Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:51:01.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Session 4: CVD, diabetes and cancer A dietary portfolio for management and prevention of heart disease

Symposium on ‘Dietary management of disease’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2009

Amin Esfahani
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, OntarioM5S 3E2, Canada Clinical Nutrition & Risk Factor Modification Center, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, OntarioM5C 2T2, Canada
David J. A. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, OntarioM5S 3E2, Canada Clinical Nutrition & Risk Factor Modification Center, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, OntarioM5C 2T2, Canada
Cyril W. C. Kendall*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, OntarioM5S 3E2, Canada Clinical Nutrition & Risk Factor Modification Center, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, OntarioM5C 2T2, Canada College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SaskatchewanS7N 5C9, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Cyril W. C. Kendall, fax +1 416 978 5310, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

CHD is the leading cause of worldwide mortality. The prevalence of heart disease has been linked to the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle and the increased dietary dependence on saturated fats from animal sources and the intake of refined foods. Elevated blood cholesterol level is one of the major risk factors for CHD. While cholesterol-lowering drug therapy (statins) has been effective in reducing the risk of heart disease, there are those individuals who are unwilling or because of muscle pains or raised levels of liver or muscle enzymes are unable to take cholesterol-lowering medication. Fortunately, there is evidence linking a number of dietary components to CHD risk reduction. The strength of this evidence has prompted various regulatory bodies to advocate diet as the first line of defence for primary prevention of heart disease. It was therefore decided to combine four dietary components that have been shown to lower blood cholesterol concentrations (nuts, plant sterols, viscous fibre and vegetable protein) in a dietary portfolio in order to determine whether the combined effect is additive. In a metabolically-controlled setting this dietary portfolio has proved to be as effective as a starting dose of a first-generation statin cholesterol-lowering medication in reducing the risk of CHD. The dietary portfolio has also been shown to be effective in sustaining a clinically-significant effect in the long term under a ‘real-world’ scenario. However, success of the diet depends on compliance and despite the accessibility of the foods adherence has been found to vary greatly. Overall, the evidence supports the beneficial role of the dietary portfolio in reducing blood cholesterol levels and CHD risk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Abbreviations:
LDL-C

LDL-cholesterol

NCEP

National Cholesterol Education Program

TC

total cholesterol

IHD is the leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for 17·3% and 11·8% of total deaths in high-income nations and low- and middle-income nations respectively(Reference Lopez, Mathers and Ezzati1). Furthermore, current projections estimate that by 2030 IHD will still be the leading cause of worldwide mortality (13·4% of total deaths)(Reference Mathers and Loncar2). Evidence from various drug-therapy trials show that statins have been effective in reducing the risk of heart disease(Reference LaRosa, Grundy and Waters3, Reference Ridker, Danielson and Fonseca4). Diet, on the other hand, although publically recognized as first-line therapy(Reference Thompson, Clarkson and Karas5), has been considered by many investigators to be ineffective because of the poor response seen in many studies. Despite this deficiency, cohort studies have shown that the risk of CHD is predominantly diet and lifestyle dependent(Reference Barter, Caulfield and Eriksson6, 7). Furthermore, it is generally accepted that recent changes in human dietary and exercise patterns, stemming from the industrial revolution and the subsequent Westernization of lifestyle, have made a major contribution to the current prevalence of this disease.

The evolution of the human diet remains controversial and the understanding of it is based largely on circumstantial evidence(Reference Ungar8). Yet, analyses of tooth morphology, C isotopes and trace elements, in addition to current dietary patterns of man's distant ape relatives, strongly support the notion that the diet of early hominins was predominantly plant-based and composed of unrefined foods including large amounts of foliage, leafy vegetables, shoots, fruit, seeds and nuts(Reference Ungar8Reference Teaford and Ungar15). This diet, therefore, would have been very high in fibre and rich in sources of plant sterols, vegetable proteins and nuts. However, the introduction of agriculture and animal husbandry practices approximately 10 000 years ago dramatically changed the human diet(Reference Cordain and Ungar16). Despite this change in the diet, food refinement and processing and the increased use of animal products did not become prevalent until the industrial revolution(Reference Cleave, Campbell and Painter17, Reference Burkitt and Trowell18). The increase in food processing and meat intake, coupled with the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle resulting from the technological revolution, are thought to be responsible for the present-day prevalence of chronic diseases such as heart disease(Reference Franklin19, Reference Popkin20).

This conclusion is strongly supported by evidence from dietary interventions that have demonstrated the ability of ancestral food components such as viscous fibres, plant sterols, vegetable proteins and nuts to reduce the risk of heart disease by lowering serum cholesterol levels(Reference Olson, Anderson and Becker21Reference Law25). The strength of the evidence has prompted various bodies such as the American Heart Association(Reference Krauss, Eckel and Howard26), the Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)(7) and the US Food and Drug Administration(2731) to endorse the intake of these food components. The Food and Drug Administration has approved health claims for the intake of soyabean protein (25 g/d)(30), nuts (42 g/d)(27), plant sterols (1·5 g/d)(29) and viscous fibres (β-glucan from oats and barley, 3 g/d; psyllium (Plantago spp.), 7 g/d)(28, 31).

Inspired by the ancestral diets, in 2001 an attempt was made to create a dietary approach based on current dietary recommendations that while being feasible and accessible, maximized the metabolic advantages of plant-based foods. Since the available evidence demonstrates that viscous fibres, plant sterols, vegetable proteins and nuts can each independently lower serum cholesterol by 5–10%(Reference Olson, Anderson and Becker21Reference Law25), it was assumed that the effect of combining these components may be additive and as such lead to clinically-significant reductions in serum cholesterol and consequently lower the risk of developing heart disease. In order to test the efficacy of this approach, a series of trials were conducted that assessed the effect of the dietary portfolio on serum cholesterol levels and other biomarkers of heart disease.

The dietary portfolio

The task was undertaken of creating a vegetable-based diet that was not only accessible and palatable, but also in compliance with the dietary recommendations of the NCEP (Adult Treatment Panel III)(7). The major recommendations are that <7% energy should come from SFA and that dietary cholesterol intake should be <200 mg/d. The NCEP (Adult Treatment Panel III) also recommends that 50–60% energy should come from carbohydrate, 15% energy from protein and 25–35% energy from fat (⩽10% from PUFA and ⩽20% from MUFA). The recommendation for dietary fibre is 20–30 g/d(7). The macronutrient profile of the devised dietary portfolio differed between the trials but was similar to the NCEP recommendations(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie34) (Table 1). The ranges of intake for carbohydrates, fats and proteins (% total energy intake) were 48·0–56·6, 23·2–30·0 and 20·0–22·4 respectively. Saturated fats comprised <7·0% total energy and <50 mg dietary cholesterol/4·2 MJ (1000 kcal) was present(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie34). Furthermore, the diet provided 30·7–37·2 g dietary fibre/4·2 MJ (1000 kcal). As for the main dietary components of the diet, it provided (/4·2 MJ (1000 kcal)) 1–1·2 g plant sterols as a sterol-enriched margarine, 8·2–9·8 g viscous fibres from oats, barley and psyllium, 16·2–22·7 g soyabean protein and 14–16·6 g raw unblanched almonds (Amygdalus communis L.; Table 1). In addition to oats, barley and psyllium, okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and aubergine (eggplant; Solanum melongena) were also sources of viscous fibre. The sources of soyabean protein were tofu, soya milk, soya yogurt and soya sausages, hot dogs and burgers. Additional vegetable fibre and protein came from legume sources, which included chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), beans and lentils (Lens culinaris)(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie34). All the foods were available at local food markets and health stores.

Table 1. Nutrient profile and the amount of key foods in the National Cholesterol Education Program (Adult Treatment Panel III)(7) control diet and the dietary portfolio in metabolically-controlled trials

* From oats, barley, psyllium (Plantago spp.), okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and aubergine (eggplant; Solanum melongena).

From a plant-sterol margarine.

The control diet was a very-low-fat lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet. The control diet lacked the sources of viscous fibres, plant sterols and almonds. Furthermore, skim-milk products replaced soyabean- and vegetable-protein foods. The sources of dietary fibre, the intake of which was 23·3–26·6 g/4·4 MJ (1000 kcal), were generally whole-grain and whole-wheat foods(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie33, Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie34).

The dietary portfolio: metabolic trials

Four 4-week metabolically-controlled randomized clinical trials have tested the effect of the dietary portfolio on markers of heart disease (Fig. 1)(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie35). The first study was uncontrolled and included thirteen subjects (seven men and six post-menopausal women (BMI 25·6 (se 0·9) kg/m2), three of whom had blood lipids in the normal range(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32). At the end of the 4-week intervention total cholesterol (TC; −22·3 (se 2·0) %), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C; −29·0 (se 2·7) %) and apoB (−24·2 (se 2·0) %) were found to be significantly reduced (P<0·001 for all three markers) when compared with baseline values. TC:HDL-cholesterol, LDL-C:HDL-cholesterol and apoB:apoA-I were also reduced. Overall, there was a 30% reduction in calculated risk of CHD(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32).

Fig. 1. Effect of the dietary portfolio (▪) v. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP; □) and NCEP+statin () treatments on baseline LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in metabolic studies (for details, see text). Mean values were significantly different from those for NCEP control: * P<0·05. Mean value was significantly different from those for dietary portfolio and NCEP control: † P<0·05.

The promising results from the first trial prompted a second trial(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie34) that compared the effects of the dietary portfolio with that of NCEP-recommended diet(7). Twenty-five healthy subjects with hyperlipidaemia took part in this parallel-designed 4-week study (sixteen men and nine post-menopausal women; BMI 26·6 (se 2·9) kg/m2). Similar to the first trial, the portfolio diet (n 13) was found to result in significant reductions in TC (−26·6 (se 2·8) %), LDL-C (−35 (se 3·1) %) and apoB (−26·7 (se 3·3) %) by comparison with the control (P<0·001 for all three measures). TC:HDL-cholesterol, LDL-C:HDL-cholesterol and apoB:apoA-I were also reduced(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie34). However, more importantly, these portfolio-induced reductions in serum TC and LDL-C levels were significantly lower than those caused by the NCEP control diet (−9·9 (se 2·0) % and −12·1 (se 2·4) % for serum TC and LDL-C respectively by comparison with baseline values; P<0·001). The dietary portfolio proved to be a more effective approach for lowering the risk of CHD by comparison with the established dietary guidelines for individuals with hyperlipidaemia (calculated reduction in 10-year CHD risk of 31·7% for the dietary portfolio v. 11·2% for the NCEP control; P<0·05)(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie34).

In order to further test the clinical relevance of the dietary portfolio, a third metabolically-controlled trial was conducted that compared the effect of the dietary portfolio with not only the NCEP diet, but also a NCEP diet supplemented with a starting dose of a cholesterol-lowering medication (20 mg lovastatin/d)(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie33). Forty-six subjects with hyperlipidaemia participated in the study (twenty-five men and twenty-one post-menopausal women; BMI 27·6 (se 0·5) kg/m2). Similar to the other two trials, subjects on the dietary portfolio arm (n 16) were found to show reductions in all variables measured in previous studies including LDL-C (−28·7 (se 3·2) % compared with baseline; P<0·001). More importantly, no significant differences were found between the lovastatin (n 14) and the dietary portfolio groups for any of the variables. In fact, both treatments were found to impact similarly on calculated 10-year CHD risk (−24·9 (se 5·5) % and −25·8 (se 4·4) % for dietary portfolio and lovastatin groups respectively; P>0·05). These two approaches were shown to be more effective in modifying the risk factors of CHD than the NCEP-derived control(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie33).

Finally, because there may be inter-individual differences in response to drug or diet therapy, it was decided to test the response of the same individuals to both treatments. A three-phase randomized cross-over study was designed that compared the effects of the NCEP diet, NCEP+statin and the dietary portfolio(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie35). The data for the first phase were taken from the previous study(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie33) and the subjects were asked to complete the other two treatments(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie35). Thirty-four healthy subjects with hyperlipidaemia completed the study (twenty men and fourteen post-menopausal women; BMI 27·3 (se 3·3) kg/m2). Similar to previous findings, significant percentage changes from baseline were found for LDL-C (−8·5 (se 1·9), −33·3 (se 1·9) and −29·6. (se 1·3) for the NCEP control, NCEP+lovastatin and portfolio diets respectively; P<0·05 for all treatments). However, in this trial the difference between the statin treatment and the dietary portfolio was found to be significant (P=0·013). Furthermore, 26% (n 9) of the participants were found to show a better response to the portfolio diet compared with the NCEP+statin diet(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie35).

The results of these four metabolically-controlled 4-week trials show that the dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods is a clinically-relevant approach for reducing the risk of heart disease. Furthermore, the magnitude of its effect is comparable with that of a starting dosage of a first-generation cholesterol-lowering medication(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie35); thus, reiterating the point that diet is an effective treatment option in primary prevention of heart disease(7).

The dietary portfolio: long-term sustainability

The metabolic studies indicate that the dietary portfolio is efficacious in reducing serum cholesterol concentrations(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie35). However, as discussed previously, the aim was to develop a dietary approach that in addition to being effective was also easy to comply with. Thus, with the effectiveness of the dietary portfolio established under well-controlled metabolic studies, the next concern to be addressed was whether the diet was effective in achieving clinically-significant cholesterol reductions under free-living conditions over the long term. Sixty-six healthy subjects with hyperlipidaemia (thirty-one men and thirty-five post-menopausal women; BMI 27·3 (se 0·4) kg/m2) participated in the 1-year free-living study in which they were provided with advice to follow the dietary portfolio(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner36). Fifty-five subjects (83%) completed the study. Significant reductions of 12·8 (se 2·0) % in LDL-C compared with baseline after the 1-year trial were shown by intention-to-treat analysis (P<0·001). Significant reductions in serum TC and TAG and a significant increase in HDL-cholesterol (P<0·05 for all three variables) were also found. For the fifty-five participants who completed the trial the mean reduction in LDL-C was slightly better at 14·6 (se 2·1) %(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner36). While the reductions achieved under ‘real-world’ conditions were found to be less than those observed under the tightly-controlled metabolic studies, >30% of the subjects who were recruited into the study managed to achieve >20% reductions in LDL-C (mean 29·7%). In terms of compliance, only two participants followed the vegan recommendations, five remained lacto-ovo-vegetarian and the rest were omnivorous. Compliance with the four dietary components was found to vary (%; 78·8 (se 3·2), 67·1 (se 3·2), 55·1 (se 2·9) and 51·0 (se 3·0) for almonds, plant sterols, viscous fibres and soyabean protein respectively). Significant correlations were found between compliance and LDL-C reduction for total dietary portfolio compliance (r −0·42, P<0·001), soyabean protein (r −0·52, P<0·0001), fibre (r −0·39, P=0·0012) and almonds (r −0·33, P=0·0080) but not for plant sterols (r −0·20, P=0·1232), possibly because the plant-sterol margarine was easy to comply with, did not displace unhealthy foods and the scatter in the data was not as great(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner36). The study demonstrates that in a ‘real-world’ setting highly-motivated individuals can achieve cholesterol reductions with the dietary portfolio that are within the clinically-meaningful range based on early statin and prestatin drug criteria(Reference Illingworth37, Reference Schectman and Hiatt38). Worth noting is that the long-term sustainability of the portfolio diet is still under investigation. Results from the third year of follow-up demonstrate that in both intent-to-treat and completer analyses the reductions in LDL-C are maintained (D. J. A. Jenkins and C. W. C. Kendall, unpublished results).

Other benefits and future direction

Evidence suggests that the favourable effects of the dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods on the risk of heart disease are not limited to its role in improving the blood lipid profile. The free-living phase of the study has shown that the dietary portfolio can significantly lower blood pressure (−4·2 (se 1·3) mmHg (P=0·002) and −2·3 (se 0·7) mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure respectively; P=0·001)(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner39). This reduction in blood pressure was found to be correlated with consumption of almonds(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner39). Evidence also suggests that the dietary portfolio may have a favourable effect on C-reactive protein(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32, Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie33, Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie40). Inflammation is thought to play a major role in CVD(Reference Rifai and Ridker41) and C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, has been proposed as a biomarker of CHD risk(Reference Ridker, Glynn and Hennekens42, Reference Ridker, Buring and Shih43). Both the dietary portfolio and the statin treatment were found to lead to similar reductions in C-reactive protein, which were shown to be significant in one study (−28·2 (se 10·8), P=0·02 and −33·3 (se 8·3) %, P=0·002 respectively)(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie33) and significant in another when subjects with C-reactive protein levels above the 75th percentile were excluded (−23·8 (se 6·9) % (n 25), P=0·001 and −16·3 (se 6·7) % (n 23), P=0·013 respectively)(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Marchie40).

An in-depth look into the effect of the dietary portfolio on LDL-C has demonstrated that this diet is capable of lowering the concentrations of all fractions of LDL-C, including the small dense fraction(Reference Lamarche, Desroches and Jenkins44, Reference Gigleux, Jenkins and Kendall45). The dietary portfolio may also reduce oxidative damage to LDL(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Faulkner32). Evidence from one study suggests that adding strawberries to the portfolio diet not only reduces oxidative damage but also increases the palatability of the diet(Reference Jenkins, Nguyen and Kendall46). Another possible beneficial effect of the dietary portfolio may be through its effect on haematological indices(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Nguyen47). The dietary portfolio has small but favourable effects on packed cell volume and mean platelet volume(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Nguyen47).

The dietary portfolio has also been effective in reducing blood lipids during weight loss. A recent randomized clinical trial that utilized three components of the dietary portfolio (nuts, viscous fibres and soyabean protein) has shown that an energy-restricted diet containing these components is more effective than an energy-restricted NCEP-derived diet in reducing blood lipids(Reference Jenkins, Wong and Kendall48). Furthermore, although not studied, the dietary portfolio may be effective in management of other chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, since there is evidence that viscous fibre and nuts (limited evidence) can improve postprandial glycaemic response acutely and glycaemic control in the long term(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Josse49Reference Anderson, Randles and Kendall52).

Conclusion

Changes in the dietary pattern of human subjects stemming from increased intake of refined foods and saturated fats, in addition to the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle, may be responsible for the prevalence of chronic diseases such as heart disease. The strength of the evidence from the current body of research suggests that dietary approaches may be an effective first line of defence against heart disease. The key to an effective dietary approach may lie in the ancestral diets. This argument is strengthened by the beneficial effects associated with the dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods, including nuts, plant sterols, viscous fibres and vegetable proteins, that are thought to have been a major part of the ancestral diets. In the metabolically-controlled setting the dietary portfolio has proved to be as effective as cholesterol-lowering drugs in reducing the risk of heart disease. Furthermore, the reductions are sustainable in the long term in a ‘real world’ setting; however, compliance is critical for this sustainability. Despite the accessibility to all components of the dietary portfolio compliance varies greatly. The key for the future of dietary approaches is to focus on adherence and to devise diets that are both effective and easy to follow.

Acknowledgements

D. J. A. J. has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Loblaw Brands Ltd, Sanitarium, Herbalife International, Nutritional Fundamentals for Health, Pacific Health Laboratories, Metagenics/MetaProteomics, Bayer Consumer Care, Almond Board of California, California Strawberry Commission, Orafti, Unilever and Solae. C. W. C. K. has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Paramount Farms. D. J. A. J. and C. W. C. K. have received grants from Barilla, Solae, Unilever, Hain Celestial, Loblaw Brands, Sanitarium, Almond Board of California, International Tree Nut Council, California Strawberry Commission, the Western Pistachio Commission, Orafti and the Canola and Flax Councils of Canada. D. J. A. J. has been on the speakers' panel for the Almond Board of California. C. W. C. K. has been on the speakers' panel for the Almond Board of California, Paramount Farms and the International Tree Nut Council. C. W. C. K., D. J. A. J. and A. E. were responsible for the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafted the manuscript and undertook critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

References

1.Lopez, AD, Mathers, CD, Ezzati, M et al. (2006) Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367, 17471757.Google Scholar
2.Mathers, CD & Loncar, D (2006) Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 3, e442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.LaRosa, JC, Grundy, SM, Waters, DD et al. (2005) Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 352, 14251435.Google Scholar
4.Ridker, PM, Danielson, E, Fonseca, FA et al. (2008) Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 359, 21952207.Google Scholar
5.Thompson, PD, Clarkson, P & Karas, RH (2003) Statin-associated myopathy. JAMA 289, 16811690.Google Scholar
6.Barter, PJ, Caulfield, M, Eriksson, M et al. (2007) Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med 357, 21092122.Google Scholar
7.Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (2001) Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285, 24862497.Google Scholar
8.Ungar, PS (2007) Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
9.Kay, R (1977) Diets of early Miocene African hominoids. Nature 268, 628630.Google Scholar
10.Milton, K (2000) Hunter-gatherer diets – a different perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 665667.Google Scholar
11.Fossey, D (1974) Observations on the home range on one group of mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei). Animal Behavior 22, 568581.Google Scholar
12.Goodall, J (1977) Feeding and ranging behaviour of a mountain gorilla group (Gorilla gorilla beringei) in the Tshinda-Kahuzi region (Zaire). In Primate Ecology, pp. 449479 [Clutten-Brock, TH, editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
13.Goodall, J (1986) The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
14.Popovich, DG, Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW et al. (1997) The western lowland gorilla diet has implications for the health of humans and other hominoids. J Nutr 127, 20002005.Google Scholar
15.Teaford, MF & Ungar, PS (2000) Diet and the evolution of the earliest human ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 1350613511.Google Scholar
16.Cordain, L (2007) Implications of Plio-Pleistocene hominin diets for modern humans. In Evolution of the Human Diet: the Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable, pp. 363383 [Ungar, PS, editor]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
17.Cleave, TL, Campbell, GD & Painter, NS (1969) Diabetes, Coronary Thrombosis and the Saccharine Disease. Bristol: John Wright & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
18.Burkitt, DP & Trowell, HC (1975) Refined Carbohydrate and Disease. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
19.Franklin, BA (2001) The downside of our technological revolution? An obesity-conducive environment. Am J Cardiol 87, 10931095.Google Scholar
20.Popkin, BM (1993) Nutrition patterns and transitions. Popul Dev Rev 19, 138157.Google Scholar
21.Olson, BH, Anderson, SM, Becker, MP et al. (1997) Psyllium-enriched cereals lower blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, but not HDL cholesterol, in hypercholesterolemic adults: results of a meta-analysis. J Nutr 127, 19731980.Google Scholar
22.Anderson, JW, Allgood, LD, Lawrence, A et al. (2000) Cholesterol-lowering effects of psyllium intake adjunctive to diet therapy in men and women with hypercholesterolemia: meta-analysis of 8 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 472479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Brown, L, Rosner, B, Willett, WW et al. (1999) Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 3042.Google Scholar
24.Anderson, JW, Johnstone, BM & Cook-Newell, ME (1995) Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. N Engl J Med 333, 276282.Google Scholar
25.Law, M (2000) Plant sterol and stanol margarines and health. Br Med J 320, 861864.Google Scholar
26.Krauss, RM, Eckel, RH, Howard, B et al. (2000) AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation 102, 22842299.Google Scholar
27.Food and Drug Administration (2003) Qualified health claims: Letter of enforcement discretion – Nuts and coronary heart disease (docket no. 02P-0505). http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/LabelClaims/QualifiedHealthClaims/ucm072926.htmGoogle Scholar
28.Food and Drug Administration (2001) Food labeling: Health claims: Soluble fiber from whole oats and risk of coronary heart disease. Fed Regist 66, 1534315344.Google Scholar
29.Food and Drug Administration (2000) Food labeling: Health claims: Plant sterol/stanol esters and coronary heart disease. Fed Regist 65, 5468554739.Google Scholar
30.Food and Drug Administration (1999) FDA final rule for food labeling: Health claims: Soy protein and coronary heart disease. Fed Regist 64, 5769957733.Google Scholar
31.Food and Drug Administration (1998) Food labeling: Health claims: Soluble fiber from certain foods and coronary heart disease. Fed Regist 63, 81038121.Google Scholar
32.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Faulkner, D et al. (2002) A dietary portfolio approach to cholesterol reduction: combined effects of plant sterols, vegetable proteins, and viscous fibers in hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism 51, 15961604.Google Scholar
33.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Marchie, A et al. (2003) Effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods vs lovastatin on serum lipids and C-reactive protein. JAMA 290, 502510.Google Scholar
34.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Marchie, A et al. (2003) The effect of combining plant sterols, soy protein, viscous fibers, and almonds in treating hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism 52, 14781483.Google Scholar
35.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Marchie, A et al. (2005) Direct comparison of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods with a statin in hypercholesterolemic participants. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 380387.Google Scholar
36.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Faulkner, DA et al. (2006) Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 582591.Google Scholar
37.Illingworth, DR (1988) An overview of lipid-lowering drugs. Drugs 36, Suppl. 3, 6371.Google Scholar
38.Schectman, G & Hiatt, J (1996) Drug therapy for hypercholesterolemia in patients with cardiovascular disease: factors limiting achievement of lipid goals. Am J Med 100, 197204.Google Scholar
39.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Faulkner, DA et al. (2008) Long-term effects of a plant-based dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods on blood pressure. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 781788.Google Scholar
40.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Marchie, A et al. (2005) Direct comparison of dietary portfolio vs statin on C-reactive protein. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 851860.Google Scholar
41.Rifai, N & Ridker, PM (2002) Inflammatory markers and coronary heart disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 13, 383389.Google Scholar
42.Ridker, PM, Glynn, RJ & Hennekens, CH (1998) C-reactive protein adds to the predictive value of total and HDL cholesterol in determining risk of first myocardial infarction. Circulation 97, 20072011.Google Scholar
43.Ridker, PM, Buring, JE, Shih, J et al. (1998) Prospective study of C-reactive protein and the risk of future cardiovascular events among apparently healthy women. Circulation 98, 731733.Google Scholar
44.Lamarche, B, Desroches, S, Jenkins, DJ et al. (2004) Combined effects of a dietary portfolio of plant sterols, vegetable protein, viscous fibre and almonds on LDL particle size. Br J Nutr 92, 657663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Gigleux, I, Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW et al. (2007) Comparison of a dietary portfolio diet of cholesterol-lowering foods and a statin on LDL particle size phenotype in hypercholesterolaemic participants. Br J Nutr 98, 12291236.Google Scholar
46.Jenkins, DJ, Nguyen, TH, Kendall, CW et al. (2008) The effect of strawberries in a cholesterol-lowering dietary portfolio. Metabolism 57, 16361644.Google Scholar
47.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Nguyen, TH et al. (2007) Effect on hematologic risk factors for coronary heart disease of a cholesterol reducing diet. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 483492.Google Scholar
48.Jenkins, DJ, Wong, JM, Kendall, CW et al. (2009) The effect of a plant-based low-carbohydrate (‘Eco-Atkins’) diet on body weight and blood lipid concentrations in hyperlipidemic subjects. Arch Intern Med 169, 10461054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Josse, AR et al. (2006) Almonds decrease postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and oxidative damage in healthy individuals. J Nutr 136, 29872992.Google Scholar
50.Josse, AR, Kendall, CW, Augustin, LS et al. (2007) Almonds and postprandial glycemia – a dose-response study. Metabolism 56, 400404.Google Scholar
51.Sievenpiper, JL, Kendall, CW, Esfahani, A et al. (2009) Effect of non-oil-seed pulses on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled experimental trials in people with and without diabetes. Diabetologia 52, 14791495.Google Scholar
52.Anderson, JW, Randles, KM, Kendall, CW et al. (2004) Carbohydrate and fiber recommendations for individuals with diabetes: a quantitative assessment and meta-analysis of the evidence. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 5–17.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Nutrient profile and the amount of key foods in the National Cholesterol Education Program (Adult Treatment Panel III)(7) control diet and the dietary portfolio in metabolically-controlled trials

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Effect of the dietary portfolio (▪) v. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP; □) and NCEP+statin () treatments on baseline LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in metabolic studies (for details, see text). Mean values were significantly different from those for NCEP control: * P<0·05. Mean value was significantly different from those for dietary portfolio and NCEP control: † P<0·05.