No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Neolithic Pottery from Larne
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2013
Extract
In the Antrim Collection at the Ashmolean Museum is a group of sherds said to be from a chambered cairn near Lame, co. Antrim. There are no exact details of the find available, but a label pasted inside one sherd states that it was found in a tumulus in 1869. Mr. E. Thurlow Leeds first drew attention to this pottery in 1927 and indicated its importance, but it has not hitherto been fully studied.
The group is unambiguously linked by certain sherds with a small series of Scottish Neolithic wares, represented by the well-known bowls from the Clachaig and Beacharra segmented cairns, but other fragments show remarkable features which serve to isolate it as a group sui generis.
The importance of the group lies in the mixture of styles represented. The actual forms of the pottery suggest kinship with the great Windmill Hill family of the British Neolithic wares, and certain sherds (Nos. 4, 5, 11, 12, and 16) exhibit features of decoration (transverse strokes on the rim, shallow grooves, etc.) characteristic of this class alone. On the other hand, the motifs of cord impressions, both plain and whipped, hatched triangles and herringbone on the other sherds are completely unknown in the pure Windmill Hill ceramics and occur in the British Neolithic only in the pottery of the Peterborough culture. The arrangement of the ornament in panels on Nos. 1 and 3 is, however, a distinctive Windmill Hill style.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1932
References
page 62 note 1 Antiq. Journ. VII, 456.Google Scholar
page 62 note 2 For this series of pottery see Arch. Journ. LXXXVIII, 107–110Google Scholar.
page 64 note 1 e.g. Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LVII, p. 247Google Scholar.
page 64 note 2 e.g. Abercromby, ii, nos., 8, 20, 127 and, imitated at Clonshannon, Wicklow, Proc Soc. Ant. Ireland, 1932Google Scholar, pl. XVI, C.
page 65 note 1 Arch. Journ. LXXXVIII, p. 57Google Scholar.