Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:29:18.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digging for Symbols in Science and History: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Ian Hodder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , 1986 , pp. 352 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barthes, R., 1977. Image, music, text. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. and Nissenbaum, S., 1974. Salem possessed. The social origins of witchcraft. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1968. Analytical Archaeology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., 1939. An autobiography. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G., 1946. The idea of history. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., 1979. Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982a. Symbols in action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982b. The Present Past. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1984a. ‘Archaeology in 1984’, Antiquity 58, 25–32.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1984b. ‘Ideology and power — the archaeological debate’, Environment and Planning D 2, 347–53.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1985. ‘Post-processual archaeology’, in Schiffer, M. (ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory 8 1–26. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1986. Reading the past. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leone, M., 1982a. ‘Childe's offspring’, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, 179–84. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leone, M., 1982b. ‘Some opinions about recovering mind’, American Antiquity 47, 742–60.Google Scholar
Miller, D. and Tilley, C. (eds), 1984. Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D., 1985. Artifacts as categories. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, H., 1985. Space, text and gender. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M., 1981. Historical metaphors and mythical realities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1982. ‘Social formation, social structures and social change’, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, 26–38. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yengoyan, A., 1985. Digging for symbols: the archaeology of everyday material life’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 51, 329–34.Google Scholar