chalcolithique d’ El Ventorro (Madrid, Espagne). réajustement de la céramique et taphonomie, d’Antonio Blanco-González et John Chapman

Fossés monumentaux et vases campaniformes sont deux phénomènes clés de l’Europe de la seconde partie de la préhistoire impliqués dans l’étude d’El Ventorro, près de Madrid. Dans cet article, nous discutons et développons un protocole analytique de caractérisation minutieuse des configurations de bris, abrasion et représentation des céramiques. Le procédé est testé sur un important échantillon de céramiques de `Pithouse 013’,un contexte exceptionnellement riche qui remet en question les récits stéréotypés de sphère domestique, festins et déposition d’objets de prestige. Ce vestige enfoncé en terre était rempli d’un mélange hétérogène de restes récemment brisés et de résidus secondaires, et on le réinterprète ici comme un segment de fossé et non pas les surfaces d’une banale occupation fossilisée. L’article éclaire d’une nouvelle lumière les pratiques de déposition, les biographies sociales de la poterie campaniforme et le remblayage des enclos à fossés. Il nous permet aussi d’évaluer le potentiel de ce réajustement intégré et de cette stratégie taphonomique pour éclairer des aspects mal compris de la céramique dans une gamme de contextes espace-temps.

Zussamenfassung

Eine Neubewertung des chalkolithischen Fundplatzes El Ventorro (Madrid, Spanien). Keramische Anpassungen und Taphonomie, von Antonio Blanco-González und John Chapman

Monumentale Gräben und Glockenbecher sind zwei der wichtigsten Phänomene des jüngeren prähistorischen Europa, die für die Untersuchung von El Ventorro, nahe Madrid, eine Rolle spielen. In diesem Artikel diskutieren und entwickeln wir ein analytisches Protokoll für eine detaillierte Erfassung von keramischen Bruch-, Abrasions- und Erhaltungsmustern. Das Vorgehen wird anhand eines großen Ensembles an Keramik aus dem „Grubenhaus 013“ getestet, ein ungewöhnlich fundreicher Kontext, der stereotype Vorstellungen in Frage stellt, welche die häusliche Sphäre, das Feiern von Festen und die Deponierung von Prestigegütern betreffen. Dieser eingetiefte Befund war mit einer heterogenen Mischung von frisch zerbrochenen Funden und sekundären Überresten verfüllt und wird hier neu interpretiert als ein Grubenabschnitt statt eines Hauses mit fossilisierten Oberflächen alltäglicher Nutzung. Der Beitrag wirft wichtiges neues Licht auf Deponierungspraktiken, auf die sozialen Biographien von Glockenbecherkeramik und die Verfüllung von Grabenwerken. Er ermöglicht auch eine Bewertung des Potentials einer solchen Strategie, die Keramikanpassungen und Taphonomie integriert um bislang kaum verstandene Aspekte von Keramik in einer Reihe verschiedener räumlich-zeitlicher Kontexte zu beleuchten.

Resumen

Revisitando el sitio calcolítico de El Ventorro (Madrid, España). Remontajes cerámicos y tafonomía, por Antonio Blanco-González y John Chapman

Los fosos monumentales y el campaniforme son dos de los fenómenos clave de la Prehistoria tardía en Europa implicados en el estudio de El Ventorro, cerca de Madrid. En este artículo, se discute y se desarrolla un protocolo analítico orientado a una meticulosa caracterización de los patrones de rotura, abrasión y representación de las cerámicas. El procedimiento se prueba con una gran muestra cerámica procedente del “fondo de cabaña 013”, un contexto inusualmente rico que desafía los valores estereotipados de la esfera doméstica, los banquetes y la deposición de bienes de prestigio. Esta estructura socavada se rellenó con una mezcla heterogénea de restos fracturados y residuos secundarios, y se interpreta como un segmento de foso más que como superficies de ocupación cotidianas fosilizadas. Este artículo arroja importantes y nuevas interpretaciones sobre las prácticas deposicionales, las biografías sociales de la cerámica campaniforme y el relleno de los recintos de fosos. También permite evaluar el potencial de esta estrategia integrada de remontado y tafonomía para esclarecer aspectos poco conocidos de la cerámica en contextos espacio-temporales en deversos contextos.

Keywords

Assemblage formationceramic re-fittingceramic taphonomysunken featuresditched enclosuresBell BeakerIberia
Type
Articles
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 80 , December 2014 , pp. 87 - 103
Copyright
© The Prehistoric Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bailey, G. 2007. Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26, 198–223 Google Scholar
Beadsmoore, E., Garrow, D. & Knight, M. 2010. Re-fitting Etton: space, time and material culture within a causewayed enclosure in Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 76, 115–134 Google Scholar
Bergin, S. 2011. Tracing floors and fills in Early Neolithic Pithouses: an example from the excavation of Ayn Abū Nukhayla, Southern Jordan. In N.J. Conard, R.H. Meadow, A. Morales & P. Drechsler (eds), Between Sand and Sea. The Archaeology and Human Ecology of Southwestern Asia, 91–112. Tübingen: Kerns Verlag Google Scholar
Blanco-González, A. & Chapman, J. 2014. A new method for identifying sherd refits: a case study from the Neolithic of Northumbria, UK. Journal of Field Archaeology 39(3), 248–255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollong, C.A. 1994. Analysis of the stratigraphy and formation processes using patterns of pottery sherd dispersion. Journal of Field Archaeology 21(1), 15–28 Google Scholar
Bradley, R. & Fulford, M. 1980. Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 17, 85–94 Google Scholar
Brudenell, M. & Cooper, A. 2008. Post-middenism. Depositional histories on Later Bronze Age settlements at Broom, Bedfordshire. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 27(1), 15–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buko, A. 1998. Pottery, potsherds and the archaeologist: an approach to pottery analyses. In W. Hensel, S. Tabaczyński & P. Urbańczyk (eds), Theory and Practice, of Archaeological Research, 381–408. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Google Scholar
Byrd, J.E. & Owens, D.D. Jr 1997. A method for measuring relative abundance of fragmented archaeological ceramics. Journal of Field Archaeology 24(3), 315–320 Google Scholar
Chapman, J. 2000. Pit-digging and structured deposition in the Neolithic and Copper Age of Central and Eastern Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61, 51–67 Google Scholar
Chapman, J. & Gaydarska, B. 2007. Parts and Wholes. Fragmentation in Prehistoric Context. Oxford: Oxbow Google Scholar
Chase, P. 1985. Whole vessels and sherds: an experimental investigation of their quantitative relationships. Journal of Field Archaeology 12(2), 213–218 Google Scholar
Darvill, T. & Thomas, J.S. 2001. Neolithic Enclosures in Atlantic Northwest Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Google Scholar
Delibes de Castro, G., Crespo Díez, M., Fernández Manzano, J., Herrán Martínez, J.I. & Rodríguez Marcos, J.A. 2010. Un recinto de fosos calcolítico en el valle medio del Duero: el Casetón de la Era (Villalba de los Alcores, Valladolid). Actas de las IV Jornadas sobre Patrimonio Arqueológico de la Comunidad de Madrid, 239–247. Madrid: Comunidad de Madrid Google Scholar
Díaz-del-Río, P. 2001. La formación del paisaje agrario: Madrid en el III y II milenios bc . Madrid: Comunidad de Madrid Google Scholar
Díaz-del-Río, P. 2004. Copper Age ditched enclosures in Central Iberia. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 23(2), 107–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-del-Río, P. 2006. An appraisal of social inequalities in Central Iberia (c. 5300–1600 cal bc). In P. Díaz-del-Río & L. García San Juan (eds), Social Inequality in Iberian Late Prehistory, 67–79. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S1525 Google Scholar
Domboróczki, L. 2009. Settlement structures of the Alfold Linear Pottery Culture (ALPC) in Heves County (North-Eastern Hungary): development models and historical reconstructions on micro, meso and macro levels. In J.K. Kozlowski (ed.), Interactions Between Different Models of Neolithization North of the Central European Agro-Ecological Barrier, 75–127. Krakow: Polska Akademia Umiejętnósci Google Scholar
Edwards, B. 2009. Pits and the Architecture of Deposition. Narratives of Social Practice in the Neolithic of North-East England. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Durham: University of Durham.Google Scholar
Edwards, B. 2012. Social structures: pits and depositional practice in Neolithic Northumberland. In H. Anderson-Whymark & J. Thomas (eds), Regional Perspectives on Neolithic Pit Deposition: Beyond the Mundane, 77–99. Oxford: Oxbow Google Scholar
García Barrios, A.S. 2005. El espacio doméstico en la Prehistoria Reciente de la Meseta: el testimonio de las cabañas de la Edad del Cobre en el Valle Medio del Duero. Lancia 6, 59–75 Google Scholar
García García, M. 2013. Las Pozas (Casaseca de las Chanas, Zamora): dos nuevos recintos de fosos calcolíticos en el Valle del Duero. Trabajos de Prehistoria 70(1), 175–184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido-Pena, 1997. Bell Beakers in the Southern Meseta of the Iberian Peninsula: socioeconomic context and new data. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16(2), 187–209 Google Scholar
Garrido-Pena, R. 2000. El Campaniforme en la Meseta Central de la Península Ibérica (c. 2500–2000 a.C.). Oxford: British Archaeological Report S892 Google Scholar
Garrow, D. 2012. Odd deposits and average practice: a critical history of the concept of structured deposition. Archaeological Dialogues 19(2), 85–115 Google Scholar
Garrow, D., Beadsmoore, E. & Knight, M. 2005. Pit clusters and the temporality of occupation: an Earlier Neolithic site at Kilverstone, Thetford, Nordfolk. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 139–157 Google Scholar
Harrison, R.J. 1977. The Bell Beaker Cultures of Spain and Portugal. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Google Scholar
Harrison, R.J. & Mederos, A. 2001. Bell Beakers and social complexity in Central Spain. In F. Nicolis (ed.), Bell Beakers Today. Pottery, People, Culture, Symbols in Prehistoric Europe (Riva del Garda, 1998), 111–124. Trento: Provincia Autonoma di Trento Google Scholar
Harrison, R.J., Quero, S. & Priego, M.C. 1975. Beaker metallurgy in Spain. Antiquity 49, 273–280 Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1999. The Archaeological Process. Oxford: Blackwell Google Scholar
Jiménez Jáimez, V. 2007. La Premisa Pompeya y las cabañas semisubterráneas del sur de la Península Ibérica (IV–III milenios AC). Mainake 29, 475–492 Google Scholar
Lamdin-Whymark, H. 2008. The Residue of Ritualised Action: Neolithic Deposition Practices in the Middle Thames Valley. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 466Google Scholar
LaMotta, V.M. & Schiffer, M.B. 1999. Formation processes of house floor assemblages. In P.M. Allison (ed.), The Archaeology of Household Activities, 19–29. London: Routledge Google Scholar
Liesau, C., Blasco, M.C., Ríos, P., Vega, J., Menduiña, R., Blanco, J.F., Baena, J., Herrera, T., Petri, A. & Gómez, J.L. 2008. Un espacio compartido por vivos y muertos: El poblado calcolítico de fosos de Camino de las Yeseras (San Fernando de Henares, Madrid). Complutum 18(1), 97–120 Google Scholar
Liesau, C., Ríos, P., Aliaga, R., Daza, A., Llorente, L. & Blasco, M.C. 2013. Hut structures from the Bell Beaker horizon: housing, communal or funerary use in the Camino de las Yeseras site (Madrid). In M.P. Prieto & L. Salanova (coords.), Current Researches on Bell Beakers. Proceedings of the 15th International Bell Beaker Conference: From Atlantic to Ural (May 2011, Poio, Pontevedra), 139–151. Santiago de Compostela: Galician ArchaeoPots Google Scholar
Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Mercer, R. & Healy, F. 2008. Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England. Excavation and Survey of a Neolithic Monument Complex and its Surrounding Landscape. Swindon: English Heritage Google Scholar
Muñoz, K. 2002. The Tagus Middle Basin (Iberian Peninsula) from the Neolithic to the Iron Age (V–I Millennium cal. bc): The Long Way to Social Complexity. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 19(3), 241–272 Google Scholar
Priego, M.C. & Quero, S. 1983. Actividades de la sección arqueológica del museo municipal durante 1982. Estudios de Prehistoria y Arqueología Madrileñas 2, 285–314 Google Scholar
Priego, M.C. & Quero, S. 1992. El Ventorro, un poblado prehistórico de los albores de la metalurgia. Madrid: Ayuntamiento de Madrid, Estudios de Prehistoria y Arqueología Madrileñas 8 Google Scholar
Quero, S. & Priego, M.C. 1975. Noticia sobre el poblado campaniforme de El Ventorro (Madrid). Zephyrus 26, 321–329 Google Scholar
Ríos, P., García, R., Aliaga, R. & Blanco, J.F. 2011. La cerámica: caracterización y contenido. In M.C. Blasco, C. Liesau & P. Ríos (eds), Yacimientos calcolíticos con campaniforme de la región de Madrid: nuevos estudios, 319–346. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Google Scholar
Rojo, M.A., Garrido-Pena, R. & García, I. 2005. El Ventorro (Madrid). In M.A. Rojo, R. Garrido & I. Martínez (eds), El Campaniforme en la Península Ibérica y su contexto europeo, 525–533. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid Google Scholar
Rojo, M.A., Garrido-Pena, R., García, I., Juan-Tresserras, J. & Matamala, J.C. 2006. Beer and Bell Beakers: drinking rituals in Copper Age Inner Iberia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 72, 243–265 Google Scholar
Sánchez-Polo, A. & Blanco-González, A. 2014. Death, relics and the demise of huts: patterns of planned abandonment in Middle BA Central Iberia (Spain). European Journal of Archaeology 17(1), 4–26 Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1985. Is there a ‘Pompeii Premise’ in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research 41(1), 18–41 Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Alburquerque, NM: New Mexico University Press Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. & Skibo, J.M. 1989. A provisional theory of ceramic abrasion. American Anthropology 91(1), 101–115 Google Scholar
Solheim, W.G. 1960. The use of sherd weights and counts in the handling of archaeological data. Current Anthropology 1, 325–329 Google Scholar
Sørensen, M.L.S. 1996. Pottery evidence for formation process in the Late Bronze Age deposits. In S. Needham & T. Spence (eds), Refuse and Disposal at Area 16 East Runnymede Vol. 2, 61–73. London: British Museum Press Google Scholar
Stanislawski, M. 1978. If pots were mortal. In R. Gould (ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, 201–228. Alburquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press Google Scholar
Tani, M. 1995. Beyond the identification of formation processes: behavioral inference based on traces left by cultural formation processes. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2(3), 231–252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1999. Understanding the Neolithic. London: Routledge Google Scholar
Val Recio, J. 1992. El yacimiento calcolítico precampaniforme de Las Pozas en Casaseca de las Chanas (Zamora). Boletín del Seminario de Estudios de Arte y Arqueología 58, 47–62 Google Scholar
Varndell, G. & Topping, P. (eds) 2002. Enclosures in Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Google Scholar
Wolfram, S. 2013. Two sides of the coin: ceramic taphonomy and domestic space in the Linear Pottery settlements Hanau-Klein-Auheim and Eythra (Germany). In C. Hamon, P. Allard & M. Ilett (eds), The Domestic Space in LBK Settlements, 79–90. Rahden/Westf: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH Google Scholar