Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:12:45.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal Alteration in Mesolithic Assemblages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

T. Douglas Price ,
Sylvia Chappell  and
David J. Ives
T. Douglas Price
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin — Madison
Sylvia Chappell
Affiliation:
Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan
David J. Ives
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental, analytical, and archaeological evidence is presented to describe the characteristics of thermal alteration in mesolithic assemblages from the northern Netherlands. Experiments, both in the field and in the laboratory, have established the sequence of changes that occur when flint is subjected to heat. Analytical techniques involving the scanning electron microscope and thermoluminescence analysis are used in an attempt to recognize thermal pretreatment and to define the stages in manufacturing in which it was used. The proportions and spatial distributions of thermally-altered artefacts are employed to compare archaeological assemblages and to locate heat sources on occupation floors. In spite of high incidence of heat alteration in the assemblages, there is no conclusive evidence for intentional thermal pretreatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , 1982 , pp. 467 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, D. C., 1971. ‘Notes on Tongue River silicified sediments’, Newsletter of the Northwest Chapter of the Iowa Archaeological Society 19(5), 4–5.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. G., 1979. ‘Prehistoric selection for intentional thermal alteration: tests of a model employing southeastern archaeological materials’, Midcontinent Jouurnal of Archaeology 5, 221–54.Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1969. ‘Traitment thermiquede silex au Solutréen’, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 67, 157.Google Scholar
Collins, M. B., 1973. ‘Observations on thermal treatment of chert in the Solutrean of Laugerie Haute, France’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 39, 461–66.Google Scholar
Collins, M. B. and Fenwick, J. M., 1974. ‘Heat treating of chert: methods of interpretation and their application’, Plains Anthropologist 19, 134–45.Google Scholar
Crabtree, D. E., 1972 An Introduction to Flintworking. Occasional Papers of the Idaho State University Museum 28. Pocatello, Idaho.Google Scholar
Crabtree, D. E. and Butler, B. R., 1964. ‘Notes on experiments in flint knapping: I, Heat treatment of silica materials’, Tebiwa 7(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
Fagg, B. E. B. and Fleming, S. J., 1970. ‘Thermoluminescent dating of a terracotta of the Nok Culture, Nigeria’, Archaeometry 12, 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitting, J. E., Devisscher, J., and Wahla, E. J., 1966. The Palaeo-Indian Occupation of the Holcombe Beach. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Anthropology Papers 27. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Fleming, S. J. and Roberts, H. S., 1970. ‘Thermoluminescence authenticity testing of a Pontic amphora’, Archaeometry 12, 129–315.Google Scholar
Fleming, S. J., Moss, H. M., and Joseph, A., 1970. ‘Thermoluminescence authenticity testing of some “Six Dynasties” figures’, Archaeometry 12, 57–65.Google Scholar
Göksu, H. Y. and Fremlin, J. H., 1972. ‘Thermoluminescence from unirradiated flints: regeneration thermoluminescence’, Archaeometry 14, 127–32.Google Scholar
Göksu, H. Y., Fremlin, J. H., Irwin, H. T., and Fryxell, R., 1974. ‘Age determination of burned flint by a thermoluminescent method’, Science 183, 651–54.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. L. and Grybush, R. J., 1976. ‘Thermally altered siliceous stone from prehistoric contexts: unintentional vs. intentional alteration’, American Antiquity 411, 189–92.Google Scholar
Hester, T., 1972. ‘Ethnographic evidence for the thermal alteration of siliceous stone’, Tebiwa 15, 63–65.Google Scholar
Hester, T. R. and Heizer, R. F., 1973. ‘Bibliography of Archaeology I: experiments, lithic technology, and petrography’, Addison-Wesley Module in Anthropology 29.Google Scholar
Huxtable, J., Aitken, M. J. and Weber, J.C., 1972. ‘Thermoluminescence dating of baked clay balls of the Poverty Point Culture’, Archaeometry 14, 269–75.Google Scholar
Irwin-Williams, C. and Irwin, H. J., 1966. ‘Excavations at Magic Mountain’, Proceedings 12, Denver Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A.J., 1965. ‘Lithic technology conference, Les Eyzies, France’, American Antiquity 31, 277–79.Google Scholar
Kneller, W. A., Kriege, H. F., Saxer, E. L., Wilband, J. T., and Rohrbacher, T. J., 1968. The Properties and Recognition of Deleterious Cherts Used by Ohio Concrete Producers. University of Toledo Research Foundation. Toledo, Ohio.Google Scholar
Mandeville, M. D., 1973. ‘A consideration of the thermal pretreatment of chert’, Plains Anthropologist 18, 177–202.Google Scholar
Mandeville, M. D. and Flenniken, J. J., 1974. ‘Newhaka Chert before and after thermal pretreatment’, Plains Anthropologist 19, 146–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, G. F., 1968. Debert: A Paleo-Indian Site. Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Canada 16. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Melcer, C. L. and Zimmerman, D. W., 1977. ‘Thermoluminescent determination of prehistoric heat treatment of chert artifacts’, Science 197, 1359–62.Google Scholar
Price, T. D., Whallon, R. Jr, and Chappell, S., 1974. ‘Mesolithic sites near Havelte, province of Drenthe (Netherlands)’, Palaeohistoria 16, 7–61.Google Scholar
Purdy, B. A., 1974. ‘Investigations concerning the thermal alteration of silica materials: an archaeological approach’, Tebiwa 17, 37–66.Google Scholar
Purdy, B. A. and Brooks, H. K., 1971. ‘Thermal alteration of silica materials’, Science 173, 322–25.Google Scholar
Rick, J. W., 1978. ‘Heat-altered cherts of the Lower Illinois Valley. An experimental study in prehistoric technology’, Prehistoric Records 2, Northwestern University Archaeological Programme.Google Scholar
Robins, G. V., Seeley, N. J., Symons, M. C. R., and MacNeil, D. A. C., 1981. ‘Manganese (11) as an indicator of ancient heat treatment in flint’, Archaeometry 23, 103–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, R. M., Mandeville, M. D., and Zeller, E. J., 1974. ‘The interpretation and dating of humanly worked siliceous materials by thermoluminescent analysis’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., 40, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, A. O., 1968. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Publication 609. Carnegie Institute of Washington.Google Scholar
Shippee, J. M., 1963. ‘Was flint annealed before flaking?’, Plains Anthropologist 8, 271–72.Google Scholar
White, A. M., 1968. The Lithic Industries of the Illinois Valley in the Early and Middle Woodland Period. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Anthropological papers 25. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Wintle, A. G. and Oakley, K. P., 1972. ‘Thermoluminescent dating of fired rock-crystal from Bellan Bandi Palassa, Ceylon’, Archaeometry 14, 277–79.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. W., 1971. ‘Thermoluminescent dating using fine grains from pottery’, Archaeometry 13, 29–52.Google Scholar