Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:34:05.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Date of Stonehenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

R. J. C. Atkinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 1953 , pp. 236 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 236 note 1 Karo, , Schachtgräber von Mykenai, taf. XCV, Munich, 1930–1933Google Scholar.

page 236 note 2 P.P.S., IV (1938), 272Google Scholar.

page 237 note 1 Ant. Journ., XIX (1939), 291Google Scholar.

page 237 note 2 ibid., 292, fig, 1, 1.

page 237 note 3 Arch. Journ., CVIII (1952), 16Google Scholar.

page 237 note 4 ibid., 15.

page 237 note 5 Similar carvings of axes are also known from Nether Largie and Ri Cruin in Scotland (P.S.A.S. VIII (1869–1870), 378Google Scholar; ibid. LXV (1930–31), 269; Childe, , Prehist. Scot. (1935)Google Scholar, Pl. XI.

page 237 note 6 Though Professor Childe has recently pointed out (in a letter to the Times on July 25th, 1953) that the constructional and optical refinements of Stonehenge are not themselves paralleled in Mycenaean architecture, it is surely more fitting to see them as the product of the relatively sophisticated civilization of Mycenae, rather than of the essentially barbarous, even if commercially successful, aristocracy of our native Wessex Culture.