Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:23:50.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some aspects of the measurement of flavour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

D. G. Land
D. G. Land
Affiliation:
Food Research Institute, Norwich
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Organolepis and Nutrition: The Sensory Perception of Food
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , December 1970 , pp. 309 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

REFERENCES

Amerine, M. A., Panghorn, R. M. & Roessler, E. B. (1965). Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
ASTM (1968). Manual on Sensory Testing Methods, STP no. 434. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
Flath, R. A., Black, D. R., Guadagni, D. G., McFadden, W. H. & Schultz, T. H. (1967). J. agric. Fd Chem. 15, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guadagni, D. G. (1968). In Correlation of Subjective-Objective Methods in the Study of Odors and Taste, STP 440 p. 36. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
Hall, B. A., Tarver, M.-G. & McDonald, J. G. (1959). Fd Technol., Champaign 13, 699.Google Scholar
Harper, R., Bate-Smith, E. C. & Land, D. G. (1968). Odour Description and Odour Classification. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Harper, R., Bate-Smith, E. C., Land, D. G. & Griffiths, N. M. (1968). Perfum. essent. Oil Rec. 59, 22.Google Scholar
Harper, R., Land, D. G., Griffiths, N. M. & Bate-Smith, E. C. (1968). Br. J. Psychol. 59, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, A. (1963). Fd Technol., Champaign 17, 1596.Google Scholar
Kramer, A. & Ditman, L. P. (1956). Fd Technol., Champaign 10, 155.Google Scholar
Mahoney, C. H., Stier, D. L. & Crosby, E. A. (1957 a). Fd Technol., Champaign 11, Suppl. p. 29.Google Scholar
Mahoney, C. H., Stier, D. L. & Crosby, E. A. (1957 b). Fd Technol., Champaign 11, Suppl. 37.Google Scholar
Sjöström, I. B., Cairncross, S. E. & Caul, J. F. (1957). Fd Technol., Champaign 11, Suppl. p. 20.Google Scholar
von Sydow, E., Anderson, J., Anjou, K., Karlsson, G., Land, D. G. & Griffiths, N. M. (1970). Lebensm.-Wiss. u. Technol. 3, 11.Google Scholar
Tilgner, D. J. (1962). Fd Technol., Champaign 16, no. 2, 26.Google Scholar
Tilgner, D. J. (1965), Fd Technol., Champaign 19, 25.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1953). Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. Ser II 16, (2) 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar