Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:09:21.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Ural Sites and the Chronology of Northern Eurasia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Marija Gimbutas
Marija Gimbutas
Affiliation:
Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The investigation of trade relations as they continued onward from the middle of the second millennium B.C. is at present one of the most fruitful methods of establishing the chronological sequence of the Bronze Age in northern Eurasia. In a recent article (Gimbutas, 1956) I attempted to correlate the Seima and Borodino dates with those of the Near East on the one hand, and of China on the other, basing my argument on analogies among widely-distributed artifacts of close affinity. Stratigraphical evidence is of no less importance than the presence of traded objects and deserves special attention. By now numerous stratified sites lying east and west of the Middle Urals have been discovered. In 1956 Raushenbakh's study appeared, a monograph, which, by a thorough description of Neolithic and Bronze Age sites east of the Middle Urals, with special emphasis upon the Gorbunovo peat-bog site, demonstrated clearly the importance of Middle Ural finds for defining the chronology of the forested region of northern Eurasia.

Since World War II continuous excavations at the confluence of the Kama and Chusovaia Rivers have been directed and described chiefly by O. N. Bader and have revealed stratified and unstratified Sub-Neolithic and Bronze Age habitation sites and cemeteries, all encompassed within a small area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 24 , December 1958 , pp. 120 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bader, O. N. 1947. ‘Novye raskopki bliz Tagila v 1944 g. (predvaritelnoe soobshcheniia)’, (New excavations near Tagil in 1944. A preliminary report), KS, vyp. 16, pp. 139–47.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1949. ‘Rabota Chusovskogo otriada Kamskoi arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii’. (Works of the Chusovaia branch of the Kama Archaeological Expedition), KS, vyp. 26, pp. 45–7.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1950a. ‘Arkheologicheskie pamiatniki Prikamia: ikh nauchnoe vyiavleniia’. (Archaeological finds in the Kama River basin and their scientific significance). Molotovgiz.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1950b. ‘Nekotorye voprosy paleogeografii Urala i severovostochnoi Evropy v svete arkheologicheskikh dannykh’. (Some problems of the palaeo–geography of the Urals and north-eastern Europe in the light of archaeological finds), Materialy po chetvertichnomu periodu SSSR, vyp. 2.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1951a. ‘Itogi dvukhletnikh issledovanii Kamskoi Arkheologichnoi Ekspeditsii (1947–8)’. (Results of the Kama Archaeological Expedition during 1947–48). Doklady Nauchnykh Konferentsii Molotovskogo universiteta, vyp. 5–6.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1951b. ‘Kamskaia arkheologicheskaia ekspeditsiia v 1949 g’. (Kama Archaeological Expedition in 1949). KS, vyp. 39, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1951c. ‘Stoianki Nizhneadishchevskaia i Borovoe Ozero I na r. Chusovoi’. (Nizhne Adishchevo and Borovoe Ozero I sites on the Chusovaia River), MIA, No. 22, pp. 7–33.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1953a. ‘Kamskaia arkheologischeskaia ekspeditsiia v 1950 g.’ (Kama Archaeological Expedition in 1950), KS, vyp. 49, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1953b. ‘Kamskaia arkheologicheskaia ekspeditsiia v 1951 g.’ (Kama Archaeological Expedition in 1951), KS, vyp. 51, pp. 82–92.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1953c. ‘Ocherk shestiletnikh rabot Kamskoi arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii (1947–52). (A survey of six years of excavations by the Kama Archaeological Expedition, 1947–52), Uchenye Zapiski Molotovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im. A. M. Gor'kogo, torn IX, vyp. 3, pp. 3–88.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1953d. ‘Ust’-Gaivinskii mogilnik i podgremiachinskoe mestonakhozhdenie Turbinskogo tipa na Kame’. (The cemetery of Ust-Gaiva and the find at Gremiachee of the Turbino type on the Kama River), Uchenye Zapiski Molotovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im. A. M. Gorkogo, torn IX, vyp. 3, pp. 135–44.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1954a. ‘Kamskaia arkheologicheskaia ekspeditsiia v 1952 g.’ (Kama Archaeological Expedition in 1952), KS, vyp. 55, pp. 117–29.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. 1954b. ‘Stoianka Bor II i predananinskoe vremia v Prikamie’. (Bor II site and Pre-Anino times in the Kama Basin), SA, tom xx, pp. 180–213.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. and Sokolova, Z. P. 1953. ‘Novye stoianki chusovskogo Prikamia’. (New sites at the Chusovaia-Kama confluence), Uchenye Zapiski Molotovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im A. M. Gorkogo, tom IX, vyp. 3, pp. 89–126.Google Scholar
Bader, O. N. and Kadikov, B. Kh. 1957. ‘Poseleniia epokhi bronzy na Kame mezhdu g. Okhanskom i g. Sarapulom’. (Bronze Age sites, on the Kamav River between Okhansk and Sarapul). SA, 1957–3. pp. 136–59.Google Scholar
Bers, E. M. 1951. ‘Arkheologicheskaia karta g. Sverdlovskai ego okresnostei’. (Archaeological map of the city of Sverdlovsk and its vicinity), MIA, No. 21, pp. 182–243.Google Scholar
Briusov, A. Ya. 1952. ‘Ocherki po istorii plemen evropeiskoi chasti SSSR v neoliticheskuiu epokhu’. (The outline of the tribal history in the European part of the USSR during the Neolithic), Akademia Nauk SSSR, Institut Istorii Materialnoi Kultury.Google Scholar
Chernetsov, V. N. 1953. ‘Drevniaia istoriia nizhnego Priobia’. (Ancient history of the lower Ob area), MIA, No. 35.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, P. A. 1951. ‘Shigirskaia kultura na vostochnom sklone Urala’. (The Shigir culture east of the Urals), MIA, No. 21, pp. 28–94.Google Scholar
Eding, D. N. 1940a. ‘Novye nakhodki na gorbunovskom torfianike’. (New finds in the peat-bog of Gorbunovo), MIA, No. 1, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
Eding, D. N. 1940b. ‘Reznaia skulptura Urala’. (Sculpture of the Urals), Trudy Gos. Istoricheskogo Muzeia, Moscow, vyp. 10, 104 pp.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M. 1956. ‘Borodino, Seima and their Contemporaries. Key Sites for the Bronze Age Chronology of Eastern Europe’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, vol. XXII, pp. 143–72.Google Scholar
Krivtsova-Grakova, . 1948. ‘Alekseevskoe poselenie i mogilnik’. (Alekseevo habitation site and cemetery), Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istoricheskogo Muzeia, vyp. 17, pp. 59–172.Google Scholar
Krupnov, E. I. 1951. ‘Materialy po arkheologii severnoi Osetii dokobanskogo perioda. Opyt periodizatsii pamiatnikov epokhi eneolita i bronzy’. (Materials concerning the archaeology of northern Osetia in the Pre-Koban period. The experiment in periodization of the Eneolithic and Bronze Age finds), MIA, vyp. 23, pp. 17–75.Google Scholar
Prokoshev, N. A. 1940a. ‘K voprosu o neoliticheskikh pamiatnikakh Kamskogo Priuralia’. (A contribution to the problem of the Neolithic finds in the Kama River area), MIA, No. 1, pp. 11–41.Google Scholar
Prokoshev, N. A. 1940b. ‘Nekotorye itogi izucheniia pozdneneoliticheskikh stoianok raiona ustia r. Chusovoi (1934–7 gg.)’. Biulleten Komissii po izucheniiu chetvertichnogo perioda, Nos. 6–7.Google Scholar
Prokoshev, N. A. 1941. ‘Arkheologicheskie issledovaniia v basseine r. Kamy’. Arkheologicheskie issledovaniia v RSFSR 1934–6 gg.Google Scholar
Raushenbakh, V. M. 1952. ‘Keramika shigirskoi kultury’. (Pottery of the Shigir culture), KS vyp. 43, pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
Prokoshev, N. A. 1956. ‘Srednee Zauralie v epokhu neolita i bronzy’. (The Middle Urals during the Neolithic and the Bronze Age). Trudy Gos. Istoricheskogo Muzeia, vyp. 29, Moscow, 150 pp.Google Scholar
Salnikov, K. V. 1951. ‘Bronzovyi vek Iuzhnogo Zauralia’. (The Bronze Age of the southern Urals), MIA, No. 21, pp. 94–152.Google Scholar
Salnikov, K. V. 1952. ‘Kurgany na ozere Alakul’. (Kurgans at Lake Alakul), MIA, No. 24, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
Salnikov, K. V. 1954. ‘Abashevskaia kultura na Iuzhnom Urale’. (The Abashevo culture in the southern Urals), SA, tom 21, pp. 52–95.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. V. 1927. ‘Die Ausgrabungen bei dem Dorf Turbina an der Kama’, Finno-Ugrische Forschungen, Anzeiger XVIII, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. V. 1935. ‘Arkheologicheskie issledovaniia v raione r. Kamy’. (Archaeological investigations in the Kama River area), Izvestiia GAIMK, p. 109.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. V. 1940. ‘Stoianka u stantsii Levshino’. (The site near the station of Levshino), SA, tom V, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Sinitsyn, I. V. 1953. ‘Arkheologicheskie raboty v zone stroitelstva Stalingradskoi GES’. (Archaeological work in the zone of construction of the Stalingrad hydroelectric station), KS, vyp. 50, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Sukhachev, V. N. and Poplavskaia, G. I. 1946. ‘Ocherk istorii ozer i rastitelnosti Srednego Urala’. (An outline of the history of lakes and vegetation in the Middle Urals), Biulleten Komissii po izucheniiu chetvertichnogo perioda, No. 8, Akademia Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Tallgren, A-M. 1916. ‘Collection Zaoussailov au Musée Historique de Finlande à Helsingfors’, I. Catalogue raisonné de la collection de l'âge du bronze, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, B. G. 1953. ‘Kama-Zhulanovskaia stoianka bronzovoi epokhi na srednei Kame’. (The Bronze Age site of Kama-Zhulanovskaia on the middle Kama), Uchenye Zapiski Molotovskogo gosudarstvennogo Universiteta int. A. M. Gorkogo, tom IX, vyp. 3, pp. 127–33.Google Scholar
Tolstov, S. P. 1948. ‘Po sledam drevne-Khorezmiiskoi tsivilizatsii’. (On the track of the ancient Khorezm civilization), Moscow-Leningrad, pp. 65–74.Google Scholar
Tolstov, S. P. 1957. ‘Itogi dvadtsati let raboty Khorezmskoi Arkheologo-Etnograficheskoi Ekspeditsii (1937–56)’. (Results of twenty years' work by the Khorezm Archaeological Expedition), Sovetskaia Etnografiia, 1957–4, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
Zbrueva, A. V. 1947. ‘Gorodishche Grokhan’. (Gorodische of Grokhan), KS, vyp. 16, pp. 52–64.Google Scholar
Zbrueva, A. V. 1952. ‘Istoriia naseleniia prikamia v Ananinskuiu epokhu’. (The history of the population of the Kama area during the Ananino period), Materialy i Issledovaniia po Arkheologii Urala i Priuralia, tom v, MIA, No. 30.Google Scholar