Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:28:19.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduction in systolic blood pressure following dietary fibre intervention is dependent on baseline gut microbiota composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2024

M. Snelson
Affiliation:
Hypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
H.A. Jama
Affiliation:
Hypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
D. Rhys-Jones
Affiliation:
Hypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia Department of Gastroenterology, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
G.A. Head
Affiliation:
Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
C.R. Mackay
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong Analysis and Test Center, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China
F.Z. Marques
Affiliation:
Hypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Uncontrolled hypertension is a primary cause of non-communicable diseases and death globally(1). The gut microbiota plays a role in hypertension and dietary interventions high in fibre have been shown to lower blood pressure (BP)(2). Not all participants respond to dietary fibre interventions, for reasons which are unclear. Here we aimed to identify responders of a high fibre intervention based on their baseline gut microbiome. Twenty treatment-naive participants with hypertension received either placebo or 40g per day of prebiotic acetylated and butyrylated high amylose maize starch (HAMSAB) supplementation for 3 weeks in a phase II randomised cross-over double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Blood pressure was monitored at baseline and each endpoint by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, with those experiencing a reduction between timepoints of ≥ 2 mmHg classified as responders. Baseline stool samples were collected and the V4-V5 region of the 16S gene sequenced. Taxonomy was assigned by reference to the SILVA database. The MaAsLin2 package was used for assessing the relationship between baseline gut microbiota and response to dietary intervention. Overall participants had significant reduction in 24-hour systolic BP (–6.1 mmHg, p = 0.03), with 14 individuals classified as responders and six individuals as non-responders. 13 genera were found to be differentially abundant between responders and non-responders. Genera significantly enriched in responders included Dialister (β = 1.29, q = 1.921x10-134), Coprococcus (β = 1.26, q = 3.282x10-121), Bifidobacterium (β = 1.67, q = 1.11x10-81), Ruminococcus (β = 0.161, q = 1.11x10-8) and Roseburia (β = 0.82, q = 4.275x10-2). Participants who experienced a decrease in systolic BP following a dietary fibre intervention had increased level of bacterial genera known to contain species that produce short-chain fatty acids (e.g. Bifidobacterium, Roseburia and Ruminococcus) at baseline. These data suggest that baseline microbiota composition contributes to the response to dietary fibre intervention trials in people with hypertension.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Murray, CJL et al. (2020) Lancet 396, 12231249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muralitharan, RR et al. (2020) Hypertension 76(6):16741687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed