Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:24:38.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunity induced after a feed of antigen during early life: oral tolerance v. sensitisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

S. Strobel
S. Strobel*
Affiliation:
Immunobiology Unit, Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London WC1N 1EH, UK
*
Corresponding Author: Professor Stephan Strobel, fax +44 20 7242 8437, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is good clinical and experimental evidence that oral tolerance exists in man and that the timing of antigen (food) administration is an important factor in the development of food allergic sensitisation and disease. Induction of tolerance is often seen as a T-helper 2-skewed response, which on one side may prevent harmful mucosal immune reactions, but on the other side may contribute to adverse responses in the susceptible individual. The primary mechanisms by which tolerance may be mediated include T-cell deletion, anergy, suppression ‘ignorance’ and apoptosis. Cell-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reactions (T-helper 1), which are implicated as a pathogenetic principle in the development of autoimmune and gastrointestinal inflammation are particularly well suppressed. Regulatory events during the induction of tolerance (or sensitisation) are not well characterised and remain at times controversial. The balance between tolerance (suppression) and sensitisation (priming) is dependent on several factors, such as: (a) genetic background; (b) nature of antigen and dose of antigen; (c) frequency of administration; (d) age (maturity v. immaturity) at first antigen exposure; (e) immunological status of the host (e.g. virus infection); dietary exposure of the mother; (g) antigen transmission via breast milk, and others. Overall, there is evidence in rodents that multiple low-dose feeds are more likely to induce regulatory cytokines (e.g. transforming growth factor-β, interleukins 10 and 4) in part secreted by CD4+CD25+ T-regulatory cells. Despite the powerful suppressive effect of oral antigen exposure observed in experimental models, its application in clinical trials of autoimmune diseases has not yet yielded the expected beneficial results.

Keywords

Oral toleranceSensitisationOvalbuminNeonatal exposure
Type
Symposium on ‘Dietary influences on mucosal immunity’
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , November 2001 , pp. 437 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2001

References

Asseman, C, Mauze, C, Leach, MW, Coffman, RL & Powrie, F (1999) An essential role for interleukin 10 in the function of regulatory T cells that inhibit intestinal inflammation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 190, 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barone, SK, Jain, SL & Michael, JG (1995) Effect of in vivo depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ cells on the induction and maintenance of oral tolerance. Cellular Immunology 163, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billingham, RE, Brent, L & Medawar, PB (1953) Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature 172, 603–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluestone, JA (1997) Is CTLA-4 a master switch for peripheral T cell tolerance? Journal of Immunology 158, 1989–1993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burks, W, Bannon, G & Lehrer, SB (2001) Classic specific immunotherapy and new perspectives in specific immunotherapy for food allergy. Allergy 56, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaouat, G, Cayol, V, Mairovitz, V & Dubanchet, S (1999) Localization of the Th2 cytokines IL-3, IL-4, IL-10 at the fetomaternal interface during human and murine pregnancy and lack of requirement for Fas/Fas ligand interaction for a successful allogeneic pregnancy. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 42, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duchén, K & Björkstén, B (1991) Sensitisation via breast milk. Immunology of Milk and the Neonate, pp. 427–436 [Mestecky, J, editor]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garside, P, Steel, M, Liew, FY & Mowat, AM (1995 a) CD4+ but not CD8+ T cells are required for the induction of oral tolerance. International Immunology 7, 501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garside, P, Steel, M, Worthey, EA, Kewin, PJ, Howie, SEM, Harrison, DJ, Bishop, D & Mowat, AM (1996) Lymphocytes from orally tolerized mice display enhanced susceptibility to death by apoptosis when cultured in the absence of antigen in vitro. American Journal of Pathology 149, 1971–1979.Google ScholarPubMed
Garside, P, Steel, M, Worthey, EA, Satoskar, A, Alexander, J, Bluethmann, H, Liew, FY & Mowat, AM (1995 b) T helper 2 cells are subject to high dose oral tolerance and are not essential for its induction. Journal of Immunology 154, 5649–5655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirahara, K, Hisatsune, T, Nishijima, K, Kato, H, Shiho, O & Kaminogawa, S (1995) CD4+ T cells anergized by high dose feeding establish oral tolerance to antibody responses when transferred in SCID and nude mice. Journal of Immunology 154, 6238–6245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husby, S, Høst, A, Teisner, B & Svehag, SE (1990) Infants and children with cow milk allergy/intolerance. Investigation of the uptake of cow milk protein and activation of the complement system. Allergy 45, 547–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, C, Roberts, J, Wilson, R, MacLean, MA, Shilito, J & Walker, JJ (2000) Evidence of a T(H) 1 type response associated with recurrent miscarriage. Fertility and Sterility 73, 1206–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, WC & Bennett, M (1998) DNA vaccines. Critical Reviews in Immunology 18, 449–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lake, AM, Whitington, PF & Hamilton, SR (1982) Dietary protein-induced colitis in breast-fed infants. Journal of Pediatrics 101, 906–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMenamin, C, McKersey, M, Kuhnlein, P, Hunig, T & Holt, PG (1995) Gamma delta T cells down-regulate primary IgE responses in rats to inhaled soluble protein antigens. Journal of Immunology 154, 4390–4394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marth, T, Strober, W, Sedes, RA & Kelsall, BL (1997) Regulation of transforming growth factor-beta production by interleukin-12. European Journal of Immunology 27, 1213–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melamed, D & Friedman, A (1993) Direct evidence for anergy in T lymphocytes tolerized by oral administration of ovalbumin. European Journal of Immunology 23, 935–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A, Lider, O, Abramsky, O & Weiner, HL (1994) Orally administered myelin basic protein in neonates primes for immune responses and enhances experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in adult animals. European Journal of Immunology 24, 1026–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreau, MC, Coste, M, Gaboriau, V & Dubuquoy, C (1995) Oral tolerance to ovalbumin in mice: Effect of some parameters on the induction and persistence of the suppression by systemic IgE and IgG antibody responses. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 371, 1229–1234.Google Scholar
Peng, HJ, Chang, ZN, Han, S-H, Won, S-H & Huang, H-T (1995) Chemical denaturation of ovalbumin abrogates the induction of oral tolerance of specific IgG antibody and DTH responses in mice. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 42, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powrie, F & Leach, MW (1995) Genetic and spontaneous models of inflammatory bowel disease in rodents: evidence for abnormalities in mucosal immune regulation. Therapeutics and Immunology 2, 115–123.Google ScholarPubMed
Prescott, SL, Macaubes, C, Yabuhara, A, Venaille, TJ, Holt, BJ, Habre, W, Loh, R, Sly, PD & Holt, PG (1997) Developing patterns of T cell memory to environmental allergens in the first two years of life. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 113, 75–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobel, S (1995) Oral tolerance: ‘Of mice and men’. Acta Paediatrica Japonica 37, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobel, S & Ferguson, A (1987) Persistence of oral tolerance in mice fed ovalbumin is different for humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Immunology 60, 317–318.Google ScholarPubMed
Strobel, S & Mowat, AM (1998) Immune responses to dietary antigens: oral tolerance. Immunology Today 19, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viney, JL, Mowat, AM, O'Malley, JM, Williamson, E & Fanger, NA (1998) Expanding dendritic cells in vivo enhances the induction of oral tolerance. Journal of Immunology 160, 5815–5825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, HL (1997 a) Oral tolerance: Immune mechanisms and treatment of autoimmune diseases. Immunology Today 18, 335–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, HL (1997 b) Oral tolerance for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Annual Review of Medicine 48, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitacre, CC, Gienapp, IE, Meyer, A, Cox, KL & Javed, N (1996) Oral tolerance in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 778, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, NW, Self, TW & Hamburger, RN (1990) Severe cow's milk induced colitis in an exclusively breast-fed neonate. Case report and clinical review of cow's milk allergy. Clinical Pediatrics Philadelphia 29, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar