Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T18:16:47.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Craniology and the Adoption of the Three-Age System in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Michael A. Morse
Michael A. Morse
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59th Street, Chicago IL 60637, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The development of the three-age system in Scandinavia has been of great interest to historians of archaeology, but the system's spread to the British Isles has received little attention, leaving a false impression that its importance has always derived from the revolutionary methodology of C.J. Thomsen. It was not Thomsen's method of putting artefacts in a chronological series, however, that first appealed to British researchers in the mid 19th century. Instead, early British researchers, working mainly in the science of ethnology, used the system to establish a sequence of races for Britain's past based on cranial types. This initial use of the three-age system as a means of creating a racial sequence left a mark on British archaeology that outlasted even the craniological ethnology that formed its first scholarly context.

Résumé

Le développement du système des trois âges en Scandinvie a suscité l'intérêt des historiens de l'archéologie, mais l'extension du système aux îles britanniques n'a reçu que peu d'attention, donnant la fausse impression que son importance était toujours venue de la méthodologie révolutionnaire de C.J.Thomsen. Ce n'est cependant pas la méthode de Thomsen de classer les objets fabriqués en une serie chronologique qui a attiré les chercheurs britanniques en premier lieu au milieu du 19ème siècle. A la place, les premiers chercheurs britanniques, qui travaillaient surtout dans le domaine de l'ethnologie, ont utilisé le système pour établir une séquence de races pour le passé de la Grande-Bretagne basée sur les types crâniens. Cette utilisation initiale du système des trois âges comme moyen d'établir une séquence raciale a laissé sa marque sur l'archéologie britannique et a même survécu à l'ethnologie des crânes qui avait constitué son premier contexte érudit.

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl die Entwicklung des Drei-Perioden-Systems in Skandinavien für die Historiker der Archäologie von großem Interesse gewesen ist, hat die Verbreitung des Systems auf den Britischen Inseln wenig Aufmerksamkeit gefunden, und dabei sogar den falschen Eindruck hinterlassen, dass seine Bedeutung immer nur von der revolutionären Methodologie von C.J. Thomsen herrührt. Es war nicht die Methode Thomsens, Artefakte in eine chronologische Reihe zu bringen, die britische Forscher in der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts für sich einnahm. Vielmehr benutzten britische Forscher, die hauptsächlich in der Ethnologie arbeiteten, das System, um eine Abfolge von Rassen auf der Grundlage von Schädeltypen für Großbritanniens Vergangenheit zu erstellen. Dieser anfängliche Gebrauch des Drei-Perioden-Systems zur Aufstellung einer rassischen Sequenz hat tiefe Spuren in der britischen Archäologie hinterlassen, die sogar die kraniologische Ethnologie, die deren ersten wissenschaft¬lichen Kontext formte, überdauert hat.

Résumen

El desarrolo del Sistema de las Tres Edades en Escandinavia ha sido de gran interés para los historiadores de la arqueología, pero la divulgación del sistema a las Islas Británicas ha recibido poca atención, creando la falsa impresión de que su importancia se deriva de la metodología revolucionaria empleada por C.J. Thomsen. Sin embargo, no fue el método de Thomsen para poner los artefactos en orden cronológico lo que atrajo inicialmente a los investigadores británicos de mitad del siglo diecinueve. Más bien, los investigadores británicos, que trabajaban principalmente en el campo de la ciencia etnológica, usaron el sistema para establecer una secuencia de razas en el pasado de Gran Bretaña basada en tipos de cráneo. El uso inicial del Sistema de las Tres Edades como un medio para crear una secuencia racial dejó una marca en la arqueología británica que sobrevivió incluso la etnología craneal que constituyó su primer contexto académico.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 65 , 1999 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1999

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, J. 1883. Scotland in Pagan Times: The Iron Age. Edinburgh: David Douglas.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. 1886. Scotland in Pagan Times: the Bronze and Stone Ages. Edinburgh: David Douglas.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1848. Proceedings of the annual meeting. Journal of the British Archaeological Association 3, 155.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1850. ‘Inquiry into the evidence of the existence of primitive races in Scotland prior to the Celtae’ by Mr.Wilson, D.. Athenaeum Aug. 24 (1191), 907–8.Google Scholar
Ash, M. 1981. ‘A fine, genial, hearty band‘: David Laing, Daniel Wilson and Scottish archaeology. In Bell, A.S. (ed.), The Scottish Antiquarian Tradition: essays to mark the bicentenary of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland and its museum, 1780–1980, 86–113. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1848. Vestiges of the Antiquities of Derbyshire and the Sepulchral Usages of Its Inhabitants from the Most Remote Ages to the Reformation. London: J.R. Smith.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1855. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Antiquities and Miscellaneous Objects Preserved in the Museum of Thomas Bateman at Lomberdale House, Derbyshire. Bakewell.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1861. Ten Years' Diggings in Celtic and Saxon Grave Hills, in the Counties of Derby, Stafford, and York, from 1848 to 1858. London: J.R. Smith.Google Scholar
Beddoe, J. 1855. On the ancient and modern ethnography of Scotland. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 1, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddoe, J. 1885. The Races of Britain: a contribution to the anthropology of Western Europe. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Bibby, G. 1956. The Testimony of the Spade. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Combe, G. 1843. A System of Phrenology, vol. 2, 5 edn. Edinburgh: MacLachlan Stewart.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. 1989. Phrenology in the British Isles: an annotated, historical bibliography and index. Metuchen & London: Scarecrow PressGoogle Scholar
Croker, T.C. 1847. Antiquities discovered in Orkney, the Hebrides, and Ireland, compared. Journal of the British Archaeological Association 2, 328–33.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. 1950. A Hundred Years of Archaeology. London: Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.B. 1855. On the forms of the crania of the ancient Britons. Report of the Twenty-Fourth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 127–8.Google Scholar
Davis, J.B. 1856. On some of the bearings of ethnology upon archaeological science. Archaeological Journal 13, 315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.B., & Thurnam, J. 1865. Crania Britannica, 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. Boyd. 1880. Early Man in Britain and His Place in the Tertiary Period. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dorson, R.M. 1968. The British Folklorists: a history. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Du Noyer, G.V. 1847. On the classification of bronze celts. Archaeological Journal 4, 1–6.Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1956. A History of the Society of Antiquaries. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1864. The Coins of the Ancient Britons. London: J. R. Smith.Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1872. The Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1881. The Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Goyder, D.G. (ed.). 1845. The Phrenological Almanac and Psychological Annual. Glasgow: Goyder.Google Scholar
Gräslund, B. 1987. The Birth of Prehistoric Chronology: Dating Methods and Dating Systems in Nineteenth-Century Scandinavian Archaeology. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Grayson, D.K. 1983. The Establishment of Human Antiquity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenwell, W. 1877. British Barrows: A Record of the Examination of Sepulchral Mounds in Various Parts of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. Colt. 1812. The Ancient History of Wiltshire, vol. 1. London: William Miller.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. Colt. 1821. The Ancient History of Wiltshire, vol. 2. London: Lackington & Co.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, T. 1850. Obituary of Dr. Prichard. Journal of the Ethnological Society of London 2, 182–207.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. 1868. Knox on the Celtic race. Anthropological Review 6, 175–91.Google Scholar
King, R. 1850. Address to the Ethnological Society of London. Journal of the Ethnological Society of London 2, 9–40.Google Scholar
Klindt-Jensen, O. 1975. A History of Scandinavian Archaeology. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Knox, R. 1850. The Races of Men: a fragment. London: Renshaw.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1865. Pre-Historic Times, As Illustrated by Ancient Remains, and the Manners and Customs of Modern Savages. London and Edinburgh: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Marsden, B.M. 1983. Pioneers of Prehistory: leaders and landmarks in English archaeology (1500–1900). Lancashire: Hesketh.Google Scholar
Massin, B. 1996. From Virchow to Fischer: Physical anthropology and ‘modern race theories’ in Wilhelmine Germany. In Stocking, G.W. Jr, (ed.), Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: essays on Boasian ethnography and the German anthropological tradition, 79–154. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S. 1838–1843. Skandinaviska Hardens Ur-invånare, ett försök i komparativa ethnografien och ett bidrag till menniskoslägtets utvecklings-historia. Lund.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S. 1848. On the primitive inhabitants of Scandinavia. Report of the Seventeenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 31–2. Trans. Shaw, Norton.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S. 1868. The Primitive Inhabitants of Scandinavia, 3 edn. Lubbock, J. (ed.). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Prestwich, J. 1860. On the occurrence of flint-implements, associated with the remains of extinct mammalia, in undisturbed beds of a late geological period. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 10, 50–9.Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C., 1813. Researches into the Physical History of Man. London: Arch.Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C. 1826. Researches into the Physical History of Mankind, 2 edn, 2 vols. London: Arch.Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C. 1841. Researches into the Physical History of Mankind, vol. 3: Containing researches into the history of the European nations, 3 edn. London: Sherwood & Co.Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C. 1843. The Natural History of Man. London: Bailliere.Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C. 1844. On the crania of the Laplanders and Finlanders. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 12, 129–35.Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C. 1848. On the various methods of research which contribute to the advancement of ethnology, and the relations of that science to other branches of knowledge. Report of the Seventeenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 230–53.Google Scholar
Retzius, A. 1847. On the ethnographical distribution of round and elongated crania. Report of the Sixteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 116.Google Scholar
Richards, E. 1989. The ‘moral anatomy’ of Robert Knox: The interplay between biological and social thought in Victorian scientific naturalism. Journal of the History of Biology 22(3), 373–436.Google Scholar
Rolleston, G. 1877. General remarks upon the series of prehistoric crania. In Greenwell, W., British Barrows: a record of the examination of sepulchral mounds in various parts of England, 557–750. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries. 1836. Report Addressed by the Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries to Its British and American Members. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries. 1848. Guide to Northern Archaeology. Earl of Ellesmere (ed.). London: Bain.Google Scholar
Stepan, N. 1982. The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain 1800–1960. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocking, G.W. Jr., 1973. From chronology to ethnology: James Cowles Prichard and British anthropology. In Stocking, G.W. Jr, (ed.), Researches into the Physical History of Man, ix–cx. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, G.W. Jr., 1987. Victorian Anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Thoms, W.J. 1846. Review of Danemark's Vorzeit Durch Altherthumer und Grabhugel Beleuchtet von J.J.A. Worsaae 1844. Archaeological Journal 2, 291–2.Google Scholar
Thomsen, C.J. 1836. Ledetraad til Nordisk Oldkyndighed. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Thurnam, J. 1850. On Danish tumuli, and importance of preserving crania found in tumuli. Archaeological Journal 7, 34–5.Google Scholar
Thurnam, J. 1865. On the two principal forms of ancient British and Gaulish skulls. Memoirs Read Before the Anthropological Society of London 1, 120–68, 459–519.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Urry, J. 1984. Englishmen, Celts, and Iberians: The ethnographic survey of the United Kingdom, 1892–1899. In Stocking, G.W. Jr, (ed.), Functionalism Historicized: essays on British social anthropology, 83–105. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Van Riper, A.B. 1993. Men among the Mammoths: Victorian science and the discovery of human prehistory. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, W.R. 1840. Narrative of a Voyage to Madeira, Teneriffe, and along the Shores of the Mediterranean, Including a Visit to Algiers, Egypt, Palestine, Tyre, Rhodes, Telmessus, Cyprus, and Greece. Dublin: Curry & Co.Google Scholar
Wilde, W.R 1844. The ethnology of the ancient Irish. Dublin Literary Journal 2, 231-4, 247–51.Google Scholar
Wilde, W.R. 1849. The Beauties of the Boyne, and its Tributary, the Blackwater. Dublin: McGlashan.Google Scholar
Wilde, W.R. 1857. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Antiquities of Stone, Earthen, and Vegetable Materials, in the Museum of the Royal Irish Academy. Dublin: Gill.Google Scholar
Wilde, W.R. 1861. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Antiquities of Animal Materials and Bronze in the Museum of the Royal Irish Academy. Dublin: Hodges & Co.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. 1961. Worsaae and British antiquities. Antiquity 35, 214–20.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1849. Synopsis of the Museum of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1851a. The Archaeology and Prehistoric Annals of Scotland. Edinburgh: Sutherland & Knox.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1851b. Inquiry into the evidence of the existence of primitive races in Scotland prior to the Celtae. Report of the Twentieth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 142–6.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1863. Prehistoric Annals of Scotland, 2 edn, 2 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1865. Inquiry into the physical characteristics of the ancient and modern Celt of Gaul and Britain. Anthropological Review 3, 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worsaae, J.J.A. 1843. Danmarks Oldtid oplyst ved Oldsager og Gravhøie. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Worsaae, J.J.A. 1847a. An account of the formation of the museum at Copenhagen, and general remarks on the classification of antiquities found in the North and West of Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 3, 310–15, 327–44.Google Scholar
Worsaae, J.J.A. 1847b. A few remarks upon the antiquities of silver found at Cuerdale. Archaeological Journal 4, 200–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worsaae, J.J.A. 1849. The Primeval Antiquities of Denmark. London: Parker. Trans. Thoms, W.J..Google Scholar
Wright, T. 1852. The Celt, the Roman, and the Saxon: a history of the early inhabitants of Britain, down to the conversion of the Anglo-Saxons to Christianity. London: Hall & Co.Google Scholar
Wright, T. 1855. On the early ethnology of Britain. Report of the Twenty-Fourth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 130.Google Scholar