Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:35:36.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Silted-Up Lake of Hoxne and Its Contained Flint Implements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Get access

Extract

Before proceeding to give a description of the silted-up lake of Hoxne, and its contained flint implements, I would wish to express my thanks to Miss Dorothy Garrod, Professor P. G. H. Boswell, Sir Arthur Keith, F.R.S., Dr. O. Erdtman, Professor Henri Breuil, Mr. Alfred S. Barnes, Mr. Reginald Smith, and to Mr. Guy Maynard, for the help they have given me in my researches during 1924–6 at this spot. I am also especially indebted to the British Association, the Percy Sladen Memorial Fund, and to Mr. Henry Balfour, F.R.S. for providing the funds to pay for the labour employed. The work of excavation was carried out under my supervision, by my trained digger, John Baxter, assisted by one of the men employed in the brickfield at Hoxne, and every care was taken to obtain a trustworthy record of the exact position each humanly flaked flint, or other specimen, occupied in the geological sequence.

The implementiferous deposits of Hoxne are justly famous throughout the archæological world. In the year 1797, there was living at, or near, this place, one, John Frere, who evidently took a keen, and remarkably astute interest in the question of the antiquity of man. There is no doubt that then, as now, a brickfield existed at Hoxne, and Frere's attention was drawn to a quantity of flaked flints which were being turned out by the workmen, at a certain level below the brickearth. To realise the significance of what follows, it is necessary to grasp the fact that, in 1797, next to nothing was known regarding ancient flint implements of any kind, and least of all about those which we now know were made by Lower Palæolithic man.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 137 note * Frere, John. Archcæologia 1800, Vol. XII., p. 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 138 note * Prestwich, Sir J. Phil. Trans., Part II., 1860, p. 318.

page 139 noet * Prestwich, Sir J. Phil. Trans., Part II., 1860, p. 304–308.

page 139 note † Prestwich, Sir J. Phil. Trans., Part II., 1860, p. 306.

page 139 note ‡ Evans, Sir J. “Ancient Stone Implements,” 2nd Edition, p. 575 and Fig. 433.

page 140 note * Belt, Thomas. Quarterly Journal of Science, 1876, p. 289Google Scholar.

page 140 note † Report of the British Association, 1896, Liverpool, p. 400.

page 141 note * Moir, J. Reid. Geol. Mag., Vol. LVII., No. 671. May, 1920Google Scholar.

page 141 note † Moir, J. Reid. The Great Flint Implements of Cromer, Norfolk. Harrison, The Ancient House, IpswichGoogle Scholar.

page 143 note † Boswell, P. G. H. and Moir, J. Reid. Journ. Roy. Anthr. Inst., Vol. III., 1923. January to June, pp. 229262Google Scholar.

page 144 note * The relative positions of the diggings, of which the various sections here given are a record, will be found set out in Fig. A.

page 149 note * Commont, V. Congres International d'Anthropologie, 1912, Geneva, p. 291Google Scholar.

page 151 note * Moir, J. Reid. Journ. Roy. Anthr. Inst., Vol. L., 1920. January to June, pp. 135152Google Scholar.

page 151 note † Moir, J. Reid. Journ. Roy. Anthr. Inst., Vol. XLVII., 1917, pp. 367412Google Scholar.