Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:51:33.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the origins of British faience beads and some aspects of the Wessex–Mycenae relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Hugh McKerrell
Hugh McKerrell
Affiliation:
National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Interest concerning the origins of the faience beads found in Britain has led to much discussion and speculation. Occurring as they do primarily in Scottish EBA contexts and Wessex cremation burials, these beads link together British cultural extremes of the second millennium BC. By their occurrence also in Europe and more profusely in the Near East, they suggest trade connections which require the most searching examination of the evidence before definite conclusions as to their source can be reached. The classic studies on faience beads were completed by Beck and Stone (1936) and Stone and Thomas (1956). Their carefully considered opinions indicated positively an Eastern origin for the British beads, but this view has been challenged recently by Newton and Renfrew (1970) using as a basis for their thesis the spectrographic analyses reported by Stone and Thomas who had ruefully regarded them as non-indicative of provenance. It must be stated from the outset that the work to be described here does not indicate the exact source of the British beads but it can be claimed to resolve adequately the problem of the local as opposed to Eastern origins.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 38 , December 1972 , pp. 286 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, J. A., Vogel, J. C. and Wislanski, T., 1969. ‘TRB and other C14 dates from Poland’, Helinium, 9, 209.Google Scholar
Beck, H. C., and Stone, J. F. S., 1936. ‘Faience beads of the British Bronze Age’, Arch., 85, 203.Google Scholar
Berger, R., 1970. ‘Ancient Egyptian radiocarbon chronology’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, Lond., A. 269, 23.Google Scholar
Britton, D., 1961. ‘A study of the composition of Wessex culture bronzes’, Archaeometry, 4, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, G., 1901. ‘Irish copper celts’, J. Anthropological Inst., 31, 265.Google Scholar
Coghlan, H. H., Butler, J. R. and Parker, G., 1963. ‘Ores and metals’, RAI Occasional Paper No. 17.Google Scholar
Coghlan, H. H. and Case, H., 1957. ‘Early metallurgy of copper in Ireland and Britain’, PPS, 22, 91.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. E. S., 1970. ‘Absolute dating from Egyptian records’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Lond., A. 269, 11.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, M., and Ritchie, P. D., 1938. ‘Spectrographic studies on ancient glasses’, Technical Studies in the Field of the Fine Arts, 6, 155.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., 1962. ‘The half-life of radiocarbon’, Nature, 195, 984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, H., 1970. ‘The contribution of radiocarbon dating to archaeology in Britain’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Lond., A. 269, 57.Google Scholar
Higgins, R. A., 1961. Greek and Roman Jewellery. London.Google Scholar
Junghans, S. E., Sangmeister, E. and Schroder, M., 1968. Studien zu den Anfangen der Metallurgie (SAM 2, 3). Berlin.Google Scholar
Kohler, E. L. and Ralph, E. R., 1961. ‘Carbon-14 dates for sites in the Mediterranean area’, Am. J. Arch., 65, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., 1963. ‘Amber and Faience,’ Antiquity, 37, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A., 1962. Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries. London.Google Scholar
Newton, R. G. and Renfrew, C., 1970. ‘British faience beads reconsidered’, Antiquity, 44, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. A., 1950. The calendars of Ancient Egypt. Chicago.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., 1912. ‘Geology of Ben Wyvis’, Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Scotland. London.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. M. F., 1892. Prehistoric Egypt. London.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1966. ‘Myceneae and barbarian Europe’, Sbornik Narodniko Muzea v Praze, 20, 117.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1971. Victoria county history. Wiltshire (in the press).Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1968. ‘Wessex without Mycenae’, Annual of the British School of Archaeology at Athens, 63, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. B. K. S., 1966. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Stone, J. F. S., 1957. In Cavalier, M. ‘Salina: a prehistoric village in the Aeolian islands’, Antiquity, 31, 13.Google Scholar
Stone, J. F. S. and Thomas, L. C., 1956. ‘The use and distribution of faience in the ancient East and prehistoric Europe’, PPS, 22, 37.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E., 1971. Proc. XII Nobel symposium. Uppsala.Google Scholar