Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T21:47:14.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Excavation of a Beaker Settlement at Belle Tout, East Sussex, England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2016

Richard Bradley
Richard Bradley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Belle Tout is the second of a series of headlands where the South Downs meet the English Channel between Eastbourne and Brighton. Three kilometres to its east, the chalk downland comes to an end at Beachy Head, while Birling Gap immediately to the west provides direct access to the shoreline. Belle Tout, in between, is a gorse-capped plateau of virgin downland, 40 hectares in area with chalk cliffs rising to a maximum height of 84 metres (fig. 1).

The even lines of the headland are only broken against the cliffs where a shallow valley runs down towards Birling Gap from the highest point at Belle Tout lighthouse. At a height of 40 metres this valley veers to the south and is cut by the present cliff edge. It was within the valley at this point that the Beaker site was discovered and excavated (NGR TV557956). The natural subsoil throughout is Upper Chalk save within this valley where the chalk is covered by a drift deposit of loam with patches of flint debris laid down under periglacial conditions. Under normal vegetation this surface loam would be acid, but a mildly alkaline reaction in the soil has been brought about by gorse roots penetrating to the underlying chalk.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 36 , December 1970 , pp. 312 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcock, L., 1969. ‘Excavations at South Cadbury 1968: a summary report’, Ant. J., 49, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon, 1812. Arch., 16, 363.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. and Ozanne, P. C. and Ozanne, A., 1960. ‘Report on the investigation of a round barrow on Arreton Down, Isle of Wight’, PPS, 26, 263–302.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. C., 1957. ‘Worms and Weathering’, Antiquity, 31, 219–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. C., Piggott, C. M. and Sandars, N. K., 1951. Excavations at Dorchester, Oxon. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bowler-Kelly, A., 1935. ‘Silex enigmatiques de Grand Bretagne’, BSPF, 32, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, H., 1963. ‘Notes on the finds (from Stanton Harcourt) and on ring ditches in the Oxford region’, Oxoniensia, 28, 19–53.Google Scholar
Case, H. et al. , 1964. ‘Excavations at City Farm Hanborough’, Oxoniensia, 29, 1–98.Google Scholar
Cheyney, H. J., 1935. ‘An Aneolithic site at Playden near Rye’, Ant. J., 15, 152–64.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D. G., 1933. ‘Report on an Early Bronze Age site in the South Eastern Fens’, Ant. J., 13, 266–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. D. G., 1934a. ‘Derivative forms of the petit tranchet in Britain’, Arch. J., 91, 32–58.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D. G., 1934b. ‘Report on recent excavations at Peacock's Farm, Shippea Hill, Cambridgeshire’, Ant. J., 15, 284–319.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D. G., 1938. ‘A Neolithic House at Haldon Devon’, PPS, 4, 222–3.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D. G., 1960. ‘Excavations at the Neolithic site at Hurst Fen, Mildenhall, Suffolk 1954, 1957 and 1958’, PPS, 26, 202–45.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1968. Analytical Archaeology, (London).Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1969. Beaker pottery of Great Britain and Ireland, (2 volumes, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Cornwall, I. W., 1958. Soils for the Archaeologist, London.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W., 1966. ‘Stoke Clump, Hollingbury and the early pre-Roman Iron Age in Sussex’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 104, 109–20.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. and Curwen, E. C., 1918. ‘Covered ways on the South Downs’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 59, 35–75.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. C., 1934. ‘A Late Bronze Age farm and a Neolithic pit dwelling on New Barn Down, Clapham near Worthing, Sussex Arch. Coll., 75, 137–70.Google Scholar
Curwen, E. C., 1954. Archaeology of Sussex, (2nd edtn., London).Google Scholar
Dyer, J. F., 1962. ‘Neolithic and Bronze Age sites at Barton Hill Farm, Bedfordshire’, Beds. Arch. Journ., I, 1–24.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. F., 1964. ‘A Secondary Neolithic camp at Waulud's Bank, Leagrave’, Beds. Arch. Journ., 2, 2–15.Google Scholar
Estyn Evans, E., 1953. Lyles Hill, A Late Neolithic Site in County Antrim, Belfast.Google Scholar
Fox, C., 1959. Life and Death in the Bronze Age, London.Google Scholar
Giot, P. R., 1960. Brittany, London.Google Scholar
Greenfield, E., 1960. ‘The excavation of Barrow 4 at Swarkestone, Derbyshire’, Derbs. Arch. Journ., 80, 1–48.Google Scholar
Haggett, P., 1965. Location Analysis in Human Geography, London.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C., 1935. ‘A Middle-Late Bronze Age date for the occupation site at Playden near Rye’, Ant. J., 15, 467–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1952. ‘Early crops in Southern Britain’, PPS, 18, 194.Google Scholar
L'Helgouach, J., 1963. ‘Le ceramique campaniforme en Armorique’, Actes du Premier Colloque Atlanlique, Brest, 57–88.Google Scholar
Houlder, C. H., 1963. ‘A Neolithic settlement on Hazard Hill, Totnes’, Trans. Devon Arch. Exploration Soc., 21, 2–30.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, A. H., 1868. ‘An examination into the character and probable origin of the hill forts of Sussex’, Arch., 42, 53–76.Google Scholar
Louis, M., Peyrolle, L. and Arnall, J., 1947. ‘Les fonds de cabanes Eneolithiques de Fontbouisse’, Gallia, 5, 235–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahany, C., 1969. ‘Fengate’, Current Arch., 17, 156–7.Google Scholar
Moore, J. W., 1966. ‘Excavations at Beacon Hill, Flamborough Head, Yorkshire’, Yorks. Arch. Journ., 41, 191–202.Google Scholar
Musson, R. C., 1954. ‘An illustrated catalogue of Sussex Beaker and Bronze Age pottery’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 92, 106–124.Google Scholar
Musson, R. C., 1955. ‘A thirteenth century dwelling at Bramble Bottom, Eastbourne’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 93, 157–170.Google Scholar
Parsons, J., 1961. ‘Broomwood Bronze Age settlement, St Paul's Cray’, Arch. Cant., 76, 134–42.Google Scholar
Piggott, C. M., 1942. ‘Five Late Bronze Age enclosures in Wiltshire’, PPS, 8, 48–62.Google Scholar
Piggott, C. M. and Piggott, S., 1940. ‘Excavations at Rams Hill, Uffington, Berkshire’, Ant. J., 20, 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S., 1943. ‘The grave structures in Beaulieu Barrows II and IX’, PPS, 9, 261–5.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1954. The Neolithic Cultures of the British Isles, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pull, J., 1932. The Flint Miners of Blackpatch, London.Google Scholar
Rhatz, P. and ApSimon, A. M., 1962. ‘Excavations at Shearplace Hill, Sydling St. Nicholas, Dorset, England’, PPS, 28, 289–328.Google Scholar
O'Riordain, S. P., 1954. ‘Lough Gur excavations: Neolithic and Bronze Age houses on Knockadoon’, PRIA, 56 (C), 297–459.Google Scholar
le Rouzic, Z., 1933. ‘Premieres fouilles au Camp du Lizio’, Revue Arch., 199–219.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. D. A., 1966. ‘A Neolithic settlement in the Outer Hebrides’, Antiquity, 40, 137–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slade, C. F., 1964. ‘A Late Neolithic Site at Sonning, Berkshire’, Berks. Arch, Journ., 61, 4–19.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1964. ‘New Neolithic sites in Dorset and Bedfordshire with a note on the distribution of Neolithic storage pits in Britain’, PPS, 30, 352–81.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1965. Windmill Hill and Avebury, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stone, J. F. S., 1933. ‘Excavations on Easton Down, Winterslow 1931–2’, Wilts. Arch. Mag., 46, 225–42.Google Scholar
Toms, H. S., 1912. ‘Excavations at the Beltout valley entrenchments’, Sussex Arch. Coll., 55, 41–55.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1969. ‘A review of henge monuments in the light of recent research’, PPS, 35, 112–33.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H. J., 1960. ‘Preliminary report on the excavations at Anlo in 1957 and 1958’, Palaeohistoria, 8, 60–90.Google Scholar