Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:17:42.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food budget standards and dietary adequacy in low-income families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2007

Michael Nelson ,
Katie Dick  and
Bridget Holmes
Katie Dick
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NN, UK
Bridget Holmes
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NN, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Budget standards are specified baskets of goods and services which, when priced, can represent predefined living standards. ‘Low cost but acceptable’ (LCA) is a minimum income standard, adequate to provide warmth and shelter, a healthy and palatable diet, social necessities, social integration, avoidance of chronic stress and the maintenance of good health (physical, mental and social) in a context of free access to good-quality health care, good-quality education and social justice. The LCA food budget standard identifies a basket of foods and corresponding menus which provides (for a given household composition) a palatable diet that is consistent with prevailing cultural norms, and that satisfies existing criteria for health in relation to dietary reference values, food-based dietary guidelines and safe levels of alcohol consumption. Two previous studies that explored the relationship between diet and food expenditure in low-income households suggested that the amount spent on food was a good predictor of dietary adequacy, growth and health in children. The current paper will focus on diet and measures of deprivation in 250 low-income households in London. Households were screened for material deprivation (e.g. no car, no fixed line telephone, in receipt of Income Support) using a doorstep questionnaire. Diet was assessed using four 24 h recalls based on the ‘triple pass’ method. Expenditure on food and other aspects of household circumstances were assessed by face-to-face interview. Food expenditure in these households was characterized in relation to food budget standards. Further analyses explored the relationships between food expenditure and dietary adequacy, growth in children and measures of deprivation.

Keywords

Food budget standardsLow-income familiesFood expenditureDietary adequacy
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , November 2002 , pp. 569 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2002

References

Chesher, A (1997) Diet revealed?: Semi-parametric estimation of nutrient intake age relationships. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 160A, 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (1991) Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom.Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 41. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Friel, S, Nelson, M, McCormack, K, Kelleher, C & Thriskos, P (2001) Methodological issues using household budget survey expenditure data for individual food availability estimation: Irish experience in the DAFNE pan-European project. Public Health Nutrition 4, 1143–1148.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, D & Pantazis, C (editors) (1997) Breadline Britain in the 1990's. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gordon, D & Townsend, P (editors) (2000) Breadline Europe. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Health Education Authority (1996a) Enjoy Healthy Eating. London: HEA.Google Scholar
Health Education Authority (1996b) Think About Drink. London: HEA.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1996) Household Food Consumption and Expenditure, 1995. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1997) Household Food Consumption and Expenditure, 1996. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1998) Household Food Consumption and Expenditure, 1997. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1999) Household Food Consumption and Expenditure, 1998. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Nelson, M (2000) Childhood nutrition and poverty. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 59, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, M & Naismith, DJ (1979) The nutritional status of poor children living in London. Journal of Human Nutrition 33, 33–45.Google Scholar
Office For National Statistics (1996) Family Spending 1995. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office For National Statistics (1997) Family Spending 1996. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office For National Statistics (1998) Family Spending 1997. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office For National Statistics (1999) Family Spending 1998. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Orshansky, M (1965) Counting the poor. Another look at the poverty profile. Social Security Bulletin 28, 3–29.Google Scholar
Parker, H (editor) (1998) Low Cost but Acceptable: A Minimum Income Standard for Families with Children in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Parker, H (editor) (1999) Low Cost but Acceptable Incomes for Older People. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Paterakis, S & Nelson, M (1999) Household food survey and individual nutrition survey estimates of food availability in selected households. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition 34, Suppl., 88S.Google Scholar
Prior, G, Teers, R, Brookes, M & Primatesta, P (2002) Health Survey for England 2000. Methodology and Documentation. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Trichopoulou A and members of DAFNE II (1998) Network for the Pan-European Food Data Bank based on Household Budget Surveys. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J (1998) Setting Adequacy Standards. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Watts, H (1980) New American Family Budget Standards: Report by the Expert Committee on Family Budget Revisions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Wynn, M (1970) Family Policy. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar