Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:33:53.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pearl millet: a sustainable cereal with low glycemic potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

B.D. Igbetar ,
C. Bosch  and
C. Orfila
B.D. Igbetar
Affiliation:
School of Food Science and Nutrition, Nutrition and Public Health Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
C. Bosch
Affiliation:
School of Food Science and Nutrition, Nutrition and Public Health Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
C. Orfila
Affiliation:
School of Food Science and Nutrition, Nutrition and Public Health Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 77 , Issue OCE4: Summer Meeting, 10–12 July 2018, Getting energy balance right , 2018 , E136
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) is a climate resilient cereal consumed widely in traditional diets in rural regions of Africa. It has a higher content of protein and minerals but is relatively lower in carbohydrates compared to maize, rice and sorghum(Reference Saleh, Zhang and Chen1). Studies have shown potential beneficial effects of starchy food consumption on obesity, especially those containing slowly-digestible and resistant starch, and low content of sugar(Reference Aller, Abete and Astrup2).

In this study, the free sugar content and starch digestibility of pearl millet flour and cooked porridge were evaluated. Starch digestion was undertaken using the harmonised INFOGEST in vitro system(Reference Minekus, Alminger and Alvito3). All experiments were done in three biological replicates. Sugars were quantified using high performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) and results expressed as percentage yield relative to dry weight.

Our results show that free sugar content of pearl millet flour (Fig. 1A) was 2·81 %, consisting mainly of sucrose and raffinose. Free sugar content increased significantly by 64·48 % after cooking (p < 0·05) suggesting endogenous amylase activity which resulted in the release of maltose and maltotriose; and invertase activity resulting in the release of glucose and fructose. Nevertheless, the total free sugar content of millet porridge is still low (less than 10 %). We observed that millet starch digestion (Fig. 1B) was rapid, reaching 44·95 % and 47·63 % in flour and cooked porridge respectively within 20 min. However, only 10·94 % and 6·83 % further digestion was observed between 20 min and 120 min. Around 45 % of starch was resistant to digestion after 120 min in both flour and porridge. Cooking had no significant effect (p < 0·05) on starch digestion at any time point.

Fig. 1. Free sugar content (a) and in vitro starch digestibility (b) of millet flour and cooked porridge. Results are presented as mean of 3 biological replicates and are expressed in a dry weight basis, error bars are standard deviation of the mean. *P < 0·05

In conclusion, high levels of resistant starch indicates low glycemic potential that needs to be verified in vivo. The consumption of millet porridge by obese populations could help them limit energy intake.

References

1.Saleh, AS, Zhang, Q, Chen, J et al. (2013) Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 12(3), 281–295.Google Scholar
2.Aller, EE, Abete, I, Astrup, A et al. (2011) Nutrients 3(3), 341–369.Google Scholar
3.Minekus, MM, Alminger, P, Alvito, S et al. (2014) Food Funct 5(6), 1113–1124.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Free sugar content (a) and in vitro starch digestibility (b) of millet flour and cooked porridge. Results are presented as mean of 3 biological replicates and are expressed in a dry weight basis, error bars are standard deviation of the mean. *P < 0·05