Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:03:15.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevention of overweight and obesity in early life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2018

Julie Lanigan*
Affiliation:
The Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
*
Corresponding author: Julie Lanigan, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Childhood obesity is a serious challenge for public health. The problem begins early with most excess childhood weight gained before starting school. In 2016, the WHO estimated that 41 million children under 5 were overweight or obese. Once established, obesity is difficult to reverse, likely to persist into adult life and is associated with increased risk of CVD, type 2 diabetes and certain cancers. Preventing obesity is therefore of high importance. However, its development is multi-factorial and prevention is a complex challenge. Modifiable lifestyle behaviours such as diet and physical activity are the most well-known determinants of obesity. More recently, early-life factors have emerged as key influencers of obesity in childhood. Understanding risk factors and how they interact is important to inform interventions that aim to prevent obesity in early childhood. Available evidence supports multi-component interventions as effective in obesity prevention. However, relatively few interventions are available in the UK and only one, TrimTots, has been evaluated in randomised controlled trials and shown to be effective at reducing obesity risk in preschool children (age 1–5 years). BMI was lower in children immediately after completing TrimTots compared with waiting list controls and this effect was sustained at long-term follow-up, 2 years after completion. Developing and evaluating complex interventions for obesity prevention is a challenge for clinicians and researchers. In addition, parents encounter barriers engaging with interventions. This review considers early-life risk factors for obesity, highlights evidence for preventative interventions and discusses barriers and facilitators to their success.

Type
Conference on ‘Improving nutrition in metropolitan areas’
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2018 

Obesity is one of the most serious health problems facing today's children. Worldwide, levels are unacceptably high and continue to rise in many countries(1). Most excess weight in childhood is gained early, during the preschool years(Reference Gardner, Hosking and Metcalf2). Globally, more than forty million children under age 5 are currently estimated to be overweight or obese(1). Obesity affects preschool children from both low- and high-income countries(1). In England, for example, the recent national child measurement programme found that almost a quarter of children measured on starting school were already overweight(3). This is a serious concern as once established obesity tracks into later childhood(Reference Cunningham, Kramer and Narayan4) and adulthood(Reference Simmonds, Llewellyn and Owen5) and is difficult to reverse. Obesity is linked to poorer health outcomes in children, including asthma(Reference Egan, Ettinger and Bracken6) and sleep apnoea(Reference Kong and Chow7) and obese adults are at increased risk of CVD, type 2 diabetes and some cancers(Reference Lauby-Secretan, Scoccianti and Loomis8). Reducing the risk of obesity therefore is a priority for public health. Achieving this reduction is a challenge for clinicians, researchers and strategists working in obesity prevention.

Obesity is a complex condition with multi-factorial causes. At its simplest, obesity results from an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure that, if sustained over a long period, leads to weight gain. While genetic factors increase susceptibility to weight gain, the current ‘obesogenic’ environment, where energy-dense foods are highly available and sedentary behaviours widespread, is a major contributor to the development of obesity(Reference Giskes, van and Avendano-Pabon9).

Obesity rates in children vary widely according to where they live. For example, the prevalence in children under 10 is higher in southern compared with northern European countries(Reference Ahrens, Pigeot and Pohlabeln10). There is a strong relationship between socioeconomic status and obesity(1). This relationship is complex but in developed countries such as the UK children of low socioeconomic status are worst affected. Obesity rates also vary widely within countries. For example, in the UK, 5·1 % of preschool children living in the London borough of Kingston-upon-Thames were obese compared with 12·7 % in the Midlands city of Wolverhampton, according to the National Child Measurement Programme(3). Rates even differed between local authority regions within the same cities. In London, for example, 13·8 % of preschool children in Brent were obese compared with only 5·1 % in Kingston(3). Obesity prevalence was higher in towns and cities (9·9 %) compared with rural areas (7·9 %), suggesting that, in the UK, urban children are most at risk(3).

Modifiable lifestyle factors in adulthood such as diet and physical activity are the main determinants of obesity. However, strong evidence suggests that factors in early life also play a major role in its development(Reference Woo Baidal, Locks and Cheng11). The aim of this review is to summarise risk factors for obesity in early life, including infancy (birth to 12 months) and preschool (1–5 years). The review will highlight evidence for preventative interventions, discuss challenges for researchers developing and implementing them and consider barriers restricting parental engagement.

Risk factors for obesity in early life

Risk factors for obesity are both genetic and environmental(Reference Hruby, Manson and Qi12). Human subjects are predisposed to obesity through genes that have been conserved throughout evolution and favour hunger over satiety(Reference Prentice13). This is clearly demonstrated by the coexistence of obesity in members of the same family. However, families live together and share similar lifestyles, and obesity is, therefore, likely to result from interactions between genes and environment(Reference Sheikh, Nasrullah and Haq14). Environmental factors influence obesity risk from early in life. Strong evidence now supports developmental factors as important contributors to obesity risk; these are described and discussed later.

Developmental risk factors most strongly associated with obesity include larger size at birth, formula feeding rather than breast-feeding, rapid early growth, less healthy dietary behaviours, low physical activity and high sedentary behaviours, as reviewed by Woo et al. (Reference Woo Baidal, Locks and Cheng11). Maternal factors strongly influence birth weight; both high pre-pregnancy BMI(Reference Linabery, Nahhas and Johnson15) and excessive gestational weight gain are independently associated with higher birth weight(Reference Sorensen, Ajslev and Angquist16). Infants with high birth weight (>4 kg) or born large for gestational age have a higher risk of obesity compared with those of lower birth weight(Reference Blake-Lamb, Locks and Perkins17). This suggests that starting pregnancy with a BMI in the normal range and avoiding excessive gestational weight gain may help to reduce the risk of obesity in infants(Reference Sorensen, Ajslev and Angquist16). Lifestyle interventions are one approach to reducing gestational weight gain in pregnancy.

Interventions to improve diet and exercise during pregnancy are successful in limiting excessive gestational weight gain(Reference Muktabhant, Lawrie and Lumbiganon18). For example, a systematic review including a meta-analysis of forty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCT) found a 20 % reduction in gestational weight gain for mothers taking part in lifestyle interventions (average risk ratio 0·80, 95 % CI 0·73, 0·87)(Reference Muktabhant, Lawrie and Lumbiganon18). This was confirmed in a later meta-analysis that included individual participant data from more than 12 000 women(19). Evidence for benefits of lifestyle interventions in pregnancy on obesity risk in infants from these two meta-analyses was not so strong. Incidence of large for gestational age infants was lower in intervention compared with control mothers. However, the difference between groups was not significant(Reference Muktabhant, Lawrie and Lumbiganon18, 19). The UK (UPBEAT) trial, included in these reviews, found no difference in large for gestational age infants between intervention and control mothers(Reference Poston, Bell and Croker20). However, intervention children had lower body fat compared with controls at age 6 months (difference in sub-scapular skinfold thickness z-score: 0·26 sd, 95 % CI −0·49, −0·02, P = 0·03)(Reference Patel, Godfrey and Pasupathy21). This suggests possible benefits of the intervention for obesity risk. Collectively, findings from these reviews support interventions to improve diet and lifestyle in pregnancy as beneficial for maternal and child health. However, evidence for a protective effect of interventions in pregnancy on obesity risk in children is limited.

Infant feeding is an important risk factor for childhood obesity. A protective effect of breast-feeding against obesity has been reported in many observational studies(Reference Victora, Bahl and Barros22). The strongest association is seen with exclusive and a longer duration of breast-feeding. The protective effect of breast-feeding is proposed to be due to the relative undernutrition and slower pattern of growth in breast-fed compared with formula-fed infants that has been suggested to programme susceptibility to obesity(Reference Singhal and Lucas23). Rapid growth in infancy is strongly associated with increased risk of obesity, as summarised in several systematic reviews(Reference Baird, Fisher and Lucas24Reference Ong and Loos26). However, nutrition and growth are closely linked and it is difficult to separate their effects on obesity risk. The mechanisms through which nutrition and growth influence obesity risk are not well understood but are likely to include the effects on endocrine systems regulating appetite, food intake, energy storage and fat deposition(Reference Singhal27). Available evidence supports the promotion of breast-feeding as one public health intervention that could help to stem the rise in obesity. The complementary feeding period when infants are no longer exclusively milk-fed is another critical period when infants are at risk of obesity through inappropriate feeding practices.

Complementary feeding and risk of obesity

From about 6 months, foods other than milk are needed to meet the nutritional needs of the rapidly growing and developing infant(Reference Fewtrell, Bronsky and Campoy28). During complementary feeding, the diet is expanded to include a wider range of foods aiming to establish a diet that meets requirements without being excessive in energy or specific nutrients. This is important for healthy growth and development. Furthermore, complementary feeding is a transitional period when lifelong dietary habits are established and taken forward into later childhood(Reference Emmett, Jones and Northstone29, Reference Lioret, Campbell and Crawford30). Therefore, this period is important for both short- and long-term health. Not surprisingly, higher consumption of energy-dense foods during complementary feeding has been linked to rapid weight gain and increased risk of obesity(Reference Fewtrell, Bronsky and Campoy28). In particular, higher protein shows this association(Reference Lind, Larnkjaer and Molgaard31). Protein intake increases markedly (from about 5 to 15 % of energy intake) when solid foods are introduced(Reference Lind, Larnkjaer and Molgaard31).

The age at introduction of complementary foods has been the main focus of research in this area. Evidence that age at complementary feeding influences obesity risk is based largely on observational studies(Reference Ong and Loos26, Reference Fewtrell, Bronsky and Campoy28). However, systematic reviews have found that early introduction of complementary foods (before 4 months) is linked to an increased risk of obesity(Reference Pearce, Taylor and Langley-Evans32, Reference Wang, Wu and Xiong33). For example, a systematic review with meta-analysis found that starting complementary foods before 4 months carried a 30 % higher risk of obesity in childhood compared with a later introduction at 4–6 months (relative risk of obesity, 1·33; 95 % CI 1·07, 1·64)(Reference Wang, Wu and Xiong33). As most included studies were observational, the influence of other factors previously associated with obesity risk in children, such as lifestyle behaviours and educational status of parents, could not be ruled out; neither could a causal relationship be established. Therefore, it is currently unclear whether early complementary feeding leads to overweight and obesity or if larger infants are introduced to complementary foods at a younger age.

A final point concerns how complementary foods are given. In recent years baby-led weaning, an approach to complementary feeding that encourages self-feeding in infants, has gained popularity(Reference Taylor, Williams and Fangupo34). Early observational studies found that infants weaned using this approach were more satiety-responsive(Reference Brown and Lee35) and less likely to be overweight in later childhood(Reference Brown and Lee35, Reference Townsend and Pitchford36) compared with those weaned using a standard approach. However, a recent study using a more rigorous RCT design found no difference in obesity risk in early childhood between children randomised to baby-led weaning as infants compared with controls following standard advice (difference in BMI z-score at age 2, 0·16; 95 % CI −0·123, 0·45)(Reference Taylor, Williams and Fangupo34). Interestingly, a lower satiety response was found in the baby-led weaning group at 24 months. This may be important as low satiety responsiveness has been associated with rapid growth and increased obesity risk in previous studies(Reference van Jaarsveld, Boniface and Llewellyn37, Reference van Deutekom, Chinapaw and Vrijkotte38). While data from these studies are not strong enough to base public health recommendations on regarding best practice for complementary feeding, they support the need for further research to clarify relationships between complementary feeding method and risk of obesity. Beyond complementary feeding, the preschool diet has also been a focus of research into the development of childhood obesity.

Diet and nutrition in preschool children and risk of obesity

Dietary habits in preschool children have changed considerably since the onset of the obesity epidemic. National surveys and several large studies consistently report that the diets of young children do not comply with recommendations(39, Reference Khalsa, Kharofa and Ollberding40). Notably, diets are low in fruit, vegetables and fibre and high in saturated fat and sugar. Given that obesity is largely the result of an energy imbalance, many studies have focused on energy intake as a risk factor for obesity(Reference Newby41). However, studies investigating this relationship in children are inconclusive. Some studies have found that energy intake is higher in obese compared with healthy weight children(Reference Anderson, Tilling and Fraser42, Reference Hebestreit, Bornhorst and Pala43) while others report the opposite(Reference Rocandio, Ansotegui and Arroyo44, Reference Niinikoski, Viikari and Ronnemaa45). Reports of a lower energy intake in obese compared with non-obese children are surprising and counterintuitive. However, these may be explained by methodological errors. For example, biases in the dietary assessment are common(Reference Newby41). In particular, obese individuals are known to underestimate energy intake(Reference Swinburn, Sacks and Ravussin46). This is likely to apply to children where estimates of dietary intake rely on parental reports that may not be accurate(Reference Foster, Hawkins and Barton47). In addition, dietary assessment in young children is difficult to do well as food wastage is high and meal patterns erratic(Reference Emmett48).

Limitations of study design may also obscure relationships between dietary exposures and obesity outcomes. For example, many studies reviewed here may have lacked the power to detect small differences in energy intake sufficient to influence weight gain(Reference Hill, Wyatt and Peters49). This is important as relatively small excesses in energy intake if sustained over a longer period, can lead to energy imbalance and weight gain(Reference Hill, Wyatt and Peters49). Another possible explanation is that lower energy expenditure rather than higher energy intake is the main determinant of obesity(Reference Prentice and Jebb50). However, studies using objective measures of energy intake (e.g. doubly labelled water) do not support this(Reference Swinburn, Sacks and Ravussin46).

In summary, available evidence is insufficient to support an association between higher energy intake and obesity risk in young children. However, energy balance is key to achieving and maintaining a healthy weight. Therefore, avoiding excessive energy intake in young children is recommended. Defining optimal energy intake in this age group is difficult. More studies using objective measures of energy intake would be helpful to inform energy needs of preschool children, but these are expensive and difficult to carry out in young children. Regular growth monitoring, using charts based on data from breast-fed infants growing under optimal conditions (i.e. the WHO multi-centre breast-fed growth reference), is a practical approach that can be used to identify children gaining weight more rapidly and at an increased risk of obesity.

Macronutrient intake and obesity risk in preschool children have also been widely studied(Reference Mace, Shahkhalili and Aprikian51Reference Patro-Golab, Zalewski and Kolodziej55). Evidence for associations of fat and carbohydrate with increased obesity risk is weak. For example, no consistent associations between the amount and type of fat consumed by preschool children and obesity risk were found in studies investigating this, as reviewed by Agostoni and Caroli(Reference Agostoni and Caroli54). Similarly, evidence for an association of carbohydrate with obesity risk was also lacking in a recent systematic review by Patro-Golab et al. (Reference Patro-Golab, Zalewski and Kolodziej55). An increase in sugar consumption in preschool children, at the same time as the obesity epidemic, has prompted research into high-sugar foods and the association of these with obesity risk(39). In particular, sugar-sweetened beverages have been a focus(Reference Scharf and DeBoer56).

Evidence for associations of sugar-sweetened beverages with obesity risk in children was reviewed most recently by Scharf and DeBoer(Reference Scharf and DeBoer56). Studies were mainly observational and included multiple age ranges(Reference Scharf and DeBoer56). A small number of prospective studies focused on preschool children(Reference DeBoer, Scharf and Demmer57Reference de Ruyter, Olthof and Seidell60). These studies consistently reported a higher risk of overweight and obesity in consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages.

Experimental evidence in this age group is limited and confounding effects of unmeasured or unaccounted for variables that affect both sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and obesity outcomes cannot be ruled out. RCT in this area are difficult to conduct for ethical reasons(Reference de Ruyter, Olthof and Seidell60). However, trials are possible in children with established sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. In one such study in the Netherlands, 4–11-year-old children who regularly drank sugar-sweetened beverages were randomised either to continued consumption or to a control group drinking artificially sweetened drinks(Reference de Ruyter, Olthof and Seidell60). BMI increased less in the artificially sweetened drinks group during the 18-month intervention period (difference in BMI increase 0·13 sd (95 % CI −0·21, −0·05))(Reference de Ruyter, Olthof and Seidell60). Further research is needed before firm conclusions can be made regarding the effects of sugar-sweetened beverages on obesity risk in young children. However, in view of the concurrent rise in sugar intake and obesity prevalence, high-sugar foods are likely to contribute to obesity risk in this age group and advice to reduce intake in line with national(61) and international(62) guidelines is warranted.

Evidence for an association of high-protein intake in preschool children and increased obesity risk is stronger than for other macronutrients(Reference Lind, Larnkjaer and Molgaard31). A recent meta-analysis including thirteen studies found that protein intake between 6 months and 3 years was associated with a higher BMI later in childhood (pooled effect size: 0·28 BMI z-scores, 95 % CI 0·20, 0·35)(Reference Lanigan, Adegboye and Northstone63). In one study of more than 2000 children, higher protein intake at 21 months was associated with increased risk of obesity at 5 years (1 % higher energy from protein associated with a 0·043 unit increase in BMI)(Reference Pimpin, Jebb and Johnson64). Similarly, the Generation R study in about 3000 children from the Netherlands found that protein intake at 1 year predicted higher BMI and fat mass in later childhood (10 g/d higher protein predicted a 0·05 sd increase in BMI and 0·06 sd increase in fat mass)(Reference Voortman, Braun and Kiefte-de Jong65).

Mechanisms underlying associations of protein with obesity risk are unclear. However, one proposed mechanism is that high-protein diets promote faster growth through programming effects on insulin-like growth factor-1(Reference Lind, Larnkjaer and Molgaard31). Evidence is currently limited to a small number of observational studies and further research is needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Beyond specific foods and nutrients, overall dietary patterns have captured the interest of researchers investigating diets in preschool children and obesity risk.

Dietary patterns in preschool children and risk of obesity

Dietary patterns are derived from food intake data using, for example, principal component analysis. This analytical method reduces large data sets to fewer variables by combining highly correlated factors. Foods commonly consumed together are combined to produce dietary patterns that are named according to the predominating foods. Dietary patterns have been shown to emerge early in childhood and to become established by age 3 years(Reference North and Emmett66). Once established, dietary patterns are stable and track through childhood(Reference Mikkila, Rasanen and Raitakari67). This is a concern as less healthy dietary patterns, characterised by high intake of energy-dense foods and low intake of fruit, vegetables and fibre, are associated with obesity in children(Reference Ambrosini68). Tracking of unhealthy dietary patterns is therefore likely to increase this risk.

Studies investigating associations of dietary patterns with obesity risk in infants and preschool children are limited and findings inconsistent. For example, a recent study reported that a dietary pattern characterised by the later introduction (between 5 and 7 months) of dairy foods and high use of ready-prepared baby foods in infancy was associated with faster growth between 1 and 3 years(Reference Betoko, Lioret and Heude69). However, a study in Australia found no association of dietary patterns in toddlers aged 14 months with growth or BMI in later childhood(Reference Bell, Golley and Daniels70). Dietary patterns in preschool children provide useful information on diet quality. However, more research is needed before firm conclusions can be made regarding influences of specific dietary patterns on obesity risk in this age group.

As discussed earlier, excessive weight gain is the result of an imbalance between energy taken in from food and beverages and energy expended during day-to-day activities. Energy intake depends on several factors including the amount and frequency of food consumed. Recent research has investigated associations between portion size, meal frequency and obesity risk in young children.

Portion size

Children's portions have increased markedly in size over the past three decades in line with the sharp rise in obesity(Reference Fox, Devaney and Reidy71). Studies have found that from an early age, children consume more when offered larger servings. One of the earliest studies to investigate this found that providing larger portions to preschool children led to higher food and energy intake(Reference Rolls, Engell and Birch72). Interestingly, the association was only seen in older preschool children (from 5 years). Offering larger portions to 3-year-old children did not increase intake suggesting that appetite control is strongest in younger children and may be over-ridden by age 5(Reference Rolls, Engell and Birch72). Evidence for an association of increased meal size with obesity risk comes from a recent UK study. Syrad et al. found that larger meal size in toddlers was associated with faster growth from 2 to 5 years(Reference Syrad, Llewellyn and Johnson73). Available evidence supports that offering larger portions influences energy intake and disrupts appetite regulation in preschool children. However, more studies are needed to confirm these associations and provide information to guide portion size advice for preschool children. Evidence informing relationships between meal frequency and obesity risk in preschool children is limited. Only two studies have investigated this and found no consistent relationship(Reference Rolls, Engell and Birch72, Reference Syrad, Llewellyn and Johnson73).

In summary, evidence supports diet during preschool as important in the development of obesity. The strongest evidence is for an association of higher protein in preschool with an increased risk of childhood obesity(Reference Lind, Larnkjaer and Molgaard31, Reference Lanigan, Adegboye and Northstone63). Evidence for an association of energy intake with obesity risk is inconclusive. Further research is needed to inform appropriate portion sizes for preschool children taking individual variation into account. More information on dietary patterns across the preschool age range is needed to improve understanding of dietary quality and its influence on obesity risk.

Nutrition and diet influence one component of energy balance. On the other side of the equation, however, physical activity is also an important consideration when assessing obesity risk.

Physical activity and sedentary behaviours in preschool children

Studies and surveys consistently report that many preschool children do not meet recommendations for daily physical activity(Reference Reilly74Reference te Velde, van Nassau and Uijtdewilligen76). For example, in the UK, only 10 % of children aged 2–4 years met recommendations for 3 h physical activity daily in 2012. This is a concern as studies consistently report that low levels of total physical activity are associated with a higher risk of obesity in children, as reviewed by te Velde et al.(Reference te Velde, van Nassau and Uijtdewilligen76). Less is known regarding the intensity of physical activity (i.e. low, moderate or high intensity) that is most protective against obesity. Some studies have found that physical activity at a vigorous level is most strongly associated with a lower risk of obesity(Reference Collings, Brage and Ridgway77). However, these were mostly cross-sectional and unable to show a causal relationship. More research is needed to define the intensity of physical activity needed to protect against preschool obesity.

Not surprisingly, a low level of total physical activity is associated with more time spent sedentary, another independent risk factor for obesity(Reference De Craemer, De Decker and de Bourdeaudhuij78). Preschool children are spending excessive time in sedentary behaviours, as reviewed by Downing et al.(Reference Downing, Hnatiuk and Hesketh79). For instance, time spent sedentary, including engaging with television and other media, ranged from 37 to 330 min daily in 2-year-old children(Reference Downing, Hnatiuk and Hesketh79). Until recently, little was known about relationships between screen time in preschool children and obesity risk in later childhood. However, a study from Canada has shed some light on this. An extra hour and a quarter spent watching television at preschool age was associated with a 13 % increase in BMI as a teenager(Reference Simonato, Janosz and Archambault80).

Shorter sleep duration in early childhood (<10 h) has been suggested as a risk factor for obesity, as reviewed by Chen et al.(Reference Chen, Beydoun and Wang81) The mechanism is unclear but is proposed to operate through effects of shorter sleep on appetite(Reference Chen, Beydoun and Wang81). Sleep plays a central role in appetite regulation and energy balance. In children under 10 years, shorter sleep duration was associated with an almost 60 % higher risk of overweight and obesity (pooled OR 1·58, 95 % CI 1·26, 1·98). However, most studies were cross-sectional and few focused on preschool children. One large study from the UK that did include preschool children found that shorter sleep duration (<10·5 h) was associated with a higher risk of obesity at 7 years (OR 1·45; 95 % CI 1·10, 1·89)(Reference Reilly, Armstrong and Dorosty82). Further research would be helpful to confirm this finding and its relevance to diverse populations.

The causes of obesity in early life are complex and no one causal factor has so far been identified. Evidence supports lifestyle factors, including diet, physical activity and related behaviours as targets for interventions. The aim of interventions in this age group is to prevent rather than treat obesity by reducing risk. Available evidence suggests that this can best be achieved by optimising nutrition and growth in infancy and instilling healthy lifestyle behaviours (e.g. dietary and physical activity related) that are taken forward into later childhood. Interventions to prevent obesity in early life are discussed in the following sections.

Interventions for the prevention of obesity in early life

Given that risk factors for childhood obesity present early in life, prevention strategies should target infants, toddlers and preschool children. However, in 2006, there were only six reports of interventions aiming to prevent obesity in preschool children, as reviewed by Flynn et al. (Reference Flynn, McNeil and Maloff83). Since then this has increased markedly as summarised in several systematic reviews(Reference Blake-Lamb, Locks and Perkins17, Reference Ling, Robbins and Wen84, Reference Redsell, Edmonds and Swift85). Systematic reviews have focused either on infants and toddlers up to age 2 years or on preschool children (age 1–5 years).

Interventions in children under 2 years

Interventions to reduce obesity risk in the first 2 years of life are mostly behavioural and target responsive parenting and feeding, or family lifestyle(Reference Redsell, Edmonds and Swift85). Those addressing responsive feeding, where mothers respond appropriately to infant cues of hunger or satiety, have so far had the greatest impact on obesity risk(Reference Redsell, Edmonds and Swift85).

Responsive parenting interventions have found benefits for obesity risk in the short term. For example, healthy beginnings, an intervention to encourage responsive parenting in Australian mother–infant pairs, led to a lower BMI at 2 years (mean difference in BMI between intervention and control groups: 0·29 units, 95 % CI 0·55, 0·02; P = 0·04)(Reference Wen, Baur and Simpson86). Similarly, children in the intervention arm of the NOURISH responsive parenting intervention, also in Australia, had a lower BMI at age 14 months compared with controls (mean difference in BMI: 0·19 units)(Reference Daniels, Mallan and Battistutta87). In both trials, effects on BMI were not sustained at later follow-up(Reference Daniels, Mallan and Nicholson88, Reference Wen, Baur and Simpson89). This suggests that obesity prevention programmes need to be continued or maintained during the preschool years.

The intervention nurses starting infants growing on healthy trajectories study is an ongoing longitudinal RCT evaluating a responsive parenting intervention. The intervention focuses on the first 6 months of life and aims to reduce the risk of overweight in infancy by preventing rapid early growth. Initial results are promising; infants in the intervention arm gained weight more slowly between birth and 28 weeks compared with controls (mean conditional weight gain score −0·18; 95 % CI −0·36, −0·001) and were less likely to be overweight at 1 year (5·5 v. 12·7 %; P  =  0·05)(Reference Savage, Birch and Marini90). Importantly, this effect did not depend on infant feeding method (predominantly breast-fed or not), suggesting an independent effect of growth on obesity risk. Longer follow-up at age 3 will inform whether the effects of this intervention are sustained.

A small number of studies in infants have focused on non-behavioural interventions. These have manipulated formula milk composition to investigate the effects of early nutrition on the risk of later obesity. In one large RCT, infants fed a protein-enriched formula had a higher BMI at 1 year compared with those given a standard infant formula(Reference Koletzko, von Kries and Closa91). At longer term follow-up when children were 6 years old, obesity risk was more than double in infants receiving the higher protein formula compared with those fed a standard formula (95 % CI for the difference in BMI: 1·12, 5·27; P = 0·024)(Reference Weber, Grote and Closa-Monasterolo92). This suggests that lowering the protein content of infant formulas could help to reduce the risk of later obesity in children who are not breast-fed.

Interventions in preschool children

In the UK, guidance for the prevention of childhood obesity is provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(93). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends that interventions should include advice on achieving a healthy diet, encourage physical activity and incorporate strategies for behaviour change. However, there are currently no full reports and only one published abstract(Reference Lanigan, Collins and Birbara94) of successful interventions for the prevention of obesity in preschool children that meet these guidelines in the UK. Multi-component interventions in other countries, based on similar guidance to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, have reported some success as reviewed by Ling et al. (Reference Ling, Robbins and Wen84).

The systematic review by Ling et al. identified twenty-six randomised interventions in preschool children (age 2–5 years), thirteen of which were preventative. Reports were mainly from the USA, Canada, Australia and Europe(Reference Ling, Robbins and Wen84). Most interventions were school-based and involved parents either directly or indirectly. Nineteen studies used a theoretical framework, mostly based on social cognitive theory, to guide the intervention. Eighteen studies included both physical activity and dietary behaviour change components. Standardised mean differences in BMI between intervention and control groups were calculated and effect sizes estimated. The pooled effect immediately the following intervention was a reduction of 0·19 BMI units (95 % CI −0·28, −0·09, P < 0·001). Importantly, sustained effects, up to 12 months following the intervention, were larger: −0·21 BMI units (95 % CI −0·35, −0·08, P = 0·002). This suggests lasting effects of interventions, possibly as a result of behaviour modifications that may have delayed effects. Several multi-component programmes are available in the UK. These include, MEND 2–4, Health Exercise Nutrition for the Really Young and TrimTots as discussed later.

The MEND 2–4 programme includes nutrition, physical activity and behaviour change components and is delivered to parents and preschool children in ten weekly sessions. The intervention has been evaluated in an RCT in Australia. No effect on BMI was found at 6 and 12 months after completion(Reference Skouteris, Hill and McCabe95). Benefits were found for vegetable and snack food intake and satiety responsiveness immediately post-intervention. However, these were not sustained at long-term follow-up(Reference Skouteris, Hill and McCabe95).

Health Exercise Nutrition for the Really Young is an 8-week community-based programme that aims to improve parenting skills and lifestyles in preschool children. Health Exercise Nutrition for the Really Young has been evaluated as part of service provision using parent-reported questionnaire data. Improvements in dietary behaviours, physical activity and children's screen time were found. Anthropometric data were not collected due to concerns that reference to weight might deter participation(Reference Willis, Roberts and Berry96). There are currently no published data from RCT to support Health Exercise Nutrition for the Really Young as a childhood obesity prevention intervention. However, a feasibility study and a larger scale trial are planned to evaluate the programme for this purpose(Reference Bryant, Burton and Cundill97).

TrimTots is a 24-week multi-component programme for obesity prevention in preschool children with an emphasis on family participation and learning through art and play. To my knowledge, TrimTots is the only preschool intervention for obesity prevention that integrates the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in a single comprehensive programme that has been evaluated in an RCT and shown to be effective at reducing obesity risk.

TrimTots was evaluated in two small-scale RCT. Trial 1 included high-risk children with BMI at or above the 91st centile or whose weight had crossed centiles upwards on the UK 1990 growth reference. Trial 2 recruited children irrespective of weight status or early growth. In trial 1, BMI was significantly lower at the end of the programme in the intervention group compared with waiting list controls (mean difference in BMI z-score: −0·9; 95 % CI −1·4, −0·4, P = 0·001). This effect was sustained in thirty-nine children followed up 2 years after completing the intervention. BMI was lower in children after participation in the programme compared with baseline (mean difference in BMI z-score: −0·3, 95 % CI −0·6, −0·1, P = 0·007). In trial 2, BMI was lower in the intervention group compared with controls immediately following participation (mean difference in BMI z-score: −0·3; 95 % CI −0·8, 0·3, P = 0·3)(Reference Lanigan, Collins and Birbara94).

The aim is to evaluate TrimTots further in a cluster RCT to assess feasibility and efficacy in a larger population. However, developing a complex intervention for obesity prevention in preschool children is demanding and there are many barriers to its successful design, development, delivery and evaluation, as discussed later.

Developing a complex intervention for prevention of obesity in preschool children

Developing, piloting, evaluating, reporting and implementing a complex intervention is a lengthy process(Reference Campbell, Fitzpatrick and Haines98). Barriers are active throughout that affect both researchers and participants. For instance, securing funding to develop and test an intervention is a major obstacle for researchers from the outset. While funders cover the costs of research, this usually does not include interventions to be evaluated. Therefore, funding for interventions must be obtained from alternative sources such as charities and philanthropic organisations. Further challenges for researchers working in public sector institutions include a lack of resources needed to implement successful interventions on a large scale. In addition to problems encountered by researchers, studies have identified barriers to engagement (participation and completion) of parents in community-based interventions (programmes).

Potential barriers to successful interventions

Financial, time-related and social costs have all been cited by parents as barriers to engagement in family-based childhood obesity prevention programmes, as reviewed by Arai et al. (Reference Arai, Panca and Morris99). Financial costs were mainly incurred through taking time off work and in travelling to attend programmes. Additional costs related to buying the healthier foods advised in programmes and adopting a healthier lifestyle (e.g. taking part in recreational activities). Time costs were mostly related to accommodating programme attendance into busy lives.

Social costs were also important to parents. These included strains on family life and relationships that led to reduced attendance at programmes. Further, some parents were reluctant to take part in obesity interventions believing their child would be stigmatised(Reference Gillespie, Midmore and Hoeflich100). Socioeconomic factors also influence attendance at interventions. Advantaged families are more likely to engage in programmes compared with those in less secure positions(Reference Williams, Van and Magarey101). Conversely, families have identified aspects of interventions that act as triggers and encourage engagement. Understanding these would help inform the design and implementation of interventions and increase their chance of success.

Facilitators to successful interventions

Parents who perceive their child to be at high risk of obesity are more likely to engage in interventions. Obese children are reported to suffer psychological stress as a result of bullying and stigma associated with their weight status(Reference Sjoberg, Nilsson and Leppert102). This is a concern to parents who may be highly motivated to attend interventions to protect the health of their child.

Other factors reported by parents to encourage their attendance at obesity prevention programmes include opportunities to meet and compare notes with other parents and to work as a group(Reference Kelleher, Davoren and Harrington103). Parents commonly report finding it easier to make changes in a group setting(Reference Kelleher, Davoren and Harrington103). Practical sessions such as cooking, portion size exercises, shopping, outdoor activities and hearing about real-life experiences are all well received and liked by parents. Additionally, dedicated time spent with their child, helpful programme staff, learning and gaining new knowledge and skills and enthusiastic leaders have all been cited as positive factors encouraging attendance. Overall, programmes that are fun, interactive and able to engage parents and children are the most likely to be successful.

Conclusions

Strong evidence supports developmental and lifestyle factors as influential in obesity risk in infants and preschool children. Optimising nutrition and growth in infancy and establishing healthy lifestyles in the preschool years could help to reduce this risk. Multi-component interventions targeting feeding and parenting styles in infants and diet and physical activity in older preschool children have shown some success in reducing obesity risk. Interventions based on theoretical frameworks that include behaviour change strategies are more likely to succeed. Interactive programmes in group settings are most likely to engage families. Programmes should be tailored to meet the needs of families and children. Evaluation in rigorous studies, including long-term follow-up is essential to assess immediate and sustained effects of interventions. Early interventions should ideally begin in infancy and continue through the preschool years to maximise the chance of success.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank all the families and children's centres that have participated in TrimTots and team members who have helped with research, development and delivery.

Financial Support

The author is a researcher at University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and has been supported by funding from this institution, the UK Medical Research Council and industry.

Conflicts of Interest

The author is a director of TrimTots Community Interest Company, a not for profits social enterprise.

Authorship

The author was solely responsible for all aspects of preparation of the present paper.

References

1.NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2017) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390, 26272642.Google Scholar
2.Gardner, DS, Hosking, J, Metcalf, BS et al. (2009) Contribution of early weight gain to childhood overweight and metabolic health: a longitudinal study (EarlyBird 36). Pediatrics 123, e67e73.Google Scholar
3.National Child Measurement Programme – England, 2016–17. https://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB30113 (accessed October 2017).Google Scholar
4.Cunningham, SA, Kramer, MR & Narayan, KMV (2014) Incidence of childhood obesity in the United States. N Engl J Med 370, 403411.Google Scholar
5.Simmonds, M, Llewellyn, A, Owen, CG et al. (2016) Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 17, 95107.Google Scholar
6.Egan, KB, Ettinger, AS & Bracken, MB (2013) Childhood body mass index and subsequent physician-diagnosed asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Pediatr 13, 121.Google Scholar
7.Kong, AP & Chow, CC (2010) Medical consequences of childhood obesity: a Hong Kong perspective. Res Sports Med 18, 1625.Google Scholar
8.Lauby-Secretan, B, Scoccianti, C, Loomis, D et al. (2016) Body fatness and cancer – viewpoint of the IARC working group. N Engl J Med 375, 794798.Google Scholar
9.Giskes, K, van, LF, Avendano-Pabon, M et al. (2011) A systematic review of environmental factors and obesogenic dietary intakes among adults: are we getting closer to understanding obesogenic environments? Obes Rev 12, e95e106.Google Scholar
10.Ahrens, W, Pigeot, I, Pohlabeln, H et al. (2014) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in European children below the age of 10. Int J Obes 38, Suppl. 2, S99107.Google Scholar
11.Woo Baidal, JA, Locks, LM, Cheng, ER et al. (2016) Risk factors for childhood obesity in the first 1000 days: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 50, 761779.Google Scholar
12.Hruby, A, Manson, JE, Qi, L et al. (2016) Determinants and consequences of obesity. Am J Public Health 106, 16561662.Google Scholar
13.Prentice, AM. (2005) Early influences on human energy regulation: thrifty genotypes and thrifty phenotypes. Physiol Behav 86, 640645.Google Scholar
14.Sheikh, AB, Nasrullah, A, Haq, S et al. (2017) The interplay of genetics and environmental factors in the development of obesity. Cureus 9, e1435.Google Scholar
15.Linabery, AM, Nahhas, RW, Johnson, W et al. (2013) Stronger influence of maternal than paternal obesity on infant and early childhood body mass index: the Fels longitudinal study. Pediatr Obes 8, 159169.Google Scholar
16.Sorensen, TI, Ajslev, TA, Angquist, L et al. (2016) Comparison of associations of maternal peri-pregnancy and paternal anthropometrics with child anthropometrics from birth through age 7 year assessed in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 104, 389396.Google Scholar
17.Blake-Lamb, TL, Locks, LM, Perkins, M et al. (2016) Interventions for childhood obesity in the first 1000 days a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 50, 780789.Google Scholar
18.Muktabhant, B, Lawrie, TA, Lumbiganon, P et al. (2015) Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15, CD007145.Google Scholar
19.The International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group (2017) Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Br Med J 358, j3119.Google Scholar
20.Poston, L, Bell, R, Croker, H et al. (2015) Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diab Endocrinol 3, 767777.Google Scholar
21.Patel, N, Godfrey, KM, Pasupathy, D et al. (2017) Infant adiposity following a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnancy. Int J Obes (Lond) 41, 10181026.Google Scholar
22.Victora, CG, Bahl, R, Barros, AJ et al. (2016) Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 387, 475490.Google Scholar
23.Singhal, A & Lucas, A (2004) Early origins of cardiovascular disease: is there a unifying hypothesis? Lancet 363, 16421645.Google Scholar
24.Baird, J, Fisher, D, Lucas, P et al. (2005) Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity. Br Med J 331, 929.Google Scholar
25.Monteiro, PO & Victora, CG (2005) Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life – a systematic review. Obes Rev 6, 143154.Google Scholar
26.Ong, KK & Loos, RJ (2006) Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent obesity: systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions. Acta Paediatr 95, 904908.Google Scholar
27.Singhal, A (2016) The role of infant nutrition in the global epidemic of non-communicable disease. Proc Nutr Soc 75, 162168.Google Scholar
28.Fewtrell, M, Bronsky, J, Campoy, C et al. (2017) Complementary feeding: a position paper by the European society for paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition (ESPGHAN) committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 64, 119132.Google Scholar
29.Emmett, PM, Jones, LR & Northstone, K (2015) Dietary patterns in the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Nutr Rev 73, Suppl. 3, S207S230.Google Scholar
30.Lioret, S, Campbell, KJ, Crawford, D et al. (2012) A parent focused child obesity prevention intervention improves some mother obesity risk behaviors: the Melbourne inFANT program. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9, 100.Google Scholar
31.Lind, MV, Larnkjaer, A, Molgaard, C et al. (2017) Dietary protein intake and quality in early life: impact on growth and obesity. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 20, 7176.Google Scholar
32.Pearce, J, Taylor, MA & Langley-Evans, SC (2013) Timing of the introduction of complementary feeding and risk of childhood obesity: a systematic review. Int J Obes 37, 12951306.Google Scholar
33.Wang, J, Wu, Y, Xiong, G et al. (2016) Introduction of complementary feeding before 4 months of age increases the risk of childhood overweight or obesity: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr Res 36, 759770.Google Scholar
34.Taylor, RW, Williams, SM, Fangupo, LJ et al. (2017) Effect of a baby-led approach to complementary feeding on infant growth and overweight: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 171, 838846.Google Scholar
35.Brown, A & Lee, MD. (2015) Early influences on child satiety-responsiveness: the role of weaning style. Pediatr Obes 10, 5766.Google Scholar
36.Townsend, E & Pitchford, NJ. Baby knows best? (2012) The impact of weaning style on food preferences and body mass index in early childhood in a case-controlled sample. BMJ Open 2, e000298.Google Scholar
37.van Jaarsveld, CH, Boniface, D, Llewellyn, C et al. (2014) Appetite and growth: a longitudinal sibling analysis. JAMA Pediatr 168, 345350.Google Scholar
38.van Deutekom, AW, Chinapaw, MJ, Vrijkotte, TG et al. (2016) The association of birth weight and postnatal growth with energy intake and eating behavior at 5 years of age – a birth cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4, 1315.Google Scholar
39.NDNS (2011) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Headline results from years 1 and 2 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009–2009/10). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
40.Khalsa, AS, Kharofa, R, Ollberding, NJ et al. (2017) Attainment of ‘5-2-1-0’ obesity recommendations in preschool-aged children. Prev Med Rep 8, 7987.Google Scholar
41.Newby, PK (2007) Are dietary intakes and eating behaviors related to childhood obesity? A comprehensive review of the evidence. J Law Med Ethics 35, 3560.Google Scholar
42.Anderson, EL, Tilling, K, Fraser, A et al. (2013) Estimating trajectories of energy intake through childhood and adolescence using linear-spline multilevel models. Epidemiology 24, 507515.Google Scholar
43.Hebestreit, A, Bornhorst, C, Pala, V et al. (2014) Dietary energy density in young children across Europe. Int J Obes 38, Suppl. 2, S124S134.Google Scholar
44.Rocandio, AM, Ansotegui, L & Arroyo, M (2001) Comparison of dietary intake among overweight and non-overweight schoolchildren. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25, 1651–5·33.Google Scholar
45.Niinikoski, H, Viikari, J, Ronnemaa, T et al. (1997) Regulation of growth of 7- to 36-month-old children by energy and fat intake in the prospective, randomized STRIP baby trial. Pediatrics 100, 810816.Google Scholar
46.Swinburn, B, Sacks, G & Ravussin, E (2009) Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 14531456.Google Scholar
47.Foster, E, Hawkins, A, Barton, KL et al. (2017) Development of food photographs for use with children aged 18 months to 16 years: comparison against weighed food diaries – The Young Person's Food Atlas (UK). PLoS ONE 12, e0169084.Google Scholar
48.Emmett, P (2015) Dietary assessment in children. World Rev Nutr Diet 113, 322325.Google Scholar
49.Hill, JO, Wyatt, HR & Peters, JC (2012) Energy balance and obesity. Circulation 126, 126132.Google Scholar
50.Prentice, AM & Jebb, SA (1995) Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth?. Br Med J 311, 437439.Google Scholar
51.Mace, K, Shahkhalili, Y, Aprikian, O et al. (2006) Dietary fat and fat types as early determinants of childhood obesity: a reappraisal. Int J Obes 30, Suppl 4, S50S57.Google Scholar
52.Dorosty, AR, Emmett, PM, Cowin, S et al. (2000) Factors associated with early adiposity rebound. ALSPAC Study Team. Pediatrics 105, 11151118.Google Scholar
53.Gunther, ALB, Buyken, AE & Kroke, A (2006) The influence of habitual protein intake in early childhood on BMI and age at adiposity rebound: results from the DONALD Study. Int J Obes 30, 10721079.Google Scholar
54.Agostoni, C & Caroli, M (2012) Role of fats in the first two years of life as related to later development of NCDs. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 22, 775780.Google Scholar
55.Patro-Golab, B, Zalewski, BM, Kolodziej, M et al. (2016) Nutritional interventions or exposures in infants and children aged up to 3 years and their effects on subsequent risk of overweight, obesity and body fat: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Obes Rev 17, 12451257.Google Scholar
56.Scharf, RJ & DeBoer, MD (2016) Sugar-sweetened beverages and children's health. Annu Rev Public Health 37, 273293.Google Scholar
57.DeBoer, MD, Scharf, RJ & Demmer, RT (2013) Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in 2- to 5-year-old children. Pediatrics 132, 413420.Google Scholar
58.Dubois, L, Farmer, A, Girard, M et al. (2008) Regular sugar-sweetened beverage consumption between meals increases risk of overweight among preschool-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 924934.Google Scholar
59.Pan, L, Li, R, Park, S et al. (2014) A longitudinal analysis of sugar sweetened beverage intake in infancy and obesity at 6 years. Pediatrics 134, Suppl. 1, S29S35.Google Scholar
60.de Ruyter, JC, Olthof, MR, Seidell, JC et al. (2012) A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med 367, 13971406.Google Scholar
61.Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2015) Carbohydrates and Health. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
62.World Health Organization (2015) Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva. 12–3–2018.Google Scholar
63.Lanigan, J, Adegboye, A, Northstone, K et al. (2017) Nutrition in preschool children and later risk of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 62, Suppl. 1, 691.Google Scholar
64.Pimpin, L, Jebb, S, Johnson, L et al. (2016) Dietary protein intake is associated with body mass index and weight up to 5 y of age in a prospective cohort of twins. Am J Clin Nutr 103, 389397.Google Scholar
65.Voortman, T, Braun, KV, Kiefte-de Jong, JC et al. (2016) Protein intake in early childhood and body composition at the age of 6 years: The Generation R Study. Int J Obes 40, 10181025.Google Scholar
66.North, K & Emmett, P (2000) Multivariate analysis of diet among three-year-old children and associations with socio-demographic characteristics. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ALSPAC) Study Team. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 7380.Google Scholar
67.Mikkila, V, Rasanen, L, Raitakari, OT et al. (2005) Consistent dietary patterns identified from childhood to adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Br J Nutr 93, 923931.Google Scholar
68.Ambrosini, GL (2014) Childhood dietary patterns and later obesity: a review of the evidence. Proc Nutr Soc 73, 137146.Google Scholar
69.Betoko, A, Lioret, S, Heude, B et al. (2017) Influence of infant feeding patterns over the first year of life on growth from birth to 5 years. Pediatr Obes 12, Suppl. 1, 94101.Google Scholar
70.Bell, LK, Golley, RK & Daniels, L (2013) Dietary patterns of Australian children aged 14 and 24 months, and associations with socio-demographic factors and adiposity. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 638645.Google Scholar
71.Fox, MK, Devaney, B, Reidy, K et al. (2006) Relationship between portion size and energy intake among infants and toddlers: evidence of self-regulation J Am Diet Assoc 106, Suppl. 1, S77S83.Google Scholar
72.Rolls, BJ, Engell, D & Birch, LL (2000) Serving portion size influences 5-year-old but not 3-year-old children's food intakes. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 232234.Google Scholar
73.Syrad, H, Llewellyn, CH, Johnson, L et al. (2016) Meal size is a critical driver of weight gain in early childhood. Sci Rep 20, 28368.Google Scholar
74.Reilly, JJ (2008) Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and energy balance in the preschool child: opportunities for early obesity prevention. Proc Nutr Soc 67, 317325.Google Scholar
75.Goldfield, GS, Harvey, A, Grattan, K et al. (2012) Physical activity promotion in the preschool years: a critical period to intervene. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9, 13261342.Google Scholar
76.te Velde, SJ, van Nassau, F, Uijtdewilligen, L et al. (2012) Energy balance-related behaviours associated with overweight and obesity in preschool children: a systematic review of prospective studies. Obes Rev 13, Suppl. 1, 5674.Google Scholar
77.Collings, PJ, Brage, S, Ridgway, CL et al. (2013) Physical activity intensity, sedentary time, and body composition in preschoolers. Am J Clin Nutr 97, 10201028.Google Scholar
78.De Craemer, M, De Decker, E, de Bourdeaudhuij, I et al. (2012) Correlates of energy balance-related behaviours in preschool children: a systematic review. Obes Rev 13, Suppl. 1, 1328.Google Scholar
79.Downing, KL, Hnatiuk, J & Hesketh, KD (2015) Prevalence of sedentary behavior in children under 2years: a systematic review. Prev Med 78, 105114.Google Scholar
80.Simonato, I, Janosz, M & Archambault, I (2018) Prospective associations between toddler televiewing and subsequent lifestyle habits in adolescence. Prev Med 110, 2430.Google Scholar
81.Chen, X, Beydoun, MA & Wang, Y (2008) Is sleep duration associated with childhood obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity 16, 265274.Google Scholar
82.Reilly, JJ, Armstrong, J, Dorosty, AR et al. (2005) Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: cohort study. Br Med J 330, 1357.Google Scholar
83.Flynn, MA, McNeil, DA, Maloff, B et al. (2006) Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations. Obes Rev 7, Suppl. 1, 766.Google Scholar
84.Ling, J, Robbins, LB, Wen, F et al. (2017) Lifestyle interventions in preschool children: a meta-analysis of effectiveness. Am J Prev Med 53, 102112.Google Scholar
85.Redsell, SA, Edmonds, B, Swift, JA et al. (2016) Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions that aim to reduce the risk, either directly or indirectly, of overweight and obesity in infancy and early childhood. Matern Child Nutr 12, 2438.Google Scholar
86.Wen, LM, Baur, LA, Simpson, JM et al. (2012) Effectiveness of home based early intervention on children's BMI at age 2: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 344, e3732.Google Scholar
87.Daniels, LA, Mallan, KM, Battistutta, D et al. (2012) Evaluation of an intervention to promote protective infant feeding practices to prevent childhood obesity: outcomes of the NOURISH RCT at 14 months of age and 6 months post the first of two intervention modules. Int J Obes 36, 12921298.Google Scholar
88.Daniels, LA, Mallan, KM, Nicholson, JM et al. (2013) Outcomes of an early feeding practices intervention to prevent childhood obesity. Pediatrics 132, e109e118.Google Scholar
89.Wen, LM, Baur, LA, Simpson, JM et al. (2015) Sustainability of effects of an early childhood obesity prevention trial over time: a further 3-year follow-up of the healthy beginnings trial. JAMA Pediatr 169, 543551.Google Scholar
90.Savage, JS, Birch, LL, Marini, M et al. (2016) Effect of the INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention on rapid infant weight gain and overweight status at Age 1 year: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 170, 742749.Google Scholar
91.Koletzko, B, von Kries, R, Closa, R et al. (2009) Lower protein in infant formula is associated with lower weight up to age 2 y: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 17191720.Google Scholar
92.Weber, M, Grote, V, Closa-Monasterolo, R et al. (2014) Lower protein content in infant formula reduces BMI and obesity risk at school age: follow-up of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 10411051.Google Scholar
93.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015) NICE public health guidance 47: Managing overweight and obesity among children and young people: lifestyle weight management services. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs94.Google Scholar
94.Lanigan, J, Collins, S, Birbara, T et al. (2013) The TrimTots programme for prevention and treatment of obesity in preschool children: evidence from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 382, 58.Google Scholar
95.Skouteris, H, Hill, B, McCabe, M et al. (2016) A parent-based intervention to promote healthy eating and active behaviours in pre-school children: evaluation of the MEND 2–4 randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Obes 11, 410.Google Scholar
96.Willis, TA, Roberts, KP, Berry, TM et al. (2016) The impact of HENRY on parenting and family lifestyle: a national service evaluation of a preschool obesity prevention programme. Public Health 136, 101108.Google Scholar
97.Bryant, M, Burton, W, Cundill, B et al. (2017) Effectiveness of an implementation optimisation intervention aimed at increasing parent engagement in HENRY, a childhood obesity prevention programme – the Optimising Family Engagement in HENRY (OFTEN) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 18, 40.Google Scholar
98.Campbell, M, Fitzpatrick, R, Haines, A et al. (2000) Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J 321, 694696.Google Scholar
99.Arai, L, Panca, M, Morris, S et al. (2015) Time, monetary and other costs of participation in family-based child weight management interventions: qualitative and systematic review evidence. PLoS ONE 10, e0123782.Google Scholar
100.Gillespie, J, Midmore, C, Hoeflich, J et al. (2015) Parents as the start of the solution: a social marketing approach to understanding triggers and barriers to entering a childhood weight management service. J Hum Nutr Diet 28, Suppl. 1, 8392.Google Scholar
101.Williams, SL, Van, LW, Magarey, A et al. (2017) Parent engagement and attendance in PEACH. BMC Public Health 17, 559.Google Scholar
102.Sjoberg, RL, Nilsson, KW & Leppert, J (2005) Obesity, shame, and depression in school-aged children: a population-based study. Pediatrics 116, e389e392.Google Scholar
103.Kelleher, E, Davoren, MP, Harrington, JM et al. (2017) Barriers and facilitators to initial and continued attendance at community-based lifestyle programmes among families of overweight and obese children: a systematic review. Obes Rev 18, 183194.Google Scholar