Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:44:54.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital mealtimes: action research for change?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2007

Angela Dickinson*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire,Hatfield College Lane Campus, Hatfield, Herts. AL10 9AB, UK
Carol Welch
Affiliation:
Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Linden Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6HE, UK
Laurie Ager
Affiliation:
Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Linden Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6HE, UK
Aileen Costar
Affiliation:
Age Concern, Oxfordshire City and County, St Edmunds House, 39, West St Helens Street, Abingdon, OX14 5BW, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Angela Dickinson, fax +44 1707 285995, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Poor nutritional care within the hospital setting continues despite decades of work chronicling and measuring the problems. To address the problem changes in practice have been attempted to improve the patients’ experience of mealtimes. In order to implement patient-centred mealtimes for older patients by changing the focus from institutional convenience to one that focuses on the requirements of the patients, an action research approach has been used that focuses on action and change, and thus appears to have much to offer those who seek to change practice. The present paper focuses on the first two phases in a three-phase approach. In phase one the nature of everyday mealtime care and the wider context are explored using focus groups, interviews and observations. The data fall into three main themes that all impact on patients’ experiences of mealtimes: institutional and organisational constraints; mealtime care and nursing priorities; eating environment. Following feedback of phase 1 findings to staff and identification of areas of concern a model of practice development was selected to guide the change process of the second phase. Changes to mealtime nursing practice and the ward environment have been made, indicating that action research has the potential to improve the mealtime care of patients.

Type
2002 Nutricia Clinical Care Research Grant Award
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2005

References

Association of Community Health Councils (1997) Hungry in Hospital London Association of Community Health Councils, Association of Community Health Councils for England and Wales.Google Scholar
Bastow, MD, Rawlings, J, Allison, SP (1983) Benefits of supplementary feeding after fractured neck of femur: a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 287, 15891592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biernacki, C, Barratt, J (2001) Improving the nutritional status of people with dementia. British Journal of Nursing 10, 11041114.Google Scholar
Binnie, A, Titchen, A (1999) Freedom to Practise: The Development of Patient-centred Nursing, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Bloor, M, Frankland, J, Thomas, M, Robson, K (2001) Focus Groups in Social Research, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourner, T, Frost, P (1996) Experiencing action learning. Journal of Workplace Learning: Employee Counselling Today 8, 1118.Google Scholar
British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Malnutrition Advisory Group (2003) ‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’ (MUST). Reddich, Worcs.: BAPEN; available at http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/Must/MUST-Complete.pdf Google Scholar
Carr, EK, Mitchell, JRA (1991) A comparison of the mealtime care given to patients by nurses using two different meal delivery systems. International Journal of Nursing Studies 28, 1925.Google Scholar
Closs, SJ (1993) Malnutrition: the key to pressure sores. Nursing Standard 8, 3236.Google Scholar
Coates, V (1985) Are They Being Served?, London: Royal College of Nursing.Google Scholar
Delmi, M, Rapin, CH, Bengoa, PD, Delmas, PD, Vasey, H, Bonjour, JP (1990) Dietary supplementation in elderly patients with fractured neck of femur Lancet, i, 10131016.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2001a) National Service Framework for Older People, London: Department of Health Google Scholar
Department of Health (2001b) Essence of Care, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2003) Modern Matrons: Improving the Patient Experience, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Dowler, E, Rushton, C (1994) Diet and Poverty in the UK: Contemporary Research Methods and Current Experience: A Review, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar
Garbett, R, McCormack, B (2002) A concept analysis of practice development. Nursing Times Research 7, 87100.Google Scholar
Gosney, M (2003) Are we wasting our money on food supplements in elder care wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing 43, 275280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, E, Bond, M (1995) Action Research for Health and Social Care, Milton Keynes, Bucks: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, G, Loftus-Hills, A, Rycroft-Malone, J, Titchen, A, Kitson, A, McCormack, B, Seers, K (2002) Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 37, 577588.Google Scholar
Haynes, S (1992) Set the change from within: The process of change in nursing. Professional Nurse 7, 635638.Google Scholar
Hill, GL, Pickford, I, Young, GA (1977) Malnutrition in surgical patients: an unrecognised problem Lancet, i, 689692.Google Scholar
Holter, IM, Schwartz-Barcott, D (1993) Action research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18, 298304.Google Scholar
Janesick, VJ (1998) The dance of qualitative research design, metaphor, methodolatry and meaning Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 3555 [Denzin, NK Lincoln, YS, editors]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jordan, S, Snow, D, Hayes, C, Williams, A (2003) Introducing a nutrition screening tool: an exploratory study in a district general hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing 44, 1223.Google Scholar
Kitson, AL, Harvey, G, McCormack, B (1998) Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care 7, 149158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitzinger, J & Barbour, RS editors (1999) Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, 120 [Kitzinger, J Barbour, RS, editors]. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Koch, T, Kralik, D (2001) Chronic illness: reflections on a community-based action research programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing 36, 2331.Google Scholar
Kreuger, RA (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 2nd T housand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kvale, S (1996) Interviews, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Leat, D (1998) Food choice and the British system of formal and informal welfare provision: questions for research.In The Nation's Diet, 289301 [Murcott, A, editors]. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lehmann, AB (1989) Review: Undernutrition in elderly people. Age and Ageing 18, 339353.Google Scholar
Lehmann, AB, Bassey, EJ, Morgan, K, Dallosso, HM (1991) Normal values for weight, skeletal size and body mass indices in 890 men and women aged over 65 years. Clinical Nutrition 10, 1822.Google Scholar
Lennard-Jones, JE (1992) A Positive Approach to Nutrition as Treatment. Report of a Working Party on the Role of Enteral and Parenteral Feeding in Hospital and at Home, London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Littlewood, S, Saedi, S, Williams, C (1997) Mealtimes: a missed opportunity Journal of Dementia Care 18 – 21 July–August.Google Scholar
McCormack, B, Manley, K, Kitson, A, Titchen, A, Harvey, G (1999) Towards practice development – a vision in reality or a reality without vision. Journal of Nursing Management 7, 255264.Google Scholar
McCracken, G (1988) The Long Interview, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McWhirter, JP, Pennington, CR (1994) Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. British Medical Journal 308, 945948.Google Scholar
Manley, K (2000) Organisational culture and consultant nurse outcomes. Part 1: Organisational culture. Nursing Standard 14, 3438.Google ScholarPubMed
Manthorpe, J, Watson, R (2003) Poorly served? Eating and dementia. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41, 162169.Google Scholar
Mathey, M-F, Vanneste, V, de Graaf, C, de Groot, LC, van Staveren, WA (2001) Health effect of improved meal ambience in a Dutch nursing home: a 1-year intervention study. Preventative Medicine 32, 416423.Google Scholar
Meyer, J, Spilsbury, K, Prieto, J (2000) Comparision of findings from a single case in relation to those from a systematic review of action research. Nurse Researcher 7, 3759.Google Scholar
Newton, R, Wilkinson, MJ (1995) When the talking is over: using action learning. Health Manpower Management 21, 3439.Google Scholar
Nolan, M, Grant, G (1993) Action research and quality of care: a mechanism for agreeing basic values as a precursor to change. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18, 305311.Google Scholar
Palmer, D (1998) The persisting problem of malnutrition in healthcare. Journal of Advanced Nursing 28, 931932.Google Scholar
Royal College of Physicians (2002) Nutrition and Patients: A Doctor's Responsibility, London: Royal College of Physicians.Google Scholar
Rycroft-Malone, J (2004) Research implementation: Evidence, context and facilitation – the PARIHS framework.In Practice Development in Nursing, 118147 [McCormack, B Manley, K Garbett, R, editors]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schön, DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Tierney, AJ (1996) Undernutrition and elderly hospital patients: a review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23, 228236.Google Scholar
Titchen, A (2000) Professional Craft Knowledge in Patient-centred Nursing and Facilitation of its Development, Kidlington, Oxon: Ashdale Press.Google Scholar
Waterman, H, Tillen, D, Dickson, R &, de Koning, K (2001) Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technology Assessment 5. http://www.hta.nhsweb.nhs.uk/fullmono/mon523.pdf Google Scholar
Williamson, GR, Prosser, S (2002) Action research: politics, ethics and participation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 40, 587593.Google Scholar
Winter, R, Munn-Giddings, C (2001) A Handbook for Action Research in Health and Social Care, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woo, J, Ho, SC, Mak, YT, Law, LK, Cheung, A (1994) Nutritional status of elderly patients during recovery from chest infection and the role of nutritional supplementation assessed by a prospective randomised single-blind trial. Age and Ageing 23, 4048.Google Scholar