Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:23:07.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2007

Ruth Chadwick
Ruth Chadwick*
Affiliation:
Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4SH, UK
*
Corresponding author: Dr Ruth Chadwick, fax +44 1524 592503, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Issues arising in connection with genes and nutrition policy include both nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics. Nutrigenomics considers the relationship between specifc nutrients or diet and gene expression and, it is envisaged, will facilitate prevention of diet-related common diseases. Nutrigenetics is concerned with the effects of individual genetic variation (single nucleotide polymorphisms) on response to diet, and in the longer term may lead to personalised dietary recommendations. It is important also to consider the surrounding context of other issues such as novel and functional foods in so far as they are related to genetic modification. Ethical issues fall into a number of categories: (1) why nutrigenomics? Will it have important public health benefits? (2) questions about research, e.g. concerning the acquisition of information about individual genetic variation; (3) questions about who has access to this information, and its possible misuse; (4) the applications of this information in terms of public health policy, and the negotiation of the potential tension between the interests of the individual in relation to, for example, prevention of conditions such as obesity and allergy; (5) the appropriate ethical approach to the issues, e.g. the moral difference, if any, between therapy and enhancement in relation to individualised diets; whether the 'technological fix' is always appropriate, especially in the wider context of the purported lack of public confidence in science, which has special resonance in the sphere of nutrition.

Keywords

NutrigenomicsEthical issuesIndividualismPublic health
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 161 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing (1997) Code of Practice and Guidance on Human Genetic Testing Services Supplied Direct to the Public. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Beck, LW (1963) Lectures on Ethics. New York Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Chadwick, R (1998) Genetic screening. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. vol. II 445–449 [Chadwick, R, editor]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chadwick, R (2001) Informed consent in genetic research. In Informed Consent in Medical Research, pp. 203–210 [Doyal, L & Tobias, J, editors]. London: BMJ Books.Google Scholar
Chadwick, R & Berg, K (2001) Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 318–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadwick, R & Hedgecoe, A (2002) Commercial exploitation of the human genome. In A Companion to Genetics, pp. 334–345 [Burley, J, Harris, J, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chadwick, R, Henson, S, Moseley, B, Koenen, G, Liakopoulos, M, Midden, C, Palou, A, Rechkemmer, G Schröder, D & von Wright, A (2003) Functional Foods. Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung Series. vol. 20 Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Defeat Diabetes Association (2003) Food Portions may Explain the 'French Paradox' of Rich Foods and a Thin Population (posted 28/08/03). http://www.defeatdiabetes.org/Articles/diet030828.htm.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2003) Our Inheritance, Our Future: Realising the Potential of Genetics in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Gütter, F & Guldberg, P (2003) Phenylketonuria. In Encyclopedia of the Human Genome. vol. 4, pp. 568–572. London: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2001) Human Genetic Databases: Challenges and Opportunities. London: The Stationery Office; available at http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200001/ldselect/ldsctech/57/5701.htm.Google Scholar
Human Genetics Commission (2002) The Supply of Genetic Tests Direct to the Public: a Consultation Document. London: Human Genetics Commission.Google Scholar
Human Genome Organisation Ethics Committee (1998) Statement on DNA Sampling: Control and Access. London: HUGO.Google Scholar
Human Genome Organisation Ethics Committee (2000) Statement on Benefit-sharing. London: HUGO.Google Scholar
Human Genome Organisation Ethics Committee (2002) Statement on Human Genomic Databases. London: HUGO.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, JPA (2003) Genetic associations in large versus small studies: an empirical assessment. Lancet 361, 567–571.Google Scholar
Kerr, A, Cunningham-Burley, S & Amos, A (1998) Drawing the line: an analysis of lay people's discussions about the new genetics. Public Understanding of Science 7, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupton, D (1996) Food, the Body and the Self. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Milunsky, A (2001) Your Genetic Destiny: Know Your Genes, Secure Your Health, Save Your Life. London: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
Müller, M & Kersten, S (2003) Nutrigenomics: goals and strategies. Nature Reviews Genetics 4, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2002) The UK Biobank. Postnote no. 180. London: Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology; available at http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn180.pdf.Google Scholar
Sciona, (2003) Nutrition screen. http://www.sciona.com/coresite/products/nutrition7.htm. accessed 2 September 2003Google Scholar
Shickle, D & Chadwick, R (1994) The ethics of screening: is screening-itis an incurable disease? Journal of Medical Ethics 20, 12–18.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsdôttir, H, Daar, AS, Smith, RD & Singer, PA (2003) Genomics – a global public good?. Lancet 361, 891–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, JMG & Jungner, G (1968) The Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Public Health Papers no. 34 Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2001) Genetic Databases: Assessing the Benefits and the Impact on Human and Patient Rights Report for Consultation. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar