Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:24:50.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Acheulean in Asia?: A Review of Research on Korean Palaeolithic Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

William S. Ayres  and
Song Nai Rhee
William S. Ayres
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon
Song Nai Rhee
Affiliation:
North-west Christian College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A recent monograph written by three prominent Korean archaeologists reports on the results of the past 20 years of research on Korean palaeolithic sites. Discussed are tasks completed, projects underway, and suggestions for future work to be done on palaeolithic remains in the Korean Peninsula. Particularly significant is the chapter on the archaeology of the Jǒngok-ni site which has produced many palaeolithic artefacts; among these the excavators find a high percentage of handaxes and other core bifaces, a cultural phenomenon claimed to be unique in East Asian prehistoric technology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , December 1984 , pp. 35 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aigner, Jean S., 1972. ‘Relative Dating of North Chinese Faunal and Cultural Assemblages’, Arctic Anthropology 9(2). 37–79.Google Scholar
Aigner, Jean S., 1978. ‘Important archaeological remains from North China’. Early Palaeolithic in South and East Asia, Ikawa-Smith, F. (ed.), 163–232. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Balout, L., Biberson, P., and Tixier, J., 1967. ‘L'Acheuléen de Ternifine (Algérie): Gisement de l'Atlanthrope’, L'Anthropologie 71, 217–38.Google Scholar
Bartstra, Gert-Jan, 1976. Contributions to the study ofthe Palaeolithic Patjitan Culture, Java, Indonensia, Part I. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter, 1979. Man's Conquest of the Pacific. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1961. Typologie du Palaéolithique Ancien et Moyen. Publications de l'lnstitute de Préhistoire de l'Université de Bordeaux, Memoir 1.Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1968. The Old Stone Age. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Choi, Bok-kyu, 1973. ‘Hangukkwa Tongpuk Ashia ǔ Hukigusǒkki Munhwau Pikyǒyongu’ (Comparative analysis of Late Palaeolithic cultures of Korea and North-east Asia), Paiksan Hakpo 14. Seoul.Google Scholar
Choi, Bok-kyu, 1978. ‘Hanguk Sonsashidae Yesulkwa kǔe Natanan Shinangǔlshik’ (Religious consciousness as reflected in the prehistoric art of Korea during the Palaeolithic period), Paiksan Hakpo 14. Seoul.Google Scholar
Choi, Mou Chang, 1982. ‘Report of the Third Excavation in Cheon-kok Palaeolithic Site’, Inmunkwahaknonchong (Jour, of Humanities) 14, 207–39. Seoul: Konkuk University.Google Scholar
Chung, Young-hwa, 1976. ‘Kogo Misul’ (Archaeology and Art), Yoksa Hakpo 72, 142–48.Google Scholar
Clark, J. Desmond, 1970. The Prehistory of Africa. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Colani, Madeleine, 1927. L'âge de la pierre dans la province de Hoa-binh (Tonkin) Memoir du Service Geologique de l'lndochine 14.Google Scholar
Howell, F. Clark, 1966. ‘Observations on the Earlier Phases of the European Lower Palaeolithic’, Recent Studies in Palaeo-Anthropology (Special Publication), American Anthropologist 68(2), 88–201.Google Scholar
Jia, Lanpo, 1980. Early Man in China. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Jia, Lampo, Pei, Gai, and Wuzhu, You, 1972. Excavation report of the Palaeolithic site of Shiyu, Shanxi (in Chinese). Kaogu Xuebao 1, 39–58.Google Scholar
Larichev, V. E. and Grigorenko, B. G., 1969. ‘Discovery of the Palaeolithic in Korea (The Coulpo Culture)’ (Translated from Russian by Powers, Roger), Arctic Anthropology 6(1).Google Scholar
Lin, C. C., 1963. ‘Geology and Ecology ofTaiwan Prehistory’, Asian Perspectives 7(1–2), 203–13.Google Scholar
Ohel, Mila, 1979. ‘The Clactonian: An Independent Complex or an Integral Part of the Acheulean’, Current Anthropology 20(4), 685–726.Google Scholar
Sohn, Pow-key, 1968. ‘Sǒkchang-ni Jagaldol Jjikkae Munhwachǔng’ (Pebble Chopping-Tool Culture at Sǒkchang-ni) Hanguksa Yǒngu 1. Seoul.Google Scholar
Sohn, Pow-key, 1973. ‘Sǒkchang-ni ǔ Huki Kusǒkkoshidae Jipjari’ (Late Palaeolithic Habitation Site at Sǒkchang-ni) Hanguksa Yǒngu 9. Seoul.Google Scholar
Sohn, Pow-key, 1974. ‘Hanguk Kusǒkkishidae ǔ Jayǒn-Tukki Jǒmmal Tongul ǔ Jichǔngbyul Ggokkarubunskǒkkwa Kihu ǔ chujǒng’ (Environment of Korean Palaeolithic — with Special Attention to Pollen Profile and Climate Reconstruction at Jommal Limestone Cave) Hanbul Yǒngu 1. Seoul.Google Scholar
Sohn, Pow-key, 1978a. ‘Jechǒon Jǒmmal Tongul Balgul Chose Yǒngu’ (Excavations and Investigations of Jechǒn Jǒmmal Limestone Cave) Hanguksa Yǒngu 19. Seoul.Google Scholar
Sohn, Pow-key, 1978b. ‘The Early Palaeolithic Industries of Sǒkchanǵ-ni, Korea’, Early Palaeolithic in South and East Asia, Ikawa-Smith, F. (ed.), 233–45. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ranov, V. A. and Davis, R. S., 1979. ‘Toward a new outline of the Soviet Central Asian Palaeolithic’, Current Anthropology 20(2), 249–70.Google Scholar
Sonneville-Bordes, Denise de, 1965. L'age de la pierre. 2nd edition. Paris.Google Scholar
Stiles, Daniel, 1979a. ‘Palaeolithic Culture and Culture Change: Experiment in Theory and Method’, Current Anthropology 29(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Stiles, Daniel, 1979b. ‘Early Acheulean an d Developed Oldowan’, Current Anthropology 20(1), 126–29.Google Scholar
Wang, Chi-wu, 1961. ‘The Forest of China’, Maria Moors Cabot Foundation Publication 5. Cambridge.Google Scholar