Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:41:23.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at a Neolithic Cursus, Springfield, Essex, 1979–85

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

D. G. Buckley ,
J. D. Hedges ,
N. Brown ,
E. Healey ,
L. Hurcombe ,
M. Kelly ,
H. Major ,
B. Milton ,
P. Murphy  and
T. P. O'Connor
...Show all authors
D. G. Buckley
Affiliation:
Heritage Conservation, Essex County Council, County Hall, Chelmsford CM1 1QH
J. D. Hedges
Affiliation:
Laurel Bank, Stocks Lane, Halifax
N. Brown
Affiliation:
Heritage Conservation, Essex County Council, County Hall, Chelmsford CM1 1QH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A long cropmark enclosure at Springfield, Essex, interpreted as a Neolithic cursus, was investigated betwee 1979–85 to confirm its date and establish a site sequence. The enclosure was c. 690 m long and 37–49 m wide the ditch being uninterrupted in all areas examined, features within the interior at the eastern end included a incomplete ring of substantial post-pits which it is suggested originally formed a complete circle. Peterborou pottery, predominately Mortlake style, Grooved Ware, a small amount of Beaker pottery, earlier Bronze Age urn sherds, and flint artefacts of the late 3rd-early 2nd millennium were recovered from the cursus ditch an other features. Collectively the evidence indicates a prolonged period of use. The results of the excavations a described, the site is discussed in its local and regional context and the implications of the excavation for our understanding of cursus monuments are considered.

Résumé

A Springfield, Essex, un long enclos décelable grâce aux cultures et identifié comme étant une allée empierrée du Néolothique a été étudié entre 1979 et 1985 pour en confirmer la date et établir une séquence d'occupation du site. L'enclos mesurait environ 690 m. de long et entre 37 et 49 m. de large, le fossé était ininterrompu dans toutes les zones étudiées. Parmi les vestiges découverts à l'intérieur on compte, à l'extrémité est, un anneau incomplet de trous de poteaux substantiels qui, suggère-t-on, formait à l'origine un cercle complet. De la poterie de Peterborough, essentiellement des vases rubanés de style Mortlake, une petite quantité de poterie des peuples à vases, des tessons d'urne datant du début de l'âge du bronze, et des objets manufacturés en silex de la fin du 3ème et du début du 2ème millénaire ont été récupérés dans le fossé de l'enclos et à d'autres endroits. Collectivement, ces vestiges témoignent d'une période d'occupation prolongée. On décrit les résultats des fouilles, on détermine l'importance du site dans le contexte local et régional et on considère les implications de ces fouilles pour notre compréhension des enceintes à allées empiérrées.

Zusammenfassung

Zwischen 1979 und 1985 wurde eine längliche Erntemarkierungsumfassung in Springfield, Essex, die bereits als neolithische Kreisgrabenanlage interpretiert worden war, untersucht. Dabei sollte zum einen die Datierung sichergestellt und zum anderen die genaue Abfolge festgelegt werden. Die Umfassung war circa 690 m lang und 37-49 m breit, und der Graben war in allen untersuchten Bereichen nicht unterbrochen. Am inneren östlichen Ende der Anlage fanden sich Strukturen eines unvollständigen Rings von umfangreichen Pfostengruben, die ursprünglich wahrscheinlich einen kompletten Kreis gebildet haben. Im und beim Kreisgraben konnten Peterborough Keramik, vornehmlich im Mortlake Stil, Rillenverzierte Ware, eine kleine Anzahl Glockenbecher Keramik, Urnenscherben aus der frühen Bronzezeit, und Silex Artefakte des späten 3. bis frühen 2. Jahrtausends geborgen werden. Alle diese Nachweise sprechen für eine ausgedehnte zeitliche Nutzung der Anlage. Weiterhin werden die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen beschrieben, die Fundstelle in ihrem lokalen und regionalen Kontext diskutiert und die Bedeutung dieser Ausgrabungen für unser Verständnis der Kreisgrabenanlagen herausgestellt.

Resúmen

Entre 1979 y 1985 se procedió a la investigación de una marca agrícola de gran extensión en Springfield, Essex, interpretada como un cursus neolítico, con el fin de confirmar su datación y establecer una secuencia para el yacimiento. El recinto medía aproximadamente 690 m de largo y 37-49 m de ancho, con una zanja continua en todas las zonas examinadas. En la zona este, los hallazgos en su interior incluyen un círculo de hoyos incompleto. En este trabajo sugerimos que originariamente este círculo fue un círculo completo. De la zanja del cursus y de los otros contextos se recobró cerámica Peterborough, predominantemente del estilo Mortlake, cerámica del tipo “Grooved Ware”, pequeñas cantidades de cerámica campaniforme, restos de urnas de la Primera Edad del Bronce, y útiles de sílex de finales del tercer o principios del segundo milenio aC. El conjunto de la evidencia indica un largo periodo de utilización del yacimiento. Este trabajo describe los resultados de las excavaciones, considera el sito en su contexto regional y local junto con las implicaciones de la excavación para nuestra comprensión de monumentos del tipo cursus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 67 , 2001 , pp. 101 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ainslie, R. & Wallis, J. 1987. Excavations on the Cursus at Drayton, Oxon. Oxoniensia 52, 1–9Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. & Preston, S. forthcoming. Prehistoric settlement and burials at Elms Farm, Essex. Essex Archaeology & HistoryGoogle Scholar
Barclay, A. & Bayliss, A. 1999. Cursus monuments and the radiocarbon problem. In Barclay, & Harding, (eds) 1999, 11–29Google Scholar
Barclay, A. & Harding, J. 1999. Pathways and Ceremonies: the cursus monuments of Britain and Ireland. Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Paper 4Google Scholar
Barclay, A. & Hey, G. 1999. Cattle, cursus monuments and the river: the development of ritual and domestic landscapes in the Upper Thames Valley. In Barclay, & Harding, (eds) 1999, 67–76Google Scholar
Barclay, G.J. & Maxwell, G.S. 1998. The Cleaven Dyke and Littletour: Monuments in the Neolithic of Tayside. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph 13Google Scholar
Barrett, J., Bradley, R. & Green, M. 1991. Landscape, Society and Monuments: the prehistory of Cranborne Chase. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, C.A. & Newcomer, M.H. 1983. Flint arrowhead breakage: examples from Ksar Akil, Lebanon. Journal of Field Archaeology 10, 238–43Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1992. The excavation of an oval barrow beside the Abingdon causewayed enclosure, Oxfordshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 127–42Google Scholar
Bradley, R. & Gardiner, J. (eds) 1984. Neolithic Studies. A Review of some Current Research. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R, & Holgate, R. 1984. The Neolithic sequence in the Upper Thames Valley. In Bradley, R. & Gardiner, (eds) 1984, 107–34Google Scholar
Brown, A.G. & Edmonds, M.R. (eds). 1987. Lithic Analysis and Later British Prehistory. Some Problems and Approaches. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. 1987. Prehistoric pottery. In Milton, B., Excavations at Bovington's Farm, Orsett Cock, Thurrock, Essex 1983. Essex Archaeology and History 18, 16–33Google Scholar
Brown, N. 1988. A Late Bronze Age Enclosure at Lofts Farm. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 54, 249–302Google Scholar
Brown, N. 1995. Ardleigh reconsidered: Deverel-Rimbury pottery in Essex. In Kinnes, I. & Varndell, G. (eds), ‘Unbaked Urns of Rudely Shape’: essays on British and Irish Pottery. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 55, 123–44Google Scholar
Brown, N. 1996. The archaeology of Essex c. 1500-500 EC. In Bedwin, O. (ed.). The Archaeology of Essex: Proceedings of the Writtle Conference 23, 98–113Google Scholar
Brown, N. 1997. A landscape of two halves: the Neolithic of the Chelmer valley/Blackwater estuary, Essex. In Topping, P. (ed.), Neolithic Landscapes, 87–98. London: Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Paper 2Google Scholar
Brown, N. 1999. The Archaeology of Ardleigh, Essex: excavations 1955-1980. Chelmsford: East Anglian Archaeology 90Google Scholar
Brown, N. & Glazebrook, J. (eds). 2000. Research and Archaeology: a framework for the Eastern Counties 2: Research Agenda and Strategy. East Anglian Occasional Paper 8Google Scholar
Brown, N. & Lavender, N. 1994. Later Bronze Age sites at Great Baddow and settlement in the Chelmer valley, 1500-500 BC. Essex Archaeology & History 25, 3–13Google Scholar
Buckley, D.G. 1986. Springfield Lyons excavations: the prehistoric periods. Essex Journal 21(3), 57–60Google Scholar
Buckley, D.G. 1991. Springfield, Springfield Lyons. In Gilman, P. (ed.), Excavations in Essex 1990. Essex Archaeology & History 22, 157Google Scholar
Buckley, D.G. 1992. Springfield Lyons. In Gilman, P. (ed.), Archaeology in Essex 1991. Essex Archaeology & History 23, 98–113Google Scholar
Buckley, D.G. & Hedges, J.D. 1987. The Bronze Age and Saxon Settlements at Springfield Lyons: an interim report. Essex County Council Occasional Paper 5Google Scholar
Buckley, D.G., Major, H. & Milton, B. 1988. Excavation of a possible Neolithic long barrow or mortuary enclosure at Rivenhall, Essex 1986. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 54, 77–91Google Scholar
Care, V. 1979. The production and distribution of Mesolithic axes in southern England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 45, 93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Care, V. 1982. The collection and distribution of lithic materials during the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods in southern England. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 1(3), 269–85Google Scholar
Catt, J.A. 1978. The contribution of loess to soils in lowland Britain. In Limbrey, S. & Evans, J.G. (eds), The Effect of Man on the Landscape, the Lowland Zone, 12–20. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 21Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D., Higgs, E.S. & Longworth, I.H. 1960. Excavations at the Neolithic site at Hurst Fen, Mildenhall, Suffolk, 1954, 1957 and 1958. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 26, 202–45Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L. 1970. Beaker Pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Cleal, R. 1984. The later Neolithic in eastern England. In Bradley, & Gardiner, (eds) 1984, 135–58Google Scholar
Cleal, R. 1992. Pottery and fired clay. In Bradley, R., Chowne, P., Cleal, R.M.J., Healy, F. & Kinnes, I., Excavations on Redgate Hill, Hunstanton, Norfolk, and at Tattershall Thorpe, Lincolnshire, 40-60, Dereham: East Anglian Archaeology 57Google Scholar
Coles, B. 1998. Wood species for wooden figures: a glimpse of a pattern. In Gibson, A. & Simpson, D. (eds), Prehistoric Ritual and Religion, 163–73Google Scholar
Corbett, W.M. & Tatler, W. 1974. Soils in Norfolk II: Sheets TG 13/14 (Barningham/Sherringham). Harpenden: Soil Survey 21Google Scholar
Darvill, T. & Foulton, A. 1998. The Monuments at Risk Survey of England 1995: Main Report. London: English HeritageGoogle Scholar
Dunning, G.C. 1933. Neolithic and Bronze Age pottery from Danbury, Essex. Antiquaries Journal 13, 59–62Google Scholar
Evans, C., Pollard, J. & Knight, M. 1999. Life in woods: tree-throws, ‘Settlement’ and forest cognition. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18(3), 241–54Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. 1984. Lithic distribution and Neolithic settlement patterns in central southern England. In Bradley, & Gardiner, (eds) 1984, 15–40Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. 1985. Intrasite patterning in the flint assemblage from the Dorset Cursus 1984. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History & Archaeological Society 107, 87–93Google Scholar
Germany, M. forthcoming. Excavations at Great Holts Boreham, Essex, 1992–1996. East Anglian ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A. 1982. Beaker Domestic Sites. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 107Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 1994. Excavations at the Sarn-y-bryn-caled cursus complex, Welshpool, Powys, and the timber circles of Great Britain and Ireland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60, 143–224Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 1995. First impressions: a review of Peterborough Ware in Wales. In Kinnes, I. & Varndell, G. (eds), ‘Unbaked urns of Rudely Shape’: essays on British and Irish Pottery for Ian Longworth. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 55, 23–40Google Scholar
Gibson, A. & Kinnes, I. 1997. On the urns of a dilemma: radiocarbon and the Peterborough problem. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16, 65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazebrook, J. 1997. Research and Archaeology: a framework for the eastern Counties 1 Agenda. East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper 3Google Scholar
Green, H.S. 1980. The Flint Arrowheads of the British Isles. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 74Google Scholar
Green, H.S. 1984. Flint arrowheads: typology and interpretation. Lithics 5, 19–39Google Scholar
Grimes, W.F. 1960. Neolithic pits at Heathrow, Harmondsworth, Middlesex. In Excavations on Defence Sites, 1939-1945 1: Mainly Neolithic-Bronze Age, 186–98Google Scholar
Harding, J. & Barclay, A. 1999. An introduction to the cursus monuments of Neolithic Britain and Ireland. In Barclay, & Harding, (eds) 1999, 1–8Google Scholar
Healey, E. & Robertson-Mackay, R. 1983. The lithic industries from Staines Causewayed Enclosure and their relationship to other earlier Neolithic industries in southern Britain. Lithics 4, 1–27Google Scholar
Healy, F. 1984. Lithic assemblage variation in the late third and early second millennia BC in eastern England. Lithics 4, 28–33Google Scholar
Healy, F. 1987. Prediction or prejudice? The relationship between field survey and excavation. In Brown, & Edmonds, (eds) 1987, 9–18Google Scholar
Healy, F. 1988. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham, Part VI: Occupation during the Seventh to Second Millennia BC. Dereham: East Anglian Archaeology 39Google Scholar
Hedges, J.D. 1980. The Neolithic in Essex. In Buckley, D.G. (ed.), The Archaeology of Essex to AD 1500, 26–39London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 34.Google Scholar
Hedges, J.D. & Buckley, D.G. 1978. Excavations at a Neolithic causewayed enclosure, Orsett, Essex, 1975. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 44, 219–308Google Scholar
Hedges, J.D. & Buckley, D.G. 1981. Springfield Cursus and the Cursus Problem Essex. Chelmsford: County Council Occasional Paper 1Google Scholar
Hedges, J.D. & Buckley, D.G. 1983. Excavation of the Roman features, Springfield, 1979-80, TL 7290-0615 (TL 70/163). In Priddy, D. (ed.), Work of the Essex County Council Archaeology Section 1982, Essex Archaeology & History 15, 135–141Google Scholar
Holgate, R. 1996. Essex c. 4000-1500 BC. In Bedwin, O. (ed.), The Archaeology of Essex: Proceedings of the Writtle Conference, 26–38Google Scholar
Hunter, J. 1999a. The Essex Landscape: a study of its form and character Hunter, J. 1999b. Regions and sub-regions of Essex. In Green, S. (ed.), The Essex Landscape: in search of its history, 11–19Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1978. The Mesolithic of Sussex. In Drewett, P.L. (ed.), The Archaeology of Sussex, 15-22. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 29Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1980. The Mesolithic in Essex. In Buckley, D. (ed.), Archaeology in Essex to 1500 AD, 12-13. London: Council British Archaeology Research Report 34Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1982. Later hunters in Kent: Tasmania and the Earliest Neolithic. In Leach, P.E. (ed.), Archaeology in Kent to AD 1500, 12-24. London: Council British Archaeology Research Report 48Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1996. The Late Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Essex. In Bedwin, O. (ed.) The Archaeology of Essex: Proceedings of the Writtle Conference, 10–14Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. & Tebbutt, C.F. 1981. A Late Mesolithic rock-shelter site at High Hurstwood, Sussex. Sussex Archaeological Collections 119, 1–36Google Scholar
Jefferies, J.S. 1977. Excavation Records. London: Department of the Environment Occasional Paper 1Google Scholar
Jones, M. 1980. Carbonised cereals from Grooved Ware contexts. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 46, 61–4Google Scholar
Keeley, L. 1974. The methodology of microwear analysis: a comment on Nance. American Antiquity 39, 126–8Google Scholar
Keeley, L. 1980. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. Chicago: University PressGoogle Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1978. The earlier prehistoric pottery. In Hedges, & Buckley, 1978, 277–80Google Scholar
Kinnes, I., Mercer, R. & Smith, I.F. 1975. Research Priorities in the British Neolithic. Unpublished paper for the Department of the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
Last, J. 1999. Out of line: cursuses and monument typology in eastern England. In Barclay, & Harding, (eds) 1999, 86–97Google Scholar
Lawson, A.J. 1986. Barrow Excavations in Norfolk, 1950-82. Dereham: East Anglian Archaeology 29Google Scholar
Leech, R. 1977. The Upper Thames Valley in Gloucestershire and Wiltshire: an archaeological survey of the river gravels. Bristol: CRAAGS Survey 4Google Scholar
Leeds, E.T. 1922. Further discoveries of the Neolithic and Bronze Age at Peterborough. Antiquaries Journal 2, 220–37Google Scholar
Longworth, I. 1969. Five sherds from Ford, Northumberland and their relative date. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 42, 258–61Google Scholar
Longworth, I. 1979. The Neolithic and Bronze Age pottery. In Wainwright, G.J., Excavations at Mount Pleasant, Dorset: excavations 1970-71, 75–124. London: Society of Antiquaries Research Report 37Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 1985. Cursuses and Related Monuments in the British Neolithic. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Loveday, R. 1989. The Barford ritual complex: further excavations (1972) and a regional perspective. In Gibson, A., Midlands Prehistory: some recent and current researches into the prehistory of central England, 51–84. Oxford: British Archaeolological Report 204Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 1998. Double entrance Henges - routes to the past? In Gibson, A. & Simpson, D. (eds), Prehistoric Ritual and Religion, 14–31Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 1999. Dorchester-on-Thames- ritual complex or ritual landscape? In Barclay, & Harding, (eds) 1999, 49–66Google Scholar
Mabey, R. 1996. Flora Britannica. London: Sinclair- StevensonGoogle Scholar
Manby, T.C. 1974. Grooved Ware Sites in Yorkshire and the North of England. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 9Google Scholar
Moffett, L., Robinson, M.A. & Straker, V. 1989. Cereals, fruits and nuts: charred plant remains from Neolithic sites in England and Wales and the Neolithic economy. In Milles, A., Williams, D. & Gardner, N. (eds), The Beginnings of Agriculture, 243–61. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S496Google Scholar
Mook, W.G. 1986. Business meeting: recommendations/resolutions adopted by the twelfth international radiocarbon conference. Radiocarbon, 28, 799Google Scholar
Murphy, P. 1983. Plant remains. In Hedges, & Buckley, 1983, 135–41Google Scholar
Pearson, G.W., Pilcher, J.R., Baillie, M.G.L., Corbett, D.M. & Qua, F. 1986. High-precision 14C measurement of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840-5210 BC. Radiocarbon 28, 911–34Google Scholar
Pearson, G.W. & Stuiver, M. 1986. High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500-2500 BC. Radiocarbon 28, 911–34Google Scholar
Pierpoint, S. 1980. Social Patterns in Yorkshire Prehistor 3500-750 BC. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 74Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1962. The West Kennett Long Barrow Excavations 1955-6. London: HMSO, Ministry of Works Archaeology Report 4Google Scholar
Pitts, M.W. & Jacobi, R.M. 1979. Some aspects of change in flaked stone industries of the Mesolithic and Neolithic in southern Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 6, 163–77Google Scholar
Pryor, F. 1978. Excavations at Fengate, Peterborough, England: the second report. Ontario: Royal Ontario Museum Archaeological Monograph 5Google Scholar
Pryor, F. 1985. The Fenland Project, No 1: Archaeology and Environment in the Lower Welland Valley. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 27Google Scholar
Pryor, F. 1998. Etton: Excavations at a Neolithic causewaye enclosure near Maxey Cambridgeshire, 1982-7. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 18Google Scholar
Rottländer, R. 1975. Formation of patina on flint. Archaeometry 17, 106–10Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1977. Two Mesolithic implement types. Northampton Archaeology 12, 3–8Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1980. Five flint assemblages from excavated sites in Wiltshire. Wiltshire Archaeological & History Magazine 72–3, 1-27Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1981. The Flint Assemblage, Grimes Graves, Norfolk. Excavations 1971-72 Vol II. London: HMSO, Department of the Environment Archaeological Report 11Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J., Healy, F. & Smith, I.J. 1985. The excavation of a ring ditch at Tye Field, Lawford, Essex. Archaeological Journal 142, 150–215Google Scholar
Smith, I.F. 1965. Windmill Hill and Avebury. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Smith, I.F. 1973. The prehistoric pottery from a site near Baston Manor, Hayes, Kent. In Philp, B. (ed.), Excavations in West Kent, 9–14. Canterbury: Kent Archaeological Research Report 3Google Scholar
Smith, I.F. 1985. The pottery. In Shennan et al. 1985Google Scholar
Stace, C. 1991. A new Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calculation. Radiocarbon 28, 839–62Google Scholar
Thomas, J. & Whittle, A. 1986. Anatomy of a tomb - West Kennet revisited. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 5, 129–56Google Scholar
Topping, P. 1982. Excavation at the Cursus at Scorton, North Yorkshire 1978. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 54, 7–21Google Scholar
Tyler, S. 1996. Early Saxon Essex AD c. 400-700. In Bedwin, O. (ed.), The Archaeology of Essex: Proceedings of the Writtle Conference, 108–16Google Scholar
Vaughan, P. 1981. Lithic Microwear Experimentation and the Functional Analysis of a Lower Magdalenian Stone Tool Assemblage. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. 1971. The flint industry. In Wilson, K.E., Longworth, I.H. & Wainwright, G.J., The Grooved Ware Site and Lion Point, Clacton, British Museum Quarterly 35, 93–124Google Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. 1972. The excavation of a Neolithic settlement on Broome Heath, Ditchingham, Norfolk. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 38, 1–97Google Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. & Longworth, I.H. 1971. Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966-68. London: Report of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 29Google Scholar
Ward, G.K. & Wilson, S.R. 1978. Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique. Archaeometry 20, 19–31Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T.J. & Murphy, P.L. 1995. Archaeology of the Essex Coast, Volume I: The Hullbridge Survey. Chelmsford: East Anglian Archaeology 71Google Scholar
Williams, D. 1973. Flotation in Siraf. Antiquity 47, 288–92Google Scholar