Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:41:43.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Azilian Harpoons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

M. W. Thompson
M. W. Thompson
Affiliation:
Inspectorate of Ancient Monuments, Ministry of Works
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is convenient to begin this study of Azilian harpoons by first considering the Magdalenian harpoons of northern Spain. The two Basque sites of Aitzbitarte, a few miles within the Spanish side of the frontier, and Isturitz, not many miles within the French side of the frontier, are useful in delimiting the Spanish area from the point of view of the fauna. At Aitzbitarte, Harlé (1908) found a great predominance of red deer with one or two odd fragments of reindeer antler, whereas the well-known excavations by St. Périer (1936) at Isturitz showed a great preponderance of reindeer in conformity with other sites in the Pyrenees. The other occurrences in the three east Spanish provinces agree with that at Aitzbitarte (for instance, at Valle, Lorenzo Sierra, 1908, gives the ratio of antler fragments as red deer to reindeer: 73–1). Judged by the fauna, therefore, the modern political frontier corresponds roughly to the limit of the effective penetration of the reindeer westward, and consequently to the line of demarcation between harpoon-heads made respectively from red deer and reindeer antler.

The subdivision of the Magdalenian deposits in north Spain has never been satısfactorily resolved, and they have obstinately refused to conform to the French sequence. The main difficulty has been the lack of stratified sites; only Cueto de la Mina has yielded three layers; and two or three other caves have given two layers. Nevertheless two stages, an earlier one without and a later one with harpoons have been clearly distinguished (Breuil and Obermaier, 1936, 165–70, 192–4). Although no stratigraphical division of this later stage is possible, a number of interesting points arise from a typological study of the known harpoons.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , December 1955 , pp. 193 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Works referred to in the Text

Aranzadi, and Barandiarán, , 1927, Exploraciones prehistoricas en Guipuzcoa 1924–1927.Google Scholar
Aranzadi, and Barandiarán, , 1931 and 1935, Exploratión de la cueva de Santintamiñe.Google Scholar
Aranzadi, and Barandiarán, , 1947, 48, ‘Exploracion de la cueva de Urtiaga,’ Ikuska I, II.Google Scholar
Bergougnioux, and Glory, , Les Premiers Hommes.Google Scholar
Breuil, and Dubalen, , 1901, ‘Fouilles d'un abri à Sordes en 1900,’ Rev. École d'Anth. Paris.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., 1903, ‘Les Fouilles dans la grotte de Mas d'Azil,’ Bull. Arch.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., 1909, ‘L'Évolution de l'Art quaternaire et les travaux d'Edouard Piette,’ Rev. Arch.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., 1924, ‘Harpons aziliens peu connus trouvés en France,’ A.F.A.S., Liège.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., 1925, ‘Quelques trouvailles d'objets inédits du S.O. de la France,’ A.F.A.S., Grenoble.Google Scholar
Breuil, and Obermaier, , 1936, La Cueva de Altamira.Google Scholar
Brueil, H., 1937, Les Subdivisions du PaUolithique superieur et leur Signification.Google Scholar
Carballo, J., 1927, Bostón de Mando prehistórico procedente de la caverna del Pendo.Google Scholar
Carballo, J., y Larin, , 1932, ‘Exploración en la gruta de “El Pendo“,’ Mém. 123 de la Junta Sup. de Exc. y Ant., Madrid.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, and Boule, , 1889, La Grotte de Reilhac.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, E., 1892, ‘Indications bibliographiques pour l'histoire des premières populations des Pyrénées,’ Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse.Google Scholar
Cazedessus, J., 1925, ‘Les Aziliens à Montespan,’ A.F.A.S., Grenoble.Google Scholar
Cendrero, O., 1915, ‘Resumen de los bastones perforados,’ C.I.P.P. Notas. Núm.1.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1952, Prehistoric Europe, The Economic Basis.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1954, Excavations at Star Carr. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ferrier, J., 1946, ‘Le Premier Harpon Azilien en Gironde,’ A.F.A.S., Nice.Google Scholar
Frossard, , 1885, ‘La Grotte de Lourdes,’ Bull. Soc. Ramond.Google Scholar
Galvez-Cañero, , 1911, ‘Cavernas de Vizcaya,’ Bol. Inst. geol. Esp.Google Scholar
Garrigou, F. 1867, ‘Age du renne dans la gotte de la Vache,’ Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse, I.Google Scholar
Harlé, , 1908, ‘Les grottes d'Aitzbitarte.’ Bol. Real Acad. Hist., 52.Google Scholar
Harlé, , 1908, ‘Faune quaternaire de San Sebastien,’ Bull. Soc. Giol. Franç.Google Scholar
Hélena, , 1937, Les Origins de Narbonne.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Pacheco, , ‘La vida de nuestros antecesores paleoliticos,’ C.I.P.P., 31.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. B., 1893, ‘Die Philippines II, Negritos,’ Kon. Etn. Mes. Dresden, IX.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J., 1892, Ethnological Results of the Point Barrow Expedition, 1881–1883. IXth Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst., Washington.Google Scholar
Obermaier, H., 1912, Der Mensch der Vorzeit.Google Scholar
Obermaier, and Breuil, , 1912, ‘Travaux,’ L'Anth. 23.Google Scholar
Obermaier, H., 1916, El Hombre Fosil.Google Scholar
Obermaier, H., 1923, ‘Escultura cuat. de la cueva del Rascaño,’ Bull. Ass. Cat. d'Ant. i Prih., I.Google Scholar
Obermaier, H., 1925, El Hombre Fosil. Second Edition (Text and figures differ from First Edition).Google Scholar
Octobon, , 1927, ‘Notes sur quelques objets inédits des grottes de la region pyrénéen et du Lot,’ Bull. Soc. Préh. Franç.Google Scholar
Patte, E., 1947, ‘La Madeleine,’ Gallia VGoogle Scholar
Péquart, St. P., 1938, ‘Le Mas d'Azil. Aperçu sur son histoire et la préhistoire de la grotte,’ Rev. Lorraine d'Anthropologie.Google Scholar
Péquart, St. P., 1940, ‘Nouvelles fouilles au Mas d'Azil,’ Préhistoire VIII.Google Scholar
Peyrony, D., 1931, ‘L'Azilien périgordien,’ A.F.A.S.Google Scholar
Piette, E., 1874, ‘La grotte de Lorthet pendant l'âge du renne,’ Bull. Soc. Anth. Paris IX (2nd series).Google Scholar
Piette, E., 1875, ‘Sur les nouvelles fouilles dans le grotte de Gourdan,’ Bull. Soc. Anth. Paris, X.Google Scholar
Piette, E., 1889, Les subdivisions de l'époque magdalénienne et néolithique.*Google Scholar
Piette, E., 1895, ‘Études d'ethnographie prèhistorique,’ L'Anth. VI and VII.Google Scholar
Piette, E., 1909, L'Art pendant l'âge du renne.Google Scholar
Regnault, F., 1892, ‘L'abri de la Tourasse à St. Mathory,’ Rev. des Pyrénées III.Google Scholar
Regnault, F., 1894, Les Haltes de chasse et de pêche de l'epoque du renne,’ A.F.A.S. pt. II Caen.Google Scholar
Reid, W. A., 1904, Negritos of Zantales. Manila.Google Scholar
Robert, Nougier, Malvesin-Fabre, , 1950, ‘Le Proto-Azilien de la grotte de la Vache et la génèse du harpon azilien,’ Bull. Soc. Préh. Ariège, V.Google Scholar
Rust, A., 1937, Das Altsteinzeitliche Rentierjägerlager Meiendorf.Google Scholar
Périer, St., 1920a, ‘Grotte des Harpons, Lespugue,’ L'Anth., 30Google Scholar
Périer, St., 1920b, ‘Sur la forme des harpons en bois de cerf,’ Bull. Soc. Préh. Franç.Google Scholar
Périer, St., 1927 ‘Grotte de Gourris à Lespugue, L'Anth., 37.Google Scholar
Périer, St., 1936, ‘La Grotte d'Isturitz, II, La Grande Salle,’ Arch. Inst. Pal. Hum. Mém. 17. Paris.Google Scholar
Schadenberg, A., 1880, ‘Über die Negritos in den Philippinen,’ Zeit. für Ethn., VII.Google Scholar
Sierra, L., 1908, in Ados y Memorias del prim. cong. de den nat. esp., Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Teit, J., 1900, The Thompson Indians of British Columbia. Jessup Exp. I, Mem. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., II.Google Scholar
Tschumi, O., Urgeschichte der Schweiz. Frauenfeld.Google Scholar
Vaillant-Couturier, , 1928, ‘La grotte azilien du Trou Violet a Montardit,’ L'Anth., 38.Google Scholar
de la Vega del Sella, Conde, 1916, ‘Pal. de Cueto de la Mina,’ C.I.P.P. 13.Google Scholar
de la Vega del Sella, Conde, 1921, ‘El Pal. de Cueva Morín,’ C.I.P.P. 29.Google Scholar
de la Vega del Sella, Conde, 1930, ‘Las cuevas de la Riera y Balmorí,’ C.I.P.P., 38.Google Scholar
Viré, and Teulière, , 1927, ‘La Grotte Batie (Crozo-Bastido) à Saint Sosy (Lot),’ L'Anth., 37.Google Scholar