Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-sl7kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-14T07:33:00.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Complex, contradictory, and confusing: exploring consumer dilemmas in navigating sustainable healthy nutrition knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2025

Bríd C. Bourke*
Affiliation:
Dept of Management and Marketing, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Ireland.
Sinéad N. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Dept Agrifood Business and Spatial Analysis, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15.
Mary B. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Dept of Management and Marketing, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Ireland.
*
Correspondence: Bríd C. Bourke, Dept of Management and Marketing, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Ireland. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Nations are revising dietary guidelines to include sustainability recommendations in response to climate change concerns. Given low adherence to current guidelines, consumer inertia is a challenge. A proliferation of nutrition information providers and dietary messages contributes to confusion. All this suggests that health professionals will face considerable obstacles in facilitating a population shift towards sustainable and healthy (SuHe) diets. This review explores the role of nutrition science in shaping dietary behavior and the challenges of shifting the nutrition narrative to encompass both health and sustainability. Societal transformation towards the ‘asks’ of a SuHe diet will rely on consumer level transformation of food acquisition, preparation, consumption, storage and disposal behaviours. Acceptance of a higher share of plant-based food and a reduction in animal protein in the diet is likely to provoke disorientations as consumers’ previously unexamined beliefs are challenged. The challenges presented by portion size distortion, protein reduction and replacement, and the role of ultra processed food are discussed here in terms of sources of confusion. The routes to change involve deeper understanding of responses to disorientations through processes of belief formation and transformation, which are the foundations of subjective knowledge and attitudes, likely mediated through affective factors. In tandem with introducing new potentially disorienting-to-consumers information, health professionals need to consider the environments where this information is presenting and consider how these environments are designed to support action. In doing so, reactance and backlash through belief rejection and behavioural non-adherence could be reduced.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Authors 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable