Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T12:00:16.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Characterization of Obsidian and its application to the Mediterranean Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

J. R. Cann  and
Colin Renfrew
J. R. Cann
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge
Colin Renfrew
Affiliation:
St. John's College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Evidence of contact between cultural groups is of great importance to the study of prehistory. Although the development of absolute dating methods has decreased our dependence on the discovery of such contacts for chronology, they are essential material when the origin and spread of culture is being studied. In the past, cultural contacts have generally been demonstrated by typological similarities of artifacts, but unfortunately many typological comparisons are open to discussion, and it can be exceedingly difficult to be certain of direct contact by this means alone.

The importance in this respect of the study of raw materials used in places far from their place of origin and presumably deliberately imported has long been realized. Recently more attention has been paid to the careful characterization of such materials; the detection, that is, of properties of the specimen under study which are characteristic of material from particular sources. By this means it is often possible to assign a source to a given specimen. The petrological identification of British neolithic stone axes is perhaps the most comprehensive archaeological characterization study yet undertaken. Demonstrations of trading links made by such methods, if based on a sure identification and a comprehensive survey of possible sources, are not open to the criticism and doubt which may be directed at typological similarities. The variety of techniques now available for the analysis and identification of materials makes this field a promising one for the archaeologist.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 30 , December 1964 , pp. 111 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, M. J. 1961. Physics and Archaeology.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, R. C. 1904. ‘The Obsidian Trade’, Excavations at Phylakopi in Melos (Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Supplementary Paper IV).Google Scholar
Britton, D. and Richards, E. E. 1963. ‘Optical Emission Spectroscopy and the Study of Metallurgy in the European Bronze Age’, Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. (editors), Science in Archaeology.Google Scholar
Buchner, G. 1949. ‘Richerche sui giacimenti e sulle industrie di ossidiana in Italia I’, Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche, IV (Fasc. 1–2), p. 162.Google Scholar
Burkitt, M. C. 1953. Note in Garstang J., Prehistoric Mersin, p. 26.Google Scholar
Carmichael, I. S. E. 1962. ‘Pantelleritic liquids and their phenocrysts’, Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 33, p. 109.Google Scholar
Cornaggia Castiglioni, O., Fussi, F. and d'Agnolo, M. 1962–1963. ‘Indagini sulla provenienza dell'ossidiana in uso nelle industrie italiane I and II,’ Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale in Milano.Google Scholar
SirEvans, A. 1921. The Palace of Minos, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1927. ‘Studies in Early Pottery of the Near East, Part II: Europe and the Aegean and their Earliest Interrelations’, Royal Anthropological Institute Occasional Paper 8.Google Scholar
Friedmann, I. and Smith, R. L. 1960. ‘The Method of Obsidian Dating’, American Antiquity, vol. 25, p. 476.Google Scholar
Georgiades, A. N. 1956. ‘Récherches sur les obsidiennes de Grèce’, Praktika tis Akademias Athinon, vol. 31, p. 150.Google Scholar
Lucas, A. 1948. Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries, 3rd. ed., p. 473.Google Scholar
Nockolds, S. R. and Allen, R. 1953. ‘The geochemistry of some igneous rock series, I’, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 4, p. 105.Google Scholar
Puxeddu, C. 1957. ‘Giacimenti di ossidiana del Monte Arci in Sardegna e sua irradazione’, Studi Sardi, XIV–XV.Google Scholar
Stone, J. F. S. and Thomas, L. C. 1956. ‘The use and distribution of Faience in the Near East and Prehistoric Europe’, PPS, XXII, p. 37.Google Scholar
Trump, D. 1961. ‘Skorba, Malta and the Mediterranean’, Antiquity, XXXV, p. 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G. A. 1927. ‘Obsidian’, Ancient Egypt (1927), Part III.Google Scholar
Zies, E. G. 1960. ‘Chemical analyses of two pantellerites’, Journal of Petrology, 1, p. 304.Google Scholar