Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:28:02.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of inulin and probiotic bacteria on iron availability in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2008

J. M. Laparra
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
R. P. Glahn
Affiliation:
US Plant, Soil, and Nutrition Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
D. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
1st International Immunonutrition Workshop, Valencia, 3–5 October 2007, Valencia, Spain
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Anaemia is the most common nutritional disorder in the world and Fe deficiency (ID) is implicated in a majority of these cases. Clinical studies have emphasized the importance of Fe in the integrity of the immune system(Reference Mullick, Rusia, Sikka and Faridi1). One of the keys is poor bioavailability of Fe in the diet. Beans constitute a good source of protein for large groups of the population around the world, and can also be a good source of essential minerals such as Fe. Nevertheless, legumes also contain phytates, polyphenols, etc., which impair Fe bioavailability. Among the phytochemicals, polyphenols have been suggested to have a beneficial effect on immune cell function(Reference Álvarez, Alvarado, Puerto, Schlumberger, Jimenez and De la Fuente2). Prebiotics such as inulin have been suggested to have an enhancing effect on Fe absorption(Reference Yeung, Glahn, Welch and Miller3), and can also modulate the immune system(Reference Watzl, Girrbach and Roller4). The objectives were to evaluate the effects of inulin and probiotic bacteria on Fe availability from white and red beans.

White and red beans, with and without supplemental 40 ginulin/kg, were subjected to an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion (pepsin, pH 2; pancreatin, pH 7.2). The digests were incubated overnight with Bifidobacterium infantis (ATCC 15697) or Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC 11974). Aliquots were then placed in the upper chamber of cell-culture plates containing monolayers of Caco-2 cells(Reference Glahn, Lee, Yeung, Goldman and Miller5). Cell associated Fe and ferritin formation were used as estimates of Fe bioavailability.

Inulin by itself increased white-bean Fe uptake in Caco-2 cultures; however, no differences in ferritin formation were detected. This observation may be explained by the capacity of each ferritin molecule to bind 4000 Fe atoms. Fermentation of both white and red beans, with or without inulin, with probiotic bacteria caused differences in Fe availability only as a function of the bacteria tested. In fermented samples higher growth rates for B. infantis than L. acidophilus were quantified, probably as a result of a faster bacteria metabolic adaptation to the media and use of nutrients in the digests. Following fermentation with B. infantis Fe uptake from both white and red beans was decreased in Caco-2 cells. This observation correlated with an increased total phenolic content in the digests. However, the fermentation with L. acidophilus resulted in a lower total phenolic content and subsequent higher Fe uptake values than controls.

These results show that inulin may enhance Fe bioavailability, and suggest that probiotic bacteria caused differences in soluble polyphenols in the digests that may explain the contrasting results from B. infantis and L. acidophilus.

References

1. Mullick, S, Rusia, U, Sikka, M & Faridi, MA (2006) Indian J Med Res 124, 647654.Google Scholar
2. Álvarez, P, Alvarado, C, Puerto, M, Schlumberger, A, Jimenez, L & De la Fuente, M (2006) Nutrition 22, 913921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Yeung, CK, Glahn, RE, Welch, RM & Miller, DD (2005) J Food Sci 70, R88R92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Watzl, B, Girrbach, S & Roller, M (2005) Br J Nutr 93, S49S55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Glahn, RP, Lee, OA, Yeung, A, Goldman, MI & Miller, DD (1998) J Nutr 128, 15551561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar