Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:38:10.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phytochemicals in animal health: diet selection and trade-offs between costs and benefits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2016

Juan J. Villalba*
Affiliation:
Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA
Morgane Costes-Thiré
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, INRA, VetAgro Sup, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
Cécile Ginane
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, INRA, VetAgro Sup, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
*
*Corresponding author: J. J. Villalba, fax 1-435-797-3796, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many plant tissues contain plant secondary compounds (PSC), which have long been recognised as defensive chemicals that deter herbivory via their toxic effects. However, herbivores may also benefit from including PSC into their diets. Plant-derived phenolics, terpenes and alkaloids have antiparasitic properties and sesquiterpene lactones have antibacterial, antifungal and antiparasitic properties. These actions are in part a consequence of the negative actions that PSC exert across several trophic levels, including the bacteria, parasites and fungi that inhabit herbivores’ bodies. Given the dual action, toxin and medicine, it is possible to hypothesise that self-selection of PSC by herbivores should occur when the benefits outweigh the costs of PSC ingestion. Recent research suggests that sheep and goats self-medicate against parasitic infections. They increase preference for condensed tannin-containing foods when experiencing a parasitic burden. This behaviour improves health; it is triggered by parasitism and weakens when parasitism subsides. However, the causes underlying these responses are not straightforward when viewed under a unidimensional cost–benefit analysis. This is because the intensity of antinutritional/toxic and medicinal effects of PSC is not static or just dependent upon the isolated post-ingestive effects of single PSC. Nutrient–PSC and PSC–PSC interactions, social models, as well as feeding patterns, all influence the perceived net benefit of incorporating medicines into a diet. A better understanding of the net benefit of self-medication in complex feeding environments will allow for the development of innovative managing strategies aimed at providing the food alternatives and conditions for improving the nutrition, health and welfare of grazing animals.

Type
Conference on ‘Phytochemicals and health: new perspectives on plant-based nutrition’
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Many plant tissues contain plant secondary compounds (PSC), which have long been identified as chemical defences that deter herbivory via their toxic effects( Reference Cheeke 1 , Reference Palo and Robbins 2 ). Despite their toxicity, intake of PSC by herbivores is a regulated process; by limiting how much of any one plant animals can eat, PSC protect plants from overuse by insects, birds, fish and mammals( Reference Palo and Robbins 2 Reference Hay and Fenical 4 ). Diverse mixtures of plants with different types of PSC share the burden of tissue loss by causing herbivores to eat small amounts of a variety of species( Reference Freeland and Janzen 5 ). The term secondary compound was coined by scientists who originally believed that these chemicals were waste products of the primary metabolism of plants. However, it is now known that the term is misleading as in addition to the benefits of preventing/reducing plant tissue loss to herbivores, PSC are essential for plants and herbivores with functions as diverse as attracting pollinators and seed dispersers( Reference Rosenthal and Janzen 6 ), protecting plants from ultraviolet radiation( Reference Barnes, Tobler and Keefover-Ring 7 ) and defending plants and herbivores against oxidative stress, disease and pathogens( Reference Agati, Azzarello and Pollastri 8 Reference Waghorn 11 ).

PSC are partitioned into three broad classes, phenolics, terpenes and alkaloids, each with thousands of compounds, making it difficult to make generalisations about their post-ingestive actions. However, it is known that condensed tannins, a tremendously diverse group of soluble phenolics, form complexes with a variety of chemicals, from proteins and carbohydrates to minerals and other PSC such as terpenoids, saponins and alkaloids( Reference MacAdam and Villalba 12 ). Some of these interactions, particularly with proteins, explain some of the antinutritional effects of condensed tannins, such as the reported reductions of forage digestibility in ruminants( Reference Robbins, Hagerman and Austin 13 ). In addition, some condensed tannins cause lesions in the gut mucosa( Reference Dawson, Buttery and Jenkins 14 ), and they can be degraded in the gut and absorbed, exerting their toxic actions systemically, impacting organs and physiological processes of herbivores( Reference Mehansho, Butler and Carlson 15 , Reference Provenza, Burritt and Clausen 16 ). Condensed tannins may also cause rapid and dramatic reductions in food intake, likely mediated by stimulation of the emetic system( Reference Provenza, Burritt and Clausen 16 , Reference Provenza, Ortega-Reyes and Scott 17 ).

Given the negative impacts of PSC on herbivores as a consequence of their role as chemical defences, it has been reasoned that PSC can exert similar actions across several trophic levels, including herbivores and the bacteria, parasites and fungi that inhabit herbivores’ bodies and that cause decreases in health( Reference Lozano, Moler, Milinski and Slater 18 ). For instance, plant-derived alkaloids, terpenes and phenolics have antiparasitic and antimicrobial properties( Reference Hocquemiller, Cortes and Arango 19 Reference Lacombe, Tadepalli and Hwang 22 ) and sesquiterpene lactones have antiamoebic, antibacterial and antifungal actions( Reference Picman 23 Reference Huffman, Ohigashi, Kawanaka, Ageta, Aimi and Ebizuka 25 ). Since the pioneering work of Niezen et al.( Reference Niezen, Waghorn and Charleston 26 ) in New Zealand with tannin-containing legumes, it is known that condensed tannins have anthelmintic properties, mainly through: (1) lower establishment of the infective third-stage larvae (L3) in the host, (2) lower excretion of eggs by adult worms and (3) impaired development of eggs into L3( Reference Hoste, Torres-Acosta and Sandoval-Castro 27 ).

From the previous analysis, it follows that PSC may have a dual action on herbivores: a toxic/antinutritional effect derived from their inherent role as a chemical defence (i.e. cost) and a medicinal consequence (i.e. benefit), which could be explained by an extension of the protection that these chemicals impinge on plant tissues. In this review, we focus on mammalian herbivore–gastrointestinal parasite interactions as a model to explore herbivores’ decisions in relation to the cost and benefits of PSC ingestion under the challenge of a parasitic burden. We believe that an enhanced predictive ability of the behaviour of herbivores faced with a trade-off between the medicinal and deleterious effects of PSC will allow for the creation of innovative management strategies aimed at enhancing animal health and welfare in animal production systems through self-selection of bioactive-containing plants or supplements. Mobilising the behavioural adaptation of herbivores to variation in their health status and in foods’ characteristics, would allow to make animals more autonomous relative to their individual parasitic loads and to reduce chemical treatments, in accordance with agroecological principles( Reference Dumont, Fortun-Lamothe and Jouven 28 ).

Herbivore self-medication: costs v. benefits

From the previously described dual action of some PSC it is possible to hypothesise that the preference for foods containing such compounds will be dictated by the ‘resultant vector’ of two opposing forces: toxic/antinutritional v. medicinal/curative effects. This ‘resultant vector’ is a function of the intensity of the effects of PSC on the herbivore and on the parasite in the tri-trophic interaction plant–herbivore–gastrointestinal parasite. When the intensity of medicinal effects of PSC outweighs the intensity of negative consequences on the fitness/performance of the herbivore, then self-selection of PSC is expected( Reference Hutchings, Judge and Gordon 29 ). In fact, it has been proposed that self-selection of PSC should: (1) improve fitness in sick animals, (2) decrease fitness in healthy animals and (3) be triggered by need, i.e. emerge as a consequence of infection( Reference Singer, Mace and Bernays 30 ). These criteria have been shown to be satisfied in insects consuming pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing foods( Reference Singer, Mace and Bernays 30 ) and in primates ingesting bioactive (sesquiterpene lactones and steroid glucosides)-containing plants( Reference Huffman 31 ). Longer-term studies are needed to assess potential fitness benefits in parasitised livestock offered PSC-containing foods. However, we know that self-selection of condensed-tannin containing foods is triggered by parasitism in sheep and goats and that such behaviour reduces parasitic burdens( Reference Villalba, Provenza and Hall 32 Reference Amit, Cohen and Marcovics 34 ). We also know that sheep reduce their preference for tannin-containing foods when parasitic burdens subside( Reference Villalba, Provenza and Hall 32 , Reference Juhnke, Miller and Hall 33 ) and that ingestion of condensed tannins induce penalties on performance (e.g. growth( Reference Silanikove, Nitsan and Perevolotsky 35 Reference Burke, Miller and Terrill 37 ); see Table 1 for evidence of self-medication in animals).

Table 1. Studies showing evidence of self-selection of plant secondary compounds (PSC) aimed at improving health

If the medicinal actions of a PSC are less intense than its toxic/antinutritional activity, then parasitised herbivores are expected to experience a net cost from PSC consumption and thus avoid the PSC-containing food( Reference Hutchings, Judge and Gordon 29 ). For instance, the antinutritional effects of condensed tannins extracted from the Quebracho tree outweigh medicinal benefits when dosed at 8 % of food intake, as observed by reductions in parasitic burdens in addition to reductions in performance by treated animals relative to controls that did not receive the PSC( Reference Athanasiadou, Kyriazakis and Jackson 36 ). This study did not assess diet selection as animals received a predetermined dose of condensed tannins with their diets, but a reduction in preference for the medicine is predicted in this context.

Finally, if the medicinal actions of a PSC are as intense as its toxic/antinutritional activity, no net benefit or cost is expected from selecting PSC-containing foods. Studies on parasitised sheep show that self-selection of tannin-containing foods does reduce parasitic burdens without a clear improvement of performance over control parasitised sheep( Reference Villalba, Provenza and Hall 32 , Reference Juhnke, Miller and Hall 33 ). It is likely that these studies were not long enough to observe a benefit on body weight gains or that the fitness benefits underlying preference were not necessarily linked to performance. Moreover, the intensity of the cost and benefits experienced by parasitised herbivores ingesting PSC may not just emerge from the isolated medicinal or toxic/antinutritional impacts of PSC on the host. Foraging behaviour is a multidimensional process( Reference Simpson and Raubenheimer 38 , Reference Villalba, Provenza and Bryant 39 ) where concentrations and types of nutrients and PSC vary across time and space and interact within the animal's diet.

Nutrients shaping the intensity of costs and benefits during self-medication

PSC are not consumed in a vacuum, they are ingested with other chemicals during a meal which in turn interact with the herbivore's physiological processes, feeding patterns and prior experiences with foods( Reference Villalba and Provenza 40 , Reference Raubenheimer and Simpson 41 ). All these interactions can modify the potential benefits and penalties that different chemicals impinge on herbivores. Thus, it is difficult to depict a scenario where the resultant between the unidimensional and isolated effects of PSC as toxins or medicines dictate fitness benefits and as a consequence self-medication.

The complexity of interactions between nutrients and PSC can be simplified in a series of graphs in a two-dimensional space( Reference Raubenheimer and Simpson 42 ), where one dimension is a nutrient (nutrient axis) and the other a PSC that provides medicinal effects (PSC axis). The rationale of this system, the geometric approach, is rooted in behavioural homeostasis. When herbivores are offered choices among foods with different concentrations of nutrients and PSC with medicinal properties, their selection should reflect the outcome of homeostatic regulation for the chemicals in question( Reference Provenza 43 , Reference Provenza, Villalba and Bels 44 ). This approach allows the animal to indicate how it prioritises the ingestion and utilisation of different food components and treats the interactions among such components as the primary variable. Moreover, the method enables measurement and interpretation of trade-offs reached between overeating some chemicals and undereating others, allowing for integration across different levels of biological analysis, including causation, development and evolution( Reference Simpson and Raubenheimer 45 ).

Nutrients influence the costs and benefits of self-medication in parasitised animals because it is known that an improved protein nutrition increases resistance to parasitic infections, i.e. an enhanced immunity to parasites( Reference Kyriazakis and Houdijk 46 ). Consistent with this, sheep infected with gastrointestinal parasites select a diet with greater protein content than non-parasitised animals( Reference Kyriazakis, Anderson and Oldham 47 , Reference Cosgrove and Niezen 48 ). Likewise, caterpillars alter their feeding behaviour in response to a viral or a bacterial infection by increasing their relative intake of protein compared with healthy controls or individuals dying of infection( Reference Lee, Cory and Wilson 49 , Reference Povey, Cotter and Simpson 50 ). This behaviour shows a compensation for the protein costs associated with resistance (i.e. mounting an immune response) against pathogens. Some condensed tannins improve protein nutrition in ruminants, which in turn enhance immune responses to parasites( Reference Min and Hart 51 ). Condensed tannins shift the site of protein digestion from the rumen to the intestines increasing the proportion of limiting and branched-chain amino acids reaching the small intestine( Reference Reed 52 , Reference Min, Barry and Attwood 53 ). Thus, condensed tannins may not always cause antinutritional effects on ruminants; on the contrary, they may improve protein nutrition( Reference Waghorn 11 ) in addition to their anthelmintic effects. It is thus possible to hypothesise that parasitised herbivores will attempt to incorporate greater amounts of both protein-based foods and condensed tannins into their diets than healthy individuals. However, research is needed to determine how mammalian herbivores will trade-off protein-based foods and PSC-containing foods with PSC-free foods of lower protein but greater energy content, in a range of concentrations of PSC and nutrients. Indeed, the global ratio of costs (antinutritional/toxic effects) to benefits (anthelmintic effects and better protein nutrition) of a given food will depend on the concentrations of PSC and nutrients in that food.

Applying the geometric approach to available studies on livestock self-medication( Reference Villalba, Provenza and Hall 32 , Reference Juhnke, Miller and Hall 33 ) it is observed that parasitised animals trained to associate condensed tannin-containing foods with recovery from parasitic burdens select more condensed tannins, but less protein than control animals with a similar selection of digestible energy in the diet (Fig. 1). As predicted by Hutchings et al.( Reference Hutchings, Judge and Gordon 29 ) animals in these studies appear to be balancing the short-term cost of greater PSC intake (and lower nutrient intake) with the potentially longer-term costs that would have been incurred through greater parasitic loads if lower amounts of PSC were consumed. This was observed in naive parasitised animals, which selected lower amounts of Quebracho tannins than experienced parasitised animals (treatment), the latter being trained to associate the ingestion of condensed tannins with relief from the parasitic infection( Reference Juhnke, Miller and Hall 33 ). Nevertheless, the costs incurred by selecting more PSC in treatment animals were only transient as ingestion of the PSC-containing food was cyclic across days (see, e.g. Juhnke et al.( Reference Juhnke, Miller and Hall 33 )), a temporal feeding pattern that may have maximised the medicinal effects of PSC, while minimising the toxic/antinutritional effects of these compounds (see the following section).

Fig. 1. Plots of mean protein, digestible energy and plant secondary compounds (PSC) (condensed quebracho tannins; PSC) intake during self-medication studies where sheep could select between a PSC-containing food and a PSC-free food. : naive control animals; : parasitised animals (data taken from Villalba et al. ( Reference Villalba, Provenza and Hall 32 )). : naive control animals; : parasitised animals (data taken from Juhnke et al. ( Reference Juhnke, Miller and Hall 33 )).

Feeding patterns shaping the intensity of costs and benefits during self-medication

Ingestion of medicines by parasitised animals is not constant across time. Once ingestion of PSC reduces infection, animals may then switch to a PSC-free diet, thus reducing the penalties induced by the toxic/antinutritional effects of PSC( Reference Hutchings, Judge and Gordon 29 ) and by the lost opportunities of harvesting more nutrients instead of a nutrient-diluted PSC-containing food. In support of this view, parasitised sheep displayed high use of tannin-containing foods only during certain days of the study. During  other days, animals increased preference for the tannin-free alternative( Reference Villalba, Provenza and Hall 32 , Reference Juhnke, Miller and Hall 33 ). Likewise, wild chimpanzees self-medicate by selecting the bitter pith of the plant Vernonia amygdalina when suffering from parasite-related diseases( Reference Huffman and Seifu 54 ). This medicinal plant contains toxic sesquiterpene lactones and steroid glucosides with antiparasitic activity at the doses consumed by the animals( Reference Ohigashi, Huffman and Izutsu 55 ). However, and likely due to the toxic effects of these PSC, the plant is sought with a low frequency, with a typical cyclic pattern of use across time, despite its year-round availability. This feeding pattern likely maximises the effectiveness of the medicinal actions of sesquiterpene lactones and steroid glucosides while minimising their severe toxic effects. Other studies also point to the ability of ruminants to balance the nutritional and toxicological effects of foods. Lambs offered a choice between a forage with high content of protein and ergovaline (a toxic PSC) or the same forage, but with lower concentrations of both protein and ergovaline, preferred the former at the beginning of the study, but then this pattern waned and by the end of the experiment they ate greater amounts of the latter food alternative( Reference Friend, Provenza and Villalba 56 ).

Plant secondary compounds shaping the intensity of costs and benefits during self-medication

PSC interact with other PSC ingested in the diet, by a mechanism which may modify the intensity of their medicinal or toxic actions on the animal's body. It has been hypothesised that PSC ingested as a dilute mixture are less toxic to herbivores because they are less concentrated and potentially detoxified by different pathways( Reference Freeland and Janzen 5 ). In addition to PSC dilution, consuming a diversity of PSC may reduce the overall toxic effect of the mix, as the formation of gastrointestinal complexes could reduce the absorption and activity of single PSC( Reference Freeland and Janzen 5 , Reference Villalba, Spackman and Goff 57 ). As an example, intestinal bonding of tannins and saponins may result in moderated toxic effects( Reference Freeland, Calcott and Anderson 58 ) and condensed tannins in sainfoin complex ergot alkaloids from endophyte-infected tall fescue( Reference Villalba, Spackman and Goff 57 ). Thus, gastrointestinal complexation represents a mechanism, which allows herbivores to consume more nutrients when offered diverse PSC-containing foods. Consistent with this, parasitised lambs ate more when allowed to select from saponin- and tannin-containing foods than when given access to either food alone. However, sheep offered choices experienced greater parasitic burdens than sheep offered single PSC-containing rations( Reference Copani, Hall and Miller 59 ). The geometric approach applied to this study shows that the decision by animals offered choices was to harvest more protein and digestible energy and lower total amounts of PSC than animals fed either tannin- or saponin-containing foods (Fig. 2). This decision entailed a cost: greater parasitic burdens. However, the benefit for animals exposed to a choice between saponin- and tannin-containing foods paid off as it involved better performance than animals fed single PSC( Reference Copani, Hall and Miller 59 ).

Fig. 2. Plots of mean protein, digestible energy and total plant secondary compounds (PSC) (condensed Quebracho tannins, saponins; PSC) intake during a self-medication study where parasitised groups of lambs were fed: (1) tannin-containing food (; only tannins), (2) saponin containing food (; only saponins), (3) PSC-free food (; control) or (4) choice between a tannin- and saponin-containing foods (; choice tannins saponins). Data taken from Copani et al. ( Reference Copani, Hall and Miller 59 )

Flavonoids (e.g. flavonols, flavones and anthocyanidins) and other phenolic compounds (e.g. gallic acid, chlorogenic acids and stilbenes) synthesised to protect plants from oxygen free-radicals produced in photosynthesis provide antioxidant, antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory activities to herbivores( Reference Crozier, Jaganath and Clifford 21 , Reference Middleton, Kandaswami and Theoharides 60 , Reference Miles, Zoubouli and Calder 61 ), which may be ingested as a diverse array of chemicals in a diet. Recent research suggests birds self-medicate with antioxidants( Reference Catoni, Schaefer and Peters 62 ). Birds challenged by an increased production of reactive oxygen species after long flights( Reference Catoni, Peters and Schaefer 9 ) or under thermal stress( Reference Beaulieu, Haas and Schaefer 63 ) preferentially select foods high in flavonoids to attenuate the oxidative damage induced by the stressors while experiencing a concomitant increase in humoral immunity (benefits). However, more research is needed to evaluate the costs or penalties incurred by antioxidant ingestion under the presence and absence of an oxidative challenge. For instance, ingestion of antioxidants by red-winged blackbird chicks experiencing a low production of reactive oxygen species leads to an increased oxidative damage, while the opposite pattern is observed when supplementing antioxidants to chicks challenged by oxidative stress (see Beaulieu & Schaefer( Reference Beaulieu and Schaefer 64 )). Moreover, the penalties incurred by antioxidant consumption are recognised in human subjects, as antioxidant use is only recommended for individuals in a suboptimal oxidative state (see Beaulieu & Schaefer( Reference Beaulieu and Schaefer 64 )). Polyphenols may act as pro-oxidants at high doses with potential negative impacts on biomolecules such as DNA, proteins and lipids( Reference Aruoma 65 , Reference Wätjen, Michels and Steffan 66 ) and toxicity can occur at high intake levels of some commonly consumed antioxidants( Reference Choueiri, Chedea and Calokerinos 67 ). Thus, it appears that as other PSC involved in self-medication, antioxidants: (1) improve fitness in sick animals, but (2) may decrease fitness in healthy individuals.

Experience shaping the intensity of costs and benefits during self-medication

Herbivore experience with PSC may influence mammalian gut microbial communities in a way that favours those microbes associated with enhanced detoxification and tolerance( Reference Freeland and Janzen 5 , Reference Barboza, Bennett and Lignot 68 ). For instance, adding PSC to woodrats’ (Neotoma bryanti and Neotoma lepida) diets altered gut microbial community structure, being the response a function of the animals’ prior experiences with ingesting PSC( Reference Kohl and Dearing 69 ). In addition, mammals and insect herbivores modify the production enzymes in their tissues that detoxify PSC, including cytochrome P450, as a function of their previous exposure to PSC( Reference Li, Schuler and Berenbaum 70 , Reference Delgoda and Westlake 71 ). Thus, experience has the potential to modulate the intensity of penalties associated with PSC ingestion, and as a consequence, preference for PSC-containing foods. As an example, lambs exposed early in life to foods containing oxalates, terpenes and condensed tannins consume substantially greater amounts of these foods later in life than naive animals, even when alternatives of greater quality were available for consumption( Reference Villalba, Provenza and GouDong 72 , Reference Shaw, Villalba and Provenza 73 ). The diverse microbial populations present in the foregut of ruminant herbivores can lead to several metabolic biotransformations that alter PSC, thus influencing the biological activity of these chemical compounds as exposure increases( Reference Foley, Iason and McArthur 74 ), likely to a greater extent than for monogastric animals. For instance, gradual exposure to increasing levels of oxalic acid to ruminants leads to a change in the composition of the rumen microbial population, which results in the breakdown of oxalic acid( Reference Duncan, Frutos and Young 75 ). Chronic exposure to terpenes in sheep increases their ability to consume terpenes( Reference Villalba, Provenza and Banner 76 ) as rumen microbes adapt to monoterpenes( Reference Dziba, Hall and Provenza 77 ) and diterpene diesters( Reference Kronberg and Walker 78 ). Collectively, past experiences and environmental contexts that encourage exposure to different PSC-containing foods help explain the contrasting patterns of PSC intake, and tolerance, observed among different groups of animals, even when they belong to the same species.

Goats of the Damascus breed typically show a high propensity to consume a tannin-containing shrub, Pistacia lentiscus, with anthelmintic properties, even when parasitic burdens are not a concern. In contrast, healthy goats of the Mamber breed incorporate much lower amounts of P. lentiscus into their diet( Reference Amit, Cohen and Marcovics 34 ). The contrasting use of this medicinal plant between breeds appears to be learned, as a cross-fostering study showed that Mamber mothers educate Damascus kids to use low amounts of P. lentiscus in their diets( Reference Glasser, Ungar and Landau 79 ). Moreover, the different use of P. lentiscus by the two breeds influences the amount of PSC that animals are willing to incorporate into their diets when experiencing a parasitic burden. When given a choice between P. lentiscus and hay, parasitised goats of the Mamber breed showed a greater preference for the medicinal plant than non-parasitised counterparts, a response which was not found in Damascus goats( Reference Amit, Cohen and Marcovics 34 ). P. lentiscus is a medicinal shrub (benefit) but also induces detrimental effects on protein metabolism (cost) in the absence of disease( Reference Amit, Cohen and Marcovics 34 ). Damascus goats, typically show a higher propensity to consume P. lentiscus and thus they regularly consume, and tolerate, greater amounts of PSC in their diet. This feeding pattern likely optimises the benefit:cost ratio of ingesting the toxic shrub even when animals are not infected, i.e. adopting a prophylactic way of self-medication (see later). Conversely, the Mamber goats, which are less tolerant to the PSC present in the shrub as a consequence of their typical lower exposure to this food resource, use this plant therapeutically, i.e. when triggered by a parasitic burden. This example gives insights into how contrasting experiences with PSC-containing foods, or contrasting experiences among herbivores, may influence the intensity of costs and benefits in animals and as a consequence self-medicative behaviour.

Diluting the costs of plant secondary compounds: feedforward mechanisms and selection of medicinal foods with low toxicity

The costs of PSC ingestion can be minimised in herbivores by the sustained ingestion of a diversity of medicinal PSC at low doses with diet. In addition, and as described earlier, PSC ingested as a dilute mixture are less toxic to herbivores because they are less concentrated and potentially detoxified by different pathways( Reference Freeland and Janzen 5 ). Chronic ingestion of small daily doses of PSC in a dietary context involves a health preventive strategy which has been referred to as feedforward( Reference Vitazkova, Long and Paul 80 ) or prophylactic self-medication( Reference Villalba, Miller and Ungar 81 ). This behaviour likely exerts minimal to nil costs on animals with potential long-term benefits. Consistent with this, diets of some wildlife species or of human cultures contain a high diversity of PSC-containing plants where PSC are consumed in low doses but on a daily basis. For instance, 30 % of the daily herbaceous diet of mountain gorillas, contains PSC with antibacterial properties. Of the 172 plant species typically consumed by Mahale chimpanzees, 22 % are used to treat gastrointestinal-related illnesses in human subjects. In addition, 89 % of the species used to treat symptoms of malaria among the Hausa people in Nigeria are also used in their diets( Reference Huffman 82 ). Dietary habits in human subjects play a crucial role at ensuring proper and regular consumption of preventive chemicals such as antioxidants( Reference Drewnowski and Gomez-Carneros 83 Reference Del Rio, Rodriquez-Mateos and Spencer 85 ).

Mammalian herbivores selecting certain PSC or arrays of PSC in their diets may incur in low to nil costs when toxicity of the PSC at moderate doses is inherently low or nil and when PSC provide additional benefits such as those described for condensed tannins on protein nutrition. For instance, most temperate tannin-containing fodder legumes naturally growing in permanent pastures, such as sainfoin (Onobrychiis viciifolia) or birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus spp.) species are characterised by moderate concentrations of condensed tannins, ranging from 0·4 to 8 % as a function of different phenological stages or growths( Reference Wang, McAllister and Acharya 86 ). At intermediate condensed tannin concentrations (3–5 %), sainfoin then brings benefits in terms of nutritive value (similar to non-tannin-containing legumes such as alfalfa( Reference Wang, McAllister and Acharya 86 )) while still providing antiparasitic actions( Reference Hoste, Martinez-Ortiz-De-Montellano and Manolaraki 87 ). In these conditions, herbivores may not need to balance the beneficial effects of sainfoin (i.e. nutritional and medicinal) against the ingestion of PSC as they benefit from selecting sainfoin over other tannin-free forages regardless of their level of parasitic burden. Thus, the inherent beneficial characteristics of some medicinal plants may not satisfy the second criterion described by Singer et al.( Reference Singer, Mace and Bernays 30 ) needed to identify self-selection of PSC by parasitised individuals: a decrease in fitness by healthy animals. In a recent experiment, we offered parasitised and non-parasitised lambs a choice between two types of sainfoin pellets characterised by their level of tannin concentration (low, 2 % v. moderate, 4 %)( Reference Costes-Thiré, Villalba and Ginane 88 ). Initially, both groups preferred the low-tannin sainfoin pellets (74 % preference) suggesting that the concentration of condensed tannins led to an initial rejection of the food type with a greater content of condensed tannins. However, after a 3-week period of exposure to only sainfoin pellets containing 4 % condensed tannins, preference reversed and all lambs preferred (62 %) sainfoin pellets with 4 % condensed tannins over pellets with lower condensed tannin content. Hence, the experience lambs had with sainfoin at moderate tannin concentrations likely optimised the benefit:cost ratio during choice tests, increasing lambs’ propensity to include a greater concentration of condensed tannins into their diet. Both parasitised and non-infected lambs displayed the same pattern of preference for tannin-containing pellets, suggesting that the benefits of condensed tannins were not only circumscribed to their anthelminthic benefits, but also to other advantages such as nutrient supply with low to nil penalties to the host, a process consistent with prophylactic self-medication.

Conclusions

Concentrations and types of medicines, nutrients and PSC vary across time and space, creating a multidimensional feeding environment. Likewise, herbivores’ experiences and feeding patterns change in time and space as well as the interactions among chemicals in a diet. This complexity hinders potential unidimensional explanations about the cost and benefits of ingesting medicinal, and potentially toxic, PSC. A better understanding of the rewards and penalties emerging by the ingestion of specific PSC interacting with other chemicals in the diet (nutrients, PSC) and with time, as well as with past herbivores’ experiences with PSC and nutrients will improve our predictive ability regarding the fitness benefits associated with self-medication. This new knowledge will guide novel management approaches, which allow animals to ‘write their own prescriptions’ and build their own diet in diverse feeding environments with choices among plants, forages, supplements or rations with different concentrations and types of nutrients and PSC.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all past and previous colleagues in the laboratory who contributed to the work reviewed in this effort.

Financial support

Research by J. J. V. was supported by grants from the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Utah Irrigated Pasture Grants Programme. Research by C. G. and M. C. T. were supported by the INRA programme on the Integrated Management of Animal Health. The present paper is published with the approval of the Director, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, and Utah State University, as journal paper number 8895.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Authorship

J. J. V., M. C. T. and C. G. co-wrote the paper and have primary responsibility for final content.

References

1. Cheeke, PR (1998) Natural Toxicants in Feeds, Forages, and Poisonous Plants. Illinois: Interstate Publications.Google Scholar
2. Palo, RT & Robbins, CT (1991) Plant Defenses Against Mammalian Herbivory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
3. Coley, PD, Bryant, JP & Chapin, FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defense. Science 230, 895899.Google Scholar
4. Hay, M & Fenical, (1996) Chemical ecology and marine biodiversity: insights and products from the sea. Oceanography 9, 1020.Google Scholar
5. Freeland, WJ & Janzen, DH (1974) Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am Nat 108, 269286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Rosenthal, GA & Janzen, DH (editors) (1979) Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
7. Barnes, PW, Tobler, MA, Keefover-Ring, K et al. (2016) Rapid modulation of ultraviolet shielding in plants is influenced by solar ultraviolet radiation and linked to alterations in flavonoids. Plant Cell Environ 39, 222230.Google Scholar
8. Agati, G, Azzarello, E, Pollastri, S et al. (2012) Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants: location and functional significance. Plant Sci 196, 6776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Catoni, C, Peters, A & Schaefer, HM (2008) Life history trade-offs are influenced by the diversity, availability and interactions of dietary antioxidants. Anim Behav 76, 11071119.Google Scholar
10. Mueller-Harvey, I (2006) Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. J Sci Food Agric 86, 20102037.Google Scholar
11. Waghorn, G (2008) Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production – progress and challenges. Anim Feed Sci Technol 147, 116139.Google Scholar
12. MacAdam, JW & Villalba, JJ (2015) Beneficial effects of temperate forage legumes that contain condensed tannins. Agriculture 5, 475491.Google Scholar
13. Robbins, CT, Hagerman, AE, Austin, PJ et al. (1991) Variation in mammalian physiological responses to a condensed tannin and its ecological implications. J Mamm 72, 480486.Google Scholar
14. Dawson, JM, Buttery, PJ, Jenkins, D et al. (1999) Effects of dietary quebracho tannin on nutrient utilisation and tissue metabolism in sheep and rats. J Sci Food Agric 79, 14231430.Google Scholar
15. Mehansho, HL, Butler, LG & Carlson, DM (1987) Dietary tannins and salivary proline-rich proteins: interactions, induction, and defense mechanisms. Annu Rev Nutr 7, 423440.Google Scholar
16. Provenza, FD, Burritt, EA, Clausen, TP et al. (1990) Conditioned flavor aversion: a mechanism for goats to avoid condensed tannins in blackbrush. Am Nat 136, 810828.Google Scholar
17. Provenza, FD, Ortega-Reyes, L, Scott, CB et al. (1994) Antiemetic drugs attenuate food aversions in sheep. J Anim Sci 72, 19891994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Lozano, GA (1998) Parasitic stress and self-medication in wild animals. In Advances in the Study of Behavior, pp. 291317 [Moler, AP, Milinski, M and Slater, PJB, editors]. London: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
19. Hocquemiller, R, Cortes, D, Arango, GJ et al. (1991) Isolation and synthesis of espintanol, a new antiparasitic monoterpenes. J Nat Prod 54, 445452.Google Scholar
20. Kayser, O, Kiderlen, AF & Croft, SL (2003) Natural products as antiparasitic drugs. Parasitol Res 90, S55S62.Google Scholar
21. Crozier, A, Jaganath, IB & Clifford, MN (2009) Dietary phenolics: chemistry, bioavailability and effects on health. Nat Prod Rep 26, 10011043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Lacombe, A, Tadepalli, S, Hwang, CA et al. (2013) Phytochemicals in lowbush wild blueberry inactivate Escherichia coli O157: H7 by damaging its cell membrane. Foodborne Pathog Dis 10, 944950.Google Scholar
23. Picman, AK (1986) Biological activities of sesquiterpene lactones. Biochem Syst Ecol 14, 255281.Google Scholar
24. Robles, M, Arguellin, M, West, J et al. (1995) Recent studies on zoopharmacognosy, pharmacology and neurotoxicology of sesquiterpene lactones. Planta Med 61, 199203.Google Scholar
25. Huffman, MA, Ohigashi, H, Kawanaka, M et al. (1998 ) African great ape self-medication: a new paradigm for treating parasite disease with natural medicines? In Towards Natural Medicine Research in the 21st Century, pp. 113123 [Ageta, H, Aimi, N, Ebizuka, Y et al. , editors]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
26. Niezen, JH, Waghorn, TS, Charleston, WAG et al. (1995) Growth and gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in lambs grazing either lucerne (Medicago sativa) or sulla (Hedysarum coronarium) which contains condensed tannins. J Agric Sci 125, 281289.Google Scholar
27. Hoste, H, Torres-Acosta, JF, Sandoval-Castro, CA et al. (2015) Tannin containing legumes as a model for nutraceuticals against digestive parasites in livestock. Vet Parasitol 212, 517.Google Scholar
28. Dumont, B, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Jouven, M et al. (2013) Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century. Animal 7, 10281043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Hutchings, MR, Judge, J, Gordon, IJ et al. (2006) Use of trade-off theory to advance understanding of herbivore–parasite interactions. Mamm Rev 36, 16.Google Scholar
30. Singer, MS, Mace, KC & Bernays, EA (2009) Self-medication as adaptive plasticity: increased ingestion of plant toxins by parasitized caterpillars. PLoS ONE 4, e4796.Google Scholar
31. Huffman, MA (2003) Animal self-medication and ethno-medicine: exploration and exploitation of the medicinal properties of plants. Proc Nutr Soc 62, 371381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD & Hall, JO (2010) Selection of tannins by sheep in response to gastrointestinal nematode infection. J Anim Sci 88, 21892198.Google Scholar
33. Juhnke, J, Miller, J, Hall, JO et al. (2012) Preference for condensed tannins by sheep in response to challenge infection with Haemonchus contortus . Vet Parasitol 188, 104114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Amit, M, Cohen, I, Marcovics, A et al. (2013) Self-medication with tannin-rich browse in goats infected with gastro-intestinal nematodes. Vet Parasitol 198, 305311.Google Scholar
35. Silanikove, N, Nitsan, Z & Perevolotsky, A (1994) Effect of a daily supplementation of poly (ethylene glycol) on intake and digestion of tannin-containing leaves (Ceratonia siliqua) by sheep. J Agric Food Chem 42, 28442847.Google Scholar
36. Athanasiadou, S, Kyriazakis, I, Jackson, F et al. (2001) Direct anthelmintic effects of condensed tannins towards different gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep: in vitro and in vivo studies. Vet Parasitol 99, 205219.Google Scholar
37. Burke, JM, Miller, JE, Terrill, TH et al. (2014) The effects of supplemental sericea lespedeza pellets in lambs and kids on growth rate. Livest Sci 159, 2936.Google Scholar
38. Simpson, SJ & Raubenheimer, D (1999) Assuaging nutritional complexity: a geometrical approach. Proc Nutr Soc 58, 779789.Google Scholar
39. Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD & Bryant, JP (2002) Consequences of the interaction between nutrients and plant secondary metabolites on herbivore selectivity: benefits or detriments for plants? Oikos 97, 282292.Google Scholar
40. Villalba, JJ & Provenza, FD (2007) Self-medication and homeostatic behaviour in herbivores: learning about the benefits of nature's pharmacy. Animal 1, 13601370.Google Scholar
41. Raubenheimer, D & Simpson, SJ (2009) Nutritional PharmEcology: doses, nutrients, toxins, and medicines. Integr Comp Biol 49, 329337.Google Scholar
42. Raubenheimer, D & Simpson, SJ (1997) Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates. Nutr Res Rev 10, 151179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Provenza, FD (1995) Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J Range Manage 48, 217.Google Scholar
44. Provenza, FD & Villalba, JJ (2006) Foraging in domestic herbivores: linking the internal and external milieu. In Feeding in Domestic Vertebrates: From Structure to Function, pp. 210240 [Bels, editor VL]. Oxfordshire: CABI Publ.Google Scholar
45. Simpson, SJ & Raubenheimer, D (2001) The geometric analysis of nutrient-allelochemical interactions: a case study using locusts. Ecology 82, 422439.Google Scholar
46. Kyriazakis, I & Houdijk, J (2006) Immunonutrition: nutritional control of parasites. Small Rum Res 62, 7982.Google Scholar
47. Kyriazakis, I, Anderson, DH, Oldham, JD et al. (1996) Long-term subclinical infection with Trichostrongylus colubriformis: effects on food intake, diet selection and performance of growing lambs. Vet Parasitol 61, 297313.Google Scholar
48. Cosgrove, GP & Niezen, JH (2000) Intake and selection for white clover by grazing lambs in response to gastrointestinal parasitism. Appl Anim Behav Sci 66, 7185.Google Scholar
49. Lee, KP, Cory, JS, Wilson, K et al. (2006) Flexible diet choice offsets protein costs of pathogen resistance in a caterpillar. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273, 823829.Google Scholar
50. Povey, S, Cotter, SC, Simpson, SJ et al. (2009) Can the protein costs of bacterial resistance be offset by altered feeding behaviour? J Anim Ecol 78, 437446.Google Scholar
51. Min, BR & Hart, SP (2003) Tannins for suppression of internal parasites. J Anim Sci 81, E102E109.Google Scholar
52. Reed, JD (1995) Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes. J Anim Sci 73, 15161528.Google Scholar
53. Min, BR, Barry, TN, Attwood, GT et al. (2003) The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 106, 319.Google Scholar
54. Huffman, MA & Seifu, M (1989) Observations on the illness and consumption of a possibly medicinal plant Vernonia amygdalina by a wild chimpanzee in the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 30, 5163.Google Scholar
55. Ohigashi, H, Huffman, MA, Izutsu, D et al. (1994) Toward the chemical ecology of medicinal plant use in chimpanzees: the case of Vernonia amygdalina, a plant used by wild chimpanzees possibly for parasite-related diseases. J Chem Ecol 20, 541553.Google Scholar
56. Friend, MA, Provenza, FD & Villalba, JJ (2015) Preference by sheep for endophyte-infected tall fescue grown adjacent to or at a distance from alfalfa. Animal 9, 516525.Google Scholar
57. Villalba, JJ, Spackman, C, Goff, BM et al. (2016) Interaction between a tannin-containing legume and endophyte-infected tall fescue seed on lambs’ feeding behavior and physiology. J Anim Sci 94, 845857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Freeland, WJ, Calcott, PH & Anderson, LR (1985) Tannins and saponin: interaction in herbivore diets. Biochem Syst Ecol 13, 189193.Google Scholar
59. Copani, G, Hall, JO, Miller, J et al. (2013) Plant secondary compounds as complementary resources: are they always complementary? Oecologia 172, 10411049.Google Scholar
60. Middleton, E, Kandaswami, C & Theoharides, TC (2000) The effects of plant flavonoids on mammalian cells: implications for inflammation, heart disease, and cancer. Pharmacol Rev 52, 673751.Google Scholar
61. Miles, EA, Zoubouli, P & Calder, PC (2005) Effects of polyphenols on human Th1 and Th2 cytokine production. Clin Nutr 24, 780784.Google Scholar
62. Catoni, C, Schaefer, HM & Peters, A (2008) Fruit for health: the effect of flavonoids on humoral immune response and food selection in a frugivorous bird. Funct Ecol 22, 649654.Google Scholar
63. Beaulieu, M, Haas, A & Schaefer, H (2014) Self-supplementation and effects of dietary antioxidants during acute thermal stress. J Exp Biol 217, 370375.Google Scholar
64. Beaulieu, M & Schaefer, HM (2013) Rethinking the role of dietary antioxidants through the lens of self-medication. Anim Behav 86, 1724.Google Scholar
65. Aruoma, O (2003) Methodological considerations for characterizing potential antioxidant actions of bioactive components in plant foods. Mutat Res 523–524, 920.Google Scholar
66. Wätjen, W, Michels, G, Steffan, B et al. (2005) Low concentrations of flavonoids are protective in rat H4IIE cells whereas high concentrations cause DNA damage and apoptosis. J Nutr 135, 525531.Google Scholar
67. Choueiri, L, Chedea, VS, Calokerinos, A et al. (2012) Antioxidant/pro-oxidant properties of model phenolic compounds. Part II: studies on mixtures of polyphenols at different molar ratios by chemiluminescence and LC–MS. Food Chem 133, 10391044.Google Scholar
68. Barboza, PS, Bennett, A, Lignot, JH et al. (2010) Digestive challenges for vertebrate animals: microbial diversity, cardiorespiratory coupling, and dietary specialization. Physiol Biochem Zool 83, 764774.Google Scholar
69. Kohl, KD & Dearing, MD (2012) Experience matters: prior exposure to plant toxins enhances diversity of gut microbes in herbivores. Ecol Lett 15, 10081015.Google Scholar
70. Li, X, Schuler, MA & Berenbaum, MR (2002) Jasmonate and salicylate induce expression of herbivore cytochrome P450 genes. Nature 419, 712715.Google Scholar
71. Delgoda, R & Westlake, ACG (2004) Herbal interactions involving cytochrome P450 enzymes. Toxicol Rev 23, 239249.Google Scholar
72. Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD & GouDong, H (2004) Experience influences diet mixing by herbivores: implications for plant biochemical diversity. Oikos 107, 100109.Google Scholar
73. Shaw, RA, Villalba, JJ & Provenza, FD (2006) Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep. J Chem Ecol 32, 12761278.Google Scholar
74. Foley, WJ, Iason, GR & McArthur, C (1999) Role of plant secondary metabolites in the nutritional ecology of mammalian herbivores—how far have we come in 25 years? In Nutritional Ecology of Herbivores 5th Int Symp on the Nutrition of Herbivores, pp. 130–209 [HJG Jung and GC Fahey Jr, editors]. Savoy, IL: Am. Soc. Anim. Sci.Google Scholar
75. Duncan, AJ, Frutos, P & Young, SA (2000) The effect of rumen adaptation to oxalic acid on selection of oxalic-acid-rich plants by goats. Br J Nutr 83, 5965.Google Scholar
76. Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD & Banner, RE (2002) Influence of macronutrients and activated charcoal on utilization of sagebrush by sheep and goats. J Anim Sci 80, 20992109.Google Scholar
77. Dziba, LE, Hall, JO & Provenza, FD (2006) Feeding behavior of the lambs in relation to kinetics of 1·8-ceneole dosed intravenously or into the rumen. J Chem Ecol 32, 391408.Google Scholar
78. Kronberg, SL & Walker, JW (1993) Ruminal metabolism of leafy spurge in sheep and goats: a potential explanation for differential foraging on spurge by sheep, goats, and cattle. J Chem Ecol 19, 20072017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79. Glasser, TA, Ungar, ED, Landau, SY et al. (2009) Breed and maternal effects on the intake of tannin-rich browse by juvenile domestic goats (Capra hircus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 119, 7177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80. Vitazkova, SK, Long, E, Paul, A et al. (2001) Mice suppress malaria infection by sampling a ‘bitter’ chemotherapy agent. Anim Behav 61, 887894.Google Scholar
81. Villalba, JJ, Miller, J, Ungar, ED et al. (2014) Ruminant self-medication against gastrointestinal nematodes: evidence, mechanism, and origins. Parasite 21, 110.Google Scholar
82. Huffman, MA (1997) Current evidence for self-medication in primates: a multidisciplinary perspective. Yearb Phys Anthropol 40, 171200.Google Scholar
83. Drewnowski, A & Gomez-Carneros, C (2000) Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 72, 14241435.Google Scholar
84. Brandt, KC, Leifert, R, Sanderson, et al. (2011) Agroecosystem management and nutritional quality of plant foods: the case of organic fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30, 177197.Google Scholar
85. Del Rio, D, Rodriquez-Mateos, A, Spencer, JPE et al. (2013) Dietary (poly)phenolics in human health: structures, bioavailability, and evidence of protective effects against chronic diseases. Antioxid Redox Sign 18, 18181892.Google Scholar
86. Wang, Y, McAllister, TA & Acharya, S (2015) Condensed tannins in sainfoin: composition, concentration, and effects on nutritive and feeding value of sainfoin forage. Crop Sci 55, 1322.Google Scholar
87. Hoste, H, Martinez-Ortiz-De-Montellano, C, Manolaraki, F et al. (2012) Direct and indirect effects of bioactive tannin-rich tropical and temperate legumes against nematode infections. Vet Parasitol 186, 1827.Google Scholar
88. Costes-Thiré, M, Villalba, JJ & Ginane, C (2016) Increased intake of tannin-rich sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) pellets by parasitized and non-parasitized sheep after a period of conditioning. Abstracts. The American Dairy Science Association (ADSA), the American Society of Animal Science (ASAS) Joint Annual Meeting. Salt Lake City, Utah, July 19–23, 2016.Google Scholar
89. Lefèvre, T, Oliver, L, Hunter, MD et al. (2010) Evidence for trans-generational medication in nature. Ecol Lett 13, 14851493.Google Scholar
90. Bernays, EA & Singer, MS (2005) Insect defences: taste alteration and endoparasites. Nature 436, 476.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Studies showing evidence of self-selection of plant secondary compounds (PSC) aimed at improving health

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Plots of mean protein, digestible energy and plant secondary compounds (PSC) (condensed quebracho tannins; PSC) intake during self-medication studies where sheep could select between a PSC-containing food and a PSC-free food. : naive control animals; : parasitised animals (data taken from Villalba et al.(32)). : naive control animals; : parasitised animals (data taken from Juhnke et al.(33)).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Plots of mean protein, digestible energy and total plant secondary compounds (PSC) (condensed Quebracho tannins, saponins; PSC) intake during a self-medication study where parasitised groups of lambs were fed: (1) tannin-containing food (; only tannins), (2) saponin containing food (; only saponins), (3) PSC-free food (; control) or (4) choice between a tannin- and saponin-containing foods (; choice tannins saponins). Data taken from Copani et al.(59)