Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:53:05.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excavation and Survey at Dyffryn Lane Henge Complex, Powys, and a Reconsideration of the Dating of Henges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2013

Alex Gibson
Affiliation:
Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP

Abstract

The henge monument and round barrow at Dyffryn Lane, near Welshpool, Powys, represent a rare instance of earthwork survival amongst the Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments of the upper Severn Valley. Antiquarian excavation in response to agricultural degradation suggested that the monument represented a round barrow covering a stone circle. Whether these stones represented a stone circle sensu stricto or a stone kerb for a turf barrow, was not determined at the time. Aerial photography subsequently demonstrated that the barrow as surrounded by a single-entranced henge monument. The present excavation was designed to assess the degree of plough damage to the site, determine the nature of the circular arrangement of stones, investigate the development of the site, and retrieve absolute dating and palaeoenvironmental material for the various phases encountered. Excavation has demonstrated that the site saw the ritual deposition of Impressed Ware pottery prior to a stone circle being erected on the site. This circle was allowed to decay before being encircled by a henge and subsequently covered by a round mound. The site adds to a small but growing body of evidence suggesting the lateness of the henge element within multi-phased monuments.

Résumé

Le monument à enceinte et fossé et le tertre rond de Dyffryn Lane, près de Welshpool, Powys, constitue un rare exemple de survivance de levées de terre parmi les monuments du néolithique et de l'âge du bronze dans la haute vallée de la Severn. Des fouilles par des amateurs d'histoire en réaction à des dégâts causés par l'agriculture ont donné à penser que le monument consistait en un tertre rond recouvrant un cercle de pierres. On n'avait pas déterminé à l'époque si ces pierres représentaient un cercle de pierres au sens propre du terme ou s'il s'agissait d'un bordage de pierres pour un tumulus en terre. Plus tard des photographies aériennes démontrèrent que le tumulus était entouré d'un monument à enceinte à entrée unique. Le but des fouilles actuelles était d'évaluer le degré des dégâts causés au site par les labours, de déterminer la nature des pierres arrangées en cercke, d'analyser l'évolution du site et de recueillir des datations absolues et du matériel paléoenvironnemental pour les diverses phases rencontrées. Les fouilles ont démontré que le site avait connu le dépôt rituel de poterie imprimée avant que le cercle de pierres ne soit érigé sur le site. On a laissé ce cercle se dégrader avant de l'entourer d'une enceinte et de le couvrir par la suite d'un tertre rond. Ce site vient ajouter à un petit mais croissant corpus de témoignages qui suggèrent que l'élément ‘enceinte'n’est arrivé que tardivement parmi les monuments à phases multiples.

Résumen

El monumento tipo henge y el túmulo redondo de Dyffryn Lane, cerca de Welshpool, Powys, constituyen un raro caso de supervivencia de los movimientos de tierra entre los monumentos del neolítico y de la Edad del Bronce de la parte alta del Severn Valley. La excavación anticuaria realizada en respuesta a la degradación agrícola sugirió que el monumento representaba un túmulo redondo que cubría un círculo de piedra. No se determinó en aquel entonces si estas piedras eran un círculo de piedra sensu stricto o un anillo peristálico para un túmulo de tierra. Posteriormente la fotografía aérea demostró que el túmulo estaba rodeado por un monumento tipo henge de una sola entrada. La actual excavación fue diseñada para evaluar el grado de daño que el arado causó en el yacimiento, determinar la naturaleza del arreglo circular de piedras, investigar el desarrollo del sito, y recuperar material palaeoenvironmental y para la datación absoluta de las varias fases encontradas. La excavación ha demostrado que el yacimiento vio la deposición ritual de Cerámica Impresa antes de que se erigiese un círculo de piedra en el sito. Este círculo se deterioró antes de ser cercado por un henge y posteriormente ser cubierto por un túmulo redondo. Este yacimiento se suma a un pequeño pero cada vez mayor cuerpo de evidencia que indica lo tardío del elemento henge dentro de monumentos multi-fase.

Zusammenfassung

Henge und Grabhügel von Dyffryn Lane nahe Welshpool, Powys, sind seltene Beispiele für die Erhaltung von neolithischen und bronzezeitlichen Erdbauten des oberen Severn-Tals. Durch landwirtschaftliche Bodeneingriffe veranlasste Ausgrabungen ließen vermuten, dass die Bauwerke aus einem runden Hügel, der einen Steinkreis bedeckt, bestanden. Ob jedoch diese Steine einen Steinkreis sensu stricto darstellen oder eine Einfassung des Hügels, konnte dabei nicht festgestellt werden. Luftbilder zeigten später, dass der Hügel von einem Henge mit einem einzigen Eingang umgeben war. Die gegenwärtig neu durchgeführte Grabung sollte das Ausmaß der Schäden durch den Pflug feststellen, den Charakter der kreisförmigen Anordnung der Steine bestimmen, die Entwicklung des Fundplatzes nachvollziehen, und sowohl eine absolute Datierung ermöglichen als auch paläoökologische Daten sammeln für die verschiedenen erkennbaren Phasen. Durch die Grabung kann gezeigt werden, dass der Fundplatz die rituelle Deponierung von Keramik der Impressed Ware erfuhr, bevor dort ein Steinkreis errichtet wurde. Dieser Steinkreis wurde dem Verfall überlassen, bevor er von einem Henge umgeben und schließlich von einem runden Hügel überdeckt wurde. Dieser komplexe Fundplatz trägt so zu einer kleinen aber wachsenden Reihe von Belegen bei, die dafür sprechen, dass das Henge-Element spät in mehrphasige Bauwerke eingeführt wurde.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, M.J. 2008. Dyffryn Lane Magnetic Susceptibility Study. Unpublished report deposited with site archiveGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1957. Tumulus near Berriew, Welshpool. Archaeologia Cambrensis, 3, 70–1Google Scholar
Atkinson, R.J.C., Piggott, C.M. & Sandars, N. 1951. Excavations at Dorchester, Oxon. Oxford: Ashmolean MuseumGoogle Scholar
Barclay, A. & Harding, J. (eds). 1999. Pathways and Ceremonies. The Cursus Monuments of Britain and Ireland. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Barclay, G. 1999. Cairnpapple revisited: 1948–1998. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 65, 1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, G. 2005. The ‘Henge’ and ‘Hengiform’ in Scotland. In Cummings, V. & Pannett, A. (eds), Set in Stone. New Approaches to Neolithic Monuments in Scotland, 8194. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Blockley, K. & Taverner, N. 2002. Excavations at Sarn-y-bryn-caled, Welshpool, Powys in 1998–99. Montgomeryshire Collections 90, 4168Google Scholar
Bradley, P, 2006. Worked flint, in Gibson, 2006, 180Google Scholar
Bradley, R. & Chambers, R. 1988. A new study of the cursus complex at Dorchester upon Thames. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 7, 271–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. & Sheridan, A. 2005. Croft Moraig and the chronology of stone circles. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 269–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2000. The Good Stones. A New Investigation of the Clava Cairns. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph 17Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2005. The Moon and the Bonfire. An Investigation of Three Stone Circles in North-east Scotland. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Brennand, M. & Taylor, M. 2003. The Survey and Excavation of a Bronze Age Timber Circle at Holme-next-the-Sea, Norfolk, 1998–9. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 69, 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettell, R. 2007. Soil Solutions: biochemical analysis of soils and sediments from the Dyffren Lane henge monument, Berriew, Powys. Unpublished BSc Thesis, University of BradfordGoogle Scholar
Britnell, W. 1982. The Excavation of Two Round Barrows at Trelystan, Powys. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 48, 133202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burl, H.A.W. 1969. Henges: internal features and regional groups. Archaeological Journal 126, 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burl, H.A.W. 2000. The Stone Circles of Britain, Ireland and Brittany. New Haven & London: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Caseldine, A.E. & Griffiths, C.J. 2008. The Charred Plant Remains and Charcoal Identification from Dyffryn Lane. Unpublished report deposited with site archiveGoogle Scholar
Cotton, D., Evans, J. & Champion, C. 2008. Geology of the Stone Samples from Dyffryn Lane. Unpublished report deposited with site archiveGoogle Scholar
David, A., Cole, M., Horsley, T.Linford, N., Linford, P. & Martin, L. 2004. A rival to Stonehenge? Geophysical survey at Stanton Drew, England. Antiquity 78, 341–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A.A. & Donahue, R.E. 2008. Microwear Summary Report for Dyffryn Lane. Unpublished report deposited with Site ArchiveGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 1994. Excavation at the Sarn-y-bryn-caled Cursus Complex, Welshpool, Powys, and the Timber Circles of Britain and Ireland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60, 143223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 1995a. The Carreg Bueno prehistoric landscape, Berriew. Montgomeryshire Collections 83, 4158Google Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 1995b. First impressions: a review of Peterborough Ware in Wales. In Kinnes, I. & Varndell, G. (eds), Unbaked Urns of Rudely Shape. Essays on British and Irish Pottery for Ian Longworth, 2340. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 55Google Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 1997. Survey, excavations and palaeo-environmental investigations on Pen y Fan & Corn Du, Brecon Beacons, Powys, 1990–92. Studia Celtica 31, 181Google Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 2000. Survey and excavation at a newly discovered long barrow at Lower Luggy, Berriew, Powys. Studia Celtica 34, 116Google Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 2002. Earlier prehistoric funerary and ritual sites in the upper Severn Valley. Montgomeryshire Collections 90, 140Google Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 2004. Round in circles. Timber circles, henges and stone circles: some possible relationships and transformations. In Cleal, R. & Pollard, J. (eds), Monuments and Material Culture. Papers in Honour of an Avebury Archaeologist: Isobel Smith, 7082. Salisbury: Hobnob PressGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 2005. Stonehenge and Timber Circles, (2 edn). Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A.M. 2006 Excavations at a Neolithic enclosure at Lower Luggy, near Welshpool, Powys, Wales. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 72, 163–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A.M., & Kinnes, I. 1997. On the urns of a dilemma: radiocarbon and the Peterborough problem. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16(1), 6572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, H.S. 1980. The Flint Arrowheads of the British Isles. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 75Google Scholar
Green, H.S. 1984. Flint arrowheads: typology and interpretation. Lithics 5, 1939Google Scholar
Green, H.S. 1986. Flint. In Warrilow, Owen & Britnell, 1986, 76–8Google Scholar
Green, H.S. 1994. Flint. In Gibson, 1994, 177–8Google Scholar
Haggarty, A. 1991. Machrie Moor, Arran: recent excavations at two stone circles. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 121, 5194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, A. with Lee, G. 1987. Henge Monuments and Related Sites of Great Britain: Air Photographic Evidence and Catalogue. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 175Google Scholar
Harding, J. 2003. Henge Monuments of the British Isles. Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Healey, E. 1982. The flintwork, in Britnell, , 1982, 173–83Google Scholar
Healy, F. & Harding, J. 2007. A thousand and one things to do with a round barrow. In Last, J. (ed.), Beyond the Grave. New Perspectives on Barrows, 5371. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. & Woodward, A. 1995. Excavations at Meole Brace, 1990 and at Bromfield 1981–1991: Part 1 – a ring ditch and neolithic pit complex at Meole Brace, Shrewsbury. Shropshire History & Archaeology 70, 121Google Scholar
Jones, N.W. 2008. Excavation and Survey at Meusydd Henge, and Timber Circles, Llanrhaeadr-ym-Mochnant, Powys, 2007. Welshpool: Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust, unpublished report 909Google Scholar
Longueville Jones, H. 1857. Maen Bueno. Archaeologia Cambrensis 3, 299301Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 1998. Double entrance henges – routes to the past? In Gibson, A. & Simpson, D. (eds), Prehistoric Ritual and Religion, 1431. Stroud: SuttonGoogle Scholar
Loveday, R. 1999. Dorchester-on-Thames – ritual complex or ritual landscape? In Barclay, A. & Harding, J. (eds), Pathways and Ceremonies. The Cursus Monuments of Britain and Ireland, 4966. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Loveday, R. 2004. Contextualising monuments. The exceptional potential of the middle Trent Valley. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 124, 112Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 2006. Inscribed Across the Landscape. The Cursus Enigma. Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Lynch, F. & Musson, C. 2004. A prehistoric and early medieval complex at Llandegai, near Bangor, North Wales. Archaeologia Cambrensis 150 (2001), 17142Google Scholar
Mainland, I. 2008. The Faunal Remains from the Excavations at Dyffryn Lane. Unpublished report deposited with site archiveGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, J. 2008. Dyffryn Lane: Soil Micromorphology. Unpublished report deposited with site archiveGoogle Scholar
Mercer, R.J. 1981. The excavation of a Late Neolithic henge-type enclosure at Balfarg, Markinch, Fife, Scotland, 1977–78. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 111, 63171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, W.R.G. & Williams, J.H. 1975. A later Neolithic site at Ecton, Northampton. Northamptonshire Archaeology 10, 3Google Scholar
Needham, S., Parfitt, K & Varndell, G. 2006. The Ringlemere Cup: precious cups and the beginning of the Channel Bronze Age. London: British MuseumGoogle Scholar
Phillips Lewis, D. 1857. Tumulus at Berriew, Montgomeryshire. Archaeologia Cambrensis 3, 296–9Google Scholar
Phillips, T., Hampshire-Monk, I. & Abramson, P. 2006. The excavation and reconstruction of the recumbant stone circle at Strichen, Aberdeenshire, 1979–82. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 136, 111–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S. 1950. The excavations at Cairnpapple Hill, West Lothian, 1947–48. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 87, 68123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J. 1992. The Sanctuary, Overton Hill, Wiltshire: a re-examination. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 213–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RCAHMW, 1911. An Inventory of the Ancient Monuments in Wales and Monmouthshire. I – County of Montgomeryshire. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. 1991. Stonehenge. London: English HeritageGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J.N.G. 1976. The Stones of Stennes, Orkney. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 107, 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A. 1992. Pagan Celtic Britain. London: ConstableGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.G. 1991. Buckbean Pond: the environmental evidence. In Musson, C.R., The Breiddin Hillfort: a later prehistoric settlement in the Welsh Marches, 95. York: Council for British ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Šoberl, L. & Evershed, R.P. 2008. Organic Residue Analysis of Pottery from Dyffryn Lane, Powys. Upublished report deposited with site archiveGoogle Scholar
Vince, A. 2008. Thin-section Analysis of Peterborough Ware from Dyffryn Lane, Powys. Unpublished report deposited with site archiveGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. 1979. Mount Pleasant, Dorset: Excavations 1970–1971. London: Report of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. 2000. Keeping out the Otherworld: the internal ditch at Navan and other Iron Age ‘hengiform’ enclosures. Emania 18, 3944Google Scholar
Webster, J. 1995. Sanctuaries and sacred places. In Green, M.J. (ed.), The Celtic World, 445–64. London & New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar