Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:30:31.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The earliest horse-bits of western Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

C. J. Balkwill
C. J. Balkwill
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Southampton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Within recent years, much attention has been focused on the earliest objects of harness which have long been noticed in the archaeological record. They are a matter of some importance in the perception of social structure from extant remains; Kossack (1954) presented strong arguments in favour of interpreting, in this manner, the early Hallstatt (Ha C) horse harness from Bavarian graves. Other major publications have since added to the picture of widespread, supposedly aristocratic adoption of harness and wagons in association with burial rite (northern and central Italy in the Early Iron Age, von Hase 1969; the Iberian peninsula in the same period, Schüle 1969; the Middle Danube to the Russian Steppes and to the Asian hinterland, Potratz 1966). Nor has the thesis of Gallus and Horvath (1939) been ignored, and the activities of ‘Thraco-Cimmerian’ cavalry still play a large part in the interpretation of west European horse harness. Already in 1954, however, Kossack observed the continuing elements of native, western Urnfield Europe in the entirely new combinations of grave-goods in Ha C and he indicated that the cheekpieces, while being modelled closely on the lines of preceding types found in the region of the Middle Danube, were, in fact, local variants chiefly concentrated in the graves of Bohemia and Bavaria. That western Europe had long had its own forms of cheekpiece was demonstrated by Thrane in 1963, yet the mouthpieces themselves have received no consolidated attention. This paper is an attempt to redress the balance, by gathering together the earliest metal bits in Europe west of Slovakia and Hungary, in order to see what light they throw on the problems of continuity and transition at the end of the Bronze Age and the beginning of the Iron Age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 39 , December 1973 , pp. 425 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alcock, L., 1961. ‘The winged objects in the Llyn Fawr hoard’, Antiquity, 35, 149–51.Google Scholar
Beltz, R., 1910. Die vorgeschichtlichen Altertümer Mecklenburg-Schwerin. Schwerin.Google Scholar
Bökönyi, S., 1968. ‘Data on Iron Age horses of Central and Eastern Europe’, Mecklenburg Collection, Pt. 1, Bulletin, 25, Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Broholm, H. C., 1947. Danmarks Bronzealder, 3. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Broholm, H. C., 1953. Danish Antiquities, 4. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Cowen, J. C., 1962. Review of Müller-Karpe, 1961, Antiquity, 36, 75–8.Google Scholar
Drack, W., 1960. ‘Spuren von urnenfelderzeitlichen Wagengräbern aus der Schweiz’, JSGU, 48, 74–7.Google Scholar
Dvořak, F., 1938. ‘Wagengräber der älteren Eisenzeit in Böhmen’, Praehistorica, 1.Google Scholar
Ebert, M., 1929. Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte, 13. Berlin.Google Scholar
Eckstein, M., 1963. ‘Flachgräber der frühen Urnenfelderkultur bei Bruck, Ldkr. Neuburg a. d. Donau’, Germania, 41, 77–84.Google Scholar
Foltiny, S., 1967. ‘The ivory horse-bits of Homer and the bone horse-bits of reality’, Bonner Jahrbücher, 167, 11–37.Google Scholar
Gallus, S. and Horvath, T., 1939. ‘Un peuple cavalier préscythique en Hongrie’, Dissertationes Pannonicae, 2, 9.Google Scholar
Gazdapusztai, G., 1967. ‘Caucasian relations of the Danubian basin in the Early Iron Age’, Acta Archaeologica Hungarica, 19, 307–34.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M., 1965. Bronze Age cultures in Central and Eastern Europe. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grempler, W., 1899. ‘Der Bronzefund von Lorzendorf, Kreis Namslau’, Schlesiens Vorzeit in Bild und Schrift, 7, 195–205.Google Scholar
Gross, V., 1878. Mörigen et Auvernier. Neuveville.Google Scholar
Gross, V., 1882. Station de Corcelettes. Neuveville.Google Scholar
Gross, V., 1883. Les Protohelvètes. Paris.Google Scholar
Günther, C., 1880. Photographisches Album der Ausstellung praehistorischer und anthropologischer Funde Deutschlands. Berlin.Google Scholar
Harding, D. W., 1972. The Iron Age in the Upper Thames Basin. Oxford.Google Scholar
von Hase, F.-W., 1969. Die Trensen der Früheisenzeit in Italien, PBF, 16, 1. Munich.Google Scholar
Heierli, J., 1886. Der Pfahlbau Wollishofen. Zürich.Google Scholar
Heierli, J., 1888. 9. Pfahlbaubericht. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.-R., 1966. Die Funde der Urnenfelderkultur in Mittel- und Südhessen, RGF, 27. Berlin.Google Scholar
Holste, F., 1940. ‘Zur Bedeutung und Zeitstellung der sogenannten “thrakokimmerischen” Pferdegeschirrbronzen’, WPZ, 27, 7–32.Google Scholar
Jacob-Friesen, G., 1969. ‘Skjerne und Egemose. Wagenteile südlicher Provenienz in skandinavischen Funden’, Acta Archaeologica, 40, 122–57.Google Scholar
Joffroy, R., 1958. Les sépultures à char du Premier Age du Fer en France. Paris.Google Scholar
Keller, F., 1858. 2. Pfahlbaubericht. Zürich.Google Scholar
Keller, F., 1876. 7. Pfahlbaubericht. Zürich.Google Scholar
Rolling, A., 1968. Späte Bronzezeit an Soar und Mosel. Saarbrücker Beiträge, 6. Bonn.Google Scholar
Kossack, G., 1954. ‘Pferdegeschirr aus Gräbern der älteren Hallstattzeit Bayerns’, Jahrbuch der Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 1, 111–78.Google Scholar
Kraft, G., 1927. ‘Die Stellung der Schweiz innerhalb der bronzezeitlichen Kulturgruppen Mitteleuropas’, 3. Teil. Anzeiger für Schweizerische Altertumskunde, NF 29, 137–48.Google Scholar
Lepage, L., 1967. ‘Les sépultures de l'Age du Fer à Chamouilley (Haute Marne)’, Revue Archéologique de l'Est et du Centre-Est, 18, 107–15.Google Scholar
Littauer, M., 1969. ‘Bits and Pieces’, Antiquity, 43, 289–300.Google Scholar
Marien, M.-E., 1958. Trouvailles du champ d'urnes et des tombelles hallstattiennes de Court-St-Etienne. Brussels.Google Scholar
Millotte, J. P., 1965. Carte archéologique de la Lorraine. Paris.Google Scholar
Much, M., 1889. Kunsthistorischer Atlas 1. Vienna.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H., 1956. ‘Das urnenfelderzeitliche Wagengrab von Hart an der Alz, Oberbayern, BVB, 21, 46–75.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H., 1959. Beiträge zur Chronologie der Urnenfelderzeit nördlich und südlich der Alpen, RGF, 22. Berlin.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H., 1961. Die Vollgriffschwerter der Urnenfelderzeit aus Bayern. Munich.Google Scholar
Munro, R., 1890. The lake-dwellings of Europe. London.Google Scholar
van Muyden, B., 1896. Antiquités lacustres (Album Lausanne). Lausanne.Google Scholar
Paret, O., 1935. ‘Das Fürstengrab von Cannstatt’, Fundberichte aus Schwaben, NF 8, Anhang 1, 28–30.Google Scholar
Paret, O., 1958. Le mythe des cités lacustres. Paris.Google Scholar
Pič, J. L., 1907. Die Urnengräber Böhmens. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1965. Ancient Europe. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Pittioni, R., 1938. Österreichs Urzeit im Bilde. Leipzig and Vienna.Google Scholar
Pittioni, R., 1954. Urgeschichte des Österreichischen Raumes. Vienna.Google Scholar
Potratz, O., 1966. Die Pferdetrensen des Alten Orient. Rome.Google Scholar
Reinecke, P., 1934. ‘Der Bronzedepotfund von Hallstatt in Oberösterreich’, WPZ, 21, 1–11.Google Scholar
Reitinger, J., 1968. Die ur- und frühgeschichtlichen Funde in Oberösterreich, 1, 3, Linz.Google Scholar
Schauer, P., 1971. Die Schwerter in Süddeutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 1, PBF, 4, 2.Google Scholar
Schiek, S., 1955. ‘Ein Grabfund der frühen Urnenfelderkultur aus Bern’, Jahrbuch des Bernischen Historisches Museum, 35/36, 273–6.Google Scholar
Schiek, S., 1962. ‘Ein Grabfund der frühen Urnenfelderkultur von Mengen, Kr. Saulgau’, Germania, 40, 130–41.Google Scholar
Schüle, W., 1969. Die Meseta-Kulturen der Iberischen Halbinsel. Berlin.Google Scholar
Smolík, J., 1881. ‘Various finds from Bohemia’ (Czech), Pamatky Archaeologi, 11, 664–5.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E., 1934. Die germanischen Vollgriffschwerter der jüngeren Bronzezeit. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E., 1956. Jungbronzezeitliche Hortfunde der Südzone des nordischen Kreises (Periode V), 1, 2. Mainz.Google Scholar
Taffanel, O. and Taffanel, J., 1962. ‘Deux tombes de cavaliers du Premier Age du Fer à Mailhac’, Gallia, 20, 3–32.Google Scholar
Thrane, H., 1958. ‘The rattle pendants from the Parc-y-Meirch hoard, Wales’, PPS, 24, 221–7.Google Scholar
Thrane, H., 1963. ‘The earliest bronze cheekpieces in Central and Northern Europe’, Aarbøger, 50–99.Google Scholar
Torbrügge, W., 1965. ‘Vollgriffschwerter der Urnenfelderzeit’, BVB, 30, 71–101.Google Scholar
Tratman, E. K., 1925. ‘Second report on King's Weston Hill, Bristol’, Proceedings of the Bristol Spelaeological Society, 2, nr 3, 238–43.Google Scholar
Viollier, D., 1924. 10. Pfahlbaubericht. Zürich.Google Scholar
Vogt, E., 1949. ‘Der Beginn der Hallstattzeit in der Schweiz’, JSGU, 40, 209–31.Google Scholar
Willvonseder, K., 1932. ‘Ein Depotfund aus Stillfried a. March’, WPZ, 19, 25–38.Google Scholar
Wocher, H., 1965. ‘Ein spätbronzezeitlicher Grabfund von Kressbron, Kr. Tettnang’, Germania, 43, 16–32.Google Scholar
Zschiller, R., and Forrer, R., 1893. Die Pferdetrense in ihrer Formentwicklung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Zürn, H., and Schiek, S., 1969. Die Sammlung Edelmannim Britischen Museum zu London. Stuttgart.Google Scholar