Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:17:57.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Neolithic Pits and Artefact Scatters at North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

Jonathan Tabor ,
Lawrence Billington ,
Frances Healy  and
Mark Knight
Jonathan Tabor
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DZ Email: Jonathan Tabor [email protected]
Lawrence Billington
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, School of Arts, Histories and Cultures, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL
Frances Healy
Affiliation:
School of History, Archaeology and Religion, Cardiff University, John Percival Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff, CF10 3EU
Mark Knight
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DZ Email: Jonathan Tabor [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an excavation at North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire, which revealed evidence of Early Neolithic occupation comprising some 48 pits together with two in situ artefact scatters preserved within buried soil horizons. Largely as a result of the spatial separation between scatters and pit sites/clusters, it has been possible to identify a series of ‘sites’, which appear to represent temporally discrete episodes of activity ranging from task-specific ‘visits’ to relatively long-lived occupation. Through analysis of pottery and flint assemblages an attempt is made to characterise each individual site in terms of the types of activities undertaken there and to consider their scale and duration. Set within a landscape that has seen extensive archaeological investigation over the past 30 years the excavation also provides an excellent opportunity to explore how these sites relate to activity in the wider locale and to what extent it is possible to characterise Early Neolithic occupation at a landscape scale.

Résumé

Fosses et artifacts dispersés du néolithique ancien à North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire, de Jonathan Tabor

Cet article présente les résultats d’une fouille à North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire, qui a révélé des vestiges d’une occupation du néolithique ancien comprenant quelques 48 fosses ainsi que deux exemples d’artifacts dispersés in situ préservés dans des horizons de sol enterrés. En grande partie grâce à une séparation spatiale entre dispersions et sites ou groupes de fosses, il a été possible d’identifier une série de ‘sites’ qui semblent représenter des épisodes d’activité, temporellement discontinus, allant de ‘visites’ pour une tâche spécifique à des occupations d’une durée relativement longue. Au moyen d’une analyse de la poterie et des assemblages de silex, nous tentons de caractériser chaque site individuel en termes de types d’activités qui s’y déroulaient et de considérer leur échelle et leur durée. Située à l’intérieur d’un paysage qui a été témoin d’extensives recherches archéologiques au cours des 30 dernières années, la fouille nous fournit également une excellente occasion d’explorer comment ces sites se rattachent à l’activité dans une région plus étendue et jusqu’à quel point on peut caractériser une occupation du néolithique ancien à l’échelle du paysage.

Zussamenfassung

Frühneolithische Gruben und Fundstreuungen in North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire, von Jonathan Tabor

Dieser Beitrag präsentiert die Ergebnisse einer Ausgrabung in North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire. Die Grabung erbrachte Informationen zu einer frühneolithischen Besiedlung, bestehend aus etwa 48 Gruben sowie zwei in situ befindlichen Artefaktstreuungen, die in konservierten Bodenhorizonten erhalten blieben. Vor allem aufgrund der räumlichen Trennung der Streuungen von den Gruben bzw. Grubenhäufungen war es möglich eine Reihe von Fundstellen zu identifizieren, die offenbar zeitlich verschiedene Aktivitätsphasen repräsentieren, die vom Aufsuchen des Ortes für spezifische Tätigkeiten bis hin zu relativ lang dauernder Nutzung reichen. Durch die Analyse von Keramik- und Flintensembles wird versucht jede einzelne Fundstelle in Bezug auf die dort durchgeführten Aktivitäten zu charakterisieren und deren Umfang und Dauer zu erschließen. Die Ausgrabung dieses Ortes, in einer Landschaft gelegen, die während der letzten 30 Jahre extensive archäologische Untersuchungen erlebt hat, bietet zudem eine hervorragende Gelegenheit um zu erforschen, wie diese Fundstellen in Beziehung stehen zu Tätigkeiten in der weiteren Umgebung, aber auch, wie weit es möglich ist die frühneolithische Besiedlung auf Landschaftsebene zu charakterisieren.

Resumen

Hoyos y dispersiones de artefactos del Neolítico Antiguo en North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire, por Jonathan Tabor.

Este artículo presenta los resultados de una excavación en North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire, que reveló la presencia de una ocupación del Neolítico Antiguo compuesta por 48 hoyos y dos dispersiones de artefactos conservadas en horizontes de paleosuelo. Debido, principalmente, a la separación espacial entre las dispersiones de materiales y las agrupaciones de hoyos, ha sido posible identificar una serie de ‘sitios’ que parecen representar episodios de actividad individualizados temporalmente que abarcan desde ‘visitas’ destinadas a actividades específicas hasta ocupaciones relativamente largas. A través del análisis de los conjuntos cerámicos y líticos se ha pretendido caracterizar individualmente cada sitio en relación con los tipos de actividad desarrollada, considerando su escala y duración. Tratándose de un espacio que ha sido objeto de investigación arqueológica durante los últimos 30 años, la excavación también aporta una excelente oportunidad para analizar cómo se relacionan estos sitios a un nivel de actividad local y en qué medida es posible caracterizar la ocupación del Neolítico Antiguo a una escala de paisaje más amplio.

Keywords

Early Neolithicpit siteflint assemblagepotteryspatial analysistask-specific activity
Type
Articles
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 82 , December 2016 , pp. 161 - 191
Copyright
© The Prehistoric Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson-Whymark, H. & Thomas, J. (eds) 2012. Regional Perspectives on Neolithic Pit Despotion. Beyond the Mundane. Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Papers 12. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Bamford, H. 1985. Excavations at Briar Hill. Northampton: Northampton Development Corporation Google Scholar
Bayliss, A., Allen, M.J., Healy, F., Whittle, A., Germany, M., Griffiths, S., Hamilton, D., Higham, T., Meadows, J., Shand, G., Stevens, S. & Wysocki, M. 2011. The Greater Thames estuary. In A. Whittle, F. Healy & A. Bayliss, Gathering Time: Dating the Early Neolithic Enclosures of Southern Britain and Ireland, 348–386. Oxford: Oxbow Books CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadsmoore, E. 2006. Earlier Neolithic flint. In Garrow et al. 2006, 53–70Google Scholar
Beadsmoore, E., Garrow, D & Knight, M. 2010. Refitting Etton: space, time and material culture within a causewayed enclosure in Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 76, 115–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, B. 2011. Early Neolithic flintwork. In B. Bishop & J. Proctor, Settlement, Ceremony and Industry on Mousehold Heath, 31–47. Oxford: Pre-Construct Archaeology Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2007. The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program Oxcal. Radiocarbon 43, 355–363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51, 337–360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffey, G. & Brook, E. 2012. Domesticity in the Neolithic: excvations at Kingsmead Quarry, Horton, Berkshire. In Anderson-Whymark & Thomas (eds) 2012, 200–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J.G.D., Higgs, E. & Longworth, I. 1960. Excavations at the Neolithic Site at Hurst Fen, Mildenhall, Suffolk (1954, 1957 and 1958). Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 26, 202–245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, C.P. & Lavender, N.J. 2008. An Early Neolithic Ring-ditch and Middle Bronze Age Cremation Cemetery: excavation and survey at Brightlingsea, Essex. Chelmsford: East Anglian Archaeology 126 Google Scholar
Cleal, R. 2004. The dating and diversity of the earliest ceramics of Wessex and south-west England. In R. Cleal & J. Pollard (eds), Monuments and Material Culture – Papers in Honour of an Avebury Archaeologist: Isobel Smith, 164–192. Salisbury: Hobnob Press Google Scholar
Collins, M. 2010. Knobbs Farm, Somersham, Phase 5b (2) Investigations. Cambridge: unpublished Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report 923 Google Scholar
Connor, A. 2009. A fen island burial: excavation of an Early Bronze Age round barrow at North Fen, Sutton. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 98, 47–64 Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 2012. Sounds from the underground: Neolithic ritual pits and pit-clusters on the Isle of Man and beyond. In Anderson-Whymark & Thomas (eds) 2012, 30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, R.E. 2002. The lithic microwear analysis of the B&Q Mesolithic and Neolithic site. In J. Sidell, J. Cotton, L. Raynor & L. Wheeler (eds), The Prehistory and Topography of Southwark and Lambeth, 81–88. London: Museum of London Archaeological Service Monograph 14 Google Scholar
Donahue, R.E. & Evans, A. 2009. Microwear analysis of lithic artefacts, 113–15 in M.G. Beamish, Island Visits: Neolithic and Bronze Age Activity on the Trent Valley Floor. Excavations at Eggington and Willington, Derbyshire, 1998–1999. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 129, 17–172 Google Scholar
Edmonds, M. 2006. The lithics, 130–4 in C. Evans, M. Edmonds & S. Boreham, ‘Total archaeology’ and model landscapes: excavations of the Great Wilbraham Causewayed Enclosure, Cambridgeshire, 1975–76. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 72, 113–162 Google Scholar
Edmonds, M., Evans, C. & Gibson, D. 1999. Assembly and collection – lithic complexes in the Cambridgeshire fenlands. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65, 47–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. & Hodder, I. 2006. A Woodland Archaeology: Neolithic Sites at Haddenham. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Haddenham Project 1 Google Scholar
Evans, C. & Knight, M. 1997. The Barleycroft Paddocks. Unpublished Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report 218Google Scholar
Evans, C., Pollard, J. & Knight, M. 1999. Life in the woods: tree throws, ‘settlement’ and forest cognition. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18(3), 241–254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C., Tabor, J. & Vander Linden, M. 2014. Making time work: sampling floodplain artefact frequencies and populations. Antiquity 88, 241–258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C., with Tabor, J. & Vander Linden, M. forthcoming. Twice-Crossed River: prehistoric and palaeoenvironmental investigations at Barleycroft Farm/Over, Cambridgeshire. Cambridge: Cambridge Archaeological Unit, Archaeology of the Lower Ouse Valley 3 Google Scholar
Evans, C., Brudenell, M., Patten, R. & Regan, R. 2013. Process and History. Prehistoric Communities at Colne Fen, Earith. Cambridge: Cambridge Archaeological Unit Landscape Archives, the Archaeology of the Lower Ouse Valley 1 Google Scholar
Evans, C., Beadsmoore, E., Brudenell, M. & Lucas, G. 2009. Fengate Revisited. Further Fen-edge Excavations, Bronze Age Fieldsystems and Settlement and the Wyman Abbott/Leeds Archives. CAU Landscape Archives: historiography and fieldwork (1). Cambridge: Cambridge Archaeological Unit Google Scholar
Garrow, D. 2006. Pits, settlement and deposition during the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age in East Anglia. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, D. 2007. Placing pits: landscape occupation and depositional practice during the Neolithic in East Anglia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 73, 1–24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, D., Beadsmoore, E. & Knight, M. 2005. Pit clusters and the temporality of occupation: an Early Neolithic Site at Kilverstone, Thetford, Norfolk. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 139–157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, D., Lucy, S. & Gibson, D. 2006. Excavations at Kilverstone, Norfolk: an Episodic Landscape History. Gressenhall: East Anglian Archaeology 113 Google Scholar
Garrow, D., Meadows, J., Evans, C. & Tabor, J. 2014. Dating the dead: a high-resolution radiocarbon chronology of burial within an Early Bronze Age barrow cemetery at Over, Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 79, 207–236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garwood, P. 2011. Early prehistory. In P. Booth, T. Champion, S. Foreman, P. Garwood, H. Glass, J. Munby & A. Reynolds, On Track. The Archaeology of High Speed 1 Section 1, 37–150. Oxford: Oxford Wessex Archaeology Monograph 4 Google Scholar
Hall, D. 1992. The Fenland Project No. 6: The South-Western Cambridgeshire Fens. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 56 Google Scholar
Hall, D. 1996. The Fenland Project No. 10: Cambridgeshire Survey: The Isle of Ely and Wisbech. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology 79 Google Scholar
Healy, F. 1988. Spong Hill part VI: 7th to 2nd millennia BC . Gressenhall: East Anglian Archaeology 39 Google Scholar
Healy, F. 2013. In the shadow of hindsight: pre-Iron Age Spong Hill viewed from 2010. In C. Hills & S. Lucy, Spong Hill. Part IX: chronology and synthesis. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Google Scholar
Healy, F., Bayliss, A., Whittle, A., Pryor, F., French, C., Allen, M., Evans, C., Edmonds, M., Meadows, J. & Hey, G. 2011. eastern England. In A. Whittle, F. Healy & A. Bayliss, Gathering Time. Dating the Early Neolithic Enclosures of Southern Britain and Ireland, 263–347. Oxford: Oxbow Books CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herne, A. 1988. A time and a place for the Grimston Bowl. In J. Barrett & I. Kinnes (eds), The Archaeology and Context of the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Recent Trends, 9–29. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield Google Scholar
Knight, M. 2006. Mildenhall pottery. In Garrow et al. 2006, 29–52Google Scholar
Knight, M. 2013. Block Fen, Chatteris, Cambridgeshire. An archaeological evaluation: Langwood Fen Farm (South). Cambridge: unpublished Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report 1145 Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 2012. Preservation and the pit problem: some examples form the Middle Trent Valley. In Anderson-Whymark & Thomas (eds) 2012, 100–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, H.R. 1998. Flint and chert artefacts. In F. Pryor, Etton: excavations at a Neolithic causewayed enclosure near Maxey Cambridgeshire, 1982–7, 215–255. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 18 Google Scholar
Neal, D.S., Wardle, A. & Hunn, J. 1990. Excavation of the Iron Age, Roman, Medieval settlement at Gorhambury, St Albans. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 14 Google Scholar
Patten, R. & Lucy, S. forthcoming. River Cam-side Investigations: Neolithic Barrows, Iron Age Occupation, Anglo-Saxon Settlements and Cemetery Excavations at Trumpington, Cambridgeshire. Place of publication: publisher? Google Scholar
Peglar, S. & Waller, M. 1994. The Ouse channel, Haddenham. In Waller (ed.) 1994, 174–9Google Scholar
Pollard, J. 1996. Worked flint. In R. Mortimer & C. Evans, Archaeological Excavations at Hinxton Quarry, Cambridgeshire. 1995. The North Field (I), 32–38. Cambridge: unpublished Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report 168 Google Scholar
Pollard 1997. The worked flint. In Evans, C & Knight, M. The Barleycroft Paddocks, 125–131. Cambridge: unpublished Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report 218 Google Scholar
Pollard, J. 1999. ‘These places have their moments’: thoughts of settlement practices in the British Neolithic. In J. Brück & M. Goodman (eds), Making Places in the Prehistoric World: themes in settlement archaeology, 76–93. London: UCL Press Google Scholar
Pryor, F. 1974. Excavations at Fengate, Peterborough, England: the first report. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum Monograph 3 Google Scholar
Pryor, F. 1998. Etton: excavations at a Neolithic causewayed enclosure near Maxey Cambridgeshire 1982–7. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 18 Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C.E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, M., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, E.M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M & van der Plicht, J. 2013. Intcal 13 and marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal bp . Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, P. 2004. Flint, 416–22, in D. Whitmore. Excavations at a Neolithic site at The John Innes Centre, Colney, 2000. Norfolk Archaeology 44(3), 406–431 Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. 2004. How the west was lost. A reconsideration of agricultural origins in Britain, Ireland and southern Scandinavia. Current Archaeology 45, 83–113 Google Scholar
Steier, P. & Rom, W. 2000. The use of Bayesian statistics for 14C dates of chronologically ordered samples: a critical analysis. Radiocarbon 42, 183–198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M & Reimer, P.J. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calculation. Radiocarbon 28, 1022–1030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabor, J.L. 2011. Sutton Gault Irrigation Reservoir, Cambridgeshire. An Archaeological Excavation. Cambridge: unpublished Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report 1032 Google Scholar
Tabor, J.L. 2015. Later Neolithic and Early Bronze Age activity at North Fen, Sutton Gault, Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 104, 31–54 Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 2004. Comment on Rowley-Conwy 2004. Current Archaeology 45, 105–106 Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 2013. The Birth of Neolithic Britain: an interpretive account. Oxford: Oxford University Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. 1972. The excavation of a Neolithic settlement on Broome Heath, Ditchingham, Norfolk. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 38, 1–97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, M. 1994. The Fenland Project No. 9: Flandrian Environmental Change in Fenland. Cambridge: East Anglian Archaeology Report 70 Google Scholar
Webley, L. & Hiller, J. 2009. A fen island in the Neolithic and Bronze Age excavations at North Fen, Sutton, Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 98, 11–36 Google Scholar
Wessex Archaeology. 2013. www.wessexarch.co.uk/projects/horton2013 Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 1997. Moving in and moving around: Neolithic settlement mobility. In P. Topping (ed.), Neolithic Landscapes, 15–22. Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Papers 2. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T., Murphy, P.L., Brown, N. & Heppell, E. 2012. The Archaeology of the Essex Coast, Volume II: Excavations at the Prehistoric Site of the Stumble. Chelmsford: East Anglian Archaeology 144 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Tabor supplementary material

Tabor supplementary material 1

Download Tabor supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 281.5 KB