Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:50:14.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The foetus as a parasite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

D. J. Naismith
D. J. Naismith
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Queen Elizabeth College, London, W8
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Nutrition of the Foetus and the Newly Born
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 1969 , pp. 25 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1969

References

Aschkenasy-Lelu, P. & Aschkcnasy, A. (1957). Archs Sci. physiol. 11, 125.Google Scholar
Aschkenasy-Lelu, P. & Aschkenasy, A. (1959). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 1, 29.Google Scholar
Beaton, G. H. (1961). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 20, Suppl. 7, p. 196.Google Scholar
Brown, J. B. (1957). J. Endocr. 16, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K. M., Innes, I. R. & Kosterlitz, H. W. (1953). J. Endocr. 9, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doe, R. P., Zinneman, H. H., Flink, E. B. & Ulstrom, R. A. (1960). J. clin. Endocr. Metab. 20, 1484.Google Scholar
Frandsen, V. A. (1963). The Excretion of Oestriol in Normal Human Pregnancy. Copenbagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Fry, E. G., Miller, M. & Long, C. N. H. (1942). Enducrinology 30, S1029.Google Scholar
Gemzell, C. A. (1952). Acta endocr., Copenh. 11, 221.Google Scholar
Gemzell, C. A. (1953). J. clin. Endocr. 13, 898.Google Scholar
Gillman, J. & Gilbert, C. (1958). Br. med. J i, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, G. A. J. & Munro, H. N. (1959). Biochem. J. 73, 343.Google Scholar
Herring, P. T. (1920). Br. med. J. ii, 886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervey, G. R. & Hervey, E. (1964). J. Endocr. 30, vii.Google Scholar
Hunscher, H. A., Hummell, F. C., Erickson, B. N. & Macy, I. G. (1935). J. Nutr. 10, 579.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. (1964). Proc. int. Congr. Nutr. VI. Edinburgh p. 59.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. & Leitch, I. (1964). The Physiology of Human Pregnancy. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Laroche, G. & Trémolières, J. (1948). Annls Endocr. 9, 71.Google Scholar
Leathem, J. H. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 68S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGanity, W. J., Cannon, R. O., Hridgforth, E. B., Martin, M. P., Densen, P. M., Newbill, J. A., McCellan, G. S., Christic, A., Peterson, J. C. & Darby, W. J. (1954). Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 67, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1956). Scot. med. J. i, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naismith, D. J. (1966). Metabolism 15, 582.Google Scholar
Scow, R. O., Chernick, S. S. & Brinley, M. S. (1964). Am. J. Physiol. 206, 796.Google Scholar
Sprague, R. G., Mason, H. L. & Power, M. H. (1951). Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 6, 315.Google Scholar
Taggart, N. (1961). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 20, xxx.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. (1959). Br. J. Nutr. 13, 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar