Article contents
The Early Iron Age Site at Micklemoor Hill West Harling, Norfolk, and its Pottery
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2014
Extract
The Iron Age settlement on Micklemoor Hill, West Harling, (Nat. Grid 62/975857) was discovered by Mr H. Apling while prospecting for Bronze Age cooking-places on the course of the river above Thetford during 1932. The site is a prominent hill of glacial gravel approximately 300 yards long and 150 yards wide, rising some 20 feet above the level of the surrounding marsh and rough grazing pasture and bounded to the north at a distance of between 200 and 600 feet by the river Thet. Its most prominent feature at the present day is a mound covering a brick-lined ice-house of 19th century construction and surrounded by a group of conifers. The prehistoric features discovered by Apling comprised two enclosures, an ‘Eastern Camp’ (our Site II), consisting of a low broad bank with external ditch and well defined opening on the west, and a larger ‘Western Camp’ (our Site III) of which only slight traces of a ditch were visible.
The excavations carried out by Apling in 1932 were mainly directed to the eastern enclosure: in addition to a number of trial holes he dug two-foot trenches across the site from two directions. No pottery was found in the interior, but the ditch which he located outside the bank yielded pottery, bones and flints. Accordingly a length of some 20 yards of the ditch-filling was removed on the eastern side and from this a really substantial quantity of material was obtained.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1953
References
page 1 note 1 Apling, H., ‘A Hallstatt Settlement at West Harling, Norfolk’, P.P.S.E.A. VII, pt. 1 (1932), pp. 111–22Google Scholar.
page 1 note 2 Childe, V. G., Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles, p. 206. London, 1940 and 1947Google Scholar; Kenyon, K., 8th Annual Report, London Univ. Inst. of Archaeology, 1952, pp. 43–7Google Scholar.
page 1 note 3 P.P.S. VI (1940), pp. 30–111Google Scholar.
page 9 note 1 The same difficulty would of course apply in the case of Professor Piggott's ingenious and very suggestive reconstruction of Woodhenge as a circular ridge-roofed temple. See his ‘Timber Circles: A Re-examination’, Arch. J. XCVI, pp. 193–225Google Scholar, especially pp. 207–11 and fig. 9.
page 24 note 1 P.P.S. 1, p. 46, fig. 6.
page 24 note 2 Ant. J. XVI, pp. 29–50Google Scholar.
page 24 note 3 Archaeologia LXXVII1, p. 184Google Scholar, figs. 14–18, 22; Rowntree, , History of Scarborough, pp. 20–3Google Scholar, fig. 19.
page 24 note 4 Proc. Cambs. Ant. Soc. XXXIX, p. 60Google Scholar. The pottery excavated by the late Mr C. S. Leaf and by Mr J. R. C. Hamilton is unpublished and is in the University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge.
page 24 note 5 Archaeologia LIV, p. 101Google Scholar, figs 17–9.
page 24 note 6 Cunnington, All Canning's Cross, pl. XLIV, 1,2; pl. XLVIII, a, 1.
page 24 note 7 Arch. J. C, p. 197Google Scholar, fig. 1, A2; p. 204, fig. 4 G1.
page 24 note 8 Fox, , Archaeology of the Cambridge Region, p. 95Google Scholar, pl. XVI, 9.
page 24 note 9 Cunnington, , All Canning's Cross, p. 33Google Scholar.
page 24 note 10 University of London Institute of Archaeology 8th Annual Report (1952), p. 44Google Scholar.
page 24 note 11 In the University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge.
page 24 note 12 Norfolk and Norwich Arch. Soc. XXV (1935), Part III, p. 408Google Scholar, fig. 2.
page 25 note 1 Archaeologia, LXXVII, pl. XXI.
page 25 note 2 Proc. Cambs. Ant. Soc. XLVI (1951), p. 34Google Scholar, fig. 3.
page 25 note 3 Arch. J. XCIII, pp. 83–5Google Scholar.
page 25 note 4 P.P.S.E.A. IV, pp. 211–33.
page 25 note 5 Archaeologia LXXVII, p. 193Google Scholar, fig. 39.
page 25 note 6 P.P.S.E.A. IV, pp. 223–4, fig. 2 E, G.
page 25 note 7 Ant.J. XXII, p. 129–38Google Scholar.
page 26 note 1 Arch. J. C, p. 201Google Scholar, A6; p. 203, G2; p. 205, H1.
page 26 note 2 Archaeologia LXXVI, p. 17Google Scholar, fig. 5.
page 26 note 3 Archaeologia LXXVII, p. 189Google Scholar, fig. 27, 4.
page 26 note 4 J. Derbyshire Arch, and Nat. Hist. Soc. XII, p. 113Google Scholar, fig. 4.
page 26 note 5 Oxoniensia 11, 4–5Google Scholar, fig. 2, 1–2.
page 26 note 6 University of London, Institute of Archaeology 8th Annual Report (1952), p. 40Google Scholar.
page 26 note 7 Oxoniensia II, pp. 8–11Google Scholar.
page 26 note 8 Sussex Arch. Coll. LXXX, pp. 217–43Google Scholar.
page 26 note 9 Ant. J. XXVII, p. 37Google Scholar, fig. 16, 2.
page 26 note 10 Arch. J. XCVI, p. 19Google Scholar, pl. 1, 2.
page 26 note 11 Proc. C.A.S. XLVI, p. 36Google Scholar, fig. 4, pp. 21–5.
page 26 note 12 Ant. J. XXVII, fig, 16, no. 1.
page 26 note 13 Laet, S. J. de and Marien, M. E., L'Antiquité Classique, vol. XIX, Fasc. 2 (1950), pp. 309–66Google Scholar, pl. II, 6, figs. 16, 18, 20, 25, 32 and 44.
page 27 note 1 Cunnington, , All Canning's Cross, pp. 31–2Google Scholar.
page 33 note 1 P.P.S. 1, p. 32, figs. 24–6.
page 33 note 2 Archaeologia LXXVI, pp. 18–19Google Scholar, fig. H. p. 11.
page 33 note 3 Archaeologia LXXVII, p. 183Google Scholar, figs. 12–3.
page 33 note 4 Arch. J. C, p. 193Google Scholar.
page 33 note 5 Wheeler, , ‘Maiden Castle, Dorset’. Research Report of Soc. Ant. XII, p. 294Google Scholar, pl. XXXIII, fig. 99.
page 33 note 6 Arch. J. XCIII, pp. 69–71Google Scholar, fig. 5.
page 33 note 7 Arch. J. C, p. 193Google Scholar, pl. 11.
page 33 note 8 Cunnington, , All Canning's Cross, pp. 18Google Scholar, 26 and 143–4, pl. 27, no. 8.
page 33 note 9 Flakes struck from flint saddle-querns were found on the Late Bronze Age 2 occupation site in Mildenhall Fen, described by Clark, J. G. D. in The Antiquaries Journal, vol. XV, pp. 29–50Google Scholar; see p. 32 and fig. 10, no. 5 (awl made from flakes struck from quern). A complete flint saddle-quern from So ham is preserved in the Univ. Mus. of Archaeology and Ethnology at Cambridge. Mus. no. 49, 439.
page 35 note 1 See Clark, , Ant. J. XVI, pp. 46–7Google Scholar and fig. 11; Stone, , Wilts. Arch. Mag. XLVII, p. 656Google Scholar and pl. VII, nos. 9, 10, 22.
page 35 note 2 Ant. J. XVI, pp. 44–5Google Scholar and fig. 9, nos. 4–7; Wilts, . Arch. Mag. XLVII, p. 656Google Scholar and pl. VI and VI.
page 35 note 3 e.g. Clark, , Ant. J. XIII, p. 272Google Scholar and fig. 3.
page 35 note 4 All Canning's Cross, pp. 24–6. Devizes, 1923Google Scholar.
page 36 note 1 Proc. Prehist. Soc. E.A. vol. VII (1932), p. 113Google Scholar.
page 36 note 2 cf. The Glastonbury Lake Village, vol. II, pp. 455–60. Glastonbury, 1917Google Scholar.
page 36 note 3 Hr Helbaek's reference number, i.e., Engl. 73.
page 37 note 1 Proc. C.A.S. XLI, pp. 76–7Google Scholar; XLII, p. 128, pl. XIV H.
page 37 note 2 Arch. J., C, p. 217Google Scholar.
page 37 note 3 Arch. J. C, pp. 220–2Google Scholar.
page 37 note 4 Proc. C.A.S., XLVI, pp. 31–42Google Scholar.
page 37 note 5 P.P.S.E.A. IV, pp. 214–25.
page 37 note 6 Arch. J. C, pp. 220–2Google Scholar.
page 37 note 7 Arch. J. XCIII, pp. 57–100Google Scholar.
page 37 note 8 Arch. J. XCVI, pp. 1–40Google Scholar.
page 37 note 9 Arch. J. C, pp. 216–20Google Scholar.
page 37 note 10 Archeologie, 1946, 2, p. 307Google Scholar.
page 37 note 11 Loë, Baron de, Belgique Ancienne 11, p. 207 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 38 note 1 See p. 26.
page 38 note 2 ‘Maiden Castle, Dorset’. Research report of the Society of Antiquaries, XII, pp. 388–94Google Scholar.
page 38 note 3 See Piggott, S. in Arch. J. XCVI, pp. 213–5Google Scholar.
page 38 note 4 See Clark, J. G. D., Prehistoric Europe, pp. 158 ff. London, 1952Google Scholar.
page 38 note 5 See Bersu, G., P.S.A.S. LXXXII (1947–1948), pp. 241–63Google Scholar and esp. pp. 260–1.
- 14
- Cited by