Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T08:46:08.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydration, mood, and cognition in primary aged school children in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2024

CA Roberts ,
K Boak ,
N McCullogh ,
C Haskell-Ramsay ,
LJ James ,
BP Green ,
GD Tempest ,
C Buce-Martin  and
PLS Rumbold
CA Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation at Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, UK
K Boak
Affiliation:
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation at Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, UK
N McCullogh
Affiliation:
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation at Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, UK
C Haskell-Ramsay
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology at Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, UK
LJ James
Affiliation:
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
BP Green
Affiliation:
Medical Nutrition Manager - Innovation R&D at Aymes, UK
GD Tempest
Affiliation:
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation at Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, UK
C Buce-Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation at Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, UK
PLS Rumbold
Affiliation:
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation at Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Children are at increased risk of dehydration(1–3), which can adversely impact cognition and mood(4–6). Many children begin their school day dehydrated and fail to replenish fluids adequately throughout the day(7–11), however, these findings have not been confirmed using objective measures of hydration(12,13). This study aimed to confirm hydration status of primary school-aged children across the school day using objective hydration assessments and to examine if changes in hydration are associated with cognition and mood.

Thirty children (mean age 9.4±0.5 years old, stature 1.4±0.5m, body mass 36.5±4.2kg, and body mass index 18.9±1.7 kg/m2) were recruited from a local primary school. Food and fluid intake were tracked via nutritional analysis of photographs. Urine osmolality (Uosm), serum osmolality (Sosm), urine specific gravity (USG) and self-reported urine colour (Ucol) were assessed at first void (Uosm only) or the start (9:00) and end (16:00) of the school day. Children’s self-reported mood were obtained via Visual Analogue Scales(100mm) (9:00, 10:30, 13:30, 16:00). Children completed cognitive assessments using the Computerised Mental Performance Assessment System (15:3016:00).

Mean total water intake was 759.9±240.7 mL. Children consumed more fluid at mealtimes than from water bottle (Mean Difference (MD) 154.3mL, t(29) =-5.763, p<0.001). From the start to the end of the day, significant increases in Sosm (MD 3.3mOsm/kg, t(21)=4.011, p = 0.002), USG (MD 0.0066, t(29)= 8.514, p = 0.005) and Ucol (MD 1.2, t(26) =15.558, p = <0.001), indicated reduced hydration. The prevalence of dehydration (Sosm >290mOsm/kg USG >1.030) increased from the start (17%) to the end of school (40%). A series of ANOVAs from the start to the end of the day showed feelings of boredom, hunger, tiredness, and thirst increased, and focus, and happiness decreased (p’s <0.05). Hydration measures were significantly associated with long term memory (LTM) (changes in Sosm, r =0.437, p = 0.042) and working memory (WM) (changes in Sosm r =0.462, p = 0.031, and USG, r= 0.403, p = 0.033).

Children were less hydrated at the end of the school day suggesting inadequate fluid replacement during the school hours. Changes in hydration status across the school day were associated with subjective mood states. Furthermore, a decrease in hydration resulted in decreased performance in the memory tasks which could potentially hold implications on school performance. Children in this study had access to water throughout the day, however, most fluids were consumed at breakfast and lunch, suggesting interventions promoting sustained drinking throughout the day are required. For example, measures could be taken to educate parents and school staff on the importance of adequate hydration, and the need to remind children to drink throughout the day. For this to be effective, action needs to be taken across lesson time, meals, and break times.

Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 83 , Issue OCE4: Nutrition Society Congress 2024, 2–5 July 2024 , November 2024 , E478
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Adan, A (2012) J Am Coll Nutr 31 (2), 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’anci, KE, Mahoney, CR, Vibhakar et al (2009) Percept mot ski 109 (1), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, HG, & Kavouras, SA (2018) Eur J Nutr 58 (2), 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-David, YAIR, Urkin, J, & Kozminsky, ELY (2005) Acta Paediatr 94 (11) 1667–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadda, R, Rapinett, G, Grathwohl, D et al (2012) Appetite 59 (3), 730–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, MJ, Ettinger, U, Foster, R et al (2011) Hum brain mapp 32 (1), 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assael, BM, Cipolli, M, Meneghelli, I et al. (2012) J Nutr Disorders Therm 2, 114.Google Scholar
Aphamis, G, Stavrinou, PS, Andreou, E et al. CD (2021) Int J Adolesc Med Health 33 (4), 20180230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-David, Y, Urkin, J, Landau, D et al. (2009) J Hum Nutr Diet 22 (5), 455–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, F, Lepicard, EM, Cathrin, L et al. (2012) Ann Nutr Metab 60, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stookey, JD, Brass, B, Holliday, A et al. (2012) Public Health Nutr 15, 2148–2156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, LE (2007) J Am Coll Nutr 575S–584S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumbold, P, Mccullogh, N, Boldon, R et al (2021) Nutr Rev 35 (1), 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar