Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:06:58.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ecology of Neolithic Farming Systems as Exemplified by the Avebury Region of Wiltshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

R. W. Smith*
Affiliation:
Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission, Fortress House, 23 Savile Row, London wix 2HE

Abstract

Best known as a major prehistoric ceremonial centre, the Avebury region has also yielded a wealth of information regarding the origins, ecology and development of neolithic farming systems in the chalklands of southern England. This paper draws the various strands of evidence together, considers interpretative problems such as pollen survival, the status of bracken, the significance of forest regrowth, etc., and concludes by reconstructing the interplay between man and his environment during this crucial stage of economic development. Some form of mesolithic participation in early cereal cropping and barrow building is identified, and indeed, in being valley-based from the outset, neolithic settlement and land use patterns form a continuum with what had gone before. The spread of agriculture is seen to have had adverse consequences, not least of which were concomitant bracken invasions. In adapting to these more difficult secondary environments important social and economic changes occurred within the local farming communities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aaby, B., 1976. ‘Cyclic climatic variations in climate over the past 5,500 years reflected in raised bogs’, Nature 263, 281–84.Google Scholar
Ashbee, P., Smith, I. F. and Evans, J. G., 1979. ‘Excavation of three long barrows near Avebury, Wiltshire’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 45, 207300.Google Scholar
Bell, M., 1982. ‘The effects of land use and climate on valley sedimentation’. In Harding, A. F. (ed.), Climatic Change in later Prehistory, 127–42. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Burl, A., 1979. Prehistoric Avebury. London, Ýale University Press.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., 1978. ‘The contribution of loess to soils in lowland Britain’. In Limbrey, S. and Evans, J. G. (eds), The effect of man on the landscape: the Lowland Zone, 1220. London, CBA Res. Rep. 21.Google Scholar
Connah, G. and McMillan, N. F., 1964. ‘Snails and archaeology’, Antiquity 38, 6264.Google Scholar
Cunnington, M. E., 1931. ‘The Sanctuary on Overton Hill, near Avebury’, Wilts Archaeol. Mag. 45, 300–35.Google Scholar
Dimbleby, G. W., 1965. ‘The buried soil under Outer Bank V and pollen analysis’. In Smith, I. F., Windmill Hill and Avebury, 3438. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dimbleby, G. W. and Evans, J. G., 1974. ‘Pollen and land snail analysis of calcareous soils’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 1, 117–33.Google Scholar
Edwards, K. J., 1982. ‘Man, space and the woodland edge: speculations on the detection and interpretation of human impact in pollen profiles’. In Bell, M. and Limbrey, S. (eds), Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology, 522. Oxford, BAR Int. Series 146.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G., 1972. Land Snails in Archaeology. London, Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G., 1978. An Introduction to Environmental Archaeology. London, Elek.Google Scholar
Grigson, C., 1982. ‘Porridge and pannage: pig husbandry in Neolithic England’. In Bell, M. and Limbrey, S. (eds), Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology, 297314. Oxford, BAR Int. Series 146.Google Scholar
Hillman, G., 1981. ‘Crop husbandry, evidence from macroscopic remains’. In Simmons, I. G. and Tooley, M. J. (eds), The Environment in British Prehistory, 183–91. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Jones, M., 1980. ‘Carbonised cereals from Grooved Ware contexts’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 46, 6164.Google Scholar
Limbrey, S., 1978. ‘Changes in quality and distribution of the soils of lowland Britain’. In Limbrey, S. and Evans, J. G. (eds), The effect of man on the landscape: the Lowland Zone, 2127. CBA Res. Rep. 21.Google Scholar
Moore, P. D. and Webb, J. A., 1978. An illustrated guide to pollen analysis. London, Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1937. ‘Neolithic pottery from Hackpen, Avebury’, Wilts. Archaeol. Mag. 48, 9091.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1954. The Neolithic Cultures of the British Isles. London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1962. The West Kennet Long Barrow. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Pitts, M. W. and Jacobi, R. M., 1979. ‘Some aspects of change in flaked stone industries of the Mesolithic and Neolithic in southern Britain’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 6, 163–78.Google Scholar
Reynolds, P., 1981. ‘Deadstock and Livestock’. In Mercer, R. (ed), Fanning Practice in British Prehistory, 97122. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., 1978. The Archaeology of the Berkshire Downs: an introductory survey. Reading, Berks. Archaeol. Comm. Google Scholar
Robertson-Mackey, M. E., 1980. ‘A “Head and Hooves” burial beneath a round barrow, with other Neolithic and Bronze Age sites on Hemp Knoll, near Avebury, Wilts’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 46, 123–76.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P., 1981. ‘Slash and Burn in the Temperate European Neolithic’. In Mercer, R. (ed), Farming Practice in British Prehistory, 8596. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P., 1982. ‘Forest grazing and clearance in temperate Europe with special reference to Denmark: an archaeological view’. In Bell, M. and Limbrey, S. (eds), Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology, 199216. Oxford, BAR Int. Series 146.Google Scholar
Saville, A., 1981. ‘The Flint Assemblage’. Volume 2 of Mercer, R. (ed), Grimes Graves, Norfolk. Excavations 1971–72. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Shackley, M., 1981. Environmental Archaeology. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., 1981. ‘The Neolithic’. In Simmons, I. G. and Tooley, M. J. (eds), The Environment in British Prehistory, 125209. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1965a. Windmill Hill and Avebury. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1965b. ‘Excavation of a Bell Barrow, Avebury G.55’, Wilts. Archaeol. Mag. 60, 2446.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. and Simpson, D. D. A., 1964. ‘Excavation of Three Roman Tombs and a Prehistoric Pit on Overton Down’, Wilts. Archaeol. Mag. 59, 6885.Google Scholar
Startin, D. W. A., 1982. ‘Prehistoric earthmoving’. In Case, H.J. and Whittle, A. W. R. (eds), Settlement patterns in the Oxford region; excavations at the Abingdon causewayed enclosure and other sites, 153–56. London, CBA Res. Rep. 44.Google Scholar
Thomas, N., 1956. ‘A Neolithic pit on Waden Hill, Avebury’, Wilts. Archaeol. Mag. 56, 167–71.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. D., 1982. ‘Neolithic enclosures and woodland habitats on the South Downs in Sussex, England’. In Bell, M. and Limbrey, S. (eds), Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology. Oxford, BAR Int. Series 146.Google Scholar
Vatcher, F. de M. and Vatcher, L., 1976. The Avebury Monuments. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J. and Longworth, I. H., 1971. Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968. London, Soc. Antiquaries Res. Rep. 29.Google Scholar
Waton, P. V., 1982. ‘Man's impact on the chalklands: some new pollen evidence’. In Bell, M. and Limbrey, S. (eds), Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology, 7592. Oxford, BAR Int. Series 146.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. W. R., 1977. The Earlier Neolithic of Southern England and its Continental Background. Oxford, BAR Int. Series 35.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. W. R., 1978. ‘Resources and population in the British Neolithic’, Antiquity 52, 3442.Google Scholar
Wigens, A., 1981. The Clandestine Farm. London, Granada.Google Scholar
Williams, D., 1976. ‘A neolithic moss flora from Silbury Hill, Wiltshire’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 3, 267–70.Google Scholar