Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T11:03:10.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metal analyses and the Scottish Early Bronze Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

John M. Coles
Affiliation:
Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology, Cambridge

Extract

The analysis of Early Bronze Age metal objects in Europe has been the concern of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Metallurgie at Stuttgart for a number of years. In 1960 the first major results of this ambitious programme were presented in a volume generally described as SAM 1, or Studien zu den Anfängen der Metallurgie (Junghans, Sangmeister and Schröder, 1960). Using the trace elements arsenic (As), antimony (Sb), silver (Ag), Nickel (Ni) and Bismuth (Bi), SAM 1 described the content and distribution of 12 European metal groups, each devised on the basis of the varying concentrations of these trace elements in Bronze Age metal. This programme was the first to attempt to examine metallurgy in this way for the whole of Europe. A number of regionally restricted studies had already been carried out before the appearance of SAM 1; the Irish, and some British, material had been previously examined by Coghlan and Case (1957) and by Britton (1961). In 1964 a major review of the Stuttgart production appeared, in which the method of combining the elements into groups was criticized on archaeological grounds (Butler and van der Waals, 1964). Subsequently a new approach was devised by Waterbolk; in this, the Stuttgart method of attempting to find clusters from a gigantic range of analyses, each one treated exactly as another, was abandoned, and replaced by a more archaeological approach in which typology and association were used (Waterbolk and Butler, 1965). The significance of the groups produced by this method are only now being assessed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annable, F. K. and Simpson, D. D. A., 1964. Guide Catalogue of the Neolithic and Bronze Age Collections in Devizes Museum, 1964.Google Scholar
ApSimon, A. M., 1954. ‘Dagger Graves in the “Wessex” Bronze Age’, Institute of Archaeology Tenth Annual Report, 1954, 37.Google Scholar
Britton, D., 1961. ‘A study of the composition of Wessex Culture bronzes’, Archaeometry, 4, 1961, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, D., 1963. ‘Traditions of metal-working in the Later Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Britain’, PPS, 29, 1963, 258.Google Scholar
Burgess, C. B., 1969. ‘The Later Bronze Age in the British Isles and north-western France’, Archaeological Journal, 125, 1969, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. J. and van der Waals, J. D., 1964. ‘Metal analysis, SAM 1, and European prehistory’, Helinium, 4, 1964, 3.Google Scholar
Butler, J. J. and van der Waals, J. D., 1966. ‘Bell Beakers and early metal-working in the Netherlands’, Palaeohistoria, 12, 1966, 41.Google Scholar
Case, H. J., 1966. ‘Were Beaker-People the first metallurgists in Ireland?’, Palaeohistoria, 12, 1966, 141.Google Scholar
Christlein, R., 1964. ‘Beiträge zur Stufengliederung der frühbronzezeitlichen Flachgräberfelder in Süddeutschland’, Bayerische Vorgeschichtsblätter, 29, 1964, 25.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1966. ‘A tentative reclassification of British Beaker pottery in the light of recent research’, Palaeohistoria, 12, 1966, 179.Google Scholar
Coghlan, H. H. and Case, H., 1957. ‘Early metallurgy of copper in Ireland and Britain’, PPS, 23, 1957, 91.Google Scholar
Coles, J. M., 1960. ‘Scottish Late Bronze Age metalwork …’, PSAS, 93, 1960, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J. M., 1964. ‘Scottish Middle Bronze Age metalwork’, PSAS, 97, 1964, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craw, J. H., 1929. ‘On a jet necklace from a cist at Poltalloch, Argyll’, PSAS, 63, 1929, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, L. N. W., 1961. ‘Wessex and Ireland in the early and middle Bronze Ages’, Bericht über den V Internationalen Kongress für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, 1958, 284.Google Scholar
Grimes, W. F., 1951. The Prehistory of Wales, 1951.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C., 1960. ‘A scheme for the British Bronze Age’, Paper to the C.B.A. conference on the British Bronze Age, London, 1960.Google Scholar
Henshall, A. S., 1968. ‘Scottish Dagger graves’, In Coles, J. M. and Simpson, D. D. A. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Europe, 1968, 173.Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R., 1969. ‘Searching for structure within multivariate archaeological data’, World Archaeology, 1, 1969, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E., and Schröder, M., 1960. Metallanalysen kupferzeitlicher und frühbronzezeitlicher Bodenfunde aus Europa, 1960.Google Scholar
Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E., and Schröder, M., 1968. Kupfer und Bronze in der frühen Metallzeit Europas, 1968.Google Scholar
Megaw, J. V. S., 1969. ‘Analyses of British and Irish Early Bronze Age Axes …’, PPS, 35, 1969, 356.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1938. ‘The Early Bronze Age in Wessex’, PPS, 4, 1938, 52.Google Scholar
Richards, E. E. and Blin-Stoyle, A. E., 1961. ‘A study in the homogeneity in composition of an Irish thick-butted axe’, Archaeometry, 4, 1961, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, D. D. A., 1968. ‘Food Vessels: associations and chronology’, in Coles, J. M. and Simpson, D. D. A. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Europe, 1968, 197.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. J., 1968. ‘Early Bronze Age gold neck-rings in western Europe’, PPS, 34, 1968, 259.Google Scholar
Torbrügge, W., 1959. ‘Die Bronzezeit in Bayern. Stand der Forschungen zur relativen Chronologie’, Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission, 40, 1959, 1.Google Scholar
Tylecote, R. F., 1962. Metallurgy in Archaeology, 1962.Google Scholar
Von Brunn, W. A., 1959. Bronzezeitliche Hortfunde. Die Hortfunde der frühen Bronzezeit aus Sachsen-Anhalt, Sachsen, Thüringen, 1959.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H. T. and Butler, J. J., 1965. ‘Comments on the use of metallurgical analysis in prehistoric studies’, Helinium, 5, 1965, 227.Google Scholar