Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T06:32:29.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on recent finds of Dama clactoniana (Cervus browni auctt.) in London and Swanscombe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2014

Dorothea M. A. Bate
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 3 , Issue 1-2 , 1937 , pp. 460 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Referred to

Abbott, W. J. L., 1892. ‘The Section exposed in the Foundations of the New Admiralty Offices.’ Proc. Geol. Ass., 12, pp. 346–356.Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. Boyd, 1868. ‘On a New Species of Fossil Deer from Clacton.’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, 24, pp. 511–516, pls. 17–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English Mechanic, The, 1882. Oct. 20, p. 49. ‘The Fossil Lions of Charing Cross.’Google Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., 1926. ‘The Pleistocene Mammalia of the British Isles and their bearing upon the date of the Glacial Period.’ Proc. Yorkshire Geol. Soc., n.s., 20, pt. III, pp. 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. B. R. and Oakley, K. P., 1936. ‘The Pleistocene Succession in the Lower Parts of the Thames Valley.’ Proc. Prehist. Soc., II, pp. 52–76.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P., and Leakey, M., 1937. ‘Report on Excavations at Jaywick Sands (1934).’ Proc. Prehist. Soc., III, pp.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. Smith, 1917. ‘On Mammalian Bones from Excavations in the London District.’ Geol. Mag., IV, no. 9, pp. 422–424.Google Scholar